THE SOURCE OF HOPELESSNESS: A REVIEW OF ‘AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH’
By Catherine Austin Fitts, Solari Inc.
[Catherine Austin Fitts served as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at HUD in the first Bush Administration; she previously served as Managing Director and Member of the Board of Directors of the Wall Street investment bank, Dillon, Read & Co., Inc.]
The day after 9-11, a person whom I respect and care about a great deal said to me, “George Bush was anointed by God for a time such as this.” He then asked me what I thought. I said that I thought that the Bush family was anointed by financial fraud, narcotics trafficking, and pedophilia. Stunned, he said, “If that is true, then it’s hopeless.” I replied that things were far from hopeless, but that for me solutions started with faith in a divine intelligence rather than affirming a dependent relationship with organized crime.
Last week I had dinner with a wonderful couple — activists in the San Francisco Bay Area — and the woman told me how wonderful she thought Al Gore’s documentary An Inconvenient Truth was. She then asked for my opinion. When I gave it, she said, “If that is true, then it’s hopeless.” We then proceeded to have a rich conversation about why folks who used to call themselves “liberal” or progressive are in the same trap as folks who use to call themselves “conservative.”
In order to respond to the problem of global warming, it is necessary to look at the ways that we as citizens support criminal activity by our government and how we as consumers, depositors and investors support the private banking, corporate and investment interests that run our government in this manner. This is easier said than done. When we ‘get it’ — i.e., that we have to withdraw from a co-dependent relationship with organized crime in order to save and rebuild our world — we can find ourselves struggling to envision the system-wide actions that are needed and feeling overwhelmed by the task of determining how to go about them personally and in collaboration with others.
My nickname for our current economic system is “The Tapeworm.” For decades I have listened to Americans from all walks of life insist that we must find solutions within the system — i.e. within the socially acceptable boundaries laid down by the Tapeworm. Believing that our solutions for addressing global warming lie within the system defined by the Tapeworm goes hand in hand with obtaining our media from companies controlled by the Tapeworm, and having to choose from among leaders anointed by the Tapeworm, such as Al Gore. This belief is, in fact, the source of our hopelessness.
George Orwell once said that omission is the greatest form of lie. Gore’s omissions in An Inconvenient Truth are so extraordinary that it is hard to know where to start.
Watching An Inconvenient Truth is more useful for understanding how propaganda is made and used than for understanding the risks of global warming (I am not qualified to judge the scientific evidence here — I am assuming that Gore’s presentation on global warming is sound).
The fundamental lie that Al Gore is telling comes from defining our problem as environmental — in this case global warming, whereas our environmental problems — as real and important as they are — are but a symptom of the problem, not the problem. Gore defines our problem as “what.” He is silent on “who.” For example, Gore does not ask or answer:
** Who is doing this?
** Who has been governing our planet this way and why?
** Cui bono? Who benefits?
** Who has suppressed alternative technologies resulting in our dependency on fossil fuels? Why?
** Who has generated how much financial capital generated from this damage?
** How did things get this bad without our changing? How much was related to fear of and dirty tricks of those in charge?
** How do we recapture resources that have been criminally drained and use them to invest in restoring environmental balance?
Utah Phillips once said, “The earth is not dying. It is being killed, and the people killing it have names and addresses.” In one sentence, Utah Phillips told us more about global warming than Al Gore has told us in a lifetime of writing and speaking, let alone in An Inconvenient Truth.
Needless to say, Gore offers no names and addresses. Gore’s “who” discussion is limited to population. He seems to imply that the issue is the growth in population combined with busy people being shortsighted, leading to some giant incompetency “accident.” That makes it easy to avoid digging into the areas that would naturally follow from starting with “who” — which should lead to dissecting the relationship between environmental deterioration and the prevailing global investment model that is such a critical part of the governance infrastructure and incentive systems.
Read all of it here.