Rabbi Arthur Waskow : Fort Hood and the Prophetic ‘IF’

These battle-weary troops from the 1st Air Cav had just staged a “combat refusal” at the PACE firebase in Vietnam. There were also countless instances of “fragging” against officers by Vietnam GI’s. Photo from NAM – The Story of the Vietnam War (Issue 8).

How will the community respond?
Fort Hood and the Prophetic ‘IF’

By Rabbi Arthur Waskow / The Rag Blog / November 25, 2009

One reader wrote me to ask: “What effect will the Ft. Hood shootings have on the American public’s perception of Islam?” That question asks us to be foretellers, fortune tellers, to predict. But The Shalom Center has had the holy chutzpah to call ourselves a “prophetic voice,” and that voice is about “forth-telling,” not foretelling. About “If,” not “will.”

The Prophets spoke always with an “if” — “IF the community chooses to oppress its workers into slaves, then the owners will themselves become slaves to Babylonia; IF the slave-owners will free their slaves, they will be freed from the yoke of Babylonia.” (That was Jeremiah, as the Babylonian Army besieged Jerusalem, speaking forth a challenge, at once a warning and a promise, to the conventional practices and power structures of his society.)

From that perspective, the Prophetic question today should be a challenge to power and convention: “What effect should the Ft. Hood shootings have on the American public’s perception of the Afghanistan War?”

For anyone who lived through the Vietnam War, Fort Hood recalls the epidemic of “fragging” late in the war — that is, enlisted men throwing fragmentation bombs at the officers who were ordering them into hopeless, senseless battle.

In Fort Hood, if the reports and claims from the police and military are correct (we already know that a number of falsehoods were reported as facts), an officer, a physician, trained to heal traumatized people from the maiming of their souls, was refused an exit from the soul-destroying prison he begged to leave.

If the reports are accurate, it seems that he broke, choosing murder rather than the nonviolent forms of resistance he might have chosen. In that sense he replicated the violence of the war he abhorred and the violence that kept him in the Army against his will –- replicated the violence instead of resisting it in a deeper way.

One of the reasons that “fragging” came near the end of the Vietnam War is that the epidemic of fragging signaled to the higher officer corps that they had better end the war. Coming on top of more and more evidence that the U.S. and NATO military presence in Afghanistan is itself multiplying the violent resistance it claims to suppress, the Fort Hood murders should signal the American public and its military and civilian leadership to take off the hoods we have put over our own eyes, see the truth, and take our soldiers out from Afghanistan.

If — IF, the Prophetic word — If we seriously want to help grow a grassroots democracy there, we might send teams of women from American community banks to provide grassroots microloans to those who are prepared to use them, especially including women, while abandoning the self-destructive effort to impose democracy with Predators. Then Fort Hood might help Americans grow into a new relationship with the hundreds of millions of Muslims who seek to shape their own futures in peace.

IF instead the American public chooses to define Fort Hood as proof that Islam is a world of hatred, then the cage of violence that some Muslims, some Christians, some Jews, some Hindus are helping build will clang shut upon us all .

IF.

Shalom, salaam, shantih, peace,

Arthur

[Rabbi Arthur Waskow is director of The Shalom Center and is co-author of The Tent of Abraham; author of Godwrestling, Round 2, Down-to-Earth Judaism and a dozen other books on Jewish thought and practice, as well as books on U.S. public policy.]

The Rag Blog

This entry was posted in Rag Bloggers and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Rabbi Arthur Waskow : Fort Hood and the Prophetic ‘IF’

  1. masterspork says:

    Ok I gotta ask; can we stop pretending that PTSD had anything to do with the reason why the shooting happened at Fort Hood?

    I mean lets break this down.

    In Fort Hood, if the reports and claims from the police and military are correct (we already know that a number of falsehoods were reported as facts), an officer, a physician, trained to heal traumatized people from the maiming of their souls, was refused an exit from the soul-destroying prison he begged to leave.

    If he was that traumatized why did he not request to resign his commission? Because that is one thing that officers can do and be put on enlisted status. Thus allows him to leave his job for a unrelated one until he leaves the Army.

    If the reports are accurate, it seems that he broke, choosing murder rather than the nonviolent forms of resistance he might have chosen. In that sense he replicated the violence of the war he abhorred and the violence that kept him in the Army against his will –- replicated the violence instead of resisting it in a deeper way.

    Or B he was a religious nut case that willing shot and killed fellow soldiers that he saw where enemies to his “faith”.

    the Fort Hood murders should signal the American public and its military and civilian leadership to take off the hoods we have put over our own eyes, see the truth, and take our soldiers out from Afghanistan.

    Why? How can you relate to the soldiers that have been deployed to one that has not gone once in 12 years?

    if we seriously want to help grow a grassroots democracy there, we might send teams of women from American community banks to provide grassroots microloans to those who are prepared to use them, especially including women, while abandoning the self-destructive effort to impose democracy with Predators.

    But here is the thing, as a whole you do not care about what happens over there much less be willing to go over there yourself to risk danger to help these people.

    Lastly, if you want to request that we do not make assumptions about people of the Muslim faith, we respectfully ask that not every single vet coming home is going to go on a crazy shooting spree. The PTSD stereotype is way old.

  2. Anonymous says:

    MP, you are so incredibly uninformed about the PTSD effects afflicting returning GIs that it’s a bit shocking. The suicide rate is setting records. The instances of returning GIs murdering wives and others is setting records. Other examples abound as well, but I shouldn’t have to do your research for you. If you care in the least you’d already know this. To base your whole argument on ignorance, especially when even the slightest reading on the subject would prove enlightening to even a rigidly ideologic person, is insulting to anyone who really cares about soldiers or their families. And a waste of time. Educate yourself first before making an argument if you want to be taken seriously. Your opinion might be respected if you began to make any sense.

  3. masterspork says:

    Except that the Major that did the shooting never deployed in the 12 years he has been in. So considering the number of people that have to deal with PTSD on a daily bases, the idea that he did this on second hand experiences is a insult to people who really have ptsd.

    So your claiming that the majority of the soldiers come back and commit crimes when they come back? Because I know that this has happened but not to the extent that you claim.

    I have worked with people who have ptsd and made sure that they where ok. What is you experiences in dealing with people who have ptsd?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.