The Naked Truth? Or Something Else Altogether …

Invasion of the Body Scanners
New airport X-Rays may be a useful way to detect hidden explosives—but officials will have to keep a tight rein on their use
by David H. Holtzman

Phoenix flyers will soon be the first travelers digitally stripped naked by a Transportation Security Agency (TSA) X-Ray machine that uses a technology called “backscatter.” The device bounces a low-intensity X-Ray beam off the target’s body and digitally analyzes and stores the returning signal, or backscatter.

Early on, the process generated a high-resolution picture that for all practical purposes was a nude photo of the target without hair, but including intimate details. The idea is that hidden bombs and guns will be readily detectable on a minimalist body image.

Although the technology isn’t new, the government’s scanner rollout announcement in December generated a great deal of controversy, split along the usual battle lines. Privacy advocates condemned the scanners as invasive; security enthusiasts insisted that it’s preferable to a pat-down.

Read more here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Further Distortion of the Constitution

Next big test of power to seize property?
The US Supreme Court will examine whether a private company can demand payment in exchange for not seizing private property.
By Warren Richey | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

Bart Didden wanted to put a CVS pharmacy on his property in Port Chester, N.Y. He even obtained approvals from the local planning board.

But because a portion of the CVS site was in a blighted redevelopment zone, Mr. Didden was told that planning board approval wasn’t enough. He’d have to reach an understanding with a private company that had been selected by Port Chester officials to control all construction inside the renewal zone.

The developer, Gregg Wasser of G&S Port Chester, told Didden he’d have to pay $800,000 or give G&S a 50 percent stake in the CVS business. If Didden refused, Mr. Wasser said, he would have Port Chester condemn and seize his property and instead of a CVS he’d put a Walgreens drugstore on the site.

Didden refused. The next day, the Village of Port Chester began legal proceedings to seize Didden’s land by eminent domain.

Lawyers for Didden took the matter to federal court. They even went to the FBI – all to no avail. Now they are asking the US Supreme Court to examine whether a private company can demand payment in exchange for refraining to seize private property in an urban renewal zone.

Property rights activists are hoping that a majority of the justices view Didden’s case as an opportunity to clarify a portion of the high court’s controversial decision in its last big eminent domain case, Kelo v. New London. In that June 2005 opinion, the court ruled 5-to-4 that local governments could seize private property and turn it over to a private developer when the action was part of an economic development project of benefit to the public.

Rebellion in the states

The decision sparked a national backlash. Since then, 34 states passed laws restricting the use of eminent domain for private development. New York is not among them.

The US Constitution forbids government officials from taking the property of one person and giving it to another. But if the overall purpose is a public benefit, such as economic transformation or urban renewal, transfers of private property to a private developer are permissible, the high court has said.

At issue in the Didden case is whether a developer selected to carry out an urban renewal project in the public interest can use the government’s eminent domain power in a way that maximizes the developer’s profit.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Another New Year – C. Loving


Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Extremist Twenty-First Century Jacobins

Predatory Capitalism, Corruption and Militarism: What Lies Ahead in An Age of Neocon Rule?
by Stephen Lendman
Global Research, January 2, 2007

Borrowing the opening line from Dickens’ Tale of Two Cities – “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times….” He referred to the French Revolution promising “Liberte, egalite and fraternite” that began in 1789, inspired by ours from 1775 – 1783. It ended a 1000 years of monarchal rule in France benefitting those of privilege and established the nation as a republic the way ours did for us here a few years earlier.

That was the good news. The bad was the wrong people came to power. They were the Jacobins who at first were revolutionary moderates and patriots until they lost control to extremists like Maximilien Robespierre who ushered in a “reign of terror” (The Great Terror sounding a lot like today’s “war on terror”) characterized by brutal repression against perceived enemies from within the Revolution who didn’t get a chance to prove they weren’t. In the name of defending it, individual rights were denied and civil liberties suspended. Laws were passed that allowed charging those designated counter-revolutionaries or enemies of the state with undefined crimes against liberty.

It resulted in justice being meted out to thousands for what Orwell called “thoughtcrimes” or for their freely expressed opinions and actions judged hostile to the state under a system of near-vigilante justice by the Paris Revolutionary (kangaroo) Tribunal with no right of appeal. It led to the public spectacle of an inglorious trip to and quick ending from the death penalty method of choice of the times – the guillotine that was barbaric but quick, and a much easier, less painful way to die for its victims than the use of state-inflicted torture-murder in the commonly drawn out lethal injection process used in 37 of the 38 death penalty states and by the federal government making the condemned endure a slow agonizing death unable to cry out while they’re being made to suffer during their last moments of life. Instances of this barbarity aren’t exceptions. They’re the rule, the exception being this time a report or two of what really happens slipped out and made news.

Fast forward to the past year and the previous five under George Bush and ask: sound familiar? French Revolutionary laws during the “reign of terror,” like the Law of Suspects, were earlier versions of our Patriot I and II and Military Commission Acts today. The Revolutionary Tribunal, with no chance for justice or right of appeal, was no different than our military courts today, and too many civil ones, in which any US citizen may now be tried anywhere in the world, with no habeas right of appeal or hope for due process and from which those sent there won’t fare any better than the French did, doomed to meet their unjust fate – even though much in these laws today is unconstitutional and one day will be reversed by a High Court upholding the law instead of the extremist rogue one now empowered that scorns it.

What May Lie Ahead

At the end of the sixth horrific year under the reign of the Bush modern-day extremist Jacobin-neocons, we can now look ahead, but to what. We have an administration in charge for another two years one longtime analyst characterizes as “a bunch of crooks, incompetents and perverts” with the president’s approval rating plunging as low as 28% in some independent polls and a growing number of people in the country demanding his impeachment and removal from office.

It’s not likely from the new Democrat-led Congress arriving in January, as their DLC leadership took it off the table and so far only promises more of the same failed policy other than some minor tinkering around the edges to create an illusion of change no different than the deceptive kind of course correction proposed by the Baker “Gang of Ten” Iraq Study Group (ISG) that guarantees none at all. It doesn’t leave members of the body politic with much hope for the new year that will likely just deliver more of the same rogue leadership and policy engendering growing public discontent and anger but not at a level so far to scare the those in power enough to want to address it.

The heart of the problem is the unpopular illegal war of aggression in Iraq, the cesspool of corruption and scorn for the law in Washington, and the assault on human rights and civil liberties in the country justified by the so-called “war on terror” now rebranded a “long war” against “Islamofascism” and “radicals and extremists” (who happen to be Muslims.) It’s the same failed policy using the kind of deliberately provocative language intended to deceive the public to think a threat great enough exists to justify any state action in the name of national security including waging wars of aggression and all the horrors associated with them at home and abroad.

After the Baker “bob and weave,” the now you see a change of course and now you don’t, disingenuously suggesting a drawdown and exit strategy, the New York Times on December 16 reports “Military planners and White House budget analysts have been asked to provide President Bush with options for increasing American forces in Iraq by 20,000 or more.”

The article goes on to say one option is to boost the force level by up to 50,000 even though any increase greater than 20 – 30,000 would be “prohibitive” – but it won’t deter the Pentagon, on administration orders, from extending tours of duty even longer for forces now there and calling up thousands of reservists and greatly extended National Guard units to get into this quagmire even though it’s recognized their presence will only make things worse as well as place an unfair burden on those called up, who’ve served before, and their families.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Paul Spencer for President in 2008

I am running for the office of President of the United States of America in the election of 2008. I should say that I am running on a program for an administration to implement, starting in 2009. There is, of course, always political give-and-take, the pressure of events, the clash of ideologies; but somewhere in all of the ad-hoc maneuvering, there must be some essential principles and related policies.

I will write and distribute a position paper that tries to explain and justify each element of this program at a rate of about one per month from now until the Spring of 2008. At that time I will review the collection for updates and possible revisions. This, then, will be my candidacy.

During this period, your role – if you choose to have a role – is to analyze and critique the statements. In late Spring of 2008, if you think that the project is worthy of your assistance, we will organize petition drives to gain access to the ballot in your home state.

At no time will I request or accept money. There will be no signs or commercials or bumper stickers; certainly there will be no attack ads.

There is, however, an inherent criticism of the major political parties. Speaking for myself, I am friendly with Democratic Party, Republican Party, Green Party, Libertarian Party, and assorted other Party members on a local level. At a national level, though, the two major parties are tied to the same societal group: the super-rich and their minions, the upper-level managers of the largest corporations. Differences in tactics between these parties do not help the working classes in this country, not to mention the overwhelming majority of the ROW (the rest of the world). The super-rich (which should be called the Ruling Class) are predatory, and we are their prey.

To begin this election-focussed process, the following is a general analysis with an implied statement of principles, culminating in a program outline. The citizens of the U.S.A. comprise roughly 4% of the world’s total population, but we currently consume 25% of the world’s resources and products. This disparity is untenable in the long term and unjust, regardless.

The U.S.A. became the dominant economic power in the world by virtue of the 20th century wars that decimated its potential imperial rivals. As a result of these wars, our chief global economic rival of the first half of the 20th century, Europe, was reduced – for almost 30 years – to a U.S. subsidiary. The U.S.A. then consolidated its dominion, becoming the world’s leading military power by virtue of outlasting our main military rival in the Cold War – the U.S.S.R.

The U.S. has projected power through a system of neo-imperialism (i.e., economic colonies under the management of compliant, local ruling groups without the administrative costs of true colonies). U.S. society has largely become a warfare state, an economy dependent on the catalyst of government military spending. In the recent past the more insightful American political leaders have indulged the domestic working class in the spoils of neo-imperial domination just enough to tie them to a nationalist crusade.

Outside its residual dominance in military technology, all the factors that led to American dominance are diminishing. Other countries and regional blocs are becoming comparable economic powers, and none are friendly to continued U.S. hegemony. Collectively, they point toward the return to a multi-polar world. This is incompatible with a U.S. ruling class that clings to its role as the “last superpower”, able to enforce its will unilaterally and with impunity.

The U.S. manufacturing base has largely been sent overseas in pursuit of cheaper labor. Financially, the U.S. wallows in debt, most of it owed to potential rivals, such as China. The military now finds itself eroded, with plenty of guns, but few who volunteer to carry them. It may become an army of mercenaries in search of justification – the new Redcoats.

Another major byproduct of our unrestrained capitalism and its venal leadership is environmental destruction. The flooding of New Orleans, triggered by government-denied global warming and aggravated by a careless incompetence, is a case-in-point. Environmental degradation is also a crucial ingredient in societal collapse, because the effects lead to hunger, disease, and, therefore, territorial aggression.

The twilight of the era of American dominion has begun. The future will be one of reduced U.S. power and wealth relative to the rest of the world. Doubtless, however, those in the most privileged positions of American society and their deluded minions will defend privilege with all their resources. A militaristic reaction is a typical response to the decline of empire, as we can see in Iraq.

As citizens living in the heart of danger, how can we react in order to advance our values of peace, justice, and equality? An essential element of this effort must be that it is international. The struggle solely within the national context of home-country of an empire in decline cannot succeed. However, this domestic struggle is crucial to the future of humanity. Unless the empire can reform so as to be a better global citizen, the potential for catastrophe is high, if not inevitable.

As to specific principles, this program favors the working class in the broadest sense. Second, and equally important, this is a democratic agenda. If, for instance, some level of socialism is implemented under one Congress, it can be dismantled by the next, if so desired by the electorate. For another instance, there is room in my vision for the Ruling Class to try to sell their cannibalistic philosophy to us at all times. If we win the class war – or at least some of the battles – we do not maneuver to implement a new autocracy.

There are some nationalistic features in this program, but the idea that we can ignore or overcome some minimum level of self-interest is too idealistic to realize. Moreover, regional interests, cultural differences, and economic organization are logical and necessary on many levels. Only on vital concerns about war, ecological disaster, famine, epidemic, and genocide should we look to international standards and intervention.


People for a (truly) Democratic Society

15 Point Program

  1. End poverty in the U.S.A. via progressive taxation to support provision of basic services (clean water, sanitation, basic food, healthcare, affordable housing) and for reinvestment in related infrastructure;
  2. Institute 14-month (minimum), universal public service (military, healthcare service, infrastructure construction, or emergency services);
  3. Provide fully-funded public education through two years of college, including related child-care, when necessary;
  4. Reinvigorate the quest for clean air, soil, and surface water via both strenghthened regulation and increased rehabilitation;
  5. Support rapid development of “alternative”, renewable energy sources (solar, wind, wave, etc.);
  6. Promote, plan, and construct affordable, environmentally-sensitive public transportation;
  7. Create socialism for “commodities” (insurance, banking, steel, oil, power);
  8. Strengthen co-ops for agricultural products from production through retail, via tax breaks;
  9. STOP: military foreign aid, depreciation allowances, farm price supports, various military hardware/system money pits, bridges to nowhere, and myriad other boondoggles;
  10. Assure equal justice for all citizens (for examples, remove recent restrictions on Habeas Corpus, reanimate the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department);
  11. Legalize, control, tax all drugs (grant amnesty to imprisoned non-violent users and low-level dealers);
  12. Finance drug, stem-cell, treatment, and disease-prevention research and development;
  13. Support international institutions for conflict resolution (for example, the U.N. and the World Court);
  14. Add Equal Rights Amendment covering all possible definitions of “rights” to the Constitution;
  15. Restrict federal-level influence in social issues, such as marriage and abortion rights, which are rightly local/regional/cultural matters.
Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Apocalypse II in Samarra – Juan Cole

Apocalypse II in Samarra
US Kills 6 at National Dialogue Front Office

CBS/AP report that an angry crowd of Sunni Arab demonstrators in the northern city of Samarra, protesting Saddam’s execution, broke “broke the locks off the badly damaged Shiite Golden Dome mosque and marched through carrying a mock coffin and photo of the executed former leader.”

Folks, this is very bad news. The Askariyah Shrine (it isn’t just a mosque) is associated with the Hidden Twelfth Imam, who is expected by Shiites to appear at the end of time to restore the world to justice. (For them, the Imam Mahdi is sort of like the second coming of Christ for Christians). The Muqtada al-Sadr movement is millenarian and believes he will reveal himself at any moment.

The centrality of the cult of the Twelfth Imam, a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad who is said to have vanished in 873 AD, helps explain why the bombing of the Golden Dome on February 21 of 2006 set off a frenzy of Shiite, Sadrist attacks on Sunni Arabs. Last February, stuck in a Phoenix hotel because of a missed flight and without an internet connection for my laptop, I blogged from my Treo that it was an apocalyptic day. Sadly, it was, kicking off a frenzy of sectarian violence that has grown each subsequent month.

For Sunni Arabs to parade a symbolic coffin of Saddam through the ruins of the Askariya shrine won’t be exactly good for social peace in Iraq.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Cartoon Tuesday – C. Loving

Thank you, Charlie.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Assessing the Human Cost

And of course, since we are arrogant Amerikans, we ignore the cost in Iraqi lives (dead, maimed, injured) for our permanent military bases in the Middle East.

How much Blood for Oil?
Published on Monday, January 01, 2007.
By Michael Munk

To bring the cost of the invasion and occupation of Iraq to the public, antiwar groups across the country are organizing to mark the 3,000th death of a member of its military components (at this writing the total is 2,991).

But by focusing only on the number of dead Americans we are being manipulated along with the media and public by the administration’s determination to minimize the cost in blood of establishing permanent military bases in the heart of the Middle East oil patch. That public relations strategy consists of prohibiting images of the dead and wounded returning home and those of US casualties in Iraq in the US media as well as aggressive efforts to prevent such coverage by foreign media—including deadly attacks on Al-Jazeera reporters and offices. It also plants stories and interviews, leaks to FOX and other Pentagon-friendly reporters and provides generous payola to foreign (especially Iraqi) news sources.

Still, the most consistent propaganda effort since the invasion aims to keep public attention away from the actual amount of blood being shed by the military victims of the war and their families. That cost now exceeds 50,000 casualties—a far cry from the 3,000 to which most of the public is restricted to know.

“Casualties” in the military sense is the total number made unavailable for duty from all causes, including deaths and wounds suffered in combat as well as injuries, accidents and illness. So whether caused by “hostile” (24,965 as of Dec.27) or “non-hostile” (25,406 as of Dec. 2) causes the Pentagon’s own web sites record more than 50,000 so far in Iraq.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Another Monday Movie – Al Qaeda is a Myth, Too

There’s no such thing as al Qaeda, or al Qaida, or however you want to spell it. It’s a fraud perpetrated on the American people by our own government to scare us into submission. This is a clip from the excellent three-part BBC documentary “The Power of Nightmares”. You can watch the whole thing on Google Video (see here) or download it at scholarsfor911truth.org.

Al Qaeda Doesn’t Exist

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Unreasonable Search and Seizure Is Now Reality

US ‘licence to snoop’ on British air travellers
By David Millward, Transport Correspondent
Last Updated: 1:35am GMT 01/01/2007

Britons flying to America could have their credit card and email accounts inspected by the United States authorities following a deal struck by Brussels and Washington.

By using a credit card to book a flight, passengers face having other transactions on the card inspected by the American authorities. Providing an email address to an airline could also lead to scrutiny of other messages sent or received on that account.

The extent of the demands were disclosed in “undertakings” given by the US Department of Homeland Security to the European Union and published by the Department for Transport after a Freedom of Information request.

About four million Britons travel to America each year and the released document shows that the US has demanded access to far more data than previously realised.
advertisement

Not only will such material be available when combating terrorism but the Americans have asserted the right to the same information when dealing with other serious crimes.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Riverbend Is Indignant

And she recognizes George Bush for what he is – a cheap, tawdry, ‘all hat, no cattle’ brand of Texas cowboy, where lynching is standard practise.

A Lynching…

It’s official. Maliki and his people are psychopaths. This really is a new low. It’s outrageous – an execution during Eid. Muslims all over the world (with the exception of Iran) are outraged. Eid is a time of peace, of putting aside quarrels and anger – at least for the duration of Eid.

This does not bode well for the coming year. No one imagined the madmen would actually do it during a religious holiday. It is religiously unacceptable and before, it was constitutionally illegal. We thought we’d at least get a few days of peace and some time to enjoy the Eid holiday, which coincides with the New Year this year. We’ve spent the first two days of a holy holiday watching bits and pieces of a sordid lynching.

America the savior… After nearly four years and Bush’s biggest achievement in Iraq has been a lynching. Bravo Americans.

Maliki has made the mistake of his life. His signature and unhidden glee at the whole execution, especially on the first day of Eid Al Adha (the Eid where millions of Muslims make a pilgrimage to Mecca), will only do more to damage his already tattered reputation. He’s like a vulture in a suit (or a balding weasel). It’s almost embarrassing. I kept expecting Muwafaq Al Rubaii to run over and wipe the drool from the corner of his mouth as he signed for the execution. Are these the people who represent the New Iraq? We’re in so much more trouble than I ever thought.

Read it here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Amerikan Morality Is a Myth

In Iraq, the losses Americans don’t see: We focus so much on the deaths of our troops that we don’t understand the suffering of Iraqis
BY JOHN TIRMAN (John Tirman is executive director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Center for International Studies.)
December 31, 2006

For all the talk about the violence in Iraq, Americans are focusing little attention on the human costs to the Iraqis. The Iraq Study Group report, for example, which is a kind of national temperature gauge of the public’s mood, fails to express much sympathy or regret for the chaos and colossal loss of Iraqi lives. In this oversight, if that’s what it is, an essential lesson is lost about this war.

The Iraq Study Group includes a number of references to the hardship and danger for U.S. forces. It speaks of growing violence caused by insurgents, militias and criminals. But where is the analysis of the role of the U.S. military in the violence and carnage suffered by the Iraqi people?

This skewed perspective is reflected among think tank analysts and news commentators. What matters in most of these accounts is that U.S. troops are caught in the crossfire of ancient rivalries within Islam. The major opinion pollsters have not asked about Americans’ concerns about the carnage in Iraq except as it relates to Americans. The slew of journalists’ reports of the war have essentially ignored Iraqi fatalities as well.

[snip]

For now, however, the silence persists. The regrettable, but unavoidable, conclusion: Americans do not care how many people are killed there. In the end, for us, that may be the biggest tragedy of the war.

Read all of it here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment