Bill O’Reilly and ‘Tiller the Baby Killer’

Excerpts from Bill O’Reilly’s attacks on murdered physician George Tiller.

O’Reilly’s campaign against murdered doctor

The Fox News star had compared Tiller to a Nazi, called him a ‘baby killer,’ and warned of ‘Judgment Day’

By Gabriel Winant / May 31, 2009

When his show airs tomorrow [June 1], Bill O’Reilly will most certainly decry the death of Kansas doctor George Tiller, who was killed Sunday while attending church services with his wife. Tiller, O’Reilly will say, was a man who was guilty of barbaric acts, but a civilized society does not resort to lawless murder, even against its worst members. And O’Reilly, we can assume, will genuinely mean this.

But there’s no other person who bears as much responsibility for the characterization of Tiller as a savage on the loose, killing babies willy-nilly thanks to the collusion of would-be sophisticated cultural elites, a bought-and-paid-for governor and scofflaw secular journalists. Tiller’s name first appeared on “The Factor” on Feb. 25, 2005. Since then, O’Reilly and his guest hosts have brought up the doctor on 28 more episodes, including as recently as April 27 of this year. Almost invariably, Tiller is described as “Tiller the Baby Killer.”

Tiller, O’Reilly likes to say, “destroys fetuses for just about any reason right up until the birth date for $5,000.” He’s guilty of “Nazi stuff,” said O’Reilly on June 8, 2005; a moral equivalent to NAMBLA and al-Qaida, he suggested on March 15, 2006. “This is the kind of stuff happened in Mao’s China, Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Soviet Union,” said O’Reilly on Nov. 9, 2006.

O’Reilly has also frequently linked Tiller to his longtime obsession, child molestation and rape. Because a young teenager who received an abortion from Tiller could, by definition, have been a victim of statutory rape, O’Reilly frequently suggested that the clinic was covering up for child rapists (rather than teenage boyfriends) by refusing to release records on the abortions performed.

When Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline, an O’Reilly favorite who faced harsh criticism for seeking Tiller’s records, was facing electoral defeat by challenger Paul Morrison, O’Reilly said, “Now we don’t endorse candidates here, but obviously, that would be a colossal mistake. Society must afford some protection for viable babies and children who are raped.” (Morrison ultimately unseated Kline.)

This is where O’Reilly’s campaign against George Tiller becomes dangerous. While he never advocated anything violent or illegal, the Fox bully repeatedly portrayed the doctor as a murderer on the loose, allowed to do whatever he wanted by corrupt and decadent authorities. “Also, it looks like Dr. Tiller, who some call Tiller the Baby Killer, is spending a large amount of money in order to get Mr. Morrison elected. That opens up all kinds of questions,” said O’Reilly on Nov. 6, 2006, in one of many suggestions that Tiller was improperly influencing the election.

Tiller’s excuses for performing late-term abortions, O’Reilly suggested, were frou-frou, New Age, false ailments: The woman might have a headache or anxiety, or have been dumped by her boyfriend. She might be “depressed,” scoffed O’Reilly, which he dismissed as “feeling a bit blue and carr[ying] a certified check.” There was, he proposed on Jan. 5, 2007, a kind of elite conspiracy of silence on Tiller. “Yes, OK, but we know about the press. But it becomes a much more intense problem when you have a judge, confronted with evidence of criminal wrongdoing, who throws it out on some technicality because he wants to be liked at the country club. Then it’s intense.”

Tiller, said O’Reilly on Jan. 6 of this year, was a major supporter of then-Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. “I think it’s unfairly characterized as just a grip and grin relationship. He was a pretty big supporter of hers.” She had cashed her campaign check from Tiller, “doesn’t seem to be real upset about this guy operating a death mill, which is exactly what it is in her state, does she?” he asked on July 14 of last year. “Maybe she’ll — maybe she’ll pardon him,” he scoffed two months ago.

This is where it gets most troubling. O’Reilly’s language describing Tiller, and accusing the state and its elites of complicity in his actions, could become extremely vivid. On June 12, 2007, he said, “Yes, I think we all know what this is. And if the state of Kansas doesn’t stop this man, then anybody who prevents that from happening has blood on their hands as the governor does right now, Governor Sebelius.”

Three days later, he added, “No question Dr. Tiller has blood on his hands. But now so does Governor Sebelius. She is not fit to serve. Nor is any Kansas politician who supports Tiller’s business of destruction. I wouldn’t want to be these people if there is a Judgment Day. I just — you know… Kansas is a great state, but this is a disgrace upon everyone who lives in Kansas. Is it not?”

This characterization of Tiller fits exactly into ancient conservative, paranoid stories: a decadent, permissive and callous elite tolerates moral monstrosities that every common-sense citizen just knows to be awful. Conspiring against our folk wisdom, O’Reilly says, the sophisticates have shielded Tiller from the appropriate, legal consequences for his deeds. It’s left to “judgment day” to give him what’s coming.

O’Reilly didn’t tell anyone to do anything violent, but he did put Tiller in the public eye, and help make him the focus of a movement with a history of violence against exactly these kinds of targets (including Tiller himself, who had already been shot). In those circumstances, flinging around words like “blood on their hands,” “pardon,” “country club” and “judgment day” was sensationally irresponsible.

Source /

The Rag Blog

This entry was posted in RagBlog and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Bill O’Reilly and ‘Tiller the Baby Killer’

  1. Anonymous says:

    O’Reilly calls down judgment on others and appears pleased when it materializes. He should remember what happens to those who live by the sword…

  2. Anonymous says:

    Damn that O’Reilly, how dare he have an opinion and express it! The nerve. We need to do something about free speech.

    Funny thing, when you speak nightly for an hour over several years a lot get’s said. When that speech is archived it provides a volume of ‘editable’ content of which is easily combined to make someone look more extreme. Could any of us if all we said was edited into a three minute segment not look bad on one subject or another? Cast the first stone!

    Sorry about it, but we do have free speech and I do realize how blogs like this hate O’Reilly but he is a citizen and has the right to say his mind. Apparently many agree as his show is pretty popular and crushes his cynical, smart ass, MSNBC competition.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Hear Hear on the free speech.

    I liked the ‘Nazi’ quotes, it really puts an evil taint on the whole sordid affair. Damn that O’Rielly he’s stopped another baby killer.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I see O’Rielly says bad stuff and more bad stuff happens. Gosh did he say bad things about someone? Yes, over time that will tend to undermine the object of the criticism. Kind of like “no ‘W'” stickers on peoples cars and ‘No WMDs’ and ‘Mission Accomplished’ and ‘Commander in Thief’ and ‘flight suit poser’ and ‘tax cuts for the rich’ etc, etc, etc.

    It’s a tried and true formula – run down someone you don’t agree with over and over and spread the negative over and over until you have fully undermined them. A favorite tactic of the Democratic party. Just ask Sarah Palin.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Thank God, there are people like Billy O’Reilly who speak for the innocent and expose the ugly truths out there- what has happened to this “God fearing” nation – one that valued human life and protected the unborn. There are many people who will have to answer one day and explain their actions at death’s door. May God show them the compassion they didn’t show the innocent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *