Tom Hayden : Becoming Two Countries in 2014

Becoming two countries. Image from Shutterstock / sojourners.

The war for America:
Becoming two countries in 2014

Joined by a right-wing Roberts Supreme Court and funded by the likes of the Koch brothers, the Right is consolidating its power on a scale not seen since the Jim Crow era of the Dixiecrats.

By Tom Hayden | The Rag Blog | October 3, 2013

The logic of voter turnout data all but guarantees right-wing Republican congressional victories in 2014 and a sealing of the divide of America into two countries for the foreseeable future.

White House operatives privately acknowledge that GOP gerrymandering plus low turnout make 2014 a war to keep the Senate Democratic and show gains while losing the House. There are eight battleground Senate seats where Mitt Romney won the popular vote in 2012 and incumbent Democrats are either retiring or vulnerable to defeat.

Even if Hillary Clinton manages to win in 2016, the battle for the House will favor the GOP since the current gerrymandered seats will remain intact until 2020, or even 2022. Assuming continued Democratic control of the White House and Senate in 2014, the opportunity to take back the Roberts Supreme Court may not occur until the next presidential term, as Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia are both 77.

President Barack Obama was not wrong when he promised a single “red, white and blue America” in 2008. That is what a majority of registered voters want, but he underestimated the white sea of hate that would be generated from him among Republicans. His electoral advisors concentrated their brilliance on the national electoral map more than the states where Republicans took over in 2010.

Joined by a right-wing Roberts Supreme Court and funded by the likes of the Koch brothers, the Right is consolidating its power on a scale not seen since the Jim Crow era of the Dixiecrats. Progressives, concentrated in Democratic-majority strongholds, will have to think strategically about how to save constituencies which have being left behind enemy lines for most of their lives.

Thanks to Howard Dean’s Democracy for America, campaign resources are being invested in Virginia’s legislative election this year, with Iowa, Pennsylvania, and Michigan to follow. These potential wins could minimize losses in the long term attempt to salvage the 2010s from a major Republican counterattack on the Thirties, Sixties, and the Obama era. Unfortunately, the failure already has been cemented by the reapportionment process.

The national Democratic strategy, such as it is, is to paint the Republicans as completely irresponsible, even insane, in an effort to encourage defections among moderate white voters and stimulate turnout among worried Democratic voters. While this strategy may be working among moderate voters, it also strengthens the Tea Party in the primaries of Republican districts and states.

The cold facts are these: in presidential election years, voter turnout ranges between 50 and 60 percent, while in mid-term elections it’s in the high thirties. In 2010, turnout was 41.6 percent, meaning a disproportionate racial and economic minority took power in the House of Representatives and also gained control of the governors’ post and both legislative houses in 12 additional states. (See Elizabeth Drew’s, “The Stranglehold on Our Politics,” for a concise summary.)

The behavior of young voters, ages 18 to 29, is a stunning illustration of the pattern. According to the Center of Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, in 2008 youth turnout was 51 percent, which then plummeted to 22.8 percent in 2010, before trending back to 45 percent in 2012.

In 2010, while the Democrats won the popular congressional vote by slightly over 50 percent, GOP candidates were able to win 54 percent of the House seats while losing by 1.4 million votes overall. In Pennsylvania, for example, Democrats won the popular vote by 83,000 but the GOP wrested a 13-5 advantage in House races. In Michigan, Democrats led by 240,000 votes but the GOP took nine of 14 House seats.

Roe v. Wade “may be doomed,” writes Drew. The Voting Rights Act already is badly gutted. New state laws are being promulgated in the swing states of Florida, Virginia, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio to make registration and voting as difficult as possible. It appears that any federal action on immigrant rights will include a delay in the path to voting for longer than a decade, preventing several million Latinos from voting, while a military “surge” is being implemented at the southern border.

Federal marriage equality benefits for LGBT couples may be jeopardized in states where gay marriage is banned. North Carolina, an Obama state in 2008, turned Republican by 2010, and is swiftly implementing new restrictions on abortion and voting rights despite massive protests. Arizona continues to be ground zero for vigilantes in the war against undocumented immigrants, and has succeeded in erasing Chicano Studies from state curriculums.

Since 2010 alone, 178 new anti-abortion measures have been adopted or are in the works. Michigan’s gerrymandered legislature has successfully passed a right-to-work law. Twenty-seven states are resisting the expansion of Medicaid, and the majority are refusing to set up the insurance exchanges authorized by Obamacare. Those states are becoming “abortion-free zones,” right-to-work states, and bastions of a resurrected “sovereignty” for whites and business interests on the defensive.

Public schools will struggle for resources in one America, while re-segregation and home schooling are completed in the other. As for the overriding crisis of climate change, the crisis of “two Americas” means that progress will occur through federal regulation combined with state action. The rest of the country will remain a Coal Zone filled with droughts, wildfires, and official climate denials.

There happens to be some “good news” in this polarization, since the libertarian Right tends to oppose foreign military interventions and Big Brother spying, while supporting the right to be stoned. A de facto coalition of the libertarian Right with the liberal Left has made progress possible on these important fronts.

The Right’s hatred towards Wall Street equals that of the Left. But the chasm on social justice is widening. Young people attracted to Rand Paul, and Ron before him, are ignoring the fact that libertarians would roll us back to the entire system of lunch counter segregation that was the focal point of the civil rights movement. The white “right to refuse service” prevails in their thinking over civil rights and due process protections.

There is no getting around the deep streaks of male chauvinism, Christian Triumphalism, plain racism, and market fundamentalism that mark so much right-wing rumination. Those divides are being institutionalized. Using the tools at their disposal, the right-wing Republicans are not trying to “take over” the United States as much as carve out a virtual country of their own based on states’ rights and resistance to the national governing majority. They want to be able to live in an America where Barack Obama is a bad memory of an illegitimate president.

Can anything be done about this? In the short term, it is imperative that Democrats join Howard Dean in trying to retain their Senate majority and make gains against the gerrymandered legislatures. They should support Attorney General Holder in the courtroom battles against voter suppression. They should help make Obamacare succeed in as many states as possible. They should refuse to employ the deceptive terms “red” and “blue.”

2016 will be a historic turning point as an American multi-cultural democracy steadily evolves on the basis of a massive demographic shift. Progressives cannot retreat into enclaves as long as millions of Americans are abused in zones under pro-corporate Republican rule.

Regulations established by the Obama administration must be implemented with the full force of the law in every state, not simply half the states. Progressive models can and should be erected in those states which become, in Justice Brandeis’ expression, “laboratories of reform,” with climate change regulations being the clearest example.

Battles will rage over voting rights, women’s rights, climate and environmental regulations, and immigration between now and 2016. The 2016 election will become a historic referendum on the future of America affecting the entire lifetimes of the younger generation coming of voting age.

Research by Emma Taylor, Research Assistant at the Peace and Justice Resource Center. This article was also posted to Tom .

[Tom Hayden is a former California state senator and leader of Sixties peace, justice, and environmental movements. He currently teaches at Pitzer College in Los Angeles. His latest book is The Long Sixties. Hayden is director of the Peace and Justice Resource center and editor of The Peace Exchange Bulletin. Read more of Tom Hayden’s writing on The Rag Blog.]

The Rag Blog

This entry was posted in RagBlog and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Tom Hayden : Becoming Two Countries in 2014

  1. Anonymous says:

    No surprise that Tom has correctly identified a problem, but completely missed with his analysis.

    … but he underestimated the white sea of hate that would be generated from him among Republicans.

    While there will alawys be some racism (yep, when white candidates are on the ballot, blacks and hispanics can be just as racist) However, the divide is NOT about race.

    In 1981, the entire federal budget was $1T. That provided for all entitlements, defense, infrastructure .. EVERYTHIHNG it took to run the nations business. Today, $1T is couch cushion money. Its what we borrow to fund the “left over” needs that our taxes do not fund.

    Those of us who are pulling the wagon are where the divide is happening. We are sick and tired of being told we are racist or greedy when we complain about more people piling in the wagon when they could be up in front with us shouldering the load.

    That is the divide. You can spin it anyway you like. But ultimately the power is ours. This house of cards comes tumbling down when we decide to stop pulling and restore sanity and fairness for ourselves and those who understand how to live honoarable with their fellow citizens.

    – Extremist2TheDHS

  2. Joe says:

    Racism is the glue that holds together the new Dixiecratism. Blacks fulfill their historical role as scapegoated caste as minority majoritization fuels white nationalism. The left has the moral high ground but the right are the land lords.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Ah Joe,
    When blacks have an out of wedlock birthrate of over 70% and grow up immersed in a culture of victimization, drugs, sexualization of women, and low regard for academics, then I would say “they” have done far more harm to their own “caste” than any white racism they might encounter.

    I work with the downtrodden daily. And I can count very few that are sleeping on cardboard boxes because of racism. Most are there because of the bad behaviors, priorities and values they were equipped with in their homes and neighborhoods.

    Perhaps you can trot out some examples of folks whose lives were destroyed because some white asshole called them a nigger and treated them unfairly??

    Doubt you can, but for everyone you can point to, I can trot out 50 whose lives were ruined because they were pressured into dealing/using drugs, hustling, and gaming the system to survive without doing any kind of actual work.

    If you could eliminate every ounce of white racism in existence, it would have very little affect on the problems facing blacks and Hispanics in this country. Their wounds are largely self inflicted.

    Left wing idiots like Joe urge them to ever greater victimization rather than actually doing anything to help the situation.

    – Extremist2TheDHS.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I agree the problem is not race, or even caste.Many anglo,hispanic,and afro segments of our society have become overwhelmed with the effort required to succeed in our modern world. They bail and opt out for hedonist comforts offered by drugs,sex,alcohol. There are many who profit from their resultant slide into hell. I think both the right and left need to stop such profit and collectively find solutions.

  5. Mariann Wizard says:

    Odd how this conversation turned to racism and its role, or lack thereof, in America’s current divisions. I see it as but one factor in the increasing bipolarization and balkanization of the country. There is little racism involved, for example, in the efforts of 5 Colorado counties to secede from their state.

    Rather, “cultural” issues such as the legalization of marijuana and gay marriage seem to fuel that divide.

    Increasingly, it seems to me, we are divided into one largely urban nation, with city-bred tolerance for whatever else our fellow citizens want to be/do as long as they don’t get way up in our space, and a largely rural one, ever-shrinking as job and social opportunities continue to vanish in small towns. That people in this rural nation are more suspicious of outsiders, new-fangled ideas, change in general, etc., is a function of their rural lifestyle and upbringing, and the “threats” they perceive against tradition.

    But the real divide these days is between the Haves and the Have-Nots. Five percent of the US population owns and controls 85% of the wealth.

    Honestly, I don’t know anyone who is in that top 5%. However, I know plenty of people who THINK they are in that privileged class, or close enough to it to see its interests as identical to theirs.

    It is this self-delusion that allows petty divisions to continue to emasculate the Have Nots. Until we are able to overcome the thinking that allows us to believe that a low-paid social worker for example, is living head and shoulders above his/her clients, when in fact he/she is likely two paychecks away from living on the streets.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Its just so painfully obvious to those of us who dont live within the delusional bubble of American liberalism. Liberals and their annoying cousins, the progressives, know whats best for all the rest of us. Why cant those low class people get it!!! Obama today demonstrated more of his Tin Ear by telling those millions of Americans who just lost their insurance plans, that they should be happy, they can now get better ones thanks to the ObamaCare! WooooHooo government knows best.
    Ms Wizard and Anonymous talk with frustrated annoyance that the “Have Nots” are just too stupid to know whats good for them and too delusional to grasp the opportunity Liberals and Progressives are dangling in front of them. Too petty, too stupid, so low class, tsk tsk. Liberals know best of course.
    Its the hubris of Liberals that has brought them to this point. And its their hubris that will not allow them to admit mistakes and turn back. They will march forward because GodDammit … they … know … best!
    – Extremist2TheDHS

  7. Anonymous says:

    ” However, I know plenty of people who THINK they are in that privileged class, or close enough to it to see its interests as identical to theirs.
    It is this self-delusion that allows petty divisions to continue to emasculate the Have Nots”
    Mariann you have it so right!

  8. Anonymous says:

    President Obungler, 11/7/2013 on NBC News:
    “So, the majority of folks will end of being better off, of course, because the website’s not working right, they don’t necessarily know it right [now].”
    Hubris, in its unadulterated form. The government is here to take care of you, whether you like it or not.
    I rest my case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *