‘If there was any value in the speech it was this: it should remind us of the importance of refusing to allow this delusional revisionism to stand.’
By Arianna Huffington / January 16, 2009
Thursday night’s valedictory speech was quintessential Bush: delusional from beginning to end.
He made Afghanistan sound like a swell place to take a vacation when, in truth, only those with a death wish venture out these days without an armed convoy.
He lauded Iraq as “a friend of the United States” — without ever mentioning the fact that if Iraq has a BFF it is Iran, not America.
He said his Medicare prescription drug plan “is brining peace of mind to seniors.” Hardly. It’s been widely derided as a poorly conceived, chaotic mess.
He claimed that, on his watch America’s “air, water, and lands are measurably cleaner.” Who is doing the measuring, the same eco-unfriendly companies to which he handed both his environmental policies and our public lands? This is a man whose administration refused to open emails from its own EPA because they contained information about greenhouse gas emissions that are endangering public health.
In a particularly jaw-dropping moment, Bush asserted that when people “live in freedom, they do not willingly choose leaders who pursue campaigns of terror” — a remarkable claim given the fact that Hamas, which has kinda been in the news lately, has leaders who “pursue campaigns of terror” and were willingly chosen by people given the freedom to elect who they wanted.
Another striking moment was watching the great pride the president took in saying that even though we might not have liked all of his decisions, we have to admit that he “was willing to make the tough decisions.” The Crawford Cowboy to the end.
Yes, he made tough decisions… but what is the value in that if the decisions you make are consistently wrong? And Bush has made the wrong decisions again and again and again.
He was wrong about Iraq and Saddam and WMD. He was wrong to take his eye off the ball on Afghanistan. He was wrong about tax cuts being the answer to our economic woes. He was wrong about Wall Street being able to regulate itself. He was wrong about Katrina. He was wrong about torture. He was wrong about extraordinary rendition. He was wrong about warrantless wiretapping. He was wrong about Gitmo. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
The speech was spin at its most dangerous. It’s easy to feel a pang of pity for a guy who was on top so long and is now heading out the door. But the more sympathy he evokes, the more susceptible we are to the lies he is telling. Before we know it, his revisionism becomes accepted as the truth.
So if there was any value in the speech it was this: it should remind us of the importance of refusing to allow this delusional revisionism to stand.
Source / The Huffington Post
A “Lilies of the Field” salute for Ms. Huffington’s conclusion:
Yet, the revisionism has already started. A very serious article from the Daily Telegraph in UK suggests that we are probably wrong about GW:
I did not whether I should laugh or cry with the historian’s views but I could not help not questioning the intelligence of some people who made comments following this article.
Bush leaves not a legacy, but destruction and misery – of course, I guess this could be labled ‘legacy’ if one wants to abuse the meaning of the word.
I think of it more like Bush’s ‘lift-his-leg-to-pee’; it sounds close enough for Government work just as his education at Yale sounds more like he was educated at ‘You-All’….