Austin and Texas : Economic Slump Finally Hitting Home

Texas unemployment up;
Austin’s tech economy fading

Since Texas has borrowed all it can, and since a state can’t print money like the federal government, the feds are now under enormous political pressure to function as the job creators of last resort.

By Roger Baker / The Rag Blog / February 7, 2010

The Texas Employment Commission, which closely monitors such things, recently announced an increase in Texas’ unemployment from 8% to 8.3%. This jobless increase says that Texas, a traditionally poor state, is now strongly feeling the effects of the national economic slump.

Note that the Texas unemployment rate is mostly rising due to private jobs continuing to disappear. The numbers for the various Texas jobs sectors seem to indicate that average folks are trying to restructure their spending by cutting back as much as they can on discretionary spending; things like travel and utility costs.

Despite the gain of 50,000 jobs in the past three months to the Texas economy, unemployment levels are still on the rise.

The unemployment rate in Texas has risen from 8 percent to 8.3 percent between the November to December, even with employment gains. This is greatly due to the reduction of 23,900 jobs from various Texas employers.

“Texas continues to feel the effects of this serious national recession with unemployment in our state now at 8.3 percent,” said Texas Workforce Commission chairman Tom Pauken. “Nonetheless, unemployment in Texas remains well below the national level of 10 percent.”

Education and health services in the past 12 months have received around 60,400 jobs, specifically 4,800 just in December. Logging and mining even showed signs of growth with an addition of 300 jobs.

“December job losses offset some of the gains from the last couple of months,” said TWC Commissioner Representing Labor Ronny Congleton.

Job markets hit with the the most losses include: Trade, transportation and utilities – accounting for a total loss of 7,400 jobs just in December. Other notable job losses for December include: Leisure/hospitality with 6,500 and professional/business services with 5,300.

Down at the micro-economic level, in Texas as elsewhere, the consumer economy seems to be restructuring in a sensible way, given the hard times. We don’t really need as many malls and salesman as last year, now that more folks shop over the Internet for things they really need. Families, perhaps jobless and struggling to live on food stamps, cast what is arguably the most meaningful vote they still have, when they decide whether or not to buy some seductive item they see advertised on TV.

Clean energy and the Austin economy

How does this outside situation affect the Austin area economy? As economic background, Austin lost about 2600 jobs in 2009. Austin unemployment rate rose from about 5.2% to 6.9%. Austin-Round Rock’s registered jobless worker numbers rose from 43,000 to 63,000.

There is always reason to be skeptical of perennial optimism. Take those who point to the Austin area as one of the nation’s strongest metropolitan economies.

Nowadays, we see that computers, high tech, semiconductors, and construction have all mostly faded as lucrative sources of profitable investment for the Austin economy. It is now frequently less expensive to develop software abroad, except for fine tuning local user needs and service requirements. With energy prices less a concern than in 2008, the investment impetus for clean energy has considerably faded.

What is Austin’s next big thing? In the past few years, the Austin business community, Sen. Kirk Watson, and a constellation of influential movers and shakers have been energetically promoting Austin as a clean energy research hub. The “Pecan Street Project” is being promoted by Austin ex-city council member, Brewster McCracken, with the goal of making the Austin area into “America’s clean energy laboratory.”

Just in the last month, we have had access to another opinion that is widely accepted by the local business community. A local economic forecasting group, AngelouEconomics Inc., led by long time Austin economist Angelos Angelou, has just issued its Austin area 2010-2011 Economic forecast; a sort of a report card on Austin’s economic future, concluding as follows:

For Austin to maintain its competitiveness, it must continually build upon these great assets. In today’s struggling financial environment, this translates into increased local government support. Effective economic development policy must be bolstered by strategic incentives and inducements that are competitive with other cities’ attraction packages.

In addition to government support that attracts companies and people, Austin’s success will also be determined by its capacity to grow jobs from within. To do so, the Austin area must cultivate entrepreneurism and attract additional early-stage capital. If people migrating to the region cannot find work, they must find the tools in place to create their own. Austin area residents are very entrepreneurial, and the region needs to continually assess and improve its infrastructure to keep entrepreneurism flourishing.

AngelouEconomics expects the current economic conditions to extend through the second quarter of this year, as the embattled technology sector and real estate markets struggle to rediscover their footing. In the meantime, Austin’s traditional economic base, the public sector, will continue to provide stability. While this
“recession-proof” sector is incapable of supplying the region with an abundance of new jobs, gradual employment gains will persist through the end of the year.

The region’s economy will continue its path of improvement with the addition of 9,200 jobs in 2010 and another 17,100 jobs in 2011.

As a rule, it is probably a fact that presidential advisors, fortune tellers, and economists do not thrive on delivering bad news. This new report is not cheery, but it does deliver a whiff of guarded optimism by predicting a modest resumption of job growth for the Austin area. But this is not through the creation of many of the kinds of jobs envisioned by Austin’s clean energy development promoters.

China is now aggressively using its mountain of accumulated U.S. treasury debt to acquire the means to surge ahead on green energy manufacturing, from electric cars, to PV, to wind turbines. Contrast this with the slow progress at Austin-subsidized PV startup Heliovolt. Venture capital, which has been the lifeblood of advanced technology development efforts, is down since even last year, both locally and nationally. The Angelou report regards Austin’s clean energy research efforts as lagging in the face of international competition.

The new thinking is that the health, education, and government sectors will likely be the big job gainers in the Austin economy, to somewhat match the steady decline in Austin area manufacturing over the last decade. It is no coincidence that these are the same economic sectors that thrive on public spending by federal and state governments. For lack of an alternative, the solid job creation burden will increasingly fall on state and or federal government.

Statewide, as we can see from the Texas Workforce report, it is primarily government-subsidized jobs sectors like health and education and government that are increasing. Presumably, Austin should be able to fit into this kind of picture. But now we see spending cutbacks and hiring freezes at the Texas state level, and also at the University of Texas, requiring shutting down the iconic Cactus Cafe, and more.

The state of Texas is broke, at least in the sense that it has slashed state expenses about as far as it can. Since Texas has borrowed all it can, and since a state can’t print money like the federal government, the feds are now under enormous political pressure to function as the job creators of last resort.

The mortgage and credit-card-debt burdened U.S. consumers spend about 70% of all the money spent in the U.S. Such debt-ridden consumers are not currently regarded as a good source of profit; the consumer sector seems to be in a deflationary spiral of uncertain duration. Yet it is only the expectation of profit that can encourage banks to lend money, leading to the creation of jobs which depend on these same consumers as customers.

The big picture

With the decline of Austin’s past economic drivers, Austin’s future is now more closely linked to conditions in both the Texas and national economies. Looking at the big picture as it affects most states, they have to depend on the feds.

Meanwhile, federal deficits are now pretty much out of control, meaning that the dollar is almost certainly going to have to be devalued in terms of its buying power. Either devalued through a messy collapse or more gradually, which is much preferable.

This means we are likely to see the U.S. consumer’s spending ability continue to deteriorate over the next few years. Here is quite a good quantitative analysis explaining the background to this uncomfortable conclusion.

Wrapping up, what does this all imply for the regional Austin economy? In general, the feds appear to be attaching more strings, in ways that often seem to be sensibly restrained compared to the past, assuming they are still spending. They are tightening up on the ozone limits affecting transportation planning, tightening up federal loan requirements, targeting energy conservation, etc.

As a trend, it looks like the feds will increasingly have to be the source of public funds needed to relieve Austin’s growing unemployment problem. The Austin area will continue to rely on state government and higher education for its traditional and reliable economic base of support, but if so, it will have to be through increasing federal participation.

Accordingly, Austin should figure out how best to play ball with the federal administrators who will be funding Austin’s future jobs programs. Let us hope that this message reaches the Texas Legislature — the fact that we are probably entering a new leaner and more practical and populist era, a time when the luxurious inefficiency of the traditional Texas good-old-boy politics probably isn’t going to work. Need proof? Just ask Gov. Rick Perry whatever happened to his Trans-Texas Corridor plan.

Conclusion: For lack of a better alternative, it probably makes good sense to let the feds guide the way toward Austin’s new industrial future. This necessarily implies political competition with the other needy areas of the USA, already impatiently waiting in line for federal help.

[Roger Baker is a long time transportation-oriented environmental activist, an amateur energy-oriented economist, an amateur scientist and science writer, and a founding member of and an advisor to the Association for the Study of Peak Oil-USA. He is active in the Green Party and the ACLU, and is a director of the Save Our Springs Association and the Save Barton Creek Association. Mostly he enjoys being an irreverent policy wonk and writing irreverent wonkish articles for The Rag Blog.]

The Rag Blog

This entry was posted in Rag Bloggers and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Austin and Texas : Economic Slump Finally Hitting Home

  1. accprof says:

    “a state can’t print money like the federal government”

    Good statement, Roger! I know little about economics, not having had economics since high school (!). However, I sometimes lean toward agreeing with the Libertarians who say that we need to return to the gold standard, when money had real value. I don’t understand things like “national debt,” “budget deficits,” etc. What we have is Monopoly money, not money with inherent value.


  2. Charley, I know it seems like monopoly money, and it would be comforting if it were. Unfortunately, its real money, its real debt, and it really has to be paid off eventually by real workers. There will be real pain felt by those who have to pay off this debt. Its doubly cruel in that most of the those paying, will not have received any of the benefits of the debt (think of todays toddlers being forced to pay off the 3.8 Billion that we borrowed and gave to the “cash for clunkers” programs when the toddlers have grown into 25 yo adults driving electric cars.) I doubt they will appreciate the irony.

    Anyone who thinks you can get 13.8 Trillion to pay off the debt(or 18 Trilion at the end of BHO’s first term) from the “rich” is deluded. Its not possible, so the money will come from everyone and everyone will feel the pain.

    Everyone except of course politicians, who will simply divert the new tax revenue to new spending programs leaving the debt untouched and requiring even more tax increases in the future. In his latest budget, BHO has requested more than 1 Trillion in new taxes and 1.6 trillion in new spending. The nightmare scenario I just described happening in real life.

    This debt is the issue which drives the tea party movement and swells its ranks.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I have just one question, Xtreme. Why didn’t this new movement become all concerned about the debt when Junior was swelling it so dramatically between 2003 and 2008? Or are you being coy about your patently ridiculous statement that the tea party movement is driven by the debt issue?

  4. Anonymous, what do you think is driving the tea party movement?

  5. Anonymous says:

    Xtreme: perhaps you could answer the question; then I will respond to yours.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Extreme: Someone who is the first to answer a question with a question has something to hide.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Is someone here so young and unschooled that they’re not aware that a Democratic president in 2000left the Republican president a huge surplus? Or does someone’s ideology only count when it’s convenient? It could be both. My guess is that it’s the one involving transparent hypocrisy and absence of ideological integrity (It could also be a galloping dementia called IOKIYAR, or IOKIYACL – it’s O.K. if you’re a cafeteria libertarian).


  8. I dont know if the three “Anonymous” comments above are from the same person. They seem to be but I could be wrong. I never post anonymously, I own my words and thoughts.

    Anonymous you have two misunderstandings about me. First, I am not a Republican, I didnt care much for W’s spending policies and I didnt vote for McCain. Secondly, you have mistaken “something to hide” with “Dont give a damn”. I am actively involved in tea party movements. Do you think I care to debate with you about what drives the movements and impassions its members? Nope, I dont. Honestly, I only hope that you and others like you continue to misunderstand and underestimate us. My efforts are focused on kicking progressives and liberals out of power everywnere possible and ensuring that consevatives, of whichever party, get elected to state and federal offices. As long as guys like you are out there spending your time “schooling” guys like me about “ideological integrity” the more I like it. Dig it?

  9. Anonymous says:

    The two other comments were not from me. And I note that, importantly, you refuse to answer the original question which, I believe, says it all about the ideological underpinnings of the movement. You are morally bankrupt, xtreme, and generally useless in providing solutions to the issues at hand. And for many months I have wished you would cease to haunt this blog.

    I will also note that you are as anonymous as I am. Your blog does not reveal your name. What is the difference between being “Extremist to the DHS” and being anonymous – there is none. But apparently you do see some difference, another revealing fact about your nature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *