The Sporting News – M. Wizard


Roundball Report: It’s the Finals
By Mariann G. Wizard / May 7, 2008 / The Rag Blog

Even if you’re not a basketball fan, if you’re not watching the Spurs-Hornets matchup in the NBA Western conference semi-finals, you are missing some show! Last night’s game, the second win in two games for the upstarts from New Orleans, was absolutely jaw-dropping, as young point guard (and league MVP runner-up) Chris Paul took multi-MVP Tim Duncan, as well as San Antonio stars Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker, to school. Literally running circles around the lightning-fast Parker, Paul is the quickest thing on the court since kangaroos, with an arrogant, self-assured ‘tude reminiscent of M. Ali when he was still lean and hungry Cassius; there’s also a definite footwork resemblance!

The 22-year old is being compared to a lot of aged NBA stars, but so far I haven’t heard today’s wannabe Cosells state the obvious — they’ve been wrong too many times — but this is the next Michael Jordan. MJ transformed his team, the lackluster Chicago Bulls; transformed the game of basketball as sport, spectacle, and business; and is still the ideal of aspiring young hoopsters worldwide. Chris Paul is gonna do and be all that, too, and be just as much fun to watch. It will be interesting to see how this series plays out when the inexperienced Hornets, who nonetheless have home court advantage over the reigning NBA champs, play game 3 Wednesday night in San Antonio. And LA’s Kobe Bryant, with the Lakers facing a tough opponent in Utah, better enjoy his MVP-ship this year; good as he is, there’s a new kid down on the block.

Meanwhile in the East, the Boston-Cleveland matchup is shaping up as a thriller, although Boston exits game two tonight with a two game lead. League-leading Celts’ star Ray Allen was held scoreless for the first time since 1997, and the Cavs’ LeBron James had an extremely poor shooting night as well. When the heavy hitters on either of these teams start hitting, it’s likely to be contagious! The series moves to Cleveland on Thursday, and I’m hoping for overtime! Also in the East, Detroit had handed Orlando two straight defeats without a lot of trouble. One young Pistons fan seen on teevee during Tuesday’s game two — who ironically was a ringer for the movies’ “Harry Potter” — had the real deal on this series painted on his chest: “THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS MAGIC.”

Well, almost no such thing. Anybody know when quidditch season starts?

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged | Leave a comment

White House E-Mail Is Broken, Deliberately

The following article outlines technical reasons that the White House e-mail system failed and cannot provide evidence for an investigation into potential criminal activities that emanated from that building. That e-mails were missing, whether inadvertently through bad information technology (IT) practices or through deliberate removal of message stores and archives, has been known for some time. Not until recently, however, has the discussion turned to technical aspects of the loss.

From a purely technical perspective, it is absurd to claim that “[t]he system would require 18 months to ingest the existing backlog of messages in the Microsoft Xchange system” and “[t]he system offered users no option to distinguish between Presidential records and political or personal materials,” and the National Archives says as much in the article that follows. It is particularly unfathomable to me as an IT professional for over 20 years that there would be no backup system whatsoever in place for an office as critical as the Executive Branch of the US government. Backup is the first ground-rule for any IT operation, even on the smallest scale.

Let’s be clear about this: there is no such thing as “IT politics.” This was pure and simple George W. Bush / Dick Cheney politics, where revealing any sort of sensitive (read: “illegal”) activity in an e-mail would be strictly taboo. These clowns are criminals through and through.

From my perspective, many of the things written in this article are patently ludicrous. Writing that there are “technical issues and concerns” so vastly understates what is happening here that I cringe at the thought of the Information Technology Political Appointee department at the White House that “maintains” the computing systems there.

Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog

Another Rag Blogger adds:

Politics and other personal (and organizational) agendas are usually to blame for IT failure. By any reasonable measure, the guardians of White House email used poor IT practice as a tool to circumvent applicable law, avoid disclosure, and maintain control over sensitive data.

One more example of executive branch obfuscation and circumvention of law.

Bill Meacham / The Rag Blog

What the White House needs.

IT politics killed White House email project
By Michael Krigsman / May 6, 2008

Data archiving in the White House is a serious business mandated by the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which was passed following the Watergate scandal.

The Act requires the White House to maintain an historical archive of its activities, policies, and decisions. Despite this law, the White House email archiving system is a model of poor IT practice and has been called “primitive,” “inadequate,” and “not robust.” The system fails to fulfill its most basic requirements: enabling reliable backup, storage, and restore capabilities.

Email backup process. Quoted in a report by the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, White House CIO, Theresa Payton, described how White House emails are archived using a manual method called “journaling:”

Under this process, a White House staffer or contractor would collect from a “journal” e-mail folder in the Microsoft Exchange system copies of e-mails sent and received by White House employees. After retrieving copies of these e-mails, the White House staffer or contractor would then manually name and save them as “.pst” files on various White House servers.

Former White House CIO, Carlos Solari, characterized the process:

[A]s a ‘message collection system’ even though we all understand that it hardly qualifies as a ’system’ by the usual IT definition.

In a memo to Acting CIO, John Straub, in 2005, IT manager, John McDevitt, described the ad hoc system:

The current email archive process depends on manual operations and monitoring, standard operating procedures do not exist, automated tools that support the email archive process are not robust, and there is no dedicated archive storage location.

The report points out at least three fatal flaws with the manual email archive process:

  • Risk of data loss
  • Risk of tampering
  • Inability to verify system functionality

Email archiving project failure. In 2003, the White House initiated an Electronic Communications Records Management System (ECRMS) project to automate email archiving. Booz Allen Hamilton was contracted to design the system and Unisys was engaged to test and implement it. According to the internal government program director for the project, John McDevitt, the project was completed in the spring of 2004:

According to Mr. McDevitt, this design was presented to the White House Counsel, the White House Office of Records Management, and counsel in the Office of Administration “for their concurrence” in the spring of 2004. With Unisys serving as the contractor for the implementation phase, the White House undertook “[s]ystem configuration, testing and tuning” through 2005. In early 2006, standard operating procedures were developed. In March 2006, the White House Counsel, the White House Office of Records Management, and OA counsel were briefed on the system, and in July of 2006, they were briefed “on the search and retrieval capabilities of the ECRMS solution.” Mr. McDevitt stated that the project was “ready to go live” on August 21, 2006.

Although the ECMRS was ready for use, current White House CIO, Theresa Payton, terminated the project in 2006 because:

“[t]he system would require 18 months to ingest the existing backlog of messages in the Microsoft Xchange system” and “[t]he system offered users no option to distinguish between Presidential records and political or personal materials.”

The National Archives responded with objections to these reasons, suggesting they did not present sufficient cause to abandon the completed project and revert to manual, and therefore unreliable, email backup techniques.

[snip]

Update 5/6/08 5:00pm EST: To gain further insight into this situation, I spoke with David Gewirtz, author of the book Where Have All the Emails Gone?. Here’s what David said:

White House email is broken. Their email archiving system is wildly inadequate to the point of negligence. Management of computer assets like laptops, flash drives, and BlackBerrys is completely non-existent.

Email in the White House needs to be fixed. Not because we want to give Congress a bigger stick with which to beat on Presidents, but because some really bad things could happen if it’s not fixed. There are technical issues and concerns, plus security issues and concerns that blast through the political rhetoric and even party affiliation. The practice of archiving is a technical act, while the practice of disclosing is a political or policy act.

We need to make sure we archive the White House email traffic, but that doesn’t mean confidential information must be disclosed to opposing parties or the general public.

Finally, there is breaking news out of the White House today. The White House has responded to Judge Facciola’s request for disclosure of email messages during the first term of the Bush administration. I’ve just gotten those court documents and am working my way through them now. The gist of them seems to be that the White House does not believe further document recovery is warranted. I’m going to be working my way through the full document set and will publish an analysis of it, probably tomorrow.

Read all of it here. / ZDNet

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Iraq War Moratorium Number 9, Number 9, Num …

The Raging Grannies, backed by San Mateo Peace Action, demonstrated at the San Mateo, CA post office on “tax day,” as part of Iraq Moratorium 8.

The Iraq Moratorium is a national, grassroots effort uniting individuals and groups who want to end the war and occupation. It encourages people to take some action, individually or with a group, on the third Friday of every month to call for an end to the war.

More than 900 vigils, marches, rallies, speakers, films, and other actions have been listed on the Iraq Moratorium website, www.IraqMoratorium.org , since the monthly events began in September. Already about 60 are listed for May 16, with more coming in daily. The website also posts reports, photos and videos of past actions around the country.

Individual action is also encouraged on Moratorium days, ranging from wearing a button or armband to work or school to writing letters to the editor, calling Congressional representatives, and more.

“Two-thirds of the American people want this war to end,” said Paul Krehbiel, a Pasadena, CA Moratorium organizer. “The Moratorium’s goal is to get those people mobilized and encourage them to speak up and do something. The Silent Majority wants our troops home. We want them to quit being silent and put some pressure on the politicians to listen to the people.”

The Iraq Moratorium is endorsed by more than 80 organizations, including: Veterans for Peace, Military Families Speak Out, U.S. Labor Against the War, and United for Peace and Justice, the nation’s largest peace coalition of some 1,400 groups.

The Rag Blog / May 6, 2008

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Surprise! You Can’t Trust Any of Them!

Jim Mitchell, communications director for the Office of the Special Counsel, in Washington on Tuesday. Photo by J. Scott Applewhite/AP.

F.B.I. Raids Office of Special Counsel
By David Stout / May 7, 2008

WASHINGTON — The office of the official responsible for protecting federal workers from political interference was raided by F.B.I. agents on Tuesday as part of an investigation into whether he himself mixed politics with official business.

The raid took place at the office of Scott J. Bloch, the head of the Office of Special Counsel. Computers and documents were seized by agents trying to determine whether Mr. Bloch obstructed justice by hiring an outside company to “scrub” his computer files, The Associated Press reported. Investigators also searched Mr. Bloch’s home in suburban Virginia after obtaining a subpoena.

“It is not clear to us what they are searching for,” James Mitchell, a spokesman for the office, told Reuters. “We are cooperating with law enforcement.” Mr. Mitchell said about 20 agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation took part in the raid.

The Office of Special Counsel gives advice to federal employees on which activities are proper and which are not allowed under the Hatch Act, which is supposed to guard against direct political interference in governmental affairs. Mr. Bloch’s duties including shielding whistle-blowers who disclose such political meddling.

Mr. Bloch was in the news a year ago when his office began to look into political briefings given to employees of several agencies by aides to Karl Rove, who was then President Bush’s chief political adviser. The White House insisted at the time that the briefings met the definitions of allowable activities.

Mr. Bloch’s critics quickly accused him of announcing an inquiry into the Rove-inspired briefings simply to draw attention away from his own shortcomings. At the time, he was the target of a complaint filed by a group of employees who accused him of trying to dismantle his own agency, of illegally barring employees from talking to journalists and of reducing a backlog of whistle-blower complaints by simply discarding old cases.

Mr. Bloch has denied wrongdoing. Last week, the White House forced out Lurita A. Doan, the head of the General Services Administration, after Mr. Bloch’s office determined that she had improperly mixed politics with government business. Mr. Bloch was nominated for his post by President Bush on June 26, 2003. He was unanimously confirmed by the Senate on Dec. 9, 2003, and sworn in to a five-year term on Jan. 5, 2004. His agency’s Web site states that he has more than 17 years’ experience litigating “employment, lawyer ethics, and complex cases before state courts, federal courts and administrative tribunals.”

The agency’s Web site praises conscientious rank-and-file federal employees, “the great heroes, ordinary heroes who have the courage to blow the whistle, who are helping to bring our government to greater accountability.”

Source. / New York Times

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Hillary (Still) : Bombs Away!

This is exactly why I will never support Hillary Clinton for president, even if she wins the nomination and names Barack Obama as her VP. I support Obama because he offers the possibility for an alternative to American militarism. Clinton has proven over and over that she does not. It is likely that the Bush regime will carry out aerial attacks against Revolutionary Guard bases in Iran before November under the pretext that they are training Iraqi militias. Hillary Clinton will support that attack.

David Hamilton
/ May 6, 2008 / The Rag Blog

Obama accuses Clinton of using the language of Bush on Iran
By Ed Pilkington / May 5 2008

Barack Obama yesterday accused his rival for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton, of adopting the language of the Bush presidency in her approach to dealing with a nuclear Iran.

Ahead of Tuesday’s hotly contested primaries in Indiana and North Carolina, the two Democratic contenders took to competing television networks and levelled at times pointed criticism at each other over foreign policy and the economy.

In the sharpest attack, Obama said that Clinton’s threat to “totally obliterate” Iran should it attempt a nuclear attack on Israel was inappropriate. “It’s not the language we need right now. It’s language that’s reflective of George Bush,” he said.

Obama said it was time to get away from a foreign policy of “bluster and sabre-rattling and tough talk”. He reminded Clinton that she had urged caution in terms of speculating about Iran on the campaign trail “yet a few days before an election she’s willing to use that language”.

Obama’s comments, made on Meet the Press on NBC, were put to Clinton as she appeared simultaneously on ABC’s This Week. She remained unapologetic: “I think we have to be very clear about what we would do. I don’t think it’s time to equivocate. [Iran has] to know they would face massive retaliation. That is the only way to rein them in.”

Asked by George Stephanopoulos, a former aide to Bill Clinton in the White House, whether she had any regrets over her Iran remarks, she replied: “No, why would I have any regrets?”

Clinton has been buoyed by her recent victory in Pennsylvania, and by evidence that white working-class voters are increasingly swinging behind her. An Associated Press survey of exit polls from earlier primaries shows that white voters without a college education favoured her by 64% to Obama’s 34%.

The New York senator has been trying to press home that advantage in Indiana, where polls suggest she has the lead, and in North Carolina, where she is behind but by a narrowing margin. The two states command 187 delegates.

On Saturday Obama added another victory to his tally, though the US territory of Guam had just four delegates riding on it. He won by seven votes.

During his interview with Tim Russert, Obama was quizzed about his relationship with the controversial pastor Jeremiah Wright. Asked why it had taken him so long to disassociate himself from the reverend, Obama said: “What became apparent to me was that he didn’t know me as well as I thought he did, and I certainly didn’t know him as well as I thought I did, and that was disappointing.”

Source. / The Guardian, U.K.

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Osteoporosis : Drugs and Your Heart

Have a Heart: Be Wary of toxic pharmaceuticals
By Janet Gilles / May 6, 2008 / The Rag Blog

Noting the lastest revelation about an osteoporosis treatment being linked to a heart condition (see article below), it’s looking to me more and more like nutrients ought to be attempted before committing to pharmaceuticals.

Since by definition, pharmaceuticals are toxic, it’s only a matter of time before the side effects become known.

It has long been known that certain toxic substances could “cure” certain diseases. Laws were passed requiring that these pharmaceuticals be proven effective before they could be used, and only with the supervision of a trained professional.

All well and good.

However, now we have a governmental authority saying certain toxic substances may be used by physicians as cures, and no claims may be made for other substances which also might cure the disease, only they are non- toxic.

Also, since by definition, pharmaceuticals are toxic, then they will, also by definition, have serious and harmful long term consequences.

We just don’t know in every case just what those consequences will be.

Just read this:

Osteoporosis drug linked to heart rhythm disturbance
Risks may outweigh benefits of treatment

By Sharon Kirkey

Women who take a popular drug for osteoporosis appear to be at increased risk of atrial fibrillation, the most common heart rhythm disturbance that increases the risk of stroke.

Researchers who compared more than 700 women with atrial fibrillation to women without the heart condition found those who had used alendronate–a generic medication that’s also sold under the brand name Fosamax –had an 86% higher risk of atrial fibrillation.

“Women who had used it at any point in the past were at a nearly twofold higher risk,” says Dr. Susan Heckbert, lead author of the study published this week in Archives of Internal Medicine.

It’s the second drug in its class to be linked with unexpected effects on the hearts: A study last year reported a higher risk of atrial fibrillation (or AF) in women who received zoledronic acid, or Re-clast, another bisphosphonate.

About one in 100 people have atrial fibrillation, where the top two chambers of the heart, the atria, quiver and beat rapidly instead of rhythmically. Blood can accumulate in the atria, forming a clot.

“Occasionally, a small piece of clot will break off and travel to the brain which can result in a stroke,” says Heckbert, professor of epidemiology and scientific investigator at the cardiovascular health research unit at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“The most devastating complication of atrial fibrillation is stroke.”

It also causes symptoms such as rapid heart rate, palpitations in the chest and shortness of breath.

More than three million prescriptions for alendronate were dispensed from retail drug stores in Canada in the 12 months ending Nov. 30, 2007, according to pharmaceutical intelligence firm IMSHealth Canada.

For most women at high risk for bone fracture, the benefits of alendronate outweigh the possible risk of atrial fibrillation, Heckbert says.

Mahyar Etminan, a scientist with the Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation at the University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, says 12 to 15 high-risk women would need to be treated with a bisphosphonate for five years to prevent one fracture.

“But if you do the same thing to people with no previous fractures who may just have low bone mineral density, the number needed to treat would go to between 20 and 30. So if you treat 30 women, only one benefits, and we don’t know who that is.”

In January, American drug regulators warned of the possibility of “severe and sometimes incapacitating” bone, joint or muscle pain in patients taking bisphosphonates. The same month, Etminan’s team published a study showing the drugs increase the risk of bone necrosis, a rare condition that results from loss of blood supply to the bone. Bone tissue dies and bone collapses.

Heckbert says women who have only a modestly increased risk of fracture, as well as women who have risk factors for atrial fibrillation, such as diabetes and heart failure, need to “carefully weigh the benefits against the possible risks” of AF.

Source. / Canwest News / National Post, Canada / April 29, 2008
Also see article on
bone-building bisphosphonate medicines? by Anthony Komaroff, M.D., Harvard Medical School.

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

In Two Lines:

Why Senator Clinton stays in the race

As Hillary Rodham, she took the SAT in 1963 and mistook her score for a prophecy about entitlements. But was her SAT number, 2012 or 2008?

Dick J. Reavis
The Rag Blog / May 6, 2008

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

An Angry Young Man from the Ghetto

When America is worried about angry black people…embrace the wisdom of Elvis

Elvis and Reverend Wright: How white people can accept Barack Obama and Reverend Wright
By Kimberly Wilder

This is a message from a white woman, who has actually been known by others and herself to be in the category of “wasp.”

Dear America: Listen to the backing vocals. And, when you have connected to the place where you really, truly enjoyed them, and actually needed them to connect with some of the subliminal conflict in your culture, then listen again to a sermon by Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

This message includes campaign advice for presidential candidate Barack Obama (even though I do not support him among others, because I belong to a third party.)

Since I fear that Barack Obama might not listen to me, this message is also to try to explain to America why they, themselves, have the power to understand that Reverend Wright is right and the people attacking him are wrong. And, that Barack Obama is missing a wonderful opportunity by not embracing Reverend Wright as an informed, compassionate, African-American leader.

The problems and injustices that Revered Jermiah Wright describes are real. There is racism in this country. Blacks and whites are not equal. The police are still more likely to shoot and kill innocent black men. And, it is important for people to communicate this information and deal with this information in their own way, with their own choices of commitment and intensity.

When I heard the Reverend’s recent speech at the NAACP, I got his message: It is okay to be different. It is okay for Reverend Wright to express his anger at injustice in the bold, loud tradition of a black preacher. And, it is okay for Barack Obama to express his anger at injustice in the smooth, unifying words of a politician.

If Barack Obama could recognize this fact, he could proceed with his campaign a lot differently. Right now, Obama is trying to fight the Karl Rove style strategy of “attack your opponents strengths, and turn them into weaknesses” by running from the attack, by running from his association with Reverend Wright. But, that will not work.

Read all of it here. / On the Wilderside.net

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ecuador: "We All Want National Sovereignty"


U.S. Base Is No Longer Welcome in Ecuador
by Jim Wyss / May 5, 2008

MANTA, Ecuador – Mayor Jorge Zambrano pulled up to the Manta City Hall in his black Ford Explorer, expecting to find a rally in support of the American military outpost that runs drug-surveillance flights from this gritty port city.

He left an hour later behind a wall of riot shields and a cloud of Mace, as police fended off banner-waving protesters who crashed the event in March.

With 18 months left on its decade-long contract, the U.S. Forward Operating Location in Manta has few friends in this South American nation — and fewer still who believe that the agreement has any hope of being extended.

Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa has vowed not to renew the base’s contract beyond its November 2009 expiration. And politicians drafting a new constitution have proposed banning the base or any other foreign military presence in the country.

If the Manta base closes, it would leave the United States shopping for a new airstrip for the radar-mounted AWAC E3s, and P-3 spy planes that ply the Eastern Pacific, looking for drug runners.

It would also be another dark turn for rapidly deteriorating U.S.-Ecuadorean relations.

The United States sees the Manta compound — with its manicured lawns and staff of about 150 pilots and crew members — as part of a multinational effort that helped block $4.2 billion worth of narcotics last year.

But in Ecuador, the Base de Manta is viewed largely as an affront to national sovereignty that threatens to drag the country into the regional drug war.

Read it here. / Common Dreams / Miami Herald

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

We Are a Nation at War with Ourselves


The Pentagon vs. America
by Scott Ritter / May 5, 2008

I recently heard from an anti-war student I met while I was speaking at a college in northern Vermont. The e-mail included the following query:

“I told you about how I wanted to build a career around social activism and making a difference. You told me that one of the most important things was to make myself reputable and give people a reason to listen to you. I think this is some of the best advice I’ve received. My issue however is that you mentioned joining the military as a way to do this and mentioned how that is how you fell into it. … We talked extensively about all of our criticisms of the military currently and our foreign policy. … What I don’t understand is, how can you [advise] someone who wants to make a difference with the flawed system, to join that flawed system?”

The question is a valid one. Throughout my travels in the United States, where I interact with people from progressive anti-war groups, I am often confronted with the seeming contradiction of my position. I rail against the war in Iraq (and the potential of war with Iran) and yet embrace, at times enthusiastically, the notion of military service. It gets even more difficult to absorb, at least on the surface, when I simultaneously advocate counter-recruitment as well as support for those who seek to join the armed services.

The notion that the military and citizens of conscience should be at odds is a critical problem for our nation. That confrontation only exacerbates the problems of the soldier and the citizen, and must be properly understood if it is to be defeated. Let us start by constructing a framework in which my positions can be better assessed.

First and foremost, I do not view military service as an obligation of citizenship. I do view military service as an act of good citizenship, but it can under no circumstance be used as a litmus test for patriotism. There are many ways in which one can serve his or her nation; the military is but one. I am a big believer in the all-volunteer military. For one thing, the professional fighting force is far more effective and efficient than any conscript force could ever be.

There are those who argue that a draft would level the playing field, spreading the burdens and responsibilities associated with a standing military force more evenly among the population. Those citizens whose lives would be impacted through war (namely those of draft age and their immediate relatives) would presumably be less inclined to support war.

Conversely, the argument goes, with an all-volunteer professional force, the burden of sacrifice is limited to that segment of society which is engaged in the fighting, real or potential. Two points emerge: First, the majority of society not immediately impacted by the sacrifices of conflict will remain distant from the reality of war. Second, even when the costs of conflict become discernable to the withdrawn population, the fact that the sacrifice is being absorbed by those who willingly volunteered somehow lessens any moral outcry.

I will submit that these are valid observations, and indeed have been borne out in America’s response to the Iraq war tragedy. However, simply because something exists doesn’t make it right. The collective response to the Iraq war on the part of the American people is not a result of there not being a draft, but rather poor citizenship. An engaged citizenry would not only find sufficient qualified volunteers to fill the ranks of our military, but would also personally identify with all those who served so that the loss of one was felt by all. The fact that many Americans today view the all-volunteer force not so much as an extension of themselves, but more along the lines of a “legion” of professionals removed from society, illustrates the yawning gap that exists between we the people and those we ask to defend us.

Narrowing this gap is not something that can be accomplished simply through legislation. Reinstating the draft is illusory in this regard. There is a more fundamental obstacle to the reunion of our society and those who take an oath in the military to uphold and defend the Constitution. Void of this bond, the inherent differences of civilian and military life will serve to drive a wedge between the two, regardless of whether the military force is drafted or volunteer.

Lacking a common understanding of the foundational principles upon which the nation was built, a citizenry will grow to view military service as an imposition, as opposed to an obligation. Simply put, one cannot willingly defend that which one does not know and understand. The fundamental ignorance that exists in America today about the Constitution creates the conditions which foster the divide between citizen and soldier that permeates society today. America must take ownership of its military, not simply by footing the bill, but by assuming a moral responsibility for every aspect of military service. The vehicle for doing this has been well established through the Constitution: the legislative branch of government, the Congress, which serves to represent the will of the people.

Congress, especially the House of Representatives, was never conceived of as separate and distinct from the people, but rather as one with the people, directly derived from their collective will via the electoral process. Unfortunately today, few Americans identify with Congress. An “us versus them” mentality pervades. This mentality creates the crack in the moral and social contract which exists regarding a citizenry and its military. Congress is responsible for maintaining the military. Congress is the branch of government mandated with the responsibility for declaring war. When the bond is strained between the people and Congress, the bond between citizen and soldier is broken. Congress, left to its own devices, will begin to view the military not as an extension of its constituents, but rather as a commodity to be traded and used in a highly politicized fashion.

This is the reality we find ourselves in today (and indeed which has existed for some time). The 2006 midterm elections highlight this reality, where a strong anti-war sentiment upon the part of the voters resulted in a Democratic majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Having assumed the mantle of legislative power, however, those who were elected on the coattails of anti-war sentiment were able to shun their anti-war constituents. They did so by taking full advantage of the reality that the anti-war movement was in fact not a movement at all, but rather a concept pushed forward by a disparate mass without much political viability.

Where anti-war sentiment did in fact cross over from the ranks of the progressive left and into the mainstream of American society, it was quickly quashed through the dishonest logic that if one truly supported the troops (as most red-blooded Americans swear they do), then one must by extension support the mission. This flawed connectivity empowered Congress to sidestep the issue of withdrawing American forces from Iraq, and enabled it to continue rubber-stamping funding for a war which long ago lost any connection, perceived or otherwise, to the general security of the American people.

Read all of it here. / TruthDig / Common Dreams

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Grand Theft Corn

The Onion.
The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Death and the D.C. Madam

Deborah Jean Palfrey aka the D.C. Madam. Photo by Nikki Kahn, The Washington Post

Call girls speak out about the suicide of Deborah Jeane Palfrey and the complicated truths it reveals about their lives.
By Susannah Breslin / May 5, 2008

May 5, 2008 On May 1, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, better known as “the D.C. Madam,” was found dead in a shed located behind her mother’s Tarpon Springs, Fla., mobile home. Apparently, Palfrey, 52, hanged herself from a metal beam with a length of nylon rope. When her 76-year-old mother, Blanche Palfrey, called 911 just before 11 a.m., the emergency operator asked if her daughter was still hanging from the rafter. “Yes,” said the madam’s weeping mother, who had regularly accompanied her daughter to court the month previous, “I can’t move her. I’m 76 years old.”

Palfrey’s was one of a recent spate of high-profile political sex scandals, from Idaho Sen. Larry Craig’s toe-tapping routine to the fall of New York Gov. Eliot “Luv Guv” Spitzer. It was also another chapter in our ongoing fascination with prostitution — that mysterious and yet still little-understood profession. (Palfrey entered the business as an escort. Later, she became a madam, claiming she was “appalled and disgusted” by the way women in the sex business were treated.) Sex may be everywhere these days — heck, adult movie star Jenna Jameson’s autobiography, “How to Make Love Like a Porn Star: A Cautionary Tale,” was a New York Times bestseller — but what life is really like inside the American sex trade remains a mystery. Mostly, Americans have been fed one of two myths about sex workers: the “Pretty Woman” story about a hooker with a heart of gold, or the Jezebel tale about a woman who leads moral men astray by virtue of her sexual wiles.

In more recent years, thanks to a growing number of call girls, strippers and other sex workers using blogs to tell their stories in their own words, we’ve seen a more complex and nuanced tale. And it’s one we don’t seem to be able to get enough of. HBO and Showtime are launching competing series focusing on working girls — “Sex and the City” creator Darren Star is turning Tracy Quan’s “Diary of a Manhattan Call Girl” (which began as a column on Salon) into a dramatic series for HBO, while Showtime will begin airing the U.K. series “Secret Diary of a Call Girl,” based on the blog turned book by Belle de Jour, next month.

Though Palfrey’s death is complicated, not to mention controversial, it does offer us some insight into the experience of sex industry workers, who bear the burden of a double life and the toll of secrecy. I contacted three women, currently chronicling online their past and present lives as sex workers, to speak to them about their reactions to Palfrey’s harrowing tale and how sharing their own stories might keep them from a similar kind of darkness.

Deborah Jeane Palfrey arrives for a hearing at a federal courthouse in Washington, April 30, 2007. Photo by Jonathan Ernst / Reuters.

Melissa Gira is a San Francisco-based sex worker and Valleywag reporter who last year co-founded Bound, Not Gagged, a group blog written by and for sex workers, because of the Palfrey case. Tired of so-called experts speaking for sex workers in the mainstream media, Gira created the site as a forum where working women could express their opinions, reactions and frustrations. The day the blog launched, Gira found Palfrey’s phone number, called her and spoke with her briefly about the project. “I was shocked she picked up the phone, she knew what a blog was, and she wasn’t immediately distrustful,” Gira says.

Upon hearing of Palfrey’s death, Gira felt a jumble of emotions: confusion, anger, sadness. “Her story represented our story,” she says.

Gira is angry about the way female sex workers are vilified when stories like these go public, while the men involved “go back to their job or they quietly leave.” From among the 15,000 names in Palfrey’s potent little black book, only three boldface names surfaced: Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, a married Republican and father of four who apologized for his “very serious sin” and kept his job; U.S. ambassador Randall L. Tobias, who as Bush’s “AIDS czar” had publicly denounced prostitution and resigned after his outing; and Harlan K. Ullman, a retired Navy commander known for developing the shock-and-awe doctrine and who told Brian Ross of ABC News that he had gotten only massages from the women involved, not had sex with them, and stated that the experience was “like ordering pizza.”

“If I was in her position I would have papered the walls of that shed with the sheets of my client list,” says Gira.

Although Gira is frustrated by the media’s relentless representation of sex workers as victims, she is also suspicious of the circumstances surrounding Palfrey’s death. It has been a question circulating since: Did Palfrey actually kill herself? In fact, Palfrey had stated in numerous interviews with members of the press that she would rather commit suicide than return to prison. Washington, D.C., writer Dan Moldea, who got to know Palfrey while considering writing a book about her, told reporters that Palfrey had told him, “I am not going back to prison. I will commit suicide first.” At the time of her death, she was awaiting her July 24 sentencing, and authorities in Florida have reported that several suicide notes were found at the scene. Either way, Gira says, Palfrey’s death has had a “chilling effect” on at least some sex workers, who, now fearing for their own lives, are more reluctant than ever to reveal themselves.

Another sex worker I spoke with, who writes online about her call girl experiences but requested anonymity for this story, was pained by the news of Palfrey’s death as well as the related older news of the death of University of Maryland professor turned call girl Brandy Britton, 43, who killed herself in January 2007 while awaiting trial on prostitution charges. Britton was a one-time employee of Palfrey’s; after Britton was found hanging in her living room, Palfrey pronounced, ironically: “I guess I’m made of something that Brandy Britton wasn’t made of.”

The call girl I interviewed was struck by the emotional stories behind these public deaths. “The first thing I thought about was the incredible isolation that both of them probably felt,” she said. “Because you’re doing something that’s perceived to be so morally wrong that you’re immediately outside society, as a prostitute or a madam. You’ve got this secret life or a compartmentalized life, and then to be pushed out there and villainized — I can only imagine the incredible isolation they must have felt.”

As a sex worker, she went on, you live a “double life.” A madam whom she worked for before she went freelance was intensely paranoid, “crazy,” prone to anxious late-night phone calls. “It got to her. She would call me up and panic, thinking they were out to get her. It was the psychology of sex work, the fear of being outed.”

When the call girl I spoke with worked at an agency, she says, she was kept isolated from other women. Then, when she started writing online about sex work, all that changed. “I know the moment I started blogging about it at length, I started connecting to other women online. It made a huge difference. I stopped feeling alone. I stopped feeling like I had to hide everything from anybody. It felt as though I had a connection to the outside world that I didn’t have before.” After all, sex work is not easy. “You have these very intimate connections, but you’re totally disposable with clients. You’re a ghost moving through their world.”

Read all of it here. / salon.com
See Palfrey Suicide Notes Released. / Washington Post
And see the suicide notes. / The Smoking Gun
Also see Bloggers discussThe D.C. Madam’s Suicide. / Slate

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment