The Second Inquisition Starts Tomorrow

Bush Theocrats Censor Grand Canyon Geology, Insist It Was Formed by Noah’s Flood
Posted by Jon Ponder | Jan. 3, 2007, 9:03 am

From Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER):

Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees. Despite promising a prompt review of its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces, more than three years later no review has ever been done and the book remains on sale at the park, according to documents released today by [PEER].

PEER says the new director of the National Park Service (NPS), Mary Bomar, has been stalling requests to remove a book that presents the Creationist version of the formation of the Grand Canyon titled, “Grand Canyon: A Different View,” by Tom Vail. The group also says that the park’s interpretive rangers are forbidden from providing the age of the canyon based on its geology.

In August 2003, Park Superintendent Joe Alston attempted to block the sale at park bookstores of [Vail’s book]. NPS Headquarters, however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the resulting furor, NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told reporters and members of Congress that there would be a high-level policy review of the issue.

According to a recent NPS response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by PEER, no such review was ever requested, let alone conducted or completed.

Bush appointees in the NPS defend selling the book by saying that bookstores are like libraries and should present a variety of different views. PEER says that “both law and park policies make it clear that the park bookstores are more like schoolrooms rather than libraries. As such, materials are only to reflect the highest quality science and are supposed to closely support approved interpretive themes.” PEER has obtained records showing that during 2003, park officials rejected 22 books and other products for the park’s bookstore and approved only one new sale item — the book presenting the creationist version of the canyon’s origins.

Source

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Movie Night at the Whitehouse

On July 20th 1944 plotters led by Klaus Von Stauffenberg attempted to assassinate the lawful ruler of Germany but fate intervened and Hitler survived. However the blood lust of this psychopathic serial killer would take weeks and thousands to satiate. It is important to understand the motivations of a psychopath, Hitler in his rage ordered everyone in Germany with the name Stauffenberg to be executed.

You see it’s not just about murder it is about power; Klaus had broken into Hitler’s psychotic delusions with the reality of possible sudden death. The psychopathic serial killer lives in a tower of fantasies of their own making, not just of power but also of intelligence. They strive to prove to the world not only are they powerful but they’re more intelligent as well. When ever anyone questioned Hitler’s military planning he would berate them and explain his past glories, and if you make a habit of it and your career would be short.

Thousands were taken and suspended by meat hooks and then hung with piano wire, and at the express orders of Adolph Hitler the executions were filmed. At his first viewing of the films Hitler was jubilant as he watched the films with glee, innocent guilty made no difference to him it was about power. The power to inflict suffering on those perceived to threaten his fantasy. Psychopaths are the most dangerous of all mentally ill; for all intents and purposes they can appear completely normal. Like all of us the have a public personality but behind that is a hidden murderous rage, they are very ill, abused as children they seek out revenge on those that hurt them and those who threaten their fantasy.

Hitler living in Vienna out of work and down on his luck was befriended by a Jewish man who operated second hand store, the man feeling sorry for Hitler seeing he had no over coat gave him one. To you and I this would be considered and act of kindness but to the psychopath Hitler this was an affront. He was Adolph Hitler and Jews were feeling sorry for him? The nerve! If the Jews in Vienna were successful and he was not then whom he thought was responsible for that? George Bush as a make believe Texas oil man was bailed out financially time and again by Arab investors, to you and I that might be considered and act of kindness…

Hitler ordered the execution films shown to the troops but the troops refused to watch in mass. They were soldiers not psychopaths if it had been presented with the choice of executing only they guilty and freeing the innocent they would have released the innocent immediately. To Hitler it was sending a message to those who would threaten his fantasy that he had the power and enjoyed their sufferings.

When then Governor George Bush refused the last minute death row appeal for clemency from Carla Faye Tucker he mocked her sufferings to a reporter. Tucker had been born again while in prison and many evangelicals endorsed her appeal. But then Governor Bush showed her no clemency nor anyone else for that matter as Governor for eight years not once was clemency ever granted, I wonder why? Setting the record for the most executions not only as Texas governor but also anywhere in the United States.

Bush as a child had a history of tormenting small animals and while in a fraternity at Yale added the burning of pledges to the initiation ritual. To willfully inflict pain on others is a clear sign of mental illness, to do so as a child is a warning sign. To do so in college is to prove your power over others. During the blitz in London during WW2 Churchill made a point to tour the most devastated areas to show solidarity with the people to empathize with their sufferings. Hitler never once toured devastated areas of Germany because it threatened his fantasy his inviolability is it any wonder then why the President doesn’t attend soldier’s funerals or allows photographs? He wants to be able to watch TV too.

Towards the end Hitler submerged in his bunker under the chancellery began to give grandiose orders to non-existent forces. When advised by Albert Speer his ministry of supply that Germany would be out of fuel in days Hitler advised we will fight on to the end with a policy of scorched earth! Speer asked, what about the German people how will they survive? Hitler said they have failed me and do not deserve to survive. What is the administrations newest talking point? Why are we failing in Iraq? Because… It’s the Iraqi’s fault! They have failed us!

So Saddam has been murdered excuse me executed and at someone’s orders the execution was filmed, hmm, I wonder whom? But why did Iraqi Judges try Saddam in Iraq? His defense was always under the Iraqi constitution he was the head law enforcement official in the country, which was true. But he was tried under the new Iraqi constitution written by Paul Bremer under that constitution Saddam did not have that right. I wonder if that’s why occupying powers are not allowed to change the occupied country’s laws under the Geneva Convention? But why not take him to The Hague then to be tried? Don’t we want to bring Iraq into the civilized family of nations? Isn’t that our stated goal du jour?

I think it might have gone something like this, “Mr. Hussein when you gassed the Kurds who supplied you with these horrible weapons?” “Mr. Donald Rumsfeld sir of the United States.” And Mr. Hussein how did you know where the Kurds were?” “The US CIA was supplying us with satellite photo’s but they were out of date.” “Out of date what do mean sir?” “We were trying to gas the Iranian military but we got bad intelligence in the form of out of date satellite photos that showed Iranian troops occupying the village.” “Mr. Hussein do you honestly expect the court to accept as your defense that because you’ve gotten bad intelligence the deaths of these people can be excused!”

“Mr. Prosecutor if you want me to plead guilty to gassing thousands of Iranians I will do that now!” “No, Mr. Hussein you can gas as many Iranians as you like we don’t care it is only when you gas people unintentionally that concerns us here. I want to get back to your defense of bad intelligence.”

So, it’s Movie night at the White House, the death toll is now 600 thousand and one. And now it’s all the Iraqis fault and after all we’ve done for them! May be they don’t deserve to survive. Try to be on time but if you are late don’t worry I’m sure the boss will be running it over and over.

See it here. H/t Today in Iraq

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Stand with Lt. Ehren Watada

Stand with Lt. Ehren Watada Against Illegal and Immoral War in Iraq

“My fellow soldiers are fighting and dying in Iraq and their families are suffering because of the lies and deceptions crafted by the Bush Administration. The Iraq war is not only a crime against domestic and international law but [it] is a terrible moral injustice against the Iraqi people.” – Lt. Ehren Watada

As the first Army officer to publicly speak out against the war and refuse deployment to Iraq, Lt Watada will be punished by the U.S. Army with a maximum six years in prison. The military’s intention IS to SILENCE VOICES OF RESISTANCE and make an example out of Lt. Watada.

“The war in Iraq is in fact illegal. It is my obligation and my duty to refuse any orders to participate in this war. An order to take part in an illegal war is unlawful in itself. So my obligation is not to follow the order to go to Iraq.” – Lt. Ehren Watada

NATIONAL DAY OF ACTION

Feb. 5, 2007 – Lt. Watada Military Court Martial
Rally at the gates of Ft. Lewis, Washington or in your local community

5 Actions to Support Lt. Watada

1. Send letters or call Commander Dubik. Urge him to:

* Dismiss all charges
* Honor Lt. Watada’s resignation

Lt. General James Dubik
Commanding General Fort Lewis
1 Corps Building 2025 Stop 1
Fort Lewis, WA 98433
Phone 253-967-1110

2. Spread the word about Feb. 5, 2007. Forward this email and post on blogs, MySpace, student, activist, social justice and media websites. Register for campaign updates.

3. Encourage your organization to endorse the National Day of Action and mobilize on Feb. 5, 2007. Please specify national, state, city, chapter/local, and contact person, and send to action@….

4. Organize a student walkout, rally or vigil on Feb. 5, 2007. Tell us about your action so we can include your event on our website.

5. Donate online to Lt. Watada’s Defense Fund.

website: www.thankyoult.org


Mark Your Calendars

Thurs. Jan 4, 2007
Pre-trial Hearing
Contact Commander Dubik
Rally at the gates of Fort Lewis, 8-11 am, exit 119

January 20-22, 2007
Citizens’ Hearings
Evergreen State College, Tacoma campus
Tacoma, WA

February 5, 2007
Court Martial Trial Begins
National Call to Action
more details to come

Make your 2007 New Year’s Resolution to Stand with Lt. Watada Against Illegal and Immoral War

+ On Monday, February 5, 2007 take action against the Iraq war and in support of Lt. Watada during his military court martial. Stand up with Lt. Watada and speak out against the illegal and immoral war! Join the national movement and organize student walkouts and non-violent demonstrations. Together let’s build a mass movement in the streets, in our schools, and in our communities to end the Iraq War. On Feb. 5, 2007 rally at the gates of Fort Lewis, Washington or in your local community.

+ For courageously standing up and speaking out against the Iraq War, New Year’s Eve 2007 may be Lt. Watada’s last holiday as a free man until 2013. While many 28 year-olds are starting their families and building their careers, Ehren will be locked away in military prison for following his conscience and refusing to fight in the Iraq War.

+ Now it is time for you to follow your conscience and join the national movement to support Lt. Watada and end the Iraq war.

+ As civilians, the responsibility ultimately falls on us to demand an end to the Iraq war. In fact, we owe it to the soldiers who are fighting and dying in Iraq every day, as well as those resisting the war. We must all stand up and speak out against the war and in support Lt. Ehren Watada!

+ Currently, the Bush Administration is planning to deploy 30,000 more U.S. troops to Iraq, yet the overwhelming majority of Americans oppose the Iraq war. Since 2003 the war has cost 3,000 U.S. soldiers’ lives, approximately 950,000 Iraqi deaths, 2 trillion U.S tax dollars or approximately 8 billion dollars a week. We can no longer stand by and continue to allow this great injustice to occur!

+ “My fellow soldiers are fighting and dying in Iraq and their families are suffering because of the lies and deceptions crafted by the Bush Administration. The Iraq war is not only a crime against domestic and international law but [it] is a terrible moral injustice against the Iraqi people.” Lt. Ehren Watada

+ As the first Army officer to publicly speak out against the war and refuse deployment to Iraq, Lt Watada will be punished by the U.S. Army with a maximum six years in prison. The military’s intention IS to SILENCE VOICES OF RESISTANCE and make an example out of Lt. Watada.

+ Lt. Watada’s bold actions have raised the consciousness of thousands of Americans about the illegality and immorality of this war, but his actions alone will not stop the Iraq war. If Lt. Watada is willing to sacrifice his freedom, then we, too, must voice our opposition and take action to end the war.

+ Take Action Feb. 5, 2007 during Lt. Watada’s military court martial and make your 2007 New Year’s Resolution to Stand with Lt. Watada Against Illegal and Immoral War.


www.sirnosir.com

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

A Backyard Hawk on Wildlife Wednesday

Another picture with a story. I met Emily in 1964 when I was 13 and she was 12. Our Dads were working on a high school textbook and we were staying in the same apartment block in Boulder, Colorado. She lived in Arlington, Virginia, I in Austin. Being kids, we sort of decided to be girlfriend and boyfriend, but in the course of a seven-year correspondence, fell in love. We lost touch in about 1970, but never forgot each other, and Emily tracked me down in May 2005 just us some rather traumatic stuff was happening in my life.

She lives in Boston now, so this is an east-coast hawk. Unfortunately, neither of us knows what species it is. Richard Jehn

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

"The long national nightmare" Isn’t Over Yet

Nearly the only rational thing said about this business in the past few days.

Pardoning Nixon Saved the GOP, Not the USA
Posted by Jon Ponder | Jan. 2, 2007, 2:34 pm

Gerald Ford was a solid and even-tempered Old School pol. But I agree with Margie Burns that Ford’s motives in pardoning Pres. Nixon were much more basic than the stated goal of sparing the nation the agony of witnessing an ex-president on trial — and that, contrary to the conventional wisdom in D.C., pardoning Nixon was not “the right thing to do”:

[The pardon] did not spare the nation; it spared Richard M. Nixon. The nation had not undergone a long nightmare with Nixon’s resignation; Nixon had. The nation had not endured a virtual state of siege with Nixon’s attempt to spy on and to steal from the opposition and then to stonewall investigation into his actions (assisted by then-head of the Republican National Committee George H. W. Bush); Nixon had. And with all due respect, most of the graybeards on television probably know that. If they don’t, they’re not qualified to be either reporters or commentators. Anyone who recollects the Seventies as being a period when public adoration of Dick Nixon was at its peak -– such that seeing him answer questions about Watergate would have been simply unbearable -– is remembering wrong.

I think Margie Burns is being generous. I believed then, and still do, that Ford’s objective in pardoning Nixon was less about saving his friend from trial and punishment and more about saving the Republican Party from going into the 1976 election cycle with Nixon’s trial dominating the news.

Had Nixon’s case gone to trial, Ford knew that Watergate’s cancer on the presidency was likely to spread to the GOP body politic, with potentially fatal consequences. Nixon’s secret Oval Office tapes would be played in open court, and the complete record of the skullduggery, break-ins, spying and lying by the president and his men would have been exposed in the worst light possible. As the leader of his party, Pres. Ford could not afford to let that happen.

Ford paid a heavy price for the Nixon pardon. Within a month after the pardon in September 1974, Ford’s popularity sank from the 70s into the 30s. His reputation never recovered, and voters turned him out in the 1976 elections.

Every Republican elected since Nixon was pardoned owes a debt of gratitude to Gerald Ford. However, for the act of pardoning Nixon, the nation owes him nothing.

Read it here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Just Regular Folks Like You and Us …


Debutante Ashley Walker Bush, granddaughter of former U.S. President George H. W. Bush and niece of U.S. President George W. Bush , represents the United States as she curtsies on stage in the Grand Ballroom of New York’s famed Waldorf Astoria Hotel during the 52nd International Debutante Ball December 29, 2006. REUTERS/Mike Segar

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

He Cares All Right !!!!

… about how thickly his and his friends pockets will be padded when it’s all over.

The White House assures us that Bush cares

I’m not a historian, but doesn’t the recurring insistence that the president “feels” the losses in Iraq seem a little bizarre?

Bush mourns death of 3,000th U.S. soldier in Iraq

“The president believes that every life is precious and grieves for each one that is lost,” said White House spokesman Scott Stanzel. “He will ensure their sacrifice was not made in vain.”

And, it’s not just this bit of boilerplate. For the last few months at every press conference, Bush has made the same point.

What does it say about his image that it’s deemed necessary for the president to assure us time and time again that he is, in fact, human and does care that people are dying?

An offshoot of the earlier “bring em on” tough boy rhetoric? A relic from the indifference of Katrina? Or a political necessity in the current politics of the war?

Source

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

The Naked Truth? Or Something Else Altogether …

Invasion of the Body Scanners
New airport X-Rays may be a useful way to detect hidden explosives—but officials will have to keep a tight rein on their use
by David H. Holtzman

Phoenix flyers will soon be the first travelers digitally stripped naked by a Transportation Security Agency (TSA) X-Ray machine that uses a technology called “backscatter.” The device bounces a low-intensity X-Ray beam off the target’s body and digitally analyzes and stores the returning signal, or backscatter.

Early on, the process generated a high-resolution picture that for all practical purposes was a nude photo of the target without hair, but including intimate details. The idea is that hidden bombs and guns will be readily detectable on a minimalist body image.

Although the technology isn’t new, the government’s scanner rollout announcement in December generated a great deal of controversy, split along the usual battle lines. Privacy advocates condemned the scanners as invasive; security enthusiasts insisted that it’s preferable to a pat-down.

Read more here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Further Distortion of the Constitution

Next big test of power to seize property?
The US Supreme Court will examine whether a private company can demand payment in exchange for not seizing private property.
By Warren Richey | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

Bart Didden wanted to put a CVS pharmacy on his property in Port Chester, N.Y. He even obtained approvals from the local planning board.

But because a portion of the CVS site was in a blighted redevelopment zone, Mr. Didden was told that planning board approval wasn’t enough. He’d have to reach an understanding with a private company that had been selected by Port Chester officials to control all construction inside the renewal zone.

The developer, Gregg Wasser of G&S Port Chester, told Didden he’d have to pay $800,000 or give G&S a 50 percent stake in the CVS business. If Didden refused, Mr. Wasser said, he would have Port Chester condemn and seize his property and instead of a CVS he’d put a Walgreens drugstore on the site.

Didden refused. The next day, the Village of Port Chester began legal proceedings to seize Didden’s land by eminent domain.

Lawyers for Didden took the matter to federal court. They even went to the FBI – all to no avail. Now they are asking the US Supreme Court to examine whether a private company can demand payment in exchange for refraining to seize private property in an urban renewal zone.

Property rights activists are hoping that a majority of the justices view Didden’s case as an opportunity to clarify a portion of the high court’s controversial decision in its last big eminent domain case, Kelo v. New London. In that June 2005 opinion, the court ruled 5-to-4 that local governments could seize private property and turn it over to a private developer when the action was part of an economic development project of benefit to the public.

Rebellion in the states

The decision sparked a national backlash. Since then, 34 states passed laws restricting the use of eminent domain for private development. New York is not among them.

The US Constitution forbids government officials from taking the property of one person and giving it to another. But if the overall purpose is a public benefit, such as economic transformation or urban renewal, transfers of private property to a private developer are permissible, the high court has said.

At issue in the Didden case is whether a developer selected to carry out an urban renewal project in the public interest can use the government’s eminent domain power in a way that maximizes the developer’s profit.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Another New Year – C. Loving


Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Extremist Twenty-First Century Jacobins

Predatory Capitalism, Corruption and Militarism: What Lies Ahead in An Age of Neocon Rule?
by Stephen Lendman
Global Research, January 2, 2007

Borrowing the opening line from Dickens’ Tale of Two Cities – “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times….” He referred to the French Revolution promising “Liberte, egalite and fraternite” that began in 1789, inspired by ours from 1775 – 1783. It ended a 1000 years of monarchal rule in France benefitting those of privilege and established the nation as a republic the way ours did for us here a few years earlier.

That was the good news. The bad was the wrong people came to power. They were the Jacobins who at first were revolutionary moderates and patriots until they lost control to extremists like Maximilien Robespierre who ushered in a “reign of terror” (The Great Terror sounding a lot like today’s “war on terror”) characterized by brutal repression against perceived enemies from within the Revolution who didn’t get a chance to prove they weren’t. In the name of defending it, individual rights were denied and civil liberties suspended. Laws were passed that allowed charging those designated counter-revolutionaries or enemies of the state with undefined crimes against liberty.

It resulted in justice being meted out to thousands for what Orwell called “thoughtcrimes” or for their freely expressed opinions and actions judged hostile to the state under a system of near-vigilante justice by the Paris Revolutionary (kangaroo) Tribunal with no right of appeal. It led to the public spectacle of an inglorious trip to and quick ending from the death penalty method of choice of the times – the guillotine that was barbaric but quick, and a much easier, less painful way to die for its victims than the use of state-inflicted torture-murder in the commonly drawn out lethal injection process used in 37 of the 38 death penalty states and by the federal government making the condemned endure a slow agonizing death unable to cry out while they’re being made to suffer during their last moments of life. Instances of this barbarity aren’t exceptions. They’re the rule, the exception being this time a report or two of what really happens slipped out and made news.

Fast forward to the past year and the previous five under George Bush and ask: sound familiar? French Revolutionary laws during the “reign of terror,” like the Law of Suspects, were earlier versions of our Patriot I and II and Military Commission Acts today. The Revolutionary Tribunal, with no chance for justice or right of appeal, was no different than our military courts today, and too many civil ones, in which any US citizen may now be tried anywhere in the world, with no habeas right of appeal or hope for due process and from which those sent there won’t fare any better than the French did, doomed to meet their unjust fate – even though much in these laws today is unconstitutional and one day will be reversed by a High Court upholding the law instead of the extremist rogue one now empowered that scorns it.

What May Lie Ahead

At the end of the sixth horrific year under the reign of the Bush modern-day extremist Jacobin-neocons, we can now look ahead, but to what. We have an administration in charge for another two years one longtime analyst characterizes as “a bunch of crooks, incompetents and perverts” with the president’s approval rating plunging as low as 28% in some independent polls and a growing number of people in the country demanding his impeachment and removal from office.

It’s not likely from the new Democrat-led Congress arriving in January, as their DLC leadership took it off the table and so far only promises more of the same failed policy other than some minor tinkering around the edges to create an illusion of change no different than the deceptive kind of course correction proposed by the Baker “Gang of Ten” Iraq Study Group (ISG) that guarantees none at all. It doesn’t leave members of the body politic with much hope for the new year that will likely just deliver more of the same rogue leadership and policy engendering growing public discontent and anger but not at a level so far to scare the those in power enough to want to address it.

The heart of the problem is the unpopular illegal war of aggression in Iraq, the cesspool of corruption and scorn for the law in Washington, and the assault on human rights and civil liberties in the country justified by the so-called “war on terror” now rebranded a “long war” against “Islamofascism” and “radicals and extremists” (who happen to be Muslims.) It’s the same failed policy using the kind of deliberately provocative language intended to deceive the public to think a threat great enough exists to justify any state action in the name of national security including waging wars of aggression and all the horrors associated with them at home and abroad.

After the Baker “bob and weave,” the now you see a change of course and now you don’t, disingenuously suggesting a drawdown and exit strategy, the New York Times on December 16 reports “Military planners and White House budget analysts have been asked to provide President Bush with options for increasing American forces in Iraq by 20,000 or more.”

The article goes on to say one option is to boost the force level by up to 50,000 even though any increase greater than 20 – 30,000 would be “prohibitive” – but it won’t deter the Pentagon, on administration orders, from extending tours of duty even longer for forces now there and calling up thousands of reservists and greatly extended National Guard units to get into this quagmire even though it’s recognized their presence will only make things worse as well as place an unfair burden on those called up, who’ve served before, and their families.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

Paul Spencer for President in 2008

I am running for the office of President of the United States of America in the election of 2008. I should say that I am running on a program for an administration to implement, starting in 2009. There is, of course, always political give-and-take, the pressure of events, the clash of ideologies; but somewhere in all of the ad-hoc maneuvering, there must be some essential principles and related policies.

I will write and distribute a position paper that tries to explain and justify each element of this program at a rate of about one per month from now until the Spring of 2008. At that time I will review the collection for updates and possible revisions. This, then, will be my candidacy.

During this period, your role – if you choose to have a role – is to analyze and critique the statements. In late Spring of 2008, if you think that the project is worthy of your assistance, we will organize petition drives to gain access to the ballot in your home state.

At no time will I request or accept money. There will be no signs or commercials or bumper stickers; certainly there will be no attack ads.

There is, however, an inherent criticism of the major political parties. Speaking for myself, I am friendly with Democratic Party, Republican Party, Green Party, Libertarian Party, and assorted other Party members on a local level. At a national level, though, the two major parties are tied to the same societal group: the super-rich and their minions, the upper-level managers of the largest corporations. Differences in tactics between these parties do not help the working classes in this country, not to mention the overwhelming majority of the ROW (the rest of the world). The super-rich (which should be called the Ruling Class) are predatory, and we are their prey.

To begin this election-focussed process, the following is a general analysis with an implied statement of principles, culminating in a program outline. The citizens of the U.S.A. comprise roughly 4% of the world’s total population, but we currently consume 25% of the world’s resources and products. This disparity is untenable in the long term and unjust, regardless.

The U.S.A. became the dominant economic power in the world by virtue of the 20th century wars that decimated its potential imperial rivals. As a result of these wars, our chief global economic rival of the first half of the 20th century, Europe, was reduced – for almost 30 years – to a U.S. subsidiary. The U.S.A. then consolidated its dominion, becoming the world’s leading military power by virtue of outlasting our main military rival in the Cold War – the U.S.S.R.

The U.S. has projected power through a system of neo-imperialism (i.e., economic colonies under the management of compliant, local ruling groups without the administrative costs of true colonies). U.S. society has largely become a warfare state, an economy dependent on the catalyst of government military spending. In the recent past the more insightful American political leaders have indulged the domestic working class in the spoils of neo-imperial domination just enough to tie them to a nationalist crusade.

Outside its residual dominance in military technology, all the factors that led to American dominance are diminishing. Other countries and regional blocs are becoming comparable economic powers, and none are friendly to continued U.S. hegemony. Collectively, they point toward the return to a multi-polar world. This is incompatible with a U.S. ruling class that clings to its role as the “last superpower”, able to enforce its will unilaterally and with impunity.

The U.S. manufacturing base has largely been sent overseas in pursuit of cheaper labor. Financially, the U.S. wallows in debt, most of it owed to potential rivals, such as China. The military now finds itself eroded, with plenty of guns, but few who volunteer to carry them. It may become an army of mercenaries in search of justification – the new Redcoats.

Another major byproduct of our unrestrained capitalism and its venal leadership is environmental destruction. The flooding of New Orleans, triggered by government-denied global warming and aggravated by a careless incompetence, is a case-in-point. Environmental degradation is also a crucial ingredient in societal collapse, because the effects lead to hunger, disease, and, therefore, territorial aggression.

The twilight of the era of American dominion has begun. The future will be one of reduced U.S. power and wealth relative to the rest of the world. Doubtless, however, those in the most privileged positions of American society and their deluded minions will defend privilege with all their resources. A militaristic reaction is a typical response to the decline of empire, as we can see in Iraq.

As citizens living in the heart of danger, how can we react in order to advance our values of peace, justice, and equality? An essential element of this effort must be that it is international. The struggle solely within the national context of home-country of an empire in decline cannot succeed. However, this domestic struggle is crucial to the future of humanity. Unless the empire can reform so as to be a better global citizen, the potential for catastrophe is high, if not inevitable.

As to specific principles, this program favors the working class in the broadest sense. Second, and equally important, this is a democratic agenda. If, for instance, some level of socialism is implemented under one Congress, it can be dismantled by the next, if so desired by the electorate. For another instance, there is room in my vision for the Ruling Class to try to sell their cannibalistic philosophy to us at all times. If we win the class war – or at least some of the battles – we do not maneuver to implement a new autocracy.

There are some nationalistic features in this program, but the idea that we can ignore or overcome some minimum level of self-interest is too idealistic to realize. Moreover, regional interests, cultural differences, and economic organization are logical and necessary on many levels. Only on vital concerns about war, ecological disaster, famine, epidemic, and genocide should we look to international standards and intervention.


People for a (truly) Democratic Society

15 Point Program

  1. End poverty in the U.S.A. via progressive taxation to support provision of basic services (clean water, sanitation, basic food, healthcare, affordable housing) and for reinvestment in related infrastructure;
  2. Institute 14-month (minimum), universal public service (military, healthcare service, infrastructure construction, or emergency services);
  3. Provide fully-funded public education through two years of college, including related child-care, when necessary;
  4. Reinvigorate the quest for clean air, soil, and surface water via both strenghthened regulation and increased rehabilitation;
  5. Support rapid development of “alternative”, renewable energy sources (solar, wind, wave, etc.);
  6. Promote, plan, and construct affordable, environmentally-sensitive public transportation;
  7. Create socialism for “commodities” (insurance, banking, steel, oil, power);
  8. Strengthen co-ops for agricultural products from production through retail, via tax breaks;
  9. STOP: military foreign aid, depreciation allowances, farm price supports, various military hardware/system money pits, bridges to nowhere, and myriad other boondoggles;
  10. Assure equal justice for all citizens (for examples, remove recent restrictions on Habeas Corpus, reanimate the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department);
  11. Legalize, control, tax all drugs (grant amnesty to imprisoned non-violent users and low-level dealers);
  12. Finance drug, stem-cell, treatment, and disease-prevention research and development;
  13. Support international institutions for conflict resolution (for example, the U.N. and the World Court);
  14. Add Equal Rights Amendment covering all possible definitions of “rights” to the Constitution;
  15. Restrict federal-level influence in social issues, such as marriage and abortion rights, which are rightly local/regional/cultural matters.
Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment