The Foundation of the US: God and Guns?

I didn’t exactly come away from my studies of early American history believing that God and guns were founding principles. It’s a fair perversion of those principles that this fellow exhibits. And I’d bet he has thousands (or millions?) who buy it. God and guns – mmmm ….

Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog

Ken Pagano, the pastor at New Bethel Church, prepared to try a Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine gun at a shooting range. Photo: Jim Winn/New York Times.

Pastor Urges His Flock to Bring Guns to Church
By Katharine Q. Seelye / June 25, 2009

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Ken Pagano, the pastor of the New Bethel Church here, is passionate about gun rights. He shoots regularly at the local firing range, and his sermon two weeks ago was on “God, Guns, Gospel and Geometry.” And on Saturday night, he is inviting his congregation of 150 and others to wear or carry their firearms into the sanctuary to “celebrate our rights as Americans!” as a promotional flier for the “open carry celebration” puts it.

“God and guns were part of the foundation of this country,” Mr. Pagano, 49, said Wednesday in the small brick Assembly of God church, where a large wooden cross hung over the altar and two American flags jutted from side walls. “I don’t see any contradiction in this. Not every Christian denomination is pacifist.”

The bring-your-gun-to-church day, which will include a $1 raffle of a handgun, firearms safety lessons and a picnic, is another sign that the gun culture in the United States is thriving despite, or perhaps because of, President Obama’s election in November.

Last year, the National Rifle Association ran a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign against Mr. Obama, stoking fears that he would be the most antigun president in history and that firearms would be confiscated. One worry was that a Democratic president and Congress would reinstitute the assault-weapons ban, which expired in 2004.

But there is little support for the ban. Mr. Obama and his party have largely ignored gun-control issues, and the president even signed a measure that will allow firearms in national parks.

Still, the fear remains that Mr. Obama, and his attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., will crack down on guns sooner or later. That — along with the faltering economy, which gun sellers say has spurred purchases for self-defense — has fueled a record surge in gun sales.

“Every president wants to be re-elected, and gun bans are pretty much a nonstarter for getting re-elected,” said Win Underwood, owner of the Bluegrass Indoor Range here. “What I suspect is going to happen is, Obama’s going to cool his jets until he can get re-elected, and then he’ll start building his legacy in these hot-button areas.”

When Mr. Obama was elected in November, federal instant background checks, the best indicator of gun sales, jumped 42 percent over the previous November. Every month since then, the number of checks has been higher than the year before, although the postelection surge may be tapering off, as all surges eventually do. While the number of checks in April increased 30 percent from the year before, the number of checks in May (1,023,102) was only 15 percent higher than in May 2008.

The National Rifle Association says its membership is up 30 percent since November. And several states have recently passed laws allowing gun owners to carry firearms in more places — bars, restaurants, cars and parks.

“We have a very active agenda in all 50 states,” said Chris W. Cox, legislative director of the N.R.A., widely considered the country’s most powerful lobby. “We have right-to-carry laws in over 40 states; 20 years ago, it was in just six.”

Of the 40 states with right-to-carry laws, 20 allow guns in churches.

Public attitudes also seem to be turning more sympathetic to gun owners. In April, the Pew Research Center found for the first time that almost as many people said it was more important to protect the rights of gun owners (45 percent) than to control gun ownership (49 percent). Just a year ago, Pew said, 58 percent said gun control was more important than the rights of gun owners (37 percent).

Gun-control advocates say they feel increasingly ineffective, especially after a recent spate of high-profile shootings, including last month’s murder, inside a church in Kansas, of a doctor who performed late-term abortions.

“We’ve definitely been marginalized,” said Pam Gersh, a public relations consultant here who helped organize a rally in Louisville in 2000, to coincide with the Million Mom March against guns in Washington.

“The Brady Campaign and other similar organizations who advocate sensible gun responsibility laws don’t have the money and the political power — not even close,” she said. “This pastor is obviously crossing a line here and saying ‘I can even take my guns to church, and there is nothing you can do about it.’ ”

Ms. Gersh said she was not aware that a group of local churches and peace activists were staging a counterpicnic — called “Bring your peaceful heart, leave your gun at home” — at the same time as Mr. Pagano’s event.

But news media attention — some from overseas — has focused on Mr. Pagano, who has been planning the event for a year, in celebration of the Fourth of July. Cameras will not be allowed in the church, he said, to protect the congregation’s privacy.

The celebration will feature lessons in responsible gun ownership, Mr. Pagano said. Sheriff’s deputies will be at the doors to check that openly carried firearms are unloaded, but they will not check for concealed weapons.

“That’s the whole point of concealed,” Mr. Pagano said, adding that he was not worried because such owners require training.

Mr. Pagano said the church’s insurance company, which he would not identify, had canceled the church’s policy for the day on Saturday and told him that it would cancel the policy for good at the end of the year. If he cannot find insurance for Saturday, people will not be allowed in openly carrying their guns.

Arkansas and Georgia recently rejected efforts to allow people to carry concealed weapons in church. Watching the debate in Arkansas was John Phillips, pastor of the Central Church of Christ in Little Rock. In 1986, Mr. Phillips was preaching in a different church there when a gunman shot him and a parishioner. Both survived, but Mr. Phillips, 51, still has a bullet lodged in his spine.

In a telephone interview, he said he found the idea of “packing in the pew” abhorrent.

“There is a movement afoot across the nation, with the gun lobby pushing the envelope, trying to allow concealed weapons to be carried in places where they used to be prohibited — churches, schools, bars,” Mr. Phillips said.

“I don’t understand how any minister who is familiar with the teachings of the Bible can do this,” he added. “Jesus didn’t say, ‘Go ahead, make my day.’ ”

Mr. Pagano takes such comments as a challenge to his faith and says they make him more determined.

“When someone from within the church tells me that being a Christian and having firearms are contradictions, that they’re incompatible with the Gospel — baloney,” he said. “As soon as you start saying that it’s not something that Christians do, well, guns are just the foil. The issue now is the Gospel. So in a sense, it does become a crusade. Now the Gospel is at stake.”

Source / New York Times

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Where’s Waldo? Play ‘Find That Health Care Lobbyist!’

NPR has started to identify individuals and publish how much cash they have thrown at elected officials to maintain the status quo for private health care insurance companies…

By Larry Ray / The Rag Blog / June 26, 2009

National Public Radio has done an amazingly creative bit of public journalism. They turned their cameras around and pictured, instead of the Congressional committee, the assemblage of lobbyists sitting before them. Now NPR has started to identify individuals and publish how much cash they have thrown at elected officials to maintain the status quo for private health care insurance companies and affiliated companies profiting handsomely from the present broken health care system.

Below is the story from the NPR web site, and a link to the site where you can visit the interactive photo which has icons above heads of lobbyists identified so far. Mouse over the icon and learn who they are, what companies they represent and how much money they are spending on lobbying to weaken or even kill a universal health care program. Typical of those identified include, Kate Leeson of Holland & Knight. The firm’s 2008 lobbying income from health care clients: $2.3 million. The list grows as readers help identify individuals in the photo.

Turning The Camera Around: Health Care Stakeholders

When 22 senators started working over the first health care overhaul bill on June 17, the news cameras were pointed at them — except for NPR’s photographer, who turned his lens on the lobbyists. Whatever bill emerges from Congress will affect one-sixth of the economy, and stakeholders have mobilized. We’ve begun to identify some of the faces in the hearing room, and we want to keep the process going. Know someone in these photos? Let us know who that someone is — NPR STORY AND PHOTO

[Retired journalist Larry Ray is a Texas native and former Austin television news anchor. He also posts at The iHandbill.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Juan Cole : Michael Jackson, Islam and the Middle East

Michael Jackson. Photo from Getty Images.

Michael Jackson was deeply hurt and humiliated by the experience [of his 2005 trial], and his withdrawal to Bahrain and search for a different tradition of spirituality may well have come out of that abasement.

By Juan Cole / June 26, 2009

See related videos, Below.

Michael Jackson’s sad death at age 50 has provoked an outpouring of emotion around the whole world. Because of globalization, it is an event that affects fans in Asia and the Middle East, as well. In early 2007, his brother Jermaine, a Muslim, announced that Michael would embrace that religion. In November of 2008, just months before his death press reports said that Michael Jackson had formally converted to Islam.

Jackson was a man of multiple identities, which helped account for his enormous worldwide popularity. It seems clear that he was deeply traumatized by his rough show business childhood, and that things happened to him to arrest his development. Just as a stem cell can grow into any organ, Michael’s eternal boyishness made him a chameleon. Increasingly androgynous, he expressed both male and female. A boy and yet a father, he was both child and adult. In part because of his vitiligo, he interrogated his blackness and became, like some other powerful and wealthy African-Americans of his generation, racially ambiguous. Toward the end of his life he bridged his family’s Jehovah’s Witness brand of Christianity with a profound interest in Islam. He was all things to all people in part precisely because of his Peter Pan syndrome. A child can grow up to become anything, after all.

Jermaine Jackson explained that it was the experience of touring the Gulf that brought family members into contact with Islam. Interestingly, he found that Islam resolved some dilemmas he had about Jehovah’s Witness beliefs. Just as Malcolm X had been converted by his pilgrimage to Mecca from a narrow sectarian folk religion in America to Sunni anti-racist universalism, so Jermaine took a similar path.

We can only speculate about the attractions for Michael Jackson of Islam, but likely his 2005 trial in which he was acquitted of all charges was implicated in his desire for a change. The court psychiatrist confirmed his psychological innocence, saying he had been arrested at the stage of a 10 year old. Michael Jackson was deeply hurt and humiliated by the experience, and his withdrawal to Bahrain and search for a different tradition of spirituality may well have come out of that abasement.

Those who lived through the 80s will never forget the Michael of “Thriller” and other breakthrough videos.

But it seems to me that the iconic later Jackson is “Black or White,” which powerfully makes the points above about the fluidity of identity in a globalized world, and underlines the common humanity of us all, something that the eternal boy could see through the ravages of hurt that clouded his never-ending childhood. Young children don’t know about racial or religious prejudice. The great tragedy of Michael Jackson is that his childlike withdrawal from reality may have left him more vulnerable to himself and others, and never protected him from bigotry or, other human realities. After all, children shouldn’t die.

Here are the lyrics of “Black or White”:

Jackson is still enormously popular in the Middle East. Here is a Gulf tribute to the King of Pop. Given the stereotyping of Gulf Arabs as medieval and fanatical, and given the hurtful prejudice against their very form of clothing in the West, it is only right that they should have the last word here on Michael Jackson’s universal appeal:

Source / Informed Comment

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Mark Sanford : GOP in Trouble, Pants-Down

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford takes the oath of office for a second term in 2007 with his wife, Jenny, and sons (from left) Marshall III, Landon, Bolton and Blake. Lessee, that’s two oaths down and counting. Photo by Mary Ann Chastain / AP.

Sanford’s admission of the affair this week… was the stuff of nightmares for Republican Party leaders.

By Carla Marinucci / June 26, 2009

See Rush Limbaugh Video Below.

The GOP has gone through some rough political patches, but thanks to the tabloid-style love tango between high-profile South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and his mysterious Argentine mistress, the party and its prospects for 2010 and beyond are looking colder than a Patagonian winter.

Sanford’s admission of the affair this week — he told staffers he was taking an extended hike on the Appalachian Trail but later was caught stepping off a plane from Buenos Aires — was the stuff of nightmares for Republican Party leaders.

Once considered on the short list for a 2012 presidential bid, Sanford instead became the target of late-night comedians for going missing from his state job and being unfaithful to his wife.

His amorous adventure leaves the GOP’s top leadership bench for next year’s congressional elections and the 2012 presidential contest looking decidedly empty. It comes on the heels of problems involving some of its aspiring stars, with questions of hypocrisy swirling over a party that holds up moral values and the sanctity of marriage.

Parade of Sex Stories

Last week, Nevada Sen. John Ensign, chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, admitted to an affair with a former staffer. That followed a parade of headlines about other conservative GOP legislators in recent years: Idaho Sen. Larry Craig, caught soliciting sex from a man in a public restroom; and junior Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, considered one of the GOP’s hopes for 2010, who turned up on the client list of the notorious “D.C. Madam.”

In addition, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, last year’s GOP vice presidential candidate and still a favorite of conservatives, has been hurt by news about her daughter, an unwed mother, as well as by alleged ethics violations and questions about her public relations judgment after laying into late-night TV host David Letterman for his jokes about her.

Sanford’s spectacular meltdown over infidelity — the second such scandal in two weeks with a major party figure – underscores the pressing need for new faces and leaders to take the Republican Party into the future, some political activists say.

“The party is at a real crossroads and needs to figure out who the voices of the future are,” said Mindy Tucker Fletcher, spokeswoman for the 2000 presidential campaign of George W. Bush, “and let them run, let them speak and promote them. There are growing pains. The key word is ‘pain.’ “

Give women a chance

Andrea Dew Steele, founder and president of Emerge America, a national organization based in San Francisco that trains Democratic women to run for office, agreed that the Sanford scandal poses a challenge that applies to both political parties. “Let’s see if we can elect more women to office,” she said, “and give them a chance to see if they can do better in power.”

Republicans said their party hardly has a lock on sex-related stories like Sanford’s: Former presidential candidate and North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and former President Bill Clinton also were the stuff of tabloid legend for infidelities and, in Spitzer’s case, illegal transactions with a young prostitute.

Still, GOP members were furious with the South Carolina governor, not only for his particularly wacky behavior that included deserting four children on Father’s Day weekend to meet up with his paramour but also going MIA from his job.

Equally galling was his timing — the Sanford scandal exploding just as Republicans were gaining ground in the polls on President Obama and the Democrats on issues like the size of the federal deficit and concerns over Obama’s health care policy.

“I am mad enough to swallow a horned toad backward,” GOP strategist Patrick Dorinson of Sacramento wrote on Politico.com. “In my mind he is… a pitiful excuse for a real man. He not only has feet of clay, he has a spine of one as well.”

While Sanford’s aides suggested that he would hang tough and not resign, many party activists took to the airwaves to urge him to give up – and go away.

‘Hang it up’

“I suggest he get out of office right now and let us be done with this whole sordid affair,” GOP strategist Trent Duffy told MSNBC. “Some of these people who have lost the public trust need to hang it up…This is a bad day for Republicans. Our party does need fresh faces. Maybe we can get a community organizer who can come out of nowhere and become the president of the United States.”

Tucker Fletcher, a leading endorser of California GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, said female candidates could be the answer. She argued that the former eBay CEO’s effort to get elected in California shows how the GOP can put those concerns into action — and take the call for change seriously.

“I’m optimistic that it will get better,” Tucker Fletcher said, “but we keep going back to the scenario of women and blacks and people we want to join our party. We have to give them a reason to. We have to resonate with a bigger cross-section of people.”

Source / SFGate

Thanks to BuzzFlash / The Rag Blog

Rush blames Obama for Sanford affair!

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Solar Powered Flight: The Potential of Renewable Energies

Solar Impulse plane

Solar plane to make public debut
By Jonathan Amos / June 26, 2009

Swiss adventurer Bertrand Picard is set to unveil a prototype of the solar-powered plane he hopes eventually to fly around the world.

The initial version, spanning 61m but weighing just 1,500kg, will undergo trials to prove it can fly at night.

Mr Picard, who made history by circling the globe non-stop in a balloon in 1999, says he wants to demonstrate the potential of renewable energies.

He expects to make a crossing of the Atlantic in 2012.

The flight would be a risky endeavour. Only now is solar and battery technology becoming mature enough to sustain flight through the night – and then only in unmanned planes.

But Picard’s Solar Impulse team has invested tremendous energy – and no little money – in trying to find what they believe is a breakthrough design.

“I love this type of vision where you set the goal and then you try to find a way to reach it, because this is challenging,” he told BBC News.

Testing programme

The HB-SIA has the look of a glider but is on the scale – in terms of its width – of a modern airliner.

The aeroplane incorporates composite materials to keep it extremely light and uses super-efficient solar cells, batteries, motors and propellers to get it through the dark hours.

Picard will begin testing with short runway flights in which the plane lifts just a few metres into the air.

As confidence in the machine develops, the team will move to a day-night circle. This has never been done before in a piloted solar-powered plane.

HB-SIA should be succeeded by HB-SIB. It is likely to be bigger, and will incorporate a pressurised capsule and better avionics.

It is probable that Picard will follow a route around the world in this aeroplane close to the path he took in the record-breaking Breitling Orbiter 3 balloon – going from the United Arab Emirates, to China, to Hawaii, across the southern US, southern Europe, and back to the UAE.

Measuring success

Although the vehicle is expected to be capable of flying non-stop around the globe, Picard will in fact make five long hops, sharing flying duties with project partner Andre Borschberg.

“The aeroplane could do it theoretically non-stop – but not the pilot,” said Picard.

“We should fly at roughly 25 knots and that would make it between 20 and 25 days to go around the world, which is too much for a pilot who has to steer the plane.

“In a balloon you can sleep, because it stays in the air even if you sleep. We believe the maximum for one pilot is five days.”

The public unveiling on Friday of the HB-SIA is taking place at Dubendorf airfield near Zürich.

“The real success for Solar Impulse would be to have enough millions of people following the project, being enthusiastic about it, and saying ‘if they managed to do it around the world with renewable energies and energy savings, then we should be able to do it in our daily life’.”

Source / BBC News

Thanks to Deva Wood / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Mexican Elections : Calderón Beats Law and Order Drum

Mexican President Felipe Calderón: his political muscle will be weakened. Photo by Gurinder Osan / AP.

With all that sucking the sand from beneath his feet, President Felipe Calderón, like every beleagured right-winger since Nixon, is beating the Law and Order drum.

By Michael Reynolds / The Rag Blog / June 25, 2009

Mexico’s mid-term elections are July 5, just ten days away. The voters will cast ballots for 500 deputies to the Mexican congress, six state governors and hundreds of mayors. The way its shaping up, President Felipe Calderón and his National Action Party (PAN) will take losses. Calderón’s political muscle will be weakened, the only thing uncertain at this date is by how much.

The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) that ruled Mexico for over 70 years is currently leading in the polls with 37% of likely voters. Calderón’s PAN comes in at 33%. The Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD)lags with 16%. Lopez Obrador, Calderón’s opponent in the controversial 2006 presidential election, is not campaigning for PRD candidates, though he remains in the party. Instead Obrador is stumping for candidates from two smaller leftist groups — Convergencia and the Workers Party (PT).

The PRD might have done well in this election but spent the past six months in an internal pissing-match between its left wing and right wing. The rightists won, taking charge of the party. So Lopez Obrador, supported by the PRD left faction, took a walk along with his “Legitimate Government” — a shadow cabinet combined with state and municipal organizations — and hooked up with Convergencia and the PT. The PRD hasn’t recovered from this.

The Mexican Legislature, both its Senate and House, are pretty much equally divided between PAN, PRI, and PRD. At this date PAN has a few more senators and representatives. The PRI and PAN ussually ally on important issues. That gives them over two-thirds of the votes, leaving the PRD out of the game. On July 5 the PRD would have to more than double its number of legislators to put the brakes on the right-wing governance. That isn’t in the cards.

Then there is the mounting “none-of-the-above” movement — primarily a “netroots” campaign that’s gaining traction. Voters are being urged to strike off all the names on their ballot, simply file it blank, or stay home. Right now this bloc is polling at 11%. Expect to see this number climb.

A low voter turnout is predicted — about 30%, a major drop from the 41.75 that voted in the 2003 midterms and less than half of the voters in the 2006 presidential election. The youth vote is nowhere to be seen. Polls show that 18-20 year-olds are not even registering to vote.

Mexicans feel hammered by their country’s cumulative crises.

  • the crisis of legitimacy of Calderón’s election. About a third to half of the electorate —- those who voted for López Obrador and some others —- don’t believe that Calderón is the legitimate president. For more on that grand goat screw, check archived PBS On-Line News Hour’s page.
  • the crisis of the drug wars and its accompanying militarization and violence. While many Mexicans support Calderón and the drug war, there is also a deep fear about what is happening to the country. A fear that Mexico might become Colombia in the nineties. This week the NGO, Mexico United against Deliquency, executed a poll showing 80% of its respondents support the use of the army to combat the narcos, but 76% said public safety is worse than before Calderon sent in the troops. Less than half of those polled consider it all a success. More telling detail on this from Frontera Norte Sur “Some in Chihuahua and Mexican Media See Drug War Failing.”
  • the crisis of Mexico’s cratered economy. The country’s official unemployment rate is now at 5.25 percent, extremely high by Mexico’s standards. That number -– like those here in the U.S. –- doesn’t reflect the actual numbers of unemployed and underemployed in the country or the 10% of the population that crossed the border north to look for jobs. Further on this at The Economist.
  • the crisis of the swine flu outbreak. The virus was later renamed H1N1 but was first attributed to a pig factory farm in Mexico that led to a freakout on both sides of the border. 7,000 Mexicans fell victim to the flu and over 100 have died, many of them children.
  • the crisis of the daycare center fire in Hermosillo that killed 47 children and is now the subject of a federal investigation. Read John Ross’s scathing piece from last week at July Dogs and the latest from AP reporter Eduardo Castillo here.

With all that sucking the sand from beneath his feet, President Felipe Calderón, like every beleaguered right-winger since Nixon, is beating the Law and Order drum.

From an AP story, June 25, 2009:

Crime Threatens Democracy, Mexico’s President Warns

Mr. Calderón painted a grim picture of the security situation in some of the most violent parts of the country, noting that crime gangs and drug cartels were carrying out “an interminable recruitment of young people without hope, family, opportunities, future, beliefs or convictions.”

And where did all the “hope… opportunities… future” go? A case can be made that they were roadkill on Calderon’s deregulated free-market highway lined with religious-right “family values” billboards. Since that has resulted in the same disaster witnessed here under Bush and the Republicans, Calderon needs the narcoguerra, needs the cartels, needs the violence to distract from the fundamental incompetence of his administration — like his old BFF Bush needed the “war on terror.”

And when Calderon takes up the hammer on the narco corruption in his rivals’ parties, he best be careful. That long green spreads wide.

[This story was also posted at NarcoGuerra Times.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Alan Haber : Exposing the Dark Forces

As long as these forces operate, and are not pursued, there is no democracy, whatever the window dressings.

By Alan Haber / The Rag Blog / June 25, 2009

See ‘Did the CIA kill Bobby Kennedy?’ by Shane O’Sullivan, Below.

I was stuck by the concluding paragraph in the article below from 2006 –- about the CIA and the assassination of Bobby Kennedy — about the relevance now of this old story. Robert Kennedy’s 81st birthday would have been last Sunday

My mind was on Iran. I was thinking we (such American movement as we are) should keep the focus on the United States’ role, grievous problems with our own elections, human rights, and covert operations and operators. Then I see this article, which underscores for me an urgency here to go after and expose the dark forces in this government, past and present, continuing to operate, both the covert ones connected with assassinations and coups, etc, and the overt ones like wars of choice in Iraq, and arming Israeli attacks on Palestine.

As long as these forces operate, and are not pursued, there is no democracy, whatever the window dressings. The Iranian democracy in the streets should be a spur to our own struggle, to root out the powers behind the powers here. Full investigations, no statute of limitations on criminal politics, no praise to the secret keepers, accountability forever. Here and Iran, both. Here, as there, the powers privatize the commons and steal the national wealth.

I hope those seeking a more open society can prevail in Iran. Moussavi and the other challengers will become captive to the increasingly principled — meaning radical — demands of the movement. Such insurgencies were put down in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, China. In other places they overwhelmed national authority, and stirred the people’s desire to be free. I heard an Iranian student say, on a phone broadcast, “This is our best chance to be free. If we fail, it will be a long time before we have a chance again.”

When the freedom call merges with “god is great,” it can be a powerful force indeed: an underground organized from the rooftops. The people are furious, it can lead to an awakening of consciousness, rethinking everything, until there is no going back. Iranian young people chanting and marching against the government and for respect (drawing praise from the right wing government in Israel and the American right also).

I hope the youth of Palestine and in America take it to heart, that the voice of the youth be heard.

Did the CIA kill Bobby Kennedy?

In 1968, Robert Kennedy seemed likely to follow his brother, John, into the White House. Then, on June 6, he was assassinated — apparently by a lone gunman. But the author says he has evidence implicating three CIA agents in the murder.

By Shane O’Sullivan

[This article was originally published by The Guardian on Nov. 20, 2006. It was reposted on The Sixties website on June 21, 2009.]

At first, it seems an open-and-shut case. On June 5, 1968, Robert Kennedy wins the California Democratic primary and is set to challenge Richard Nixon for the White House. After midnight, he finishes his victory speech at the Ambassador hotel in Los Angeles and is shaking hands with kitchen staff in a crowded pantry when 24-year-old Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan steps down from a tray-stacker with a “sick, villainous smile” on his face and starts firing at Kennedy with an eight-shot revolver.

As Kennedy lies dying on the pantry floor, Sirhan is arrested as the lone assassin. He carries the motive in his shirt-pocket (a clipping about Kennedy’s plans to sell bombers to Israel) and notebooks at his house seem to incriminate him. But the autopsy report suggests Sirhan could not have fired the shots that killed Kennedy. Witnesses place Sirhan’s gun several feet in front of Kennedy, but the fatal bullet is fired from one inch behind. And more bullet-holes are found in the pantry than Sirhan’s gun can hold, suggesting a second gunman is involved. Sirhan’s notebooks show a bizarre series of “automatic writing” — “RFK must die RFK must be killed — Robert F Kennedy must be assassinated before 5 June 68” – and even under hypnosis, he has never been able to remember shooting Kennedy. He recalls “being led into a dark place by a girl who wanted coffee,” then being choked by an angry mob. Defence psychiatrists conclude he was in a trance at the time of the shooting and leading psychiatrists suggest he may have be a hypnotically programmed assassin.

Three years ago, I started writing a screenplay about the assassination of Robert Kennedy, caught up in a strange tale of second guns and “Manchurian candidates” (as the movie termed brainwashed assassins). As I researched the case, I uncovered new video and photographic evidence suggesting that three senior CIA operatives were behind the killing. I did not buy the official ending that Sirhan acted alone, and started dipping into the nether-world of “assassination research,” crossing paths with David Sanchez Morales, a fearsome Yaqui Indian.

Morales was a legendary figure in CIA covert operations. According to close associate Tom Clines, if you saw Morales walking down the street in a Latin American capital, you knew a coup was about to happen. When the subject of the Kennedys came up in a late-night session with friends in 1973, Morales launched into a tirade that finished: “I was in Dallas when we got the son of a bitch and I was in Los Angeles when we got the little bastard.” From this line grew my odyssey into the spook world of the 60s and the secrets behind the death of Bobby Kennedy.

Working from a Cuban photograph of Morales from 1959, I viewed news coverage of the assassination to see if I could spot the man the Cubans called El Gordo — The Fat One. Fifteen minutes in, there he was, standing at the back of the ballroom, in the moments between the end of Kennedy’s speech and the shooting. Thirty minutes later, there he was again, casually floating around the darkened ballroom while an associate with a pencil moustache took notes.

The source of early research on Morales was Bradley Ayers, a retired US army captain who had been seconded to JM-Wave, the CIA’s Miami base in 1963, to work closely with chief of operations Morales on training Cuban exiles to run sabotage raids on Castro. I tracked Ayers down to a small town in Wisconsin and emailed him stills of Morales and another guy I found suspicious — a man who is pictured entering the ballroom from the direction of the pantry moments after the shooting, clutching a small container to his body, and being waved towards an exit by a Latin associate.

Ayers’ response was instant. He was 95% sure that the first figure was Morales and equally sure that the other man was Gordon Campbell, who worked alongside Morales at JM-Wave in 1963 and was Ayers’ case officer shortly before the JFK assassination.

I put my script aside and flew to the US to interview key witnesses for a documentary on the unfolding story. In person, Ayers positively identified Morales and Campbell and introduced me to David Rabern, a freelance operative who was part of the Bay of Pigs invasion force in 1961 and was at the Ambassador hotel that night. He did not know Morales and Campbell by name but saw them talking to each other out in the lobby before the shooting and assumed they were Kennedy’s security people. He also saw Campbell around police stations three or four times in the year before Robert Kennedy was shot.

This was odd. The CIA had no domestic jurisdiction and Morales was stationed in Laos in 1968. With no secret service protection for presidential candidates in those days, Kennedy was guarded by unarmed Olympic decathlete champion Rafer Johnson and football tackler Rosey Grier — no match for an expert assassination team.

Trawling through microfilm of the police investigation, I found further photographs of Campbell with a third figure, standing centre-stage in the Ambassador hotel hours before the shooting. He looked Greek, and I suspected he might be George Joannides, chief of psychological warfare operations at JM-Wave. Joannides was called out of retirement in 1978 to act as the CIA liaison to the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) investigating the death of John F Kennedy.

Ed Lopez, now a respected lawyer at Cornell University, came into close contact with Joann-des when he was a young law student working for the committee. We visit him and show him the photograph and he is 99% sure it is Joannides. When I tell him where it was taken, he is not surprised: “If these guys decided you were bad, they acted on it.

We move to Washington to meet Wayne Smith, a state department official for 25 years who knew Morales well at the US embassy in Havana in 1959-60. When we show him the video in the ballroom, his response is instant: “That’s him, that’s Morales.” He remembers Morales at a cocktail party in Buenos Aires in 1975, saying Kennedy got what was coming to him. Is there a benign explanation for his presence? For Kennedy’s security, maybe? Smith laughs. Morales is the last person you would want to protect Bobby Kennedy, he says. He hated the Kennedys, blaming their lack of air support for the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961.

We meet Clines in a hotel room near CIA headquarters. He does not want to go on camera and brings a friend, which is a little unnerving. Clines remembers “Dave” fondly. The guy in the video looks like Morales but it is not him, he says: “This guy is fatter and Morales walked with more of a slouch and his tie down.” To me, the guy in the video does walk with a slouch and his tie is down.

Clines says he knew Joannides and Campbell and it is not them either, but he fondly remembers Ayers bringing snakes into JM-Wave to scare the secretaries and seems disturbed at Smith’s identification of Morales. He does not discourage our investigation and suggests others who might be able to help. A seasoned journalist cautions that he would expect Clines “to blow smoke,” and yet it seems his honest opinion.

As we leave Los Angeles, I tell the immigration officer that I am doing a story on Bobby Kennedy. She has seen the advertisements for the new Emilio Estevez movie about the assassination, Bobby. “Who do you think did it? I think it was the Mob,” she says before I can answer.

“I definitely think it was more than one man,” I say, discreetly.

Morales died of a heart attack in 1978, weeks before he was to be called before the HSCA. Joannides died in 1990. Campbell may still be out there somewhere, in his early 80s. Given the positive identifications we have gathered on these three, the CIA and the Los Angeles Police Department need to explain what they were doing there. Lopez believes the CIA should call in and interview everybody who knew them, disclose whether they were on a CIA operation and, if not, why they were there that night.

Today would have been Robert Kennedy’s 81st birthday. The world is crying out for a compassionate leader like him. If dark forces were behind his elimination, it needs to be investigated

Source / The Sixties

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Neda and the Kent State 4 : Heartbreaking Then and Now

(Above) Neda Agha-Soltan, 27, who bled to death on the streets of Tehran, Saturday, June 20, 2009. Still shot from video taken with cell phone and posted to YouTube. (Below) Mary Ann Vecchio, a fourteen-year-old runaway, kneeling over the dead body of Jeffrey Miller after he was shot by the National Guard during demonstrations at Kent State, May 4, 1970. He was one of four students killed. Pulitzer Prize-winning photo by John Filo from Wikipedia.

Four dead in Ohio…
Heartbreaking then and now

Just as it is unlikely anyone will ever be prosecuted for the murder of Neda Agha-Soltan, no one has ever been prosecuted for the murders at Kent State or Jackson State.

By Jay D. Jurie / The Rag Blog / June 25, 2009

President Obama responded to a question at his June 23 press conference that he was “appalled and outraged” by the violence following the controversial electoral outcome in Iran.

Asked specifically about Neda Agha-Soltan, 26, a bystander at the protests whose shooting death on a Tehran street has been blamed on Iran governmental forces and is the subject of a widely-circulated video, Obama responded it is “heartbreaking.” He went on to say “I think that anybody who sees it knows that there’s something fundamentally unjust about that.”

This eminently reasonable assessment can be contrasted with official opinion in the wake of the fatal shooting of four students at Kent State University on May 4, 1970. None of the four students killed by the Ohio National Guard on that day, Allison Krause, who had just turned 19, Jeffrey Miller, 20, Sandy Scheuer, 21, or William Schroeder, 19, were armed. Two, Scheuer and Schroeder, like Neda Agha-Soltan, were not participants in the demonstration, they just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Then-President Richard Nixon expressed no sense of fundamental injustice. According to his official statement, “This should remind us all once again that when dissent turns to violence, it invites tragedy.” Characteristically, then-Vice President Spiro Agnew went even further, assigning blame to a “calculated, consistent, and well-publicized barrage of criticism against the principles of this nation.”

These statements are not wholly inconsistent with what Iranian Supreme Leader Sayyed Ali Khameini had to say about the protests in his country: “I have insisted and will insist on implementing the law in issues related to the presidential election, and the Islamic system and people will not give in to pressure at any cost.”

On May 15, 1970, two African-American students at Jackson State University, Phillip Gibbs, 21, and James Green, 17, were shot and killed in similar circumstances. Again, these slayings elicited no official sense of fundamental injustice.

Let us hope we now have an administration more attuned to injustice than that of Nixon and Agnew. Will the spotlight be fixed on injustice in Iran while turning a blind eye to injustice at home or elsewhere?

Just as it is unlikely anyone will ever be prosecuted for the murder of Neda Agha-Soltan, no one has ever been prosecuted for the murders at Kent State or Jackson State.

Nor are there any indications that any indictments for crimes against humanity in the “war on terror” are likely.

We must insist there be no double standard. Accountability applies to our own government as well as others.

President Obama concluded his remarks about the murder of Neda Agha-Soltan with the observation, “While this loss is raw and extraordinarily painful we also know this: those who stand up for justice are always on the right side of history.”

[Sources: alancanfora.com; Charles A. Thomas Papers — KSU May 4 Collection; Helen Kennedy, “President Obama Calls Iranian Martyr Neda’s Death ‘heartbreaking’,” NY Daily News, June 23, 2009; I.F. Stone, The Killings at Kent State: How Murder Went Unpunished, NY: New York Review of Books, 1970; “Leader Says People Won’t Yield to Lawlessness,” Tehran Times, June 25, 2009.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

NASA Scientist, Actress Hannah, Arrested in Coal Mining Protest

Actress Darryl Hannah is arrested by West Virginia State Police Tuesday, June 23, 2009 following a mountaintop removal mining protest in Naoma, W.Va. She was among several hundred protesters who held a rally outside Marsh Fork Elementary school that sits about 300 feet away from a Massey Energy coal processing plant. Photo by Jeff Gentner / AP.

Foremost authority on climate change arrested at mountaintop removal protest.

By Roger Baker / The Rag Blog / June 25, 2009

For those who follow the climate issue, a top NASA scientist, James Hansen, foremost authority on climate change, was arrested at a non-violent protest of mountaintop removal coal mining in West Virginia. (Actress Daryl Hannah was also arrested at the protest.)

For an account of the action organized by Rainforest Action Network (RAN), go here, and here(from Michael Brune, executive director of Rainforest Action Network:

…I can’t remember a more charged atmosphere. The majority of people surrounded one-half of the stage, supporting each speaker calling for an end to mountain blasting. Separated by police, the remainder crowded around the rest of the stage, wearing Massey t-shirts and shouting their disapproval.

I spoke shortly after Ken Hechler, the 94-year-old former Congressional Representative who has decried the effects of mountaintop removal in his region for more than three decades. “I want to thank Don Blankenship for inviting me to this rally,” I began, to a mixture of catcalls and applause. I told the crowd that mountaintop removal isn’t just a local issue, it’s an American problem — brought to us by Massey Energy and other coal companies…

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Short Attention-Span News (A Little Birdie Told Me)


Trippin’ down the cobblestones:
Short Attention-Span News

By Mariann G. Wizard / The Rag Blog / June 25, 2009

[“slow down, you move too fast; you got to make the morning last; just trippin down the cobblestones, lookin for fun and feelin groovy! la la la la la la”

It must be the heat…]

I’ve taken up tweeting n the last week (@Pollyanna46 + @CannabisResourc); I love it! N Austin’s record heat, brevity is next 2 goddessness.

* * *
Theresa Anthony, 29, black, busted 4 pot poss., DIED N HARRIS CNTY JAIL 6/20. Her Mom was told by fone. No cause of death has been released.
* * *
Sen Lautenberg (D-NJ; David Codrea sez D-Mordor) will intro law to keep any on terrorist “watch list” from buying guns. NJ, will Sauron win?
* * *
New Scientist reports nat. gas n permafrost, under seabed (methane clathrate) cd fuel world 100s of years &/r push global warming; explode.
* * *
Pres Obama has declared cyberspace a domain of warfare. New Pentagon command 2 oversee ops. Hacker recruits will get 2 play games for real!
* * *
India‘s largest tiger sanctuary has few tigers, prey of poachers, feared by farmers. Hindu vegetarian Dharmendra Khandal seeks to save them.
* * *
60+years’ abuse n Irish R.C. skools revealed n new report recalls Holocaust. Big Diff: few survived Auschwitz; 100,000s Irish knew; did zip.
* * *
Dilute lemongrass oil repels fleas; ticks from humans; animals. N footbath, refreshes; aids excess sweating. Lemongrass tea aids digestion.
* * *
TX Freedom Network (www.tfn.org) has candidate training 7/22 for ANYONE interested n a seat on State Bd of Education; 8 incumbents up n ’10.
* * *
19th Annual Havana Intrntl Book Fair, 2/13-20.2010, legal 4 US professional librarians 2 go. Overlaps w/ Intrntl Jazz Fest; ur waiting 4???
* * *
“The sun has a working schedule, & the snow, & the birds, & every green leaf. Perhaps you should have one 2?” — Mary Oliver (APSMuseletter)

[Note: Follow The Rag Blog on Twitter: twitter.com/TheRagBlog.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged | Leave a comment

Health Insurance : The High Cost of ‘Competition’


Can private insurers compete?

The truth is that the Republicans aren’t opposed to a government-run system because the private companies can do it better and cheaper — they can’t. They oppose the public insurance choice because they want to protect the egregious and exorbitant profits of their rich buddies…

By Ted McLaughlin / The Rag Blog / June 25, 2009

Conservative Republicans have been talking out of both sides of their mouths when discussing health insurance and health care in the United States. First they will tell you that thanks to competition in the marketplace, private insurance can do a better job of holding down health care costs and delivering health insurance that will be better than what the government could do.

But then they turn around and whine that a government-run health insurance program would run them out of business. How can that possibly be, if they can do it better than the government can? Wouldn’t the people want the best product — the one that delivers the most for the least cost? If the private companies can really do it better, wouldn’t consumers flock to that better product?

President Obama put it well in his speech the other night, when he said, “Why would it drive private insurers out of business? If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality healthcare, if they tell us that they’re offering a good deal, then why is it that the government — which they say can’t run anything — suddenly is going to drive them out of business? That’s not logical.”

He’s right. It’s not logical. Unless the Republicans and the insurance companies have been lying to us. And that’s exactly what they’ve been doing. The private companies really can’t compete because they are one of the major causes of the inflated cost of health care.

There are two reasons why they can’t compete. The first is overhead. The private companies are notoriously inefficient, with overhead costs running 15-40% of premiums. By comparison, Medicare overhead is only about 2% of premiums (and there is no reason why another government-run program can’t perform just as efficiently as Medicare). The famous market competition certainly hasn’t helped the private companies to hold down costs.

The second reason is company profits. Private insurance companies aren’t in business to provide exceptional health care to their consumers. They are in business to make a profit — the larger the better. And the sad fact is that the less they pay out for health care, the larger their profits will be. Meanwhile, a government-run health insurance system doesn’t have to show even a penny of profit. Except for the 2% overhead, ALL of the premiums paid to a public insurance system will go to pay for consumer health care.

If the private companies can compete, let them do it. If they can’t, then they should go out of business because they are not providing the best health care for the dollars spent.

The truth is that the Republicans aren’t opposed to a government-run system because the private companies can do it better and cheaper — they can’t. They oppose the public insurance choice because they want to protect the egregious and exorbitant profits of their rich buddies — the owners of private insurance companies.

Our health care system in the United States is a broken mess. Countless millions of people have no insurance coverage at all. Many more are driven into bankruptcy by medical bills (even though most of them had private insurance). Millions are praying they don’t lose their jobs, because if they do they’ll lose what little insurance coverage they have. And millions more are losing their insurance because their bills have gotten too high (even though they’ve paid their premiums).

Forcing everyone to buy private insurance will not solve these problems. It will just give the huge insurance companies their biggest payday, and they can go on abusing their consumers to make ever larger profits.

This is not the time to assure the insurance companies of maximum profits. This is the time to give American citizens health insurance at a decent price, that cannot be cancelled, and provides them with their choice of doctor and hospital. Private companies cannot or will not do that. A government-run insurance system will do it.

The only real fix for our health care mess is public insurance.

[Rag Blog contributor Ted McLaughlin also posts at jobsanger, an excellent Texas political blog.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bad Boy Mark Sanford, and the Freedom Fighters from Martin Jr. High

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, no longer MIA, fesses up. Photo by Mary Ann Chastain / AP.

Modern-day Freedom Fighters

On June 4, the state Supreme Court ruled 5-0 against Gov. Sanford, finding that he must apply for the $700 million in federal stimulus money for its intended purposes, including educational enhancement.

By Jay D. Jurie / The Rag Blog / June 24, 2009

According to his staff, missing South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford was merely enjoying Father’s Day away from his family, hiking the Appalachian Trail. This prompted the observation from TV commentator Keith Olbermann that Father’s Day was also “national hike naked day.” One might wonder if perhaps Sanford was at a rendezvous in the woods with fellow Republicans Mark Foley, Larry Craig, and Charlie Crist. Olbermann’s guest, columnist Gene Robinson, mentioned something about a movie called Deliverance…

Upon his re-appearance, Gov. Sanford, contrary to the staff cover story, revealed that he was having a tryst in Argentina.

This has not been Gov. Sanford’s first brush with notoriety.

Ty-Sheoma Bethea, an 8th grader from J.V. Martin Jr. High in Dillon, South Carolina, was invited to sit next to Michelle Obama during President Obama’s Feb. 24 address to a joint session of Congress. Obama quoted from a letter Ms. Bethea had sent Congress about the deplorable condition of her school, “we’re not quitters,” as part of the urgent necessity of passing a stimulus program benefiting education and other needs.

It seemed apparent that relief was on the way, and that J.V. Martin Jr. High would almost certainly be earmarked for reconstruction assistance. Then Gov. Sanford intervened, refusing to apply for the stimulus money unless he could use it to pay down state debt rather than for its intended purposes.

Shortly thereafter, two other South Carolina students got involved. Casey Edwards, a senior at Chapin High in Chapin, and Justin Williams, a third-year University of South Carolina law student, acted as lead plaintiffs in the suit Edwards and Williams v. State, and SCASA (South Carolina Association of School Administrators) v. Sanford. On June 4, the state Supreme Court ruled 5-0 against Gov. Sanford, finding that he must apply for the $700 million in federal stimulus money for its intended purposes, including educational enhancement.

Conditions in schools like J.V. Martin Jr. High along South Carolina’s I-95 “Corridor of Shame” were cited by Edwards and Williams as primary reasons for their suit.

Ty-Sheoma Bethea, Casey Edwards, and Justin Williams are modern-day freedom fighters.

[Sources: Katie Jones, “USC Law Student Sues Sanford,” Daily Gamecock, June 10, 2009, CNN, Chicago Tribune, Bud Ferillo “Corridor of Shame” documentary, 2005.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment