Tom Hayden’s Return to Vietnam

[This is a fine article by Tom Hayden, SDS co-founder, primary author of The Port Huron Statement and now California state senator, on his return trip to Vietnam. I recommend it highly. Thorne Dreyer, The Rag Blog.]

The Old Revolutionaries of Vietnam
By Tom Hayden / The Nation

Tom Hayden was cleared of conspiracy charges after leading anti-Vietnam War protests at the 1968 Democratic convention, and he directed the Indochina Peace Campaign from 1972 to ’75. He taught classes on Indochina in 1971 and on the Iraq War in 2007, both at Pitzer College.

During Christmas 2007 I traveled back in time with my family, to Vietnam, for the first time in thirty-two years. I was feeling a deep need to see the place once more, a regret at having withdrawn from a country I had visited four times during the war. I wanted to understand the long-term lessons and, on a personal basis, track down the Vietnamese guides and translators, men and women, who assumed an ideological faith in the American “people” they escorted through ruins inflicted by the American “enemy.” They would become important diplomatic bridges between our two countries in the postwar period. Most were survivors of the French and American wars and would be in their 80s by now.

Were they still alive? How had they suffered? After the exuberance at their victory and reunification after 1975, how had they adjusted to a Vietnam without war? Vietnam’s consul in San Francisco, Chau Do, said many of these old revolutionaries were alive, excited by my return and inquiring whom I wanted to see. I told him that my closest Vietnamese friend was a poet, musician and translator, Do Xuan Oanh, who was perhaps 40 in those days. “I can help you find him,” Chau replied with a smile. “He’s my dad.” My eyes filled with tears. It would be quite a trip.

Before I would reunite with these old friends and contacts, however, I plunged into the shocking contrasts between past and present in Hanoi. Between Christmas 1965 and November 1972, when I made four unauthorized visits to Hanoi, the wartime city was unlit and ghostly. Most people had been evacuated to the countryside. Air-raid sirens and public-safety broadcasts were the only urban sounds.

There was no economic development beyond the construction of pontoon bridges to replace bridges bombed by the Americans. The only motorized vehicles were military ones. Most residents rode bicycles or carried their meager wares on bamboo poles across their shoulders. Water buffalo pulled the heavier loads. To outward appearances, Gen. Curtis LeMay’s plan to bomb Vietnam back to the Stone Age was on track.

Finally came the Christmas bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong by 200 B-52s, from December 18 to December 28, 1972. The United States says that fifteen of the giant Stratofortresses were shot down and ninety-three American airmen went missing before the bombing ended (Hanoi says thirty-four B-52s and eighty-one fighter planes were put out of action). Estimates of civilian deaths range from 1,600 to 2,368 in those eleven days, and Hanoi listed 5,480 buildings destroyed. In the American narrative, the Christmas bombing forced Hanoi to sign the Paris peace agreement one month later.

But under terms agreed to by the Nixon Administration, North Vietnamese units remained positioned in the south, and in 1975 they stormed Saigon. What is beyond dispute is that crowded Hanoi neighborhoods and the Bach Mai hospital were reduced to rubble during the Christmas B-52 raids. The last time I had seen Hanoi was in 1974, when Jane Fonda and I walked through the hospital debris and interviewed still-furious victims of the Christmas 1972 bombs.

Read all of it here.

California Senator Tom Hayden, the Nation Institute’s Carey McWilliams Fellow, has played an active role in American politics and history for over three decades, beginning with the student, civil rights and antiwar movements of
the 1960s.

“Tom Hayden changed America,” wrote Nicholas Lemann, national correspondent for The Atlantic, of Hayden’s role in the 1960s. Richard Goodwin, former speechwriter for John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, said that Hayden, “without even knowing it, inspired the Great Society.”

Hayden was elected to the California State Legislature in 1982, where he served for ten years in the Assembly before being elected to the State Senate in 1992, where he served eight years. Hayden has been described as “the conscience of the Senate” by columnist Dan Walters of the Sacramento Bee, and as “the liberal rebel” by George Skelton of the Los Angeles Times. “He has carved out a key watchdog role,” according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

He is author of over 175 measures ranging from reform of money in politics, worker safety, school decentralization, small business tax relief, domestic violence, lessening gang violence in the inner city, stopping student fee increases at universities, protecting endangered species like salmon, overhauling three strikes, you’re out laws, and a measure signed into law that will assist Holocaust survivors in receiving recognition and compensation for having been exploited as slave labor during the Nazi era.

Hayden is the author of eleven books, including his autobiography, Reunion; a book on the spirituality and the environment, Lost Gospel of the Earth; a collection of essays on the aftermath of the Irish potato famine, Irish Hunger (Roberts Rhinehart) and a book on his Irish background, Irish on the Inside: In Search of the Soul of Irish America (Verso); Radical Nomad, a biography of C. Wright Mills (Paradigm Publishers); and, most recently, Ending the War in Iraq (2007). A collection of his work, Writings for a Democratic Society: The Tom Hayden Reader was published this year .

— The Nation

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Richard Dawkins and "The God Delusion"

Photo by Bret Gerbe / Austin American-Statesman.

Atheist author draws impassioned crowd in Austin.
By Eileen E. Flynn / Austin American-Statesman / March 20, 2008

Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist with star power, drew some 1,200 people to hear his take on the origins of the universe and the problems of religion.

The Oxford University professor and author of the best-selling “The God Delusion,” spoke Wednesday night at Hogg Auditorium at the University of Texas, where he ravaged creationism and design theories that claim a supernatural being created the universe and held up Darwin’s theory of natural selection as a logical alternative.

“I don’t want to come across as an enemy of religion so much as a friend of truth,” the British Dawkins said, though he admittedly enjoys satirizing and ridiculing the world’s faiths.

During his talk he showed a cartoon depiction of God at a computer engineering the parting of the Red Sea and pointed to images of Zeus, Baal and other ancient deities as delusions.

But his main concern, he said, is debunking the notion advanced by creationists that either God designed the universe or humanity was created by chance.

“Darwinian evolution is not a theory of random chance,” he said. “Very, very far from it.”

He described natural selection as a “powerful and elegant” process that offers hope that science will eventually be able to explain everything.

“The God Delusion” has already sold more than 1.5 million copies. That doesn’t count the foreign translations or the sales of the newly released paperback version.

Over the past few months, Dawkins’ speaking tour has electrified college campuses from Wisconsin to California, according to officials with theCenter for Inquiry who have helped organize the talks.

At the University of California at Berkeley, the 700-seat auditorium filled quickly and hundreds of people had to be turned away, said Debbie Goddard, a field organizer for the Amherst, N.Y.-based center.

Some 1,700 packed the hall at Stanford University, she said, with another 1,300 at the University of Wisconsin.

Organizers had to turn away more than 100 people at the door at UT. Among those who got in were three Oklahoma University students who drove Wednesday from Norman, Okla.

The success of Dawkins and fellow best-selling atheist authors such as Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris has also prompted a slew of books written to defend faith and debunk atheism.

Dawkins’ book has inspired “The God Solution: A Reply to the God Delusion” by James A. Beverley and “The Dawkins Delusion? Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine” by Alister McGrath and Joanna Collicutt McGrath.

Dawkins doesn’t find the responses worthwhile. In fact, he refers to the books — he’s counted 22 so far — as “fleas,” drawing from a line from a William Butler Yeats poem: “But was there ever dog that praised his fleas?”

But he said he is encouraged to see the religious establishment on the defensive and taking atheists seriously.

One of Dawkins’ “fleas” is John Haught’s book “God and the New Atheism.” Haught, a senior fellow in science and religion at Georgetown University’s Woodstock Theological Center, said he isn’t daunted by the new atheists, whose arguments he finds thin.

Their theories, he said, are based on scientism: “the view that scientific method is the only really reliable way to gather truth and come in touch with reality.”

Ironically, Haught said, that world view — that science can explain everything — requires a leap of faith as well.

He also accuses the new atheists of presenting — and attacking — a literal interpretation of religious texts without acknowledging that many believers have a more nuanced and complex understanding of religion.

“Not only do they not understand religion,” he said, “they themselves have the most literalist and primitive understanding of religion.”

Haught said religion has undergone attacks from skeptics before: philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean-Paul Sartre challenged Christian belief in the 19th and 20th centuries, prompting a post-atheist theology.

The new atheists, he said, are not theologically challenging.

Dawkins shrugs off the criticism. “The point is that if there is no God, then the whole of theology is irrelevant,” he said. “It would be like saying you can’t say you don’t believe in fairies unless you’ve consulted learned tomes of fairyology.”

Source.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Iraq Protesters Gather at Texas State Capitol

Vigil at Texas State Capitol. Photo by Jamie Josephs / The Rag Blog.


There was a liberal turnout at last night’s (March 19, 2008) Peace Vigil which started at 7 p.m. at the front gates of the Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas. The vigil marked the fifth anniversary of Bush’s war in Iraq.

By the time the speakers began, the crowd had grown to an estimated 200-300 peace-loving folks. Many vigil participants held up anti-war signs and raised their hands high shooting the peace sign at the moderate drive-by traffic on Congress and 11th streets downtown. Most cars honked and shot peace signs back.

Several types of media covered the event. Reporters present were from radio, The Daily Texan U.T, and several photographers were shooting the event — and television film crews covered the vigil. MDS/Austin was strongly represented. Thanks to David Hamilton a lot of the crowd were holding up MDS ‘For Peace’ yard signs.

At dusk candles were passed out and lighted. Many people stayed until the full moon rose around 8:30 p.m. Thanks to all who participated. Click link below to view photos. View more photos here.

Peace,
Jamie Josephs / The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Vigils Mark Fifth Anniversary of Iraq War

Protesters gather in San Antonio, Austin to urge end to Iraq war.
By Michele Roberts / AP / March 20, 2008

SAN ANTONIO — Protesters calling for an end to the war in Iraq gathered Wednesday night near the Alamo, the state’s most famous battle site.

About 30 people stood in Alamo Plaza — surrounded by the buzz of tourists — calling for an end to a war they said was costing Americans too much money and too many lives and preventing the nation from addressing needs at home.

The gathering in San Antonio, which likes to call itself “Military City USA,” was one of dozens held around the country on the fifth anniversary of the war.

“How can we have victory when there’s nothing to win?” said James Berbiglia, a 73-year-old retired Army chaplain who served in Vietnam. “It can’t be made right. It can only be made worse.”

He was among several former servicemembers who spoke at the event, where people held signs and occasionally chanted “Get out now.”

“I was in the military. I know what war is,” said Aaron Flores, who served three tours in Vietnam.

He said he believes more current military personnel would speak out against the war in Iraq if they were free to do so.

Berbiglin said Iraqis simply want American soldiers to leave their country, and if they do, Iraq will get back to normal. If Americans don’t leave, they’ll continue to make more enemies, he said.
“We have to get home before something more terrible happens,” Berbiglia said.

Nancy Russell, a retired Army lieutenant colonel, said the war in Iraq has created more enemies than friends for America.

There were no weapons of mass destruction, the early explanation for the invasion, and Russell believes the conflict was personal for President Bush, whose father didn’t depose Saddam Hussein in the first Gulf War.

Bush “doesn’t want to admit he screwed up. He made a major blunder and he can’t admit he was wrong,” she said.

In Austin, protesters lit candles and held signs as they gathered outside the state Capitol grounds, where one person stood next to two fake coffins representing the deaths of American soldiers and Iraqi civilians. Motorists honked their horns as they passed and two people kneeled in silence, the Austin American-Statesman reported.

“We’re here to give the leaders a message,” Pash Amini said. “We’re here to tell them we have not forgotten.”

Morgan Knicely believes the nation’s leaders are listening.

“I think we have been having an effect,” Knicely said. “It can be discouraging, but … over time, things move.”

At a gathering in Madeline Park in El Paso, a crowd of about 80 people listened as the names of slain soldiers from El Paso and Fort Bliss were read. Protesters read letters from Iraq war veterans and called for a quick end to the war.

“I was completely opposed to it from the beginning, and I didn’t believe in a pre-emptive move from the beginning, even if the evidence thrown out by the administration was accurate, which it wasn’t,” Tammy Cagann, a math teacher at Riverside High School and an organizer of the vigil, said in a story of Thursday’s El Paso Times.

Source.

Protesters fill Civic Center Plaza in San Francisco Wednesday before a march into the Mission District on the five-year anniversary of the Iraq war. Photo by Brant Ward / S.F. Chronicle.

A day of protest across Bay Area
By SFGate / March 20, 2008

San Francisco — War protesters converged in San Francisco Wednesday for the five-year anniversary of the war in Iraq and, from early morning to late evening, rallied, marched, shouted, sang, danced and committed acts of civil disobedience to demonstrate their opposition.

Roughly 150 people were arrested, many of them in front of the office of U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein. Many of those arrested were participating in an afternoon “die-in” – collapsing en masse to evoke deaths in Iraq – though a few actively scuffled with police.

Demonstrators gathered in the evening at Civic Center Plaza to hear speeches and take an evening march to the Mission District. They carried signs with slogans such as “impeach” and chanted mantras like “money for health care, not warfare.”

In the morning, a crowd of about 500 people snaked its way through the Financial District, periodically prompting police to shut down intersections and city blocks and Muni officials to reroute buses.

Yet, despite the often creative costumes and messages, the protests were a far cry from the large and dramatic protests that marked the buildup to the war as well as the conflict’s early months. Tens of thousands came to San Francisco in those days, making it an epicenter of the anti-war movement. Roughly 2,150 protesters were arrested during the first three days of the war, Mar. 19-21, 2003. The city’s hotels were crammed, and mobs tried to shut down the Bay Bridge.

Wednesday’s biggest demonstration in the city occurred in the evening. Answer coalition organizer Richard Becker estimated the crowd of participants at 7,000.

Read more here

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

There Is No Room for Gloating – There’s Work to Do

The Left Was Right
By Curt Guyette

19/03/08 “Metro Times” — – They take no satisfaction in knowing that they were right in opposing this ill-fated Iraq war from the outset. All they want is for people to listen to them now.

And what they have to say is this: If we are ever going to get all of our troops out, it will be because of pressure that starts at the grassroots level and works its way up to the top of the political chain – not the other way around.

When the Bush administration was spewing its lies and the mainstream media marched behind in lockstep, trumpeting myths about weapons of mass destruction and fantasies about invading troops being greeted with tossed bouquets, members of the peace movement were trying to warn us not to make what became a mistake of epic proportions.

But America didn’t listen. The drumbeat for war was too loud, drowning out the voices of opposition. Shoved to the margins, they were all but invisible. When not being ignored by mainstream media they were on the receiving end of ridicule from squawking chicken hawks.

Before the start of the war, nearly 60 percent of the country supported an invasion of Iraq. An invasion supposedly made necessary by Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction and the dictator’s close working relationship with Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist network. An invasion that would cost only about $50 million, we were told, with a majority of the troops expected to be back home within a matter of months.

All of which proved to be untrue.

Now, with 4,000 American soldiers dead and another 30,000 U.S. troops wounded in this conflict, with tens of thousands – and perhaps hundreds of thousands – of Iraqis killed and 4.5 million more displaced, there is no room for gloating by those who urged us not to invade. Instead there is only frustration that their voices were not heard.

After five long and bloody years, the doves aren’t despairing. Instead, they are determined.

“We just have to keep going,” says Phyllis Aronson. “There is no other choice.”

As co-chair of the Huntington Woods Peace, Citizenship & Education Project, Aronson is old enough to have witnessed how public protest helped bring about an end to the Vietnam War more than three decades ago. Memories of that era are like a buoy keeping afloat hopes that another mass movement will succeed in bringing this war to an end.

Public opinion has flipped since the start of the war, with polls showing that about 60 percent of Americans now say that the war was a mistake.

“The peace movement hasn’t been marginalized, we’ve been mainstreamed,” says Leslie Cagan, co-chair of the national antiwar coalition United for Peace and Justice.

But the shift in opinion has not resulted in an outpouring of protesters taking to the streets.

Wendy Hamilton, director of the Detroit peace group Swords Into Plowshares is perplexed by the lack of outrage: “Where’s the anger? Where’s the indignation? Why aren’t people saying we were lied to and doing something about it?”

Part of the answer is cynicism, she says. People believe that nothing is going to change as long as George Bush remains in office, so why bother to protest.

“A lot of people, I believe, think that speaking out won’t make any difference,” she says.

Yousef Rabhi, a 19-year-old sophomore at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, has a similar view.

“A lot of people are fed up with the war. You can see that in the national polls,” he says. “But there’s a feeling that’s like despair. Because the task seems so daunting, some people are afraid to do anything at all.”

It doesn’t help that the 2006 mid-term elections, which were largely seen as a referendum on the war, resulted in the Democrats taking control of both the U.S. House and Senate – yet the Bush administration has continued to wage war unimpeded by the opposition party.

“The Democrats didn’t do what some of us hoped they would do, which was use the power of the purse to force an end to the war,” says veteran activist Al Fishman, a board member of the group Peace Action of Michigan. “Not enough of them had the courage to face the accusation that cutting off funding meant that they were deserting the troops in the field.”

It’s a ridiculous charge, Fishman says. You don’t support troops by keeping them in harm’s way; you show support by bringing them home.

Read the rest here.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

There Is a Tide in the Affairs of Men

From Juan Cole’s Informed Comment.

Iran: Danger and Opportunity; Polk Guest Op-Ed

William R. Polk writes:

Cassandra and Yogi Berra are an unlikely pair, but I hear both of their voices today. Cassandra, like some of us, was cursed to be always disbelieved as she correctly predicted the future while baseballer Yogi Berra will be remembered for his penetrating insight into the flow of history, “This is like deja vu all over again.”

It is through the unlikely medium of U.S. News and World Report that Cassandra speaks. The March 12 issue gives us “6 signs the U.S. may be headed for war in Iran.” The first tip the magazine highlights is the firing of Admiral William Fallon. While Fallon is hardly a “dove,” he apparently – to judge by hints he gave in an interview with Thomas Barnett published in the March issue of Esquire – had argued that an attack on Iran made no military sense. If this really was his judgment, he obviously was not the man to be “CINC [Commander-in-chief] Centcom.” That is, if the Bush administration really is intent on an attack.

Among other straws U.S. News and World Report found in the wind blowing out of Washington was the projected trip by Vice President Dick Cheney to what the magazine correctly described as a “logistics hub for military operations in the Persian Gulf,” Oman, where the Strait of Hormuz constitutes “the vulnerable oil transit chokepoint into and out of the Persian Gulf that Iran threatens to blockade in the event of war.”

Here is where Yogi Berra begins to come into the picture. As the U.S. News and World Report notes, “Back in March 2002, Cheney made a high-profile Mideast trip to Saudi Arabia and other nations that officials said at the time was about diplomacy toward Iraq and not war…” It was, as we now know, one of the concerted moves in the build-up to the already-decided-upon plan to attack Iraq. Is Cheney’s 2008 trip “like deja vu all over again?” That certainly is the inference drawn by U.S. News and World Report.

Then, U.S. News and World Report introduces the Israeli card. It reports the widely held belief that the Israeli air attack on Syria, analyzed by Sy Hersh in one of his insightful pieces of investigative reporting on February 11, 2008 in The New Yorker, was not what it was proclaimed to be, an attack on a presumed nuclear site, but a means to force the Syrians to activate their anti-aircraft electronics – as America used to do with the Russians – to detect gaps along what might be a flight path from Israel toward Iran.

Why a flight path across Syria? Both because Turkey might not allow the use of its airspace and because using Jordan’s airspace, as Israel did in its June 7, 1981 strike on the Iraqi nuclear facility at Osiriq, might seriously weaken the Jordanian regime which Israel would like to keep in place, at least for the time being.

Is a flight across Syria and Iraq to attack Iranian targets feasible? The short answer is yes: the aircraft the United States has supplied to Israel have the range and presumably could be refueled on their return at a remote base among the 14 or so bases the U.S. has built and maintains in Iraq.

U.S. News and World Report also drew attention to the stationing of a guided missile destroyer off the Lebanese coast as another indication of preparations for war. The article does not explain why but points out that the destroyer has an anti-aircraft capability; so, the inference is that it would shoot down any Syrian aircraft attempting to hit Israel.

The article curiously passes over in silence the much more impressive build-up of naval power in the Persian Gulf. As of the last report I have seen, a major part of the U.S. Navy is deployed in and around the Persian Gulf. The numbers are stunning and include not only a vast array of weapons, including nuclear weapons, cruise and other missiles and hundreds of aircraft but also “insertion” (invasion) forces and equipment. Even then, these already deployed forces amount to only a fraction of the total that could be brought to bear on Iran because aircraft, both bombers and troop and equipment transports, stationed far away in Central Asia, the Indian Ocean, Europe and even in America can be quickly employed .

Of course, deploying forces along Iran’s frontier does not necessarily mean using them. At least that is what the Administration says. However, as a historian and former participant in government, I believe that having troops and weapons on the spot makes their use more likely than not. Why is that?

It is because a massive build-up of forces inevitably creates the “climate” of war. Troops and the public, on both sides, come to accept its inevitability. Standing down is difficult and can entail loss of “face.” Consequently, political leaders usually are carried forward by the flow of events. Having taken steps 1, 2 and 3, they find taking step number 4 logical, even necessary. In short, momentum rather than policy begins to control action. As Barbara Tuchman showed in her study of the origins of the First World War, The Guns of August, even though none of the parties really wanted to go to war, none could stop the process. It was the fact that President Kennedy had been reading Tuchman’s book just before the Cuban Missile Crisis, I believe, that made him so intent on not being “hijacked by events.” His restraint was unusual. More common is a surrender to “sequence” as was shown by the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It would have taken a major reversal of policy – and considerable political bravery — to halt either invasion once the massive build-up was in place. No such effort was made then. Will it be now? I think the odds are against it.

Read all of it here.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Austin Student in D.C. Actions Against War

Students Arrested Protesting Iraq War in Washington, D.C.

Austin teen joins Iraq war protests in Washington.
By Bob Dart / Washington Bureau / Austin American-Statesman / March 19, 2008

WASHINGTON — Nora Hansel, an 18-year-old college student from Austin, is taking her spring break from Wesleyan University in Connecticut to join an anti-war protest today that aims to disrupt the nation’s capital on the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.

In an array of planned actions, organizers said, tens of thousands of demonstrators will block traffic and access to buildings as well as march to the Capitol in protests against the role of business, media and the government in the war.

Hansel, who has been in the District of Columbia for about a week in the anti-war campaign, said she probably would have spent spring break at South by Southwest but said that too many college students are ignoring the war. Hansel said she did a research paper comparing this anti-war movement to the often violent campus unrest during the Vietnam War.

There is no military draft now, as there was in the 1960s, so “people are not necessarily threatened” by the far-away fighting, she said. “It allows (students) to be disconnected and under the illusion that the war is not affecting them, when in reality it is affecting all of us.”

United For Peace and Justice, a coalition of organizations, is sponsoring the actions, which will range from trying to shut down the headquarters of the Internal Revenue Service — because taxes finance the war — to blocking access to the American Petroleum Institute to demonstrating outside The Washington Post and bureaus of CNN, Fox News and other media outlets and the National Press Club.

“The media perpetuated a lot of the administration’s lies” at the start of the war, said Lisa Fithian, a protest organizer from Austin. Responsibility for the war rests “not just with the White House and Congress but with other key institutions that we’re calling the ‘Pillars of War.’ War profiteers. The military.”

Organizers said they are targeting the Democratic majority in Congress as well as the Republican administration and will also march on the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee.
The demonstrators plan a “March of the Dead” from Arlington National Cemetery into the areas of the city where tourists gather, including the war memorials.

Grannies for Peace will stage a “knit-in” at the State Department, and there will be a waterboarding demonstration near the White House and a street dance.

Fithian said it is “outrageous, really” that Congress is out of town on a two-week Easter recess and won’t see the demonstrators.

“Soldiers can’t come home” for the holidays, she said.

“We believe Wednesday will be an unprecedented day of action. It is a working day. We will be confronting the people who are in the business of death and destruction in downtown Washington,” Fithian said.

Source.

[Nora Hansel is the daughter of Lori Jo Hansel, an Austin attorney and MDS/Austin activist who was also a staff member of Austin’s underground newspaper, The Rag. Nora is carrying on a grand tradition. Thorne Dreyer / The Rag Blog.]

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

A Giant Military Camp to Protect World Capitalism

From Joe Bageant’s blog.

‘America is run by gangsters,’ he said

Hello Joe,

Greetings from Sydney, Australia. I heard your interview on our ABC radio a while back and finally bought your book, Deer Hunting with Jesus. Nearly finished it and I can’t agree more with your sentiments.

I have been over to the USA four times and travelled around the back blocks a bit, including your area. I feel a sadness for the average citizen there. They haven’t got a clue as to what’s going on. I feel the USA has become a giant military camp to protect world capitalism and the citizens are not aware they have been conscripted. I have also travelled around Asia a bit. I’ve had deeper conversations about world affairs with Indonesian fishermen, Thai taxi drivers and even Tibetan peasants in far western China than I could get out many of the “middle class, educated” people I have met in the USA.

It is pretty humbling when a fellow in Laos running a small tourism venture can talk about world and local politics, exchange rates, government policies (including European and American) and how this will affect his plans, and, he can do it in at least three languages — Lao, French and pretty good English. It is tme to shut up and listen. The Thai taxi driver in Chiang Mai just about spat out the window on US policies and politics. “America is run by gangsters,” he said.

I have a habit of finding myself in drinking situations when I travel and was particularly taken with your “learning through drinking” program. In Thailand on the banks of the Mekong River I found myself talking with a bunch of motor-tricycle drivers at their local “depot”, or garage. My father had a few garages and I am a motor mechanic by trade and have had motorbikes all my life so we had plenty in common, except our language but with the help of a few bottles of whisky and someone’s sister who was learning English at school, we solved many of the worlds pressing problems.

At a road house in Oregon (USA) I met a local fellow who was an American native. He was big on hunting and fishing and had canoed all over his area all his life (he thought he was about 70 and that is another story). His pet gripe was the authorities telling him he had to start wearing a life jacket and crash helmet when he went on the water. This opened a can of worms (and another beer) and he said how pissed off he was that the governments had the time to come down on his lifestyle which hurt no one but himself if he had some misfortune and yet the rest of the country and the big issues were all too hard. He too wondered why the best land was being taken over and had many of the same ideas and concerns you put forward.

[snip]

We little guys of the world can feel it. The tightening, I mean. And when we honestly talk about it between us, we become an implied threat to power. And if we take action, then of course we become “terrorists.” That’s because the property of those with the most property is always more valuable than the lives of those with less or none. In the big picture of human civilization, this is true everywhere in the world, even Australia.

I’m no super fan of Derek Jensen, though I agree with nearly everything he writes. To quote Jensen:

“It is acceptable for those above to increase the amount of property they control — in everyday language, to make money — by destroying or taking the lives of those below. This is called production. If those below damage the property of those above, those above may kill or otherwise destroy the lives of those below. This is called justice.”

That’s the brutal on-the-ground truth about human civilization, governments and money. And it’s getting worse as the world’s population increases and resources diminish. Most people around the world understand this at least at some gut level. We in the so-called “developed countries” don’t kick up much sand about it because in the larger picture, we are on the receiving end of most of the goods and materials (however unsustainable that may be.)

Read all of it here.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Hillary Clinton and Her Secretive Religious "Fellowship"

Illustration by Andy Friedman / Mother Jones

Hillary’s Nasty Pastorate
by Barbara Ehrenreich / The Nation / March 19, 2008

There’s a reason Hillary Clinton has remained relatively silent during the flap over intemperate remarks by Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. When it comes to unsavory religious affiliations, she’s a lot more vulnerable than Obama.

You can find all about it in a widely under-read article in the September 2007 issue of Mother Jones, in which Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet reported that “through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as “The Fellowship,” also known as The Family. But it won’t be a secret much longer. Jeff Sharlet’s shocking exposé The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power will be published in May.

Sean Hannity has called Obama’s church a “cult,” but that term applies far more aptly to Clinton’s “Family,” which is organized into “cells”–their term–and operates sex-segregated group homes for young people in northern Virginia. In 2002, Sharlet joined The Family’s home for young men, forswearing sex, drugs and alcohol, and participating in endless discussions of Jesus and power. He wasn’t undercover; he used his own name and admitted to being a writer. But he wasn’t completely out of danger either. When he went outdoors one night to make a cell phone call, he was followed. He still gets calls from Family associates asking him to meet them in diners–alone.

The Family’s most visible activity is its blandly innocuous National Prayer Breakfast, held every February in Washington. But almost all its real work goes on behind the scenes–knitting together international networks of right-wing leaders, most of them ostensibly Christian. In the 1940s, The Family reached out to former and not-so-former Nazis, and its fascination with that exemplary leader, Adolf Hitler, has continued, along with ties to a whole bestiary of murderous thugs. As Sharlet reported in Harper’s in 2003:

During the 1960s the Family forged relationships between the U.S. government and some of the most anti-Communist (and dictatorial) elements within Africa’s postcolonial leadership. The Brazilian dictator General Costa e Silva, withFamily support, was overseeing regular fellowship groups for Latin Americanleaders, while, in Indonesia, General Suharto (whose tally of several
hundred thousand “Communists” killed marks him as one of the century’s most murderous dictators) was presiding over a group of fifty Indonesian legislators. During the Reagan Administration the Family helped build friendships between the U.S. government and men such as Salvadoran general Carlos Eugenios Vides Casanova, convicted by a Florida jury of the torture of thousands, and Honduran general Gustavo Alvarez Martinez, himself an evangelical minister, who was linked to both the CIA and death squads before his own demise.

At the heart of The Family’s American branch is a collection of powerful right-wing politicos, who include, or have included, Sam Brownback, Ed Meese, John Ashcroft, James Inhofe and Rick Santorum. They get to use The Family’s spacious estate on the Potomac, The Cedars, which is maintained by young men in Family group homes and where meals are served by The Family’s young women’s group. And, at The Family’s frequent prayer gatherings, they get powerful jolts of spiritual refreshment, tailored to the already powerful.

Clinton fell in with The Family in 1993, when she joined a Bible study group composed of wives of conservative leaders like Jack Kemp and James Baker. When she ascended to the Senate, she was promoted to what Sharlet calls the Family’s “most elite cell,” the weekly Senate Prayer Breakfast, which included, until his downfall, Virginia’s notoriously racist Senator George Allen. This has not been a casual connection for Clinton. She has written of Doug Coe, The Family’s publicity-averse leader, that he is “a unique presence in Washington: a genuinely loving spiritual mentor and guide to anyone, regardless of party or faith, who wants to deepen his or her relationship with God.”

Furthermore, The Family takes credit for some of Clinton’s rightward legislative tendencies, including her support for a law guaranteeing “religious freedom” in the workplace, such as for pharmacists who refuse to fill birth control prescriptions and police officers who refuse to guard abortion clinics.

What drew Clinton into the sinister heart of the international right? Maybe it was just a phase in her tormented search for identity, marked by ever-changing hairstyles and names: Hillary Rodham, Mrs. Bill Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton and now Hillary Clinton. She reached out to many potential spiritual mentors during her White House days, including New Age guru Marianne Williamson and the liberal rabbi Michael Lerner. But it was the Family association that stuck.

Sharlet generously attributes Clinton’s involvement to the under-appreciated depth of her religiosity, but he himself struggles to define The Family’s theological underpinnings. The Family avoids the word Christian but worships Jesus, though not the Jesus who promised the earth to the “meek.” They believe that, in mass societies, it’s only the elites who matter, the political leaders who can build God’s “dominion” on earth. Insofar as The Family has a consistent philosophy, it’s all about power–cultivating it, building it and networking it together into ever-stronger units, or “cells.” “We work with power where we can,” Doug Coe has said, and “build new power where we can’t.”

Obama has given a beautiful speech on race and his affiliation with the Trinity Unity Church of Christ. Now it’s up to Clinton to explain–or, better yet, renounce–her long-standing connection with the fascist-leaning Family.

Source.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Organizer

Alice Embree of MDS/Austin and CodePink — and former Ragstaffer — at the Million Musicians March, March 15, 2008. For more CodePink pictures, go Here.

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

You’ve Been Injected with Mass Amnesia

How to Destroy a Country and Get Off Scot-Free
By Linda Heard, sierra12th@yahoo.co.uk

18/03/08 “Arab News” Someone once told me if you’re going to tell a lie make it a whopper based on the premise the more outrageous the lie the more likely it is to be believed. At the time, I wrote off his advice as hogwash but as we see from the Iraq debacle, he was right. Five years later, the deceit continues undiminished and nobody has been held to account.

Britain’s Gordon Brown yesterday promised to hold an enquiry into the “mistakes” made in Iraq. Sounds good, but don’t hold your breath. All previous inquiries have been labeled “whitewashes”. They can’t afford the truth to come out else they might get a one-way ticket to The Hague.

Ambassador David Satterfield, and adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, is doing the rounds of talk shows lauding America’s victories over Al-Qaeda in Iraq.

On one occasion the host interjected to mention the unpalatable fact that Al-Qaeda members only flocked to Iraq once the Americans were in place leaving Satterfield momentarily nonplussed.

It’s obvious that Satterfield is so saturated in the party line he forgot the Pentagon’s recently published study that found with certainty that Saddam Hussein had absolutely no links to Al-Qaeda. And lest we forget Saddam didn’t have WMD either, which means not only was the war immoral the prewar sanctions on that country that contributed to the deaths of over half-a-million Iraqi children were too.

Think about it for a moment. The warmongers invaded, crushed and occupied a country that was no threat to anyone. They stood by as it was looted, exacerbated sectarianism, flattened entire towns, tortured untold numbers of innocents, brought in gum-chewing, tattooed foreign mercenaries and paid crony companies billions of dollars for mythical reconstruction projects.

They then pretended to hand over sovereignty to that country while at the same time constructing permanent bases and the biggest US Embassy in history resembling a small town. They said they had no interest in Iraq’s oil, yet they are putting immense pressure on the Iraqi government (sic) to sign into law a bill that permits foreign (read American) oil companies to lock up decades-long deals. Let’s be frank. Iraq wasn’t a blunder, it was a crime. So how did they manage to get away with implanting their long-conceived plot to do away with Israel’s No. 1 foe, ensure their competitors couldn’t get their hands on Iraq’s resources and entrench their military might in the region? Future historians will no doubt be scratching their heads over this one. You had to live through it to believe it.

First, they cleverly used the politics of fear to sway public opinion. As noted in the Project for the New American Century’s document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, the warmonger signatories – who later became senior members of the Bush administration – needed “a new Pearl Harbor”. On Sept. 1l 2001 they got it. Americans and their allies were in shock. Almost every country in the world was sympathetic and willing to do anything to help. And, boy, did they capitalize on that empathy even managing to persuade Russia to stay silent as they made deals with Caspian states to allow US bases.

Step one was a country where a giant bogeyman was supposed to be hiding out in a cave presumably equipped with a dialysis machine and a production studio and whose black-turbaned government forced women to wear a burqa and disallowed nail polish. But then Defense Minister Donald Rumsfeld was disappointed because there weren’t enough targets for his bombs. It was no fun bombing a country into the Stone Age when it was already there.

Step two was the insidious demonizing of Muslims, thousands of whom were arrested and held for months without charge or access to lawyers. In that climate of fear, it was relatively simple to persuade the American people that Saddam Hussein was conniving with the people who brought down the World Trade Center. US officials warned of mushroom clouds; Prime Minister Tony Blair said British interests could be attacked within 45 minutes of Saddam giving the order. Then Secretary of State Colin Powell allowed himself to be used as their fall guy. He spouted the most unbelievable scripted codswallop the UN had ever heard…yet, bullied and bribed nation after nation pretended to believe him as IAEA chief Mohammed El-Baradei and UN weapons inspector Hans Blix did little to discredit the hoax.

Step three entailed replacing Osama in people’s minds with Saddam, who overnight morphed into a hydra-headed monster whose idea of a pleasant weekend was gassing and torturing his own people.

Step four was ‘Shock and Awe’ which illuminated the Baghdad skyline on March 19, 2003. As their bombs and missiles rained down on crowded market places scattering limbs, they told us those bombs and missiles were Saddam’s even though the Independent’s Middle East correspondent inconveniently dug up their Made in the USA shards.

As the months went on, we began to wonder what happened to the WMD. They told us it was only a matter of time before it would be unearthed from under the sands or discovered in a tunnel under one of Saddam’s palaces. They even suggested it may have been shipped off to a neighboring country for safekeeping!!

Step five was an orchestrated administration campaign to inject us with mass amnesia. Never mind about the weapons, they said. We are here to liberate the poor Iraqi people from their evil dictator and deliver freedom and democracy. Look, look, they said. The Iraqis have purple fingers! With up to one million dead, Iraqis are lucky they have any fingers at all.

To be fair, they couldn’t have done it without the aid of a compliant, supine media, which embedded its reporters with US battalions and agreed not to show captured US soldiers, flag-draped coffins, military funerals or scenes of blood-soaked Iraqi civilians. Independent reporters who neglected to abide by the script were discredited, refused access to information and even shelled.

I still recall a live report from David Chater of Sky News, who saw the barrel of a US tank slowly turn toward the Palestine hotel – known to be a journalist’s hang-out – before firing its shell killing three reporters. The Baghdad offices of Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya were also hit.

With so much information on tap I’m flabbergasted that so many people still believe the Iraq fairytale. I wish they’d get in touch with me. I’ve got a few pyramids and a sphinx going cheap. Sad, isn’t it!

Source

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Barack Obama’s Speech on Race, Religion and Jeremiah Wright

Barack Obama: A More Perfect Union (Full Speech) March 8, 2008

Source.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment