No Torture. No Exceptions


“No Torture. No Exceptions” means:

* reaffirming America’s commitment to existing federal laws and international treaties that ban torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under all circumstances.

* renouncing all legal interpretations and executive orders that redefine torture and permit such acts as sensory and sleep deprivation, stress positions, sexual humiliation, and mock executions.

* enforcing full transparency of information about how America treats any and all detainees held by our personnel and those in our employ anywhere in the world.

* rejecting and abolishing the practice of rendering detainees abroad.

* establishing a single standard of interrogation procedures to apply to all persons held in U.S. custody or by those under U.S. control, whether C.I.A., military, or civilian.

* treating our detainees as we would have others treat detained Americans.

TOGETHER WE CAN HALT TORTURE.

STEP 1: Call each presidential candidate NOW.
INSIST: “No Torture. No Exceptions.”

John McCain:
Phone: (202) 224-2235 • Fax: (202) 228-2862

Barack Obama:
Phone: (202) 224-2854 • Fax: (202) 228-4260

Hillary Clinton:
Phone: (202) 224-4451 • Fax: (202) 228-0282

For more information, click here.

Thanks to The Guantanamo Blog / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

If You Mess Up, People Get Hurt

How much we blatantly and consciously minimise the effects of this war in Iraq. It is unconscionable to me that we almost refuse to acknowledge the death in Baghdad of innocent civilians every day as a direct consequence of planned US air strikes. Remember for each Hellfire missile fired, the statistics tell us that 9 civilians will die for every combatant killed. We so ignore this horrifying fact.

It is time to acknowledge the war crimes, bring the criminals to justice, and get the hell out of Iraq.

Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog

Different Perspectives: from the air before death strikes

In Iraq, a Surge in U.S. Airstrikes
By Ernesto Londoño and Amit R. Paley / May 23, 2008

Military Says Attacks Save Troops’ Lives, but Civilian Casualties Elicit Criticism; Since clashes broke out in eastern Baghdad in late March the U.S. Army has fired more than 200 hellfire missiles in Baghdad, killing over 251 people. A pilot describes his experiences.

CAMP TAJI, Iraq — From an Apache helicopter, Capt. Ben Katzenberger’s battlefield resembles a vast mosaic of tiny brown boxes.

“The city looks like a bucket of Legos dumped out on the ground,” the 26-year-old pilot said. “It’s brown Legos, no color. It’s really dense and hard to pick things out because everything looks the same.”

He uses a powerful lens to zoom in on tiny silhouettes, trying to identify people with “hostile intent” among hundreds of ordinary citizens in Baghdad.

In recent weeks, Katzenberger and other pilots have dramatically increased their use of helicopter-fired missiles against enemy fighters, often in densely populated areas. Since late March, the military has fired more than 200 Hellfire missiles in the capital, compared with just six missiles fired in the previous three months.

The military says the tactic has saved the lives of ground troops and prevented attacks, but the strikes have also killed and wounded civilians, provoking criticism from Iraqis.

On Wednesday, eight people, including two children, were killed when a U.S. helicopter opened fire on a group of Iraqis traveling to a U.S. detention center to greet a man who was being released from custody, Iraqi officials said.

The U.S. military said in a statement that it had targeted men linked to a suicide bombing network. “Unfortunately, two children were killed when the other occupants of the vehicle, in which they were riding, exhibited hostile intent,” the statement said.

U.S. officials say they go to great lengths to avoid harming civilians in airstrikes.

Different Perspectives: on the ground after death and mayhem strike

“It’s not Hollywood and it’s not 110 percent perfect,” said Col. Timothy J. Edens, the commander of the 12th Combat Aviation Brigade, of the accuracy of his unit’s strikes. “It is as precise as very hardworking soldiers and commanders can make it. These criminals do not operate in a clean battle space. It is occupied by civilians, law-abiding Iraqis.”

Those civilians include people like Zahara Fadhil, a 10-year-old girl with a tiny frame and long brown hair. Relatives said she was wounded by a missile on April 20 at approximately 8 p.m. in Baghdad’s Shiite enclave of Sadr City. The U.S. military said it fired a Hellfire missile in Zahara’s neighborhood at that time, targeting men who were seen loading rockets into a sedan.

Her face drained of color and her legs scarred by shrapnel, Zahara spoke haltingly when asked what she thought of U.S. troops.

“They kill people,” she said. Lying in bed, she gasped for air before continuing. “They should leave Iraq now.”

Shortly after Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki launched an operation in late March to crack down on Shiite militias in the southern city of Basra, Shiite fighters in Baghdad stepped up mortar and rocket attacks against the Green Zone, the fortified area housing many U.S. and Iraqi officials. A handful of Americans were killed in those attacks.

The U.S. military responded by targeting fighters from the air, firing Hellfire missiles almost daily into Sadr City, a vast and impoverished district that is the Baghdad stronghold of anti-American cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. U.S. forces have also supported Iraqi troops on the ground.

Many residents described the recent military operations in Sadr City as indiscriminate attacks. Civilian deaths and damage to homes were key reasons Sadrist leaders demanded that U.S. troops remain on the sidelines of an Iraqi Army incursion into Sadr City this week that has significantly reduced violence there.

At a sprawling air base on the outskirts of Baghdad, Edens, Katzenberger and their colleagues live in small trailers surrounded by blast walls, play volleyball on sand courts and eat at an outdoor food court. Many of the pilots are in their 20s.

The pilots sometimes scrawl messages on the five-foot-long missiles strapped to their “birds.” During a recent visit to the base, a reporter saw a missile addressed to “Haji,” an honorific for people who have made the pilgrimage to Mecca. Many U.S. soldiers use it to refer dismissively to Iraqis and Arabs in general. Someone wrote “rock this thang” on another.

The small, white trailers adjacent to the airfield where the pilots do paperwork have Christmas lights strung from the ceiling. Two bumper stickers on windows say: “I [heart] Sadr City.”

Just before the missile hit, Zahara was returning home from delivering food to neighbors. She was near the door when her grandmother yelled: “Get inside the house!”

As she began to move, the missile crashed into the house, throwing her behind a set of stairs.

One of Zahara’s uncles, Dhia Rahi Shaie al-Koreishi, 34, a taxi driver, and her grandmother, Um Fadhil al-Koreishi, were killed by the blast.

“The heart of this family has been ripped out,” said Alaa Rahi Shaie, 29, another uncle, who was stoic in describing the death of his brother. “This is his blood,” he said, indicating red splotches in front of his home. “And the remains of his head are over there.”

He pointed at a large mound of dirt. A group of young boys dug out the remains and then showed visitors a black bag filled with clumps of hair and scalp.

Family members and neighbors said they didn’t see anyone in the area fire rockets. Two black funeral banners hung outside the battered home to honor the dead.

Read all of it here. / Washington Post

US strike kills children north of Baghdad
By Kim Gamel, May 23, 2008

BAGHDAD – A US helicopter strike north of Baghdad killed eight people in a vehicle, including at least two children, Iraqi officials said Thursday, insisting all the dead were civilians. The US military said six were al-Qaida militants but acknowledged children were killed.

The attack threatened to further alienate Sunni Arabs at a time when the US is working to keep them on their side in the fight against the terror network.

Associated Press Television News footage showed the bodies of three children in blood-drenched clothes – the eldest appearing to be in his early teens – along with the bodies of five men, at the hospital in Beiji, where the dead were taken after Wednesday evening’s strike.

Iraqi and US officials each put the number of slain children at two, and the reason for the discrepancy was not known.

It was the latest incident threatening to alienate Sunnis, who have played a key role in the steep decline in violence over the past year by joining forces with the Americans against al-Qaida in Iraq. Beiji, an oil hub 250 kilometers (155 miles) north of Baghdad, lies in a largely Sunni Arab area.

The strike came as the US was trying to ease Iraqi anger over the shooting of a copy of the Quran by an American sniper, who used Islam’s holy book for target practice.

In Afghanistan, a protest over the Quran shooting turned violent, leaving a NATO soldier and two demonstrators dead, after protesters began throwing stones at police and troops, a NATO spokesman said. Police opened fire on the protesters, killing two. The soldier was also killed by gunfire but it was not clear by whom.

Iraq has not seen any street protests over the Quran shooting, which took place earlier this month in a Sunni Arab area west of Baghdad. But Iraqi leaders have loudly denounced the act, prompting a series of apologies from US military commanders and US President George W. Bush. The US military says the sniper was disciplined and removed from Iraq.

In the attack near Beiji, the military said its forces were targeting members of an al-Qaida suicide bombing network. The forces engaged the occupants of a vehicle after they refused to surrender and “exhibited hostile intent.”

It said five suspected “terrorists” were killed along with two children in the vehicle. A sixth militant was killed in a field next to the road, according to a statement.

Beiji police Col. Mudhher al-Qaisi, however, said the dead were six civilian farmers and two children who were fleeing in their vehicle from the area after the US forces launched their raids. He said a US helicopter became suspicious of their vehicle and opened fire on it.

A resident of the area, Mohammed al-Shimmari, said the raid occurred when a group of his relatives had gathered at the home of his cousin, who is being held by the US military on suspicion of insurgent ties, after hearing he would be released soon.

Read the rest here. / New Zealand Herald

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Musical Remarks About the Big Five Oil Companies

Pain at the Pump by Brent Burns

“This song is self-explanatory. It’s hard not to believe that a few people are making billions off a lot of regular folks who are just getting by! These ridiculous prices are a real burden on the working class. ‘The Man’ knows we have to have gas and he’s jackin’ us around again. I’ll be damned if I’ll be quiet about it!” Brent Burns

For more, click here.

Thanks to Mariann Wizard / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

It’s Larry Craig "Bobblefoot" Day!

Minor league promotion is homage to senator’s airport bathroom bust
May 22, 2008

Capitalizing on Senator Larry Craig’s restroom bust, a Minnesota minor league baseball team this Sunday is giving away a promotional item celebrating the Republican politician’s arrest last year at the Minneapolis-St.Paul airport.

Dubbed a “bobblefoot” (as opposed to a bobblehead doll), the polyresin giveaway depicts an occupied bathroom stall (the inhabitant’s pants and shoes can be seen below the stall’s panels). When the St. Paul Saints’s “bobblefoot” is shaken, one of the spring-loaded feet taps. The keepsake, which will be handed out to the first 2500 fans attending the Saints’s May 25 game against the Fort Worth Cats, is pictured above.

According to an undercover cop’s account, while in the airport bathroom, Craig “tapped his toes several times and moved his foot closer to my foot.” The officer, Sgt. Dave Karsnia, was seated in an adjoining stall and believed Craig’s footsie was a signal that the politician was seeking sex. Craig has denied this, blaming his “wide stance” for Karsnia’s unfortunate misinterpretation.

Source. / The Smoking Gun

What caught my attention about this story is that I have actually seen the St. Paul Saints play baseball. While attending a family reunion in Minneapolis, where my oldest nephew was getting married, we went to see the Saints at their stadium next to the railroad tracks in St. Paul.

They are an independent minor league team, unaffiliated with any major league team; their stadium has the best food (I loved the moose bratwurst), and, as the article verifies, the best promotions. On the night we attended, they had suspended a randomly-selected fan over the center-field fence, and promised all in attendance some prize if the fan was hit by a home run during the game. Truly wacky!

Their stadium is a really old, rickety structure, and the fans are incredibly laid back. But the brats – that’s the best part!

Thanks for running that story and awakening these pleasant memories!

David Ross / The Rag Blog

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Americans: Cowering from Our Responsibility to Defend the Constitution


For His Treatment of Children in the ‘War on Terror’ : Bush Is a War Criminal
By Dave Lindorff / May 22, 2008

Surely nothing that President Bush has done in his two wretched terms of office — not the invasion and destruction of Iraq, not the overturning of the five-centuries-old tradition of habeas corpus, not his authorization and encouragement of torture, not his campaign of domestic spying — nothing, can compare in its ugliness as his approval, as commander in chief, of the imprisoning of over 2500 children.

According to the US government’s own figures, that is how many kids 17 years and younger have been held since 2001 as “enemy combatants” — often for over a year, and sometimes for over five years. At least eight of those children, some reportedly as young as 10, were held at Guantanamo. They even had a special camp for them there: Camp Iguana. One of those kids committed suicide at the age of 21, after spending five years in confinement at Guantanamo. (Ironically and tragically, that particular victim of the president’s criminal policy, had been determined by the Pentagon to have been innocent only two weeks before he took his own life, but nobody bothered to tell him he was slated for release and a return home to Afghanistan.)

I say Bush’s behavior is criminal because since 1949, under the Geneva Conventions signed and adopted by the US, and incorporated into US law under the Constitution’s supremacy clause, children under the age of 15 are classed as “protected persons,” and even if captured while fighting against US forces are to be considered victims, not POWs. In 2002, the Bush administration signed an updated version of that treaty, raising the “protected person” age to all those “under 18.”

Treaties don’t mean much to this president, to the vice president, or to the rest of the administration, but they should mean something to the rest of us.

But capturing and imprisoning children isn’t even the worst of this president’s war crimes when it comes to the abuse of the young. Under Bush’s leadership as commander in chief, the US military in Iraq and Afghanistan has been considering any male child in Iraq of age 14 or older to be a potential combatant. They have been treated accordingly — shot by US troops, imprisoned as “enemy combatants,” and subjected to torture.

In the 2004 assault by US Marines on the city of Fallujah, things were even worse. Dexter Filkins, a reporter for the New York Times, reported that before that invasion, some 20,000 Marines encircled the doomed city, which the White House had decided to level because it harbored a bunch of insurgents and had angered the American public by capturing, killing and mutilating the bodies of four mercenaries working for US forces. The residents of the 300,000-population city were warned of the coming all-out attack. Women and children and old people were allowed to flee the city and pass through the cordon of troops. But Filkins reported that males determined to be “of combat age,” which in this case was established as 12 and up, were barred from leaving, and sent back into the city to await their fate. Young boys were ripped from their screaming mothers and sent trudging back to the city to face death.

In the ensuing slaughter, as the US dumped bombs, napalm, phosphorus, anti-personnel fragmentation weapons and an unimaginable quantity of machine gun and small arms fire on the city, it is clear that many of those young boys died.

This was a triple war crime. First of all, it was a case of collective punishment — a practice popular with the Nazis in World War II, and barred by the Geneva Conventions. The international laws of war also guarantees the right of surrender, so those men and boys who tried to leave, even if suspected of being enemy fighters, should have been allowed to surrender and be held as captives until their loyalties could be established. The boys, meanwhile, were “protected persons” who were by law to be treated as victims of war, and protected from harm.

Instead they were treated as the enemy, to be destroyed.

For these crimes, the president should today be impeached by the Congress and then tried as a war criminal.

After watching this Congress cower from its responsibility to defend the Constitution, I have little hope of that happening. But I do harbor the hope that once Bush has left office, some prosecutor in another country — perhaps Spain, or Canada or Germany — will use the doctrine of universal jurisdiction to indict him for war crimes, and, should he leave the country for some lucrative speaking engagement, arrest him, the way former dictator Augusto Pinochet was arrested by a Spanish prosecutor on a visit to the UK.

For his abuse, imprisonment and killing of children, this president should stand trial for war crimes.

Dave Lindorff’s most recent book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006). His work is available at http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/.

Source / Information Clearing House / Common Dreams

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Rove to Testify Before Congress … Hah, Hah, Hah

Man, just read what this piece says: “… Conyers had negotiated with Rove’s attorneys for more than a year …” This says everything I need to know about the meaning of Congress.

Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog

House Committee Subpoenas Karl Rove
By Lara Lakes Jordan / May 22, 2008

WASHINGTON — The House Judiciary Committee on Thursday subpoenaed President Bush’s former chief political adviser, Karl Rove, to testify about whether the White House improperly meddled with the Justice Department.

Accusations of politics influencing decisions at the department led to the resignation last year of Bush’s attorney general, Alberto Gonzales.

It’s unclear whether Rove will ever be forced to testify. The White House refuses to let him or other top aides testify about private conversations with Bush, citing executive privilege to block Congress’ demands.

The subpoena orders Rove to appear before the House panel on July 10. Lawmakers want to ask him about the White House’s role in firing nine U.S. attorneys in 2006 and the prosecution of former Gov. Don Siegelman of Alabama, a Democrat.

House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers had negotiated with Rove’s attorneys for more than a year over whether he would testify voluntarily.

“It is unfortunate that Mr. Rove has failed to cooperate with our requests,” Conyers, D-Mich., said in a statement. “Although he does not seem the least bit hesitant to discuss these very issues weekly on cable television and in the print news media, Mr. Rove and his attorney have apparently concluded that a public hearing room would not be appropriate.”

Conyers added: “Unfortunately, I have no choice today but to compel his testimony on these very important matters.”

Both Rove and his attorney, Robert Luskin, declined to comment.

Read it here. / AOL News

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Fox News : A Rogue’s Gallery


Fox News’ Criminal Pundits
By James Thindwa

Conservatives have created a two-tier system of accountability: one for progressives, the other for themselves and their claimed moral rectitude. Share Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine The sensationalist media inquest into Sen. Barack Obama’s associations has cheapened the national debate. It has also exposed the hypocrisy and double standard of the conservative media.

Fox News, which has championed this “guilt by association,” questions Obama’s fitness for office because of his relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers, a distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

But if Fox News truly believed in guilt-by-association, the network would have severed ties with some of its pundits and consultants.

Mark Fuhrman — of O.J. Simpson infamy — is now one of its talking heads. Fuhrman, if you remember, was convicted of lying under oath during Simpson’s murder trial when he denied having used the word “nigger.” For right-wingers unburdened with racial sensitivity, Fuhrman’s easy use of the “n” word was probably not a big deal. And for Fox News, flouting the law is OK as long as the cause is right. O.J. Simpson was guilty, legalities be damned.

G. Gordon Liddy, sentenced to 20 years in prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate break-in (he served almost five), enjoys a post-prison celebrity status among conservatives. Liddy turns up on Fox News as a respected commentator, and has cultivated a fan base as a right-wing talk-radio jock. While Fox’s pundits froth at the mouth condemning Ayers for his membership in the Weather Underground 40 years ago, Liddy, whose crimes created a constitutional crisis, is embraced and celebrated as a conservative hero.

Conservatives have created a two-tier system of accountability: one for progressives, the other for themselves and their claimed moral rectitude.

How about Oliver North? His claim to fame was the Iran-Contra affair in the ’80s, when he illegally sold weapons to Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini and transferred the money to Nicaraguan Contras, in violation of U.S. law. He was charged with 16 felonies and convicted of three, which were later overturned because the prosecution had used testimony given under a grant of immunity. For his mockery of the Constitution, North became a right-wing folk hero, eventually landing a job at Fox News as an Iraq War correspondent. He was subsequently given his own television show, “War Stories.”

Former Bush adviser Karl Rove is now a paid commentator on Fox News. Though Rove has not been convicted of any crimes, he has had an uneasy relationship with ethics and the law: reportedly the mastermind of the political firing of nine U.S. attorneys; allegedly outing CIA operative Valerie Plame; spreading rumors in 2000 about Sen. John McCain having fathered a daughter with a black woman; and selling the Iraq War for political advantage. But to Fox News and its conservative base, Rove is a hero.

William Kristol is not a former convict, but as salesman-in-chief for the Iraq War he has committed crimes of conscience. Kristol has a permanent seat on Fox News Sunday. Despite his discredited claims about Saddam Hussein’s nuclear programs and his many attempts to link Hussein with al Qaeda, Kristol continues to be featured as an expert on the war.

Bill O’Reilly, the big daddy of Fox News, reached a settlement in November 2004 with a colleague who had reportedly recorded him attempting to have phone sex with her as he masturbated with a vibrator. This history contradicts the self-righteous protestations in his book Cultural Warriors and his screeds against “liberal” wrongdoers.

Newt Gingrich, Fox News’ most erudite and self-righteous pundit, has a checkered past that includes reportedly serving divorce papers to his cancer-stricken wife while she lay in her hospital bed. The former House Speaker also admitted to an affair with an aide while he was still married, even as he championed President Clinton’s impeachment. Most liberals believe these private matters should not disqualify people from public office. However, the pedantic moralists at Fox News cannot exempt themselves from the standards they apply to others. Their hypocrisy needs exposing.

Conservatives have created a two-tier system of accountability: one for progressives, the other for themselves. But their claimed moral rectitude belies an indulgent attitude toward questionable legal and ethical conduct. Mark Fuhrman, G. Gordon Liddy and Oliver North betrayed the rule of law that conservatives like to crow about.

Fox News and its right-wing functionaries threaten the fabric of our electoral system. The push back should start with denying them legitimacy. That means exposing their hypocritical invocation of the “rule of law,” challenging their simplistic “anything goes” standard of patriotism and denouncing their use of guilt-by-association.

Source. / In These Times

Thanks to Carl Davidson / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Psycho Christians, McCain, and the Media

Robert Mitchum as crazed preacher in “Night of the Hunter.”

UNION CITY, Calif. — Republican John McCain rejected the months-old endorsement of an influential Texas televangelist after an audio recording surfaced in which the preacher said God sent Adolf Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land.

“Obviously, I find these remarks and others deeply offensive and indefensible, and I repudiate them. I did not know of them before Reverend Hagee’s endorsement, and I feel I must reject his endorsement as well,” the presidential candidate said in a statement issued Thursday.

The Huffington Post / May 22, 2008

Why the press gives McCain a pass for consorting with batshit holy men, but condemns Obama to talk-show hell for the same sin.
By Gary Kamiya / May 20, 2008

John McCain has some seriously screwed-up holy men surrounding him. First, there’s the Rev. John Hagee, a hate-monger and certifiable loon who believes that Hurricane Katrina was God’s judgment on New Orleans for planning a gay parade, calls Catholicism a “false cult system” that conspired with Hitler to exterminate the Jews, and believes that America’s divine duty is to destroy Iran. Then there’s the Rev. Rod Parsley, who garnishes his bigoted theology by calling Islam “the greatest religious enemy of our civilization and the world” and saying that Muhammad was “a mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil.”

These psycho Christians make Robert Mitchum’s sociopathic traveling preacher in “The Night of the Hunter” (the guy with “love” tattooed on one hand and “hate” on the other) look like St. Francis of Assisi. They are undiluted bigots who espouse beliefs just as twisted as those promulgated by the Rev. Louis Farrakhan — and far more toxic and extreme than those held by Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Yet, as many media critics have noted, no major-network interviewer is demanding that McCain denounce Hagee or Parsley, as Tim Russert infamously demanded again and again that Obama do of Farrakhan during a prime-time debate. No cable channel is ranting 24/7 about McCain’s failure to disavow these extremist bigots, and speculating that his ties to Hagee and Parsley could cost him the election. Considering that McCain desperately needs Hagee and Parsley to deliver votes in key states like Ohio, this is no small matter.

It’s true that neither Hagee nor Parsley was McCain’s pastor and personal spiritual advisor, as Wright was for Obama. Obama’s personal relationship with Wright raised more legitimate questions than were raised by McCain’s actively seeking Hagee’s endorsement. But especially during the second, more serious outburst of Wright-hysteria, after Wright went off the reservation at the National Press Club, it was obvious that the story had really shifted to Wright, not Obama. The brouhaha was a media ritual, in which Obama was required to sacrifice an unseemly political ally as a kind of campaign station of the cross. Obama had already given his now-famous speech about race in Philadelphia, and no one seriously believed that he shared Wright’s views. In any case, even if Hagee and Parsley had been McCain’s pastors, it’s hard to imagine that the media would have attacked him as relentlessly as it has attacked Obama over Wright and Farrakhan.

The media’s double standard is all about deference to perceived mainstream norms, and tiptoeing around the Christian right. Despite their cartoonish views, the media treats Hagee and Parsley as quasi-mainstream figures, which makes McCain’s relationship with them non-newsworthy. The dirty little secret of mainstream American journalism is that it operates within invisible constraints that conform to some imagined Middle American consensus. The issue isn’t that journalists share Hagee and Parsley’s views so much as that they know that they are widely held, which makes them reluctant to acknowledge how truly outrageous they are. After years of nodding at the whacked-out likes of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, the media has, to borrow Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s famous phrase, defined right-wing religious deviancy down. More or less “orthodox” Christian-right insanity, of the sort espoused by Hagee and Parsley, is familiar and normal, whereas black-church radicalism, with its ties to left-wing liberation theology, is not. In 2000, 45 percent of the population told Gallup they were either born-again or evangelical Christians.

The question of “newsworthiness” is one of the blind spots of conventional journalism. Since right-wing religious leaders have been endorsing conservative Republican candidates for decades (Moral Majority founder Jerry Falwell endorsed Ronald Reagan; Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani; a small church in North Carolina kicked out members who voted for John Kerry), when another one does it, it’s a dog-bites-man story. Mainstream editors and reporters pose as hard-bitten realists, but they are in fact reluctant to deviate from pack thinking. For the media to suddenly go after McCain on Hagee as hard as it has gone after Obama on Farrakhan and Wright would represent, in their eyes, a “controversial” rejection of the way things have always been done.

This echo-chamber effect, in which a story is a story because it has been a story before, highlights the critical importance of precedent. From the beginning, the media didn’t go hard after extreme figures on the religious right because those extreme figures have major constituencies. The taboo against criticizing Christianity also plays a crucial role: Extreme, even demented beliefs are seen as untouchable so long as they are part of what is seen as mainstream evangelical Christianity. Of course this taboo does not extend to criticizing left-wing Christianity, à la Wright. If some public figure said that the earthquake in China was caused by the wrath of Zeus, who was offended because women’s rights had reduced the number of compliant virgins available for him to deflower, any politician who consorted with him would be forced to repudiate him. But Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, John Hagee and other such figures have said essentially the same thing and gotten a pass. Afraid of coming across as arrogant elitists who don’t understand or respect the faith of “real” Americans, the media has pulled its punches on the Christian right for years.

Patriotism and Islamophobia also contribute to the blank check handed to the religious right. Hagee and Parsley may be barking mad, but they wave the flag and denounce Islam. In the age of George W. Bush, that qualifies them as solidly in the American mainstream.

In fact, the media’s failure to subject Hagee and Parsley to the same scrutiny that they have given to Wright and Farrakhan is closely related to its colossal failures in covering Bush’s “war on terror.” The media failed in the run-up to the war in Iraq in large part because, under the patriotic pressure of 9/11, it followed the wartime norm of swallowing the administration line. Its shortcomings with Hagee and Parsley reflect the same internalized self-censorship.

One could argue that neither McCain nor Obama should be subjected to this “gotcha” game in which the media demands that a candidate prove his character and values by publicly excommunicating a problematic political ally. But the fact is that political news coverage today is driven by sensationalism, and candidates are subjected to simplistic tests, and that’s not going to change. So if Obama is forced to answer for Wright’s off-the-wall black nationalist Christianity, it’s only fair that McCain should be forced to answer for Hagee’s even more off-the-wall Christian right looniness as well.

Yet the coverage has been anything but fair — not just because of the media’s fear of going after nutty Christians, but because everything about Obama is unprecedented and therefore “sensational.” He’s not only the first-ever black presidential front-runner, but the first to confront a loose-cannon black pastor who said, “God damn America.” It bleeds! It leads! Tear up the front page! Call in the pundits to opine! By contrast, McCain’s mealy-mouthed half-criticisms of Hagee’s outrageous statements, and Hagee’s transparently disingenuous apology for attacking Catholics, are so familiar as to be sleep-inducing. There’s practically nothing that McCain can say or do that can make news the way that Obama does just by walking down the street.

By incessantly attacking Obama as strange and scary, which is certain to be his strategy, McCain will be tapping into this already existing media bias toward sensationalism. His and Bush’s outrageous charges that Obama is an “appeaser” are intended to play into this, and much worse is sure to be coming (get ready for a revival of “he’s a Muslim” smears from proxies who can be disavowed). Whether the press will be able to find the backbone to reveal the cynical emptiness of those charges, and bring aggressive scrutiny even to the old, familiar, patriotic, war-supporting, flag-waving ethos represented by McCain, may go a long way toward determining who our next president is.

Source. / Salon.com

Mother Jones magazine broke the story about Rev. Parsley and Islam. Please see McCain’s Spiritual Guide: Destroy Islam .

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Reflections on the Question of Appeasement

Financier Prescott Bush and son George H.W. Bush.

The Bushes and Hitler’s Appeasement
By Robert Parry

The irony of George W. Bush going before the Knesset and mocking the late Sen. William Borah for expressing surprise at Adolf Hitler’s 1939 invasion of Poland is that Bush’s own family played a much bigger role assisting the Nazis.

If Borah, an isolationist Republican from Idaho, sounded naïve saying “Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided,” then what should be said about Bush’s grandfather and other members of his family providing banking and industrial assistance to the Nazis as they built their war machine in the 1930s?

The archival evidence is now clear that Prescott Bush, the president’s grandfather, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from and collaborated with key financial backers of Nazi Germany.

That business relationship continued after Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and even after Germany declared war on the United States following Japan’s bombing of Pearl Harbor in December 1941. It stopped only when the U.S. government seized assets of Bush-connected companies in late 1942 under the “Trading with the Enemy Act.”

So, perhaps instead of holding up Sen. Borah to ridicule, Bush might have acknowledged in his May 15 speech that his forebears also were blind to the dangers of Hitler.

Bush might have noted that his family’s wealth, which fueled his own political rise, was partly derived from Nazi collaboration and possibly from slave labor provided by Auschwitz and other concentration camps.

A more honest speech before the Knesset – on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s founding – might have contained an apology to the Jewish people from a leading son of the Bush family for letting its greed contribute to Nazi power and to the horrors of the Holocaust. Instead, there was just the jab at Sen. Borah, who died in 1940.

President Bush apparently saw no reason to remind the world of a dark chapter from the family history. After all, those ugly facts mostly disappeared from public consciousness soon after World War II.

Protected by layers of well-connected friends, Prescott Bush brushed aside the Nazi scandal and won a U.S. Senate seat from Connecticut, which enabled him to start laying the foundation for the family’s political dynasty.

In recent years, however, the archival records from the pre-war era have been assembled, drawing from the Harriman family papers at the Library of Congress, documents at the National Archives, and records from war-crimes trials after Germany’s surrender.

Managers for the Powerful

One can trace the origins of this story back more than a century to the emergence of Samuel Bush, George W. Bush’s great-grandfather, as a key manager for a set of powerful American business families, including the Rockefellers and the Harrimans. [See Consortiumnews.com’s “Bush Family Chronicles: The Patriarchs.”]

That chapter took an important turn in 1919 when investment banker George Herbert Walker teamed up with Averell Harriman, scion to a railroad fortune, to found a new investment banking firm, W.A. Harriman Company.

The Harriman firm was backed by the Rockefellers’ National City Bank and the Morgan family’s Guaranty Trust. The English-educated Walker assisted in assembling the Harriman family’s overseas business investments.

In 1921, Walker’s favorite daughter, Dorothy, married Samuel Bush’s son Prescott, a Yale graduate and a member of the school’s exclusive Skull and Bones society. Handsome and athletic, admired for his golf and tennis skills, Prescott Bush was a young man with the easy grace of someone born into the comfortable yet competitive world of upper-crust contacts.

Three years later, Dorothy gave birth to George Herbert Walker Bush in Milton, Massachusetts.
Lifted by the financial boom of the 1920s, Prescott and Dorothy Bush were on the rise. By 1926, George Herbert Walker had brought his son-in-law in on a piece of the Harriman action, hiring him as a vice president in the Harriman banking firm.

By the mid-Thirties, Prescott Bush had become a managing partner at the merged firm of Brown Brothers Harriman. The archival records also show that Brown Brothers Harriman served as the U.S. financial service arm for German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, an early funder of the Nazi Party.

Thyssen, an admirer of Adolf Hitler since the 1920s, joined the Nazi Party in 1931 when it was still a fringe organization. He helped bail the struggling party out with financial help, even providing its headquarters building in Munich.

Meanwhile, Averell Harriman had launched the Hamburg-Amerika line of steamships to facilitate the bank’s dealings with Germany, and made Prescott Bush a director. The ships delivered fuel, steel, coal, gold and money to Germany as Hitler was consolidating his power and building his war machine.

Other evidence shows that Prescott Bush served as the director of the Union Banking Corp. of New York, which represented Thyssen’s interests in the United States and was owned by a Thyssen-controlled bank in the Netherlands.

As a steel magnate, Thyssen was amassing a fortune as Hitler rearmed Germany. Documents also linked Bush to Thyssen’s Consolidated Silesian Steel Company, which was based in mineral-rich Silesia on the German-Polish border and exploited slave labor from Nazi concentration camps, including Auschwitz. But records at the National Archives do not spell out exactly when Bush’s connection ended or what he knew about the business details.

In 1941, Thyssen had a falling out with Hitler and fled to France where he was captured. Much of Thyssen’s empire went under the direct control of the Nazis, but even that did not shatter the business ties that existed with Prescott Bush and Harriman’s bank.

It wasn’t until August 1942 that newspaper stories disclosed the secretive ties between Union Banking Corp. and Nazi Germany.

After an investigation, the U.S. government seized the property of the Hamburg-Amerika line and moved against affiliates of the Union Banking Corp. In November 1942, the government seized the assets of the Silesian-American Corp. [For more details, see an investigative report by the U.K. Guardian, Sept. 25, 2004.]

No Kiss of Death

For most public figures, allegations of trading with the enemy would have been a political kiss of death, but the disclosures barely left a lipstick smudge on Averell Harriman, Prescott Bush and other business associates implicated in the Nazi business dealings.

“Politically, the significance of these dealings – the great surprise – is that none of it seemed to matter much over the next decade or so,” wrote Kevin Phillips in American Dynasty.

“A few questions would be raised, but Democrat Averell Harriman would not be stopped from becoming federal mutual security administrator in 1951 or winning election as governor of New York in 1954. … Nor would Republican Prescott Bush (who was elected senator from Connecticut in 1952) and his presidential descendants be hurt in any of their future elections.”

Indeed, the quick dissipation of the Nazi financial scandal was only a portent of the Bush family’s future. Unlike politicians of lower classes, the Bushes seemed to travel in a bubble impervious to accusations of impropriety, since the Eastern Establishment doesn’t like to think badly of its own. [For details, see Robert Parry’s Secrecy & Privilege.]

To this day – as President Bush showed by mocking the long-forgotten Sen. Borah and then wielding the Nazi “appeasement” club against Barack Obama and other Democrats – the assumption remains that the bubble will continue to protect the Bush family name.

However, the evidence from dusty archives suggests that the Bush family went way beyond appeasement of Adolf Hitler to aiding and abetting the Nazis.

[Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com.]

Source. / Consortiumnews / Posted May 18, 2008

Also see How Bush’s grandfather helped Hitler’s rise to power. / Guardian, U.K.

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

D. Zachary Cares About Vets, Other Victims of War

For GI’s, best cure is prevention
By Doug Zachary / The Rag Blog

[Rag Blogger Doug Zachary of Veterans for Peace originally posted the followinig as a comment to Vets Getting Shaft from Veterans Affairs by Maya Schenwar and Matt Renner, posted earlier today on The Rag Blog.]

Working class youth across the country have been conned into participating in this war, and they are being systematically cast aside upon their return home. There is nothing new about this behavior on the part of the government. From the so-called Revolutionary War on, veterans have been consistently denied their “rights”.

Veterans For Peace has been receiving a barrage of information of this sort for a couple of weeks now. Just in the past two days, Ms. Perez at Waco has been nailed as responsible for issuing “orders” to under-diagnose PTSD. Before she came to light, and throughout this war and occupation, we have seen several ways in which the Pentagon and the VA were working separately and together to deny soldiers their deserved care.

Sadly, even when a “proper” diagnosis is made, the quality of the care rendered at most VA facilities is lacking. The solutions used are usually drugs, drugs, and more drugs; nothing in the way of discernment or consciousness-building regarding the experiences of the soldiers. Just drug them and shut them the fuck up! This helps to ensure that future generations of young people can be fooled into acting against the interests of their own social class and persuaded to give up body, mind, and spirit to serve the Ultra-rich.

Some people in VFP make this their primary issue; Bill Perry in Philly comes to mind as the best among us in getting the Iraq vet through the maze at the VA. MY efforts are aimed at awakening the veterans and guiding them to the Iraq Veterans Against the War and to other peace groups. From my 39 years among Peace Veterans, I have learned that the best, and perhaps only, cure for PTSD, is a life dedicated to righting the wrongs by working for peace and justice. We are talking about a wound of the Mind and heart; it is about consciousness.

Frankly, my concern is for all the victims of the war and occupation, especially the Iraqi citizens who are suffering at the hands of these soldiers. The absolutely best “cure” is prevention. That is why Austin VFP is at the gates of Fort Hood and in the cafes and bars in Killeen, “armed” with information (including the likelihood that, if wounded, they will be under-treated) trying to open the minds and hearts of these vets before they deploy, or re-deploy, or re-re-deploy. Other members of Austin VFP are deployed in the schools in our city, along with non-veteran members of Nonmilitary options for Youth, working, preventitively, to reduce the incidence of PTSD.

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas Rebuked Over Seizure of Mormon Children

Members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints leave the Tom Green County Courthouse in San Angelo, Texas, on Friday, April 18, 2008. Photo by Tony Gutierrez / AP.

Appeals court: state had no right to seize sect kids
By Lisa Sandberg and Terri Langford / May 22, 2008

SAN ANGELO — A Texas appeals court ruled today that a San Angelo judge exceeded her discretion when she ordered the state to take custody of children from a polygamist sect.

The order by a panel of the 3rd Court of Appeals in Austin gave State District Judge Barbara Walther 10 days to vacate her order, which applied to more than 460 children.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the decision means the children will be returned right away to the custody of their parents, followers of a breakaway Mormon sect called the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

A spokesman for Texas’ Child Protective Services said attorneys were reviewing the order. “Any decision regarding an appeal will be made later,” Patrick Crimmins said.

Two FLDS mothers whose children were placed in foster care learned of the decision from reporters on their way to the courthouse in San Angelo, unaware of the 3rd Court ruling or that child custody status hearings that started here this week had been canceled in its wake.

“Hurray. Praise the Lord,” said Sarah Barlow, 45, who has two children in foster care. “We’re grateful for this.”

Ilene Jeffs, 45, who has three children in foster care, said, “We’re grateful for anything that’s positive.”

FLDS spokesman Rod Parker said families not involved in the lawsuit ruled on today will be filing paperwork to ensure they “get the benefits of this ruling.”

Cynthia Martinez, a spokeswoman for Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid, which represented 48 mothers in the custody suit against the state, said, “We’re extremely happy with the ruling.”

Martinez said she wasn’t certain how soon the children might be returned to the 1,700-acre Yearning for Zion Ranch near Eldorado

“The way that the courts have ignored the legal rights of these mothers is ridiculous,” said Texas Rural Legal Aid attorney Julie Balovich, who also represents FLDS mothers. “It was about time a court stood up and said that was has been happening to these families is wrong.”

“It is a great day for families in the state of Texas,” Balovich added later. “It’s a great day for justice in Texas. It was the right decision.”

In the decision, the 3rd Court ruled that CPS failed to provide any evidence that the children were in imminent danger and acted hastily in removing them from their families.

The agency had argued that the children on the ranch near Eldorado were either abused or at risk of abuse. The Texas Family Code allows a judge to consider whether the “household” to which a child would be returned includes a person who has sexually abused another child. Child welfare officials alleged that the polygamist sect’s practice of marrying underage girls to older men places all its children at risk of sexual abuse.

According to the court, “The existence of the FLDS belief system as described by the Department’s witnesses, by itself, does not put children of FLDS parents in physical danger.”

It stated, “Removing children from their homes on an emergency basis before fully litigating the issue of whether the parents should continue to have custody of the children is an extreme measure.”

“The danger must be to the physical health or safety to the child,” the appeals court wrote. “The Department (CPS) did not present any evidence of danger to the physical health or safety of any male children or any female children who had not reached puberty.”

The state can either ask the Texas Supreme Court to stay the order or comply by returning the children to their parents, said Scott McCown, a former judge and executive director of the Center for Public Policy Priorities.

McCown said the appeals court is not saying the children could not be removed from their families, only that Walther had overstepped her authority by issuing an emergency order. He said protective services could still remove the children after a full trial.

But McCown said there is a very real risk that if the children are returned to their parents they will be moved to another state, Canada or Mexico and be outside the jurisdiction of Texas’ protective custody.

“One of the real dangers is flight, and the court doesn’t address that at all,” McCown said.

Dallas attorney Susan Hays, an ad litem attorney representing a 3-year-old girl, said also said the state’s options were to ask for a stay or comply. She said the stay could be sought either from the 3rd Court or the Texas Supreme Court.

In today’s order, she said, “What they’ve been told to do is start over, and do it right.”

Parker said, “All of the families want to express their thanks to Texas Rural Legal Aid for achieving this wonderful result. They’re ecstatic. They’re looking forward to being reunited with their children.”

Source. / Houston Chronicle

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Contempt for the Plight of the Common Man

Let’s be clear about the contempt that corporate Amerikkka holds for you, me, and all those trying to make their way. This example is one of thousands a day that shows that we are beneath them, they have no time for our petty concerns, and we would be better served by staying silent. It is time to bring an end to capitalism in all its criminality and contempt for us. Up the revolution !!

Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog

Countrywide CEO’s E-Mail Draws Fire
May 22, 2008

CALABASAS, Calif. – The chairman of beleaguered Countrywide Financial Corp. raised eyebrows and tempers with his snippy reply to an e-mail plea from a man who said he was in danger of losing his home.

“Disgusting,” Angelo Mozilo wrote in his inadvertent reply to an e-mail from Daniel Bailey Jr. who had asked the company to modify terms of his adjustable-rate mortgage.

Bailey said he didn’t fully understand the terms, was wrongly told he could refinance after a year and was on the verge of losing his home of 16 years because of unaffordable payments.

Bailey’s e-mail went to 20 Countrywide addresses. He used language from a form letter on the Web site LoanSafe.org, which offers advice to borrowers in trouble.

Countrywide said mass e-mails have flooded its inboxes and disrupted operations.

“This is unbelievable,” Mozilo wrote Tuesday. “Most of these letters now have the same wording. Obviously they are being counseled by some other person or by the Internet. Disgusting.”

Mozilo apparently clicked “reply” instead of “forward,” sending his comments back to Bailey.

Bailey posted the response on a LoanSafe forum, touching off a furor on housing Web sites.

A comment posted on loanworkout.org said Mozilo’s e-mail was “a perfect example of the ‘help’ they can expect to receive when contacting their lenders.”

Another comment on the Web site read: “If borrowers want the freedom to take out credit for hundreds of thousands of dollars, they are equally responsible to not sign something they don’t understand.”

Late Tuesday, Countrywide issued a statement saying the company and Mozilo “regret any misunderstanding caused by his inadvertent response to an e-mail by Mr. Bailey. Countrywide is actively working to help borrowers like Mr. Bailey keep their homes.”

Last week, a federal judge ruled that a shareholder lawsuit against Mozilo and other Countrywide executives and directors should go to trial. The plaintiffs claim the top officials failed to provide enough oversight of the lender and misled shareholders about the company’s true financial state.

According to congressional figures, Countrywide lost $1.2 billion in the third quarter of 2007 and another $422 million in the fourth quarter as the subprime mortgage crisis hit. The company’s stock fell 80 percent between February and the end of the year.

During the same period, Mozilo received a $1.9 million salary. He also received $20 million in performance-based stock awards and sold $121 million in stock.

Source. / AOL News / AP

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged | Leave a comment