Warsaw and Gaza : An Inevitable Comparison

New York Times, May 10th, 1943: ‘Warsaw Ghetto Uprising an Over-Reaction.’ From Kevin Dayhoff’s Storage Closet. Click for larger image..

In 1943 members of the Jewish population dug in and organized a poorly armed last-ditch resistance. They were crushed by a heavily armed and massive German army assault.

By Jay D. Jurie / The Rag Blog / January 10, 2009

As a number of commentators have observed, there is a comparison to be made between the concentration of Jews into the Warsaw ghetto 1939-45 and the current concentration of Palestinians into the Gaza strip.

There are some eerie similarities: the deliberate isolation and containment of an entire population, complete with walls and checkpoints, the imposition of slow death through deprivation of essential resources, including food and medical care.

In 1943 members of the Jewish population dug in and organized a poorly armed last-ditch resistance. They were crushed by a heavily armed and massive German army assault. In Gaza, Hamas has likewise dug in and is conducting an ill-equipped resistance against a heavily armed and massive Israeli Defense Force assault.

A minor dissimilarity: contrary to mythology that has been erected about the Warsaw uprising, that revolt was largely organized by secular left-wing elements rather than the Zionist movement.

A more significant dissimilarity: in Warsaw, the Jewish population was subject to direct eradication, forcibly loaded onto trains for transport to Nazi extermination camps.

Regardless of dissimilarities, in 2009 it is sad that any comparison with Warsaw in 1943 can be so easily made, especially as it involves reversing the role of the former victims and today’s perpetrators.

One of the lessons to be drawn from this experience is that no particular ethnic group holds a monopoly on truth, just as no group holds a monopoly on suffering. As we have been admonished by Albert Camus, “neither victims nor executioners be.”

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Israel Bombs Civilians Evacuated by UN

Smoke rises from Gaza for a 15th straight day of bombing. Photo from Mail Onlin, UK.

UN: Israel bombed building used for evacuated Palestinians
January 9, 2009

See the latest news, Below:

Israeli forces have dropped dozens of leaflets over the Gaza Strip warning civilians it is set to ‘escalate’ its military offensive. . .

The Israeli threat to launch a ‘new phase’ in its two-week-old offensive that has already killed more than 800 Palestinians came in defiance of international calls for a cease-fire. . .

JERUSALEM — A United Nations report released Friday said that earlier this week Israeli forces repeatedly shelled a home to which the UN had evacuated about 110 Palestinians in the Zeitoun area of Gaza City, killing around 30 people.

The Israeli military said it had no immediate comment.

‘We received eyewitness accounts from several survivors,’ said Allegrea Pacheco, the deputy head of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

The UN report, based on the testimonies, said that Israeli ground troops evacuated the Palestinians into a single-residence home on Sunday and warned them ‘to stay indoors.’

About half of the Palestinians were children.

Israeli forces then ‘shelled the home repeatedly’ the next morning, the UN official said.

‘It took several days until ambulances could reach the area,’ said Pacheco, explaining that the wounded and dead were stuck together in the same cramped rubble the entire time.

The International Red Cross had said that it was unable until Wednesday to access the area, where it found severely weakened people, including children, and corpses. It condemned Israel for violating international law by denying medical teams access to the area.

The UN said at least 257 of the over 781 Palestinians killed in Operation Cast Lead, were children. Since Israel began its ground operation on January 3 ‘the number of children fatalities has increased by 250 percent.’

‘There is no safe place in Gaza,’ said Pacheco, adding that civilians needed to be protected in times of war.

OCHA said the ongoing Israeli offensive in Gaza, now in its 14th day, has ‘resulted in the largest number of forcibly displaced Palestinians since 1967.’

Source / Deutsche Presse-Ageuter / Monsters and Critics

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, right, abstains from voting, as Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Gabriela Shalev, left, observes at the United Nations Security Council meeting. Photo from Mail Online, UK.

Israel drops leaflets over Gaza warning civilians of ‘escalation’ in violence
By David Williams / January 10, 2009

‘The IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) will escalate the operation in the Gaza Strip,’ the leaflets said in Arabic.

‘The IDF is not working against the people of Gaza but against Hamas and the terrorists only. Stay safe by following our orders.’

Meanwhile flames and smoke rose over Gaza City today amid more heavy fighting, with Israeli tanks advancing and Hamas militants firing rockets at Israel, despite international efforts to put a stop to the conflict.

The Israeli military said more than 15 militants were killed in overnight fighting.

It said aircraft attacked more than 40 targets including 10 rocket-launching sites, weapons-storage facilities, smuggling tunnels, an anti-aircraft missile launcher and gunmen.

In the day’s bloodiest incident, an Israeli tank shell killed nine people in a garden outside a home in the northern Gaza town of Jebaliya.

Separately, a woman was killed by tank fire in the nearby town of Beit Lahiya.

The Israeli army denied carrying out any attacks in the area.

The deaths, including those of several Palestinian gunmen, raised the Palestinian toll to at least 821, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza.

Thirteen Israelis have been killed: 10 soldiers and three civilians hit in rocket fire.

The fighting continued even during a three-hour ceasefire window Israel has established in recent days to allow aid into Gaza to sustain the 1.5 million people living there.

Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas said all parties would be responsible for continued violence, if they did not accept an Egypt-brokered truce.

Mr Abbas, who was in Cairo for talks on how to halt the conflict, which is in its 15th day, called for an international force in Gaza.

Israel has come under international criticism for the rising number of civilian casualties.

Israeli troops were accused yesterday of evacuating Palestinian civilians to a house in Gaza and then shelling it 24 hours later.

At least 30 died and dozens were injured in the incident which could prompt a war crimes investigation.

The United Nations said about half the dead were children. Witnesses told staff that 110 civilians had taken shelter in the building when it was hit last Sunday.

Israel said it was investigating the war crimes claims, but leading UN human rights official Navi Pillay called for a ‘credible and independent’ inquiry.

Israeli forces have already been accused of killing two UN drivers with tank fire and civilians sheltering at two UN schools.

Hopes of a truce were dashed with Israel rejecting a UN Security Council resolution calling for an ‘immediate and fully respected ceasefire’.

Hamas gave its answer by continuing to fire rockets into Israeli towns – about a dozen rockets were fired today.

The U.N. said it was hoping to resume full aid distribution today after receiving Israeli assurances that its staff would not be harmed.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, right, abstains from voting, as Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Gabriela Shalev, left, observes at the United Nations Security Council meeting

The allegations surrounding the death of the 30 civilians are the most serious so far in Israel’s assault on Gaza.

The Red Cross vented its fury at Israel after the strike, saying it had found four starving children at the house clinging to the corpses of their dead mothers.

‘This is a shocking incident,’ said Pierre Wettach, Red Cross regional head. ‘The Israeli military must have been aware of the situation but did not assist the wounded.’

Senior UN official Allegre Pacheco said medical workers found children who were ‘too weak’ from hunger to stand.

The Israeli Defence Force today released a map showing the rocket range into Israel from Gaza. The IDF claims one million people in Israel are within striking range of Gaza rockets

One survivor, Ahmed Ibrahim Samouni, 13, said from hospital: ‘We were asleep when the tanks and the planes struck, we all slept in one room. One shell hit our house.

‘We ran out and saw 15 men, they landed from helicopters on rooftops of buildings.’

Another report yesterday claimed U.S. President-elect Barack Obama was set to open up low-level talks with Hamas when he takes over the presidency.

With agreement growing in Washington that the Bush policy of excluding Hamas is counter-productive, the Guardian cited transition sources who claimed the President-elect is being advised to open clandestine talks with the Islamist organisation – possibly through European channels.

Palestinian children who fled from their homes following an Israeli air strike sit at a United Nations aid centre based in a local school. The UN has accused Israel of killing 30 more civilians in shelling in Gaza.
.
Meanwhile the Bush administration, which abstained in the U.N. vote calling for an end to fighting, has offered further support for Israel’s military goals.

‘This situation will not improve until Hamas stops lobbing rockets into Israel,’ White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said.

Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the UN resolution calling for a ceasefire ‘cannot work’ and declared: ‘The firing of rockets this morning only goes to show that the UN decision is unworkable and will not be adhered to by the murderous Palestinian organisations.’

Source / Mail Online, UK.

Thanks to S. M. Wilhelm / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thorne Dreyer : While Opposing Israeli Aggression, We Must Also Fight Anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitic cartoon from Arab press / WMD.

Anti-Semitism is for cowards. We believe Israel as it positions itself in the world to be a reactionary force, a rogue state. But that has nothing to do with the Jewish people or their rich history of dignity and struggle.

By Thorne Dreyer / The Rag Blog / January 10, 2009

See ‘Nazi Imagery, Anti-Semitism Rampant In Arab Media As Gaza Crisis Unfolds,’ Below.

In the world press we are learning about a sharp rise in anti-Semitic activity and Nazi imagery that have accompanied Israel’s assault on and incursion into Gaza. This has occurred in the media and in the streets, not only in the Middle East but in Europe and elsewhere in the world.

At the same time, we are witnessing a consistent stereotyping and villianizing of Palestinians and Arabs, and of those of the Islamic faith – and see this as a serious and growing problem.

The Rag Blog strongly opposes Israel’s inhumane occupation of Palestine and its current operation in Gaza.

We believe Israel’s actions – and those of its loyal and uncritical sponsor, the United States — to be cynical, immoral and in stark violation of international law. And we observe among many of Israel’s supporters a keen and hypocritical ability to ignore facts, to react in a knee-jerk fashion to any criticism of Israel and to label it anti-Semitic.

At the same time, we must recognize that the situation in the Middle East is far from simple, the product of centuries of history involving ethnic and religious fear and hatred. And we hold no truck for terrorism in any form, whether individual or state-sponsored, and find religious fundamentalism, and especially state religion, to be anathema in all its incarnations. We must add, however, that the policies of Israel and of the United States, with all the lip service to fighting terrorism and spreading democracy, are all about markets and politics and territory, and serve, in the face of all the pretty rhetoric, to create and invigorate fundamentalism and terrorism.

But we also must put ourselves on the record in the strongest words possible as opposing racism wherever it rears its horrific head.

Anti-Semitism is for cowards. We believe Israel as it positions itself in the world to be a reactionary force, a rogue state. But that has nothing to do with the Jewish people or their rich history of dignity and struggle.

One can and, we believe, should in all conscience oppose the unconscionable actions of the Israeli state. (While offering a nod to the growing peace movement in Israel and to the courageous resistance of the refuseniks in the Israeli army. )

At the same time, we should never ever allow ourselves to fall for the easy trick of racism and anti-Semitism. We must, in fact, always decry it, never allowing our response to be that of silence.

We can never become the evil that we oppose.

Nazi Imagery, Anti-Semitism Rampant In Arab Media As Gaza Crisis Unfolds
January 8, 2008

New York — As Israel’s operation against the Hamas terrorist infrastructure in Gaza continues, expressions of anti-Semitism and offensive Holocaust imagery have “reached a fever pitch” in the Arab press, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

Newspapers across the Arab and Muslim world have published editorial cartoons, articles and opinion pieces laced with age-old anti-Semitic themes, including blood-libel accusations and ugly stereotypical depictions of demonic large-nosed, bearded Jews plotting to rule the world. The articles and editorial cartoons have appeared in mainstream newspapers from Egypt and Jordan, to Syria, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

ADL has released an online slide show of anti-Semitic cartoons on Gaza and a compilation of selected articles from the Arab press.

“The Arab press serves both as a powerful influencer of opinion and as mirror of the larger society, and as the conflict between Israel and Hamas plays out in the daily newspapers, anti-Semitism and Nazi comparisons have reached a fever pitch,” said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director and a Holocaust survivor. “In this incendiary environment, where anger at Israel already seethes in the Arab street, cartoonists and editors are doing more than heaping invective on Israel. They are fueling a toxic mix of hatred — for Israel, for America, for Jews, for the West – by dredging up anti-Semitism in its most lethal and virulent form.”

From Riyadh to Damascus and beyond, readers of Arab newspapers are more likely to encounter swastikas and headlines declaiming a Palestinian Holocaust than they are to encounter balanced news, according to ADL, which monitors and translates the Arab and Muslim press from its offices in Israel. Editorial cartoons and banner headlines on the Gaza operation repeatedly draw on analogies to the Holocaust, both by accusing Israel of carrying out a Nazi-like campaign of extermination in Gaza, and by comparing Israelis and Jews to Nazis.

One of the most vicious cartoons, published January 7 in newspapers in Jordan and the U.K., depicted three Israeli leaders in full Nazi regalia under the headline “Israel Has the Reich to Defend Itself.” A menorah above the cabal of leaders is emblazoned with a swastika.

Other cartoons show harshly stereotypical Jews dreaming of taking over the world, or controlling the United States government or the United Nations.

The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913, is the world’s leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.

Source / Anti-Defamation League

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Michael Moore and Paul Krugman : Is Sanjay Gupta a ‘Sicko?’


CNN’s Sanjay Gupta vs. Michael Moore
By Jim Galloway / January 9, 2009

See ‘PNHP Opposes Gupta for Surgeon General,‘ by Larry Jones; and Video of Sanjay Gupta and Michael Moore on the Larry King Show, Below.

Speculation in Washington is building that Democratic opposition to President-elect Barack Obama’s selection of CNN’s Sanjay Gupta as U.S. surgeon general is rooted in Gupta’s clash with another media figure — liberal documentarian Michael Moore.

Today, the newspaper notes:

Conyers also cited a Jan. 6 blog item by Paul Krugman in The New York Times. Unlike Conyers, however, Krugman does not have a problem with Gupta’s qualifications.

Krugman pointed out that Gupta engaged in a televised argument with Moore in 2007 over his movie, “SiCKO.”

Conyers is friends with Moore, a Michigan native who is an ardent backer of the legislator’s universal healthcare bill. Moore’s film made the case for the U.S. to adopt a “single-payer” healthcare system like Canada’s.

On Thursday, Moore’s website prominently highlighted Krugman’s blog on Gupta.

Specifically, here’s what Krugman posted on his NYTimes blog:

I don’t have a problem with Gupta’s qualifications. But I do remember his mugging of Michael Moore over Sicko. You don’t have to like Moore or his film; but Gupta specifically claimed that Moore “fudged his facts”, when the truth was that on every one of the allegedly fudged facts, Moore was actually right and CNN was wrong.

Moore’s web site now also gives prominent display to both Krugman’s remarks and Conyer’s letter of objection.

Below is a YouTube clip of the Moore-Gupta confrontation on CNN’s “Larry King Live” that seems to have caused several pairs of underwear to twist themselves into a wad:

Sanjay Gupta and Michael Moore on CNN’s Larry King

Source / Political Insider / Atlanta Journal-Constitution

PNHP Opposes Gupta for Surgeon General
By Larry Jones / January 8, 2009

Physicians for a National Health Program has declared its opposition to the expected appointment of Dr. Sanjay Gupta as Surgeon General of the U.S.

Here’s why PNHP is opposed to Gupta:

Among our concerns are these:

  • 1. He has very little background in public health, preventive medicine or administration.
  • 2. He has openly opposed progressive health reform, going so far as to cite false information to denigrate single payer (e.g. in his error-laden attack on Michael Moore’s film “Sicko”) and parroting the health insurance lobby’s distortions of single payer.
  • 3. As a media figure, he has been disturbingly cozy with Big Pharma. He co-hosts Turner Private Networks’ monthly show “Accent Health,” which airs in doctors’ offices around the country and which serves as a major conduit for targeted ads from the drug companies. Another example: In 2003, despite mounting evidence to the contrary, he publicly downplayed concerns about the dangers of Vioxx. It was removed from the market a year later by its manufacturer, Merck.
  • 4. In the 2008 election campaign, his reporting on John McCain’s health proposals was misleading and implicitly positive, giving undeserved credence to McCain’s claims that buying private health insurance on the open market is a financially viable option for most Americans.

We urge you to write to President-elect Obama and express your opposition to Gupta’s possible nomination, and to urge Obama to nominate a more acceptable candidate for this critically important post. You can do so by clicking here: http://change.gov/….

Sincerely yours,

Quentin Young, M.D.
National Coordinator

Source / Daily Kos

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

New Reports : Did KBR Poison GIs in Iraq?

Welder testing for hexavalent chromium. Photo by Orbital Joe.

In 2003, James Gentry and his men were responsible for guarding a KBR-run power plant. The soldiers were stationed there for months before being informed that the site was contaminated with a chemical known as hexavalent chromium.

By Paul Riechkoff / January 9, 2009

James Gentry served his country honorably as a battalion commander in Iraq. Now, he is dying of a rare form of lung cancer. And he’s not the only one. A troubling number of troops in Gentry’s Indiana National Guard unit have bloody noses, tumors and rashes. And tragically, one soldier has already died.

New reports suggest these injuries may be the result of exposure to toxins at a KBR-run power plant in Southern Iraq. In 2003, James and his men were responsible for guarding that plant, and protecting KBR’s employees. The soldiers were stationed there for months before being informed that the site was contaminated with a chemical known as hexavalent chromium.

Hexavalent chromium is a deadly carcinogen. It’s the same toxin that Erin Brockovich became famous for campaigning against. James believes that it was the inhalation of this chemical that caused his cancer, and the other rare illnesses among the Guardsmen who served at the plant.

But this is not just some sad story about accidental chemical exposure. This is a question of responsibility. CBS News has uncovered evidence that KBR may have known about the contamination at the power plant months before it took any action to inform the troops stationed there.

If the CBS story is proven true, checks need to be written, contracts should be cancelled, and heads must roll. James signed up to serve his country, and he was told to protect KBR contractors. He did his job. But it doesn’t seem like KBR did theirs. If the company neglected to take quick and decisive action, it must be held responsible for the months of avoidable toxic exposure that may be taking the lives of American servicemembers.

From burn pits to power plants, we are hearing more and more about troops who have been exposed to toxins while serving our country overseas. Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana has announced that he will reintroduce legislation to create a medical registry for military personnel exposed to toxins. That’s a vital first step towards discovering the full extent of toxic exposure in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is critical to preventing a replay of the Agent Orange situation after Vietnam.

We need real answers from KBR. And so far, the company has denied any wrongdoing whatsoever. Iraq and Afghanistan veterans will stand behind our brothers and sisters in demanding accountability. The veterans’ community will fight back, and we need everyone’s help. Add your name to IAVA’s petition, and tell KBR to come clean now. KBR must tell Congress and the American people what they knew, and when they knew it. James Gentry and his fellow soldiers deserve the truth.

[Paul Rieckhoff, 33, is the Executive Director and Founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA). A non-partisan non-profit group with over 100,000 members around the world, IAVA was founded in 2004 and is America’s first and largest Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans organization. Rieckhoff was a First Lieutenant and infantry rifle platoon leader in the Iraq war from 2003-2004. He is now a nationally recognized authority on the war in Iraq and issues affecting troops, military families and veterans.]

Source / The Huffington Post

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Pilgrim’s Pride and Tysons Benefit from Bailout

As our Friend and contributor, Diane Stirling-Stevens, says of this article, “Another bit of news that made me do “#$*&(#$&(*#$&(#*&$#”.” We couldn’t agree more. Big Ag is a significant economic and health issue, and we remain hopeful that the new administration will address it.

Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog


Malia & Sasha Obama Get Organic School Lunches; Your Kids Get Bailout Chicken From Big Ag
By Obama Foodorama / January 8, 2009

Malia and Sasha Obama started school on Monday at Sidwell Friends in Washington, and in addition to a lovely Quaker-inflected education, they’re going to be enjoying a lunch program that relies on organic foods, with menus that are well planned and highly nutritious. It’s all of a piece with Sidewell’s excellent program of environmental stewardship, which teaches ethical and green values with concrete things like locally grown veggie stew. Malia and Sasha definitely won’t be eating lunch meat purchased from companies with terrible food safety, pollution and ethics problems, but your kids might be, because the USDA just bailed out the top two poultry producers in the US with a $42 million purchase of chicken products, which are going into school lunch programs across the country. The bailed-out poultry companies, unfortunately, both have ridiculously bad track records.

Pilgrim’s Pride gets $30 million of the bailout money because they filed for bankruptcy last month. But it’s difficult to believe anyone actually wants to eat Pilgrim’s Pride products, let alone that these products are now going to be fed to children. In 2002, listeria-contaminated products from Pilgrim’s Pride were responsible for 7 deaths, 149 hospitalizations, and a huge wave of illness among people who’d eaten the contaminated foods (more details here). The recall of more than 29.5 million pounds of meat was then a record breaker. Worse, Pilgrim’s Pride had known about their listeria contamination for months before taking action, and the Food Safety and Inspection Service had cited them for more than 40 infractions previously (mold, cockroaches, leftover food on conveyor belts…). In 2004, Pilgrim’s had another very high profile “problem” with horrifying animal abuse in one of their facilities (videotaped, of course), which led to more state and federal investigations, and public outrage.

How, you may wonder, does a food company that murders people, sickens thousands, is cited repeatedly by state and federal agencies for safety infractions, and mistreats its food animals, remain in business and get bailout money, and have their food served to kids, who are even more susceptible to foodborne illnesses than adults?? Yeah, that’s The Question of The Ages.

Tysons Foods, the second largest poultry producer in the US, is also getting bailout bucks, and they have a grim history, too. They’ve been sued many times for making people ill with contaminated products; they’ve been involved in a years-long lawsuit brought by the state of Oklahoma for dumping poultry excrement into the Illinois River watershed (poisoning the water supply), they’ve been sued for injecting eggs with antibiotics so they can claim their chickens are “antibiotic-free;” former employees say the company slaughtered chickens inhumanely; and Tyson’s has also been placed under a federal consent decree for maintaining facilities segregated by race at one of their processing plants.

With this bailout, USDA is, once again, putting economics ahead of public health. Could Barack stop the chicken from these two companies from getting on to childrens’ lunch plate? Another Question For The Ages. He should put an end to this kind of insanity, because he’s a big proponent of school lunch programs. As a Senator, Barack voted for The Farm Bill, and he went on the record as saying it was in part because of the billions of dollars earmarked for nutrition assistance and school lunches. In general, this is a terrific thing, because the statistics hardly need repeating: Nearly one in six children and teens are overweight, and diet-related (Type II) diabetes — until recently rare in children — is reaching epidemic levels. But we’re pretty sure Bam had no idea that two companies with appalling safety records might in future be allowed to dump 60 millions pounds of their products on to lunch trays nationwide. Neither Pilgrim’s Pride nor Tysons represents the kind of “change” in agriculture policies that Obama says he stands for; nor are they ethical or environmentally friendly. But this kind of bailout nonsense is something Barack will face repeatedly when he takes office; the USDA and FDA are both notorious for protecting the interests of business rather than the interests of American consumers. And we haven’t even touched on the nutrition/health aspects of Pilgrim’s Pride and Tyson’s products. Both companies feed their chickens chow that is from genetically modified corn, a controversial food source because it may well lead to health problems on its own, such as infertility, allergies, obesity…and both companies produce “fast foods,” such as chicken fingers and chickens nuggets…

Obama Mamas (and Papas!) all over the country will be sending their kids to school to dine out on the terrible leftovers of the Bush administrations’ awful food and farming policies, and Barack needs to move as swiftly as possible to make sure all kids will be able to eat school lunches like those Malia and Sasha will be enjoying. Alice Waters has been working hard to try to get Barack converted to the ethical/sustainable foodist program, but she hasn’t been lobbying–yet–over school lunch programs, even though her own Chez Panisse Foundation was a pioneer in creating grow-your-own/locally sourced school lunch programs. It’s dire that Barack gets up to speed on this, too. All children should be able to eat the way Malia and Sasha will at Sidwell Friends, and that’s not just pie-in-the sky thinking. It’s possible, and necessary.

Source / La Vida Locavore

Thanks to Diane Stirling-Stevens / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Questions About Israel’s Use of US-Made Weapons

Israel rains fire on Gaza with phosphorus shells
By Sheera Frenkel in Jerusalem and Michael Evans, Defence Editor / December 2008

Israel is believed to be using controversial white phosphorus shells to screen its assault on the heavily populated Gaza Strip yesterday. The weapon, used by British and US forces in Iraq, can cause horrific burns but is not illegal if used as a smokescreen.

Israeli artillery shells explode with a chemical agent designed to create smokescreen for ground forces. Photo: Patrick Baz/AFP/Getty Images.

As the Israeli army stormed to the edges of Gaza City and the Palestinian death toll topped 500, the tell-tale shells could be seen spreading tentacles of thick white smoke to cover the troops’ advance. “These explosions are fantastic looking, and produce a great deal of smoke that blinds the enemy so that our forces can move in,” said one Israeli security expert. Burning blobs of phosphorus would cause severe injuries to anyone caught beneath them and force would-be snipers or operators of remote-controlled booby traps to take cover. Israel admitted using white phosphorus during its 2006 war with Lebanon.

The use of the weapon in the Gaza Strip, one of the world’s mostly densely population areas, is likely to ignite yet more controversy over Israel’s offensive, in which more than 2,300 Palestinians have been wounded.

The Geneva Treaty of 1980 stipulates that white phosphorus should not be used as a weapon of war in civilian areas, but there is no blanket ban under international law on its use as a smokescreen or for illumination. However, Charles Heyman, a military expert and former major in the British Army, said: “If white phosphorus was deliberately fired at a crowd of people someone would end up in The Hague. White phosphorus is also a terror weapon. The descending blobs of phosphorus will burn when in contact with skin.”

The Israeli military last night denied using phosphorus, but refused to say what had been deployed. “Israel uses munitions that are allowed for under international law,” said Captain Ishai David, spokesman for the Israel Defence Forces. “We are pressing ahead with the second stage of operations, entering troops in the Gaza Strip to seize areas from which rockets are being launched into Israel.”

The civilian toll in the first 24 hours of the ground offensive — launched after a week of bombardment from air, land and sea— was at least 64 dead. Among those killed were five members of a family who died when an Israeli tank shell hit their car and a paramedic who died when a tank blasted his ambulance. Doctors at Gaza City’s main hospital said many women and children were among the dead and wounded.

The Israeli army also suffered its first fatality of the offensive when one of its soldiers was killed by mortar fire. More than 30 soldiers were wounded by mortars, mines and sniper fire.

Israel has brushed aside calls for a ceasefire to allow humanitarian aid into the besieged territory, where medical supplies are running short.

With increasingly angry anti-Israeli protests spreading around the world, Gordon Brown described the violence in Gaza as “a dangerous moment”.

White phosphorus: the smoke-screen chemical that can burn to the bone

— White phosphorus bursts into a deep-yellow flame when it is exposed to oxygen, producing a thick white smoke

— It is used as a smokescreen or for incendiary devices, but can also be deployed as an anti-personnel flame compound capable of causing potentially fatal burns

— Phosphorus burns are almost always second or third-degree because the particles do not stop burning on contact with skin until they have entirely disappeared — it is not unknown for them to reach the bone

— Geneva conventions ban the use of phosphorus as an offensive weapon against civilians, but its use as a smokescreen is not prohibited by international law

— Israel previously used white phosphorus during its war with Lebanon in 2006

— It has been used frequently by British and US forces in recent wars, notably during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Its use was criticised widely

— White phosphorus has the slang name “Willy Pete”, which dates from the First World War. It was commonly used in the Vietnam era

Source / Times Online

Note, too, that this behavior dates back to the last conflict with Lebanon. Here is what Congressman Kucinich wrote to Condeleeza Rice on this issue:

Dear Dr. Rice:

I am writing concerning Israel’s military offensive against Gaza, which began on December 27th. I support Israel’s security and its right to exist in peace, without the fear of rocket attacks from Hamas. Moreover, I abhor the violence being visited upon the citizens of our firm ally. However, no nation is immune from the legal conditions placed on the receipt of U.S. military assistance.

I believe that with the current escalation of violence in Gaza, a legal threshold has been reached, warranting a Presidential examination and report to Congress. I hereby request an examination of Israel’s compliance with the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (AECA).

While neither the AECA nor the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA) define “internal security” and “legitimate self-defense,” I believe that Israel’s most recent attacks neither further internal security nor do they constitute “legitimate” acts of self-defense. They do, however, “increase the possibility of an outbreak or escalation of conflict,” because they are a vastly disproportionate response to the provocation, and because the Palestinian population is suffering from those military attacks in numbers far exceeding Israeli losses in life and property.

Israel’s current military campaign in Gaza has inflicted a significant toll on Palestinian civilians and society. Israel’s recent aerial and ground offensive against Gaza has killed nearly 600 and injured over 2,500. The Associated Press reported: “children are paying the price… The United Nations has said the death toll includes 34 children… But the broad range of Israel’s targets–police compounds, fire stations, homes of militants, Hamas-run mosques and university buildings–means most shelling is occurring in residential areas.”

The extensive destruction of such civilian institutions violates Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits the wanton destruction of property and collective punishment of a civilian population. There have also been reports of bombings of United Nations (UN) schools, despite the fact that Israeli Defense Forces were allegedly given coordinates of the facilities prior to the current escalation in violence.

The blockade that Israel has imposed on Gaza since 2006 has further exacerbated the extent of collateral damage, as hospitals and morgues have been unable to cope with the magnitude of deaths and injuries as a result of the current escalation in violence and hospitals lack proper supplies needed to treat the injured.

I believe that Israel’s use of defense articles provided by the U.S in the current Gaza military attacks may constitute a violation of the AECA. At a minimum, the conflict is sufficient to warrant an immediate report to Congress as required by 22 U.S.C. §2753. Please contact my office by close of business on January 7, 2009 with the date the report will be submitted.

Sincerely,

Dennis J. Kucinich Member of Congress

h/t Juan Cole / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Cop Nation : Snitch Brandon Darby, and Riot Police With the ‘Kent State’ Gene

Riot cops at 2008 Republic National Convention in St. Paul, Minn. Photo by Pan African News.

‘I fear those individuals, identified only after they explode, who project their anxieties, anger and insecurities by becoming officers of the law and marauding under the protection of a badge.’

By Larry Ray / The Rag Blog / January 8, 2009

Brandon Darby represents more, much more, than just a disordered wannabe spy, snitch, or informant. Darby was attracted to the magnet that America’s local police, sheriff’s offices and even federal agents still purposefully drag around the edges of peaceful protest. A crude “intelligence” effort that tramples constitutional directives and generally attracts the disaffected, unreliable and duplicitous.

That riot police, expensively outfitted in custom made gear designed more for confrontation than personal protection, can become a mob themselves always frightens me. Too many of those in the riot helmets have the “Kent State” gene which overrides sound police training and leads them to trample civil rights and inflict physical damage on innocent people. I greatly appreciate being able to dial 911 and have police respond to help and protect me. This is not an indictment of professional, dedicated law enforcement. This brief observation is about the tattered edges of law enforcement and the dated, worthless practices that some enforcement officers still employ.

I fear those individuals, identified only after they explode, who project their anxieties, anger and insecurities by becoming officers of the law and marauding under the protection of a badge. These types seem to band together under a code of silence within their ranks among police and sheriff’s forces, as well as on the federal agencies across America. And this rogue element shares a similar mentality with Brandon Darby. They share a sick drive to assert themselves toward a narrow and mean expression of their fantasies and delusions. They have no allegiance to truth, fairness or humanity.

I can’t address the pathology of these individuals, because I am a writer, not a mental health professional. But the regular news reports and videos of brutal beatings of subdued, handcuffed people by uniformed officers is disturbing enough to indicate a real ongoing problem. Darby has, without landing a punch or kneeing a groin, vicariously satisfied his sickness, and the pushers providing his fix, the drug of importance he needs, are those Agents who are as indiscriminate in their judgment as the fringe “informants” they seem to select.

This is of small solace to those who are arrested and jailed with barely a nod to Miranda, and who are then forced to prove they have done nothing wrong except exercise their rights to assemble and voice protests. This could be called the “Darby-Hoover” symbiosis. Flawed and medieval, it ultimately forces those arrested to obtain legal counsel to disprove what a potentially mentally unbalanced “informant” fed to eagerly waiting agents. George Bush and his administration have provided more than tacit approval to the trampling of human and civil rights at home and abroad and this has further emboldened law enforcement excesses. As our new administration and legislators attack serious fiscal and energy problems in the coming term, let’s hope overall American law enforcement also undergoes a badly needed house cleaning.

Other Rag Blog posts related to FBI informant Brandon Darby of Austin:

Mariann Wizard on Brandon Darby : ‘To Live Outside the Law You Must Be Honest’ by Mariann Wizard / The Rag Blog / Jan. 7, 2008

Brandon Darby : FBI Informant is Provocateur, Not a Hero by Austin Informant Working Group / The Rag Blog / Jan. 6, 2009

Brandon Darby: Austin Activist Outed as FBI Spy / The Rag Blog / Jan. 2, 2009

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

El Paso City Council : Rethink Drug War, Drug Prohibition

Maybe it’s time for a new look at drug prohibition:

A police officer guards a crime scene where four men were gunned down in a drive-by shooting in the border city of Ciudad Juarez Aug. 22, 2008. More than 2,000 people have died this year in Mexico’s drug war, mostly resulting from violence between rival gangs, in a fight for control of smuggling corridors into the United States. Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso, Texas, has the highest murder toll in the country this year, with 867 killed, according to media. Photo by Reuters.

El Paso mayor vetoes unanimous City Council Resolution calling for a new look at causes of the drug war and calling for study of drug legalization.
By Gustavo Reveles Acosta / January 6, 2008

EL PASO — Mayor John Cook on Tuesday vetoed a unanimously supported resolution from City Council asking the federal government to seriously study the legalization of narcotics as a way to respond to the plague of violence that last year killed 1,600 people in Juárez.

The council on Tuesday had voted 8-0 on a resolution drafted by the city’s Border Relations Committee, outlining 11 steps the U.S. and Mexican governments can take to help El Paso’s “beleaguered and besieged sister city.”

All city representatives also supported an amendment by South-West city Rep. Beto O’Rourke that added a 12th step: the encouragement of the U.S. federal government to start a “serious debate” on the legalization of drugs.

Cook said it was the amendment that forced him to use his veto power for just the third time in his administration.

“The action of council … undermines the hard work of the committee by adding new language which may affect the credibility of the entire resolution,” he said in his veto.

“It is not realistic to believe that the U.S. Congress will seriously consider any broad-based debate on the legalization of narcotics,” Cook added. “That position is not consistent with the community standards both locally and nationally.”

Cook’s veto angered several on council, including some of his closest political allies.

“I am really disappointed. I went and told him that personally,” O’Rourke said. “This amendment received unanimous support from council and it also received the support of the members of the committee who wrote the resolution.”

Eastridge/Mid-Valley city Rep. Steve Ortega said he respected Cook’s decision, but disagreed with it.

“The controversial amendment merely calls for the initiation of a debate regarding the prohibition of narcotics … (it) does not endorse the legalization of drugs but it places it on the table for debate,” he said. “Ending cartel related violence in Juárez represents this region’s biggest challenge and justifies an all-inclusive dialogue concerning potential solutions.”

Cook did find some support from U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, who said Tuesday that the council’s resolution wouldn’t have been supported in Washington, D.C.

“Legalizing the types of drugs that are being smuggled across the border is not an effective way to combat the violence in Mexico,” he said. “I would not support efforts in Congress that would seek to do so.”

O’Rourke and others on council said they are not advocating for the legalization of drugs, much less their use.

Rather, they want lawmakers to have a serious debate on whether the end of drug prohibition would have a positive impact on the level of violence that has erupted along the U.S.-Mexico border.

“I completely understand … this is a very uncomfortable conversation to have,” said West-Central city Rep. Susie Byrd. “But the reason that I am compelled to support the resolution as we approved it is that whatever we have been doing in the last 40 years has not worked.”

But Cook said the council missed the point on the message that the resolution as first drafted was meant to send.

“The whole purpose of the resolution was to get national attention to the violence in Juárez,” he said. “After it was amended, the focus was placed instead on legalizing drugs in the United States.”

O’Rourke said that the resolution was powerful as it was originally presented, but that his amendment was successful in taking the document “to the next level.”

“We started a conversation about solutions … a conversation that was supported by everyone on council,” he said. “The mayor, though, didn’t say a word during the meeting. It wasn’t until I received a Xerox copy of his veto that I heard from him.”

Cook said he was sorry that he didn’t voice his opposition to the amendment, but “frankly, I didn’t think it was going to pass.”

Byrd, who has previously criticized Cook’s vetoes, said the mayor needed to take action during the open meeting and not wait until the afternoon to act.

“It’s almost like policy- development in the back room … there is no public discussion,” she said.

Source / El Paso Times

Also see The Power of Ideas in the War on Drugs by by Jacob G. Hornberger / Media With a Conscience / Jan. 7, 2008

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

FILM / Indie Beat: Hot Amnesia Babe Meets Mexican Mennonites

Charlotte Fich and Anders W. Bertelsen in “Just Another Love Story,” left, and Maria Pankratz in “Silent Light.” Photo courtesy of salon.com.

‘The movies that are most daring and strange — and often the most extraordinary — don’t get much of a shot.’
By Andrew O’Hehir / January 8, 2008

After years of covering the indie-film beat, I’m pretty well convinced of the dogma that drives the business: The audience for art-house films is still out there, no smaller or larger than it ever was. But it’s carved up differently, and the demands on its attention are far more various than they were in the days when reverent big-city throngs lined up for the latest Bergman or Fellini flick.

Basically, the movies that are most daring and strange — and often the most extraordinary — don’t get much of a shot. They have to stop off in a few theaters on the way to video-on-demand or DVD, because otherwise people like me don’t pay attention and the public never hears about them at all. But outside the world of movie bloggers and their readership (hi, guys!), even films that might have provoked furious debate 20 or 30 years ago will just come and go, momentary blips on a bewildering radar screen.

Consider the cases of two movies about adultery, the Danish thriller “Just Another Love Story” and the Mexican rural drama “Silent Light,” pictures that were rapturously received on the 2008 festival circuit. Whatever their virtues and flaws, they’re both arresting and accomplished films that evince a visionary sensibility, reject ordinary storytelling forms and seek to take the viewer on an unpredictable journey. I’d recommend both to any serious film buff. Both are getting quickie releases in Manhattan theaters this week, with some wider release (but not much) to follow. If you don’t live in New York or L.A., very likely your next chance to see them will be in your living room. So it goes these days.

As you may have surmised, the title of writer-director Ole Bornedal’s “Just Another Love Story” is meant to be ironic. Bornedal has made a bloody, showoffy, self-mocking noir, the kind of movie that presumes nothing good ever comes of two people falling in love. It’s narrated by Jonas (Anders W. Bertelsen), whom we see in the opening shot lying prostrate in the rain on a Copenhagen street, evidently bleeding to death. A blond woman arrives to moan and shriek over him, but he isn’t impressed. “The woman,” he tells us in tones of resignation. “There’s always a woman.”

Actually, the blond shrieking woman isn’t the woman. Instead she’s his long-suffering wife, Mette (Charlotte Fich), whom he abandoned some months earlier to go live with the sultry and mysterious Julia (Rebecka Hemse), renegade heiress to a publishing fortune. You see, it’s no wonder Jonas finds himself dying in the street, since he’s violated at least three of the cardinal rules of the film-noir universe: Never leave your wife for the Other Woman; never take the suitcase that doesn’t belong to you; and never pretend to be someone you’re not.

Punishment awaits those who break those rules, of course, and Bornedal’s task is to make all those forbidden fruits completely irresistible to Jonas and bring him full circle, from dying in the street to upstanding family man and back to, well, dying in the street. “Just Another Love Story” is a monumentally implausible tale told with a bravura array of flashbacks, flash-forwards, dream sequences and slo-mo incidents, and involving a beautiful woman suffering from both amnesia and blindness, an undead boyfriend, a mysterious fellow wrapped in mummy-style bandages, and a suicide pact in a Hanoi junkie hotel.

When Jonas’ piece-of-crap car stalls out on the highway, with wife and kids aboard, Julia swerves to avoid it and nearly dies in a head-on collision. She’s just arriving from Frankfurt, where she got off a plane from Vietnam, where she was fleeing a poisonous relationship with a boyfriend named Sebastian (Nikolaj Lie Kaas), whom she met in Asia. But her super-rich family have never met this mysterious paramour, and when Jonas shows up at the hospital to check on the comatose Julia, they all assume that he’s Sebastian. Within minutes he’s been assigned to kiss her and murmur in her ear, bathe her naked body with a loofah glove, and accept a blank check tucked into his pocket by Julia’s publishing-magnate papa.

Look, I said it was ridiculous. Of course when Julia wakes up she can’t see anything and doesn’t remember the real Sebastian anyway (who has reportedly been murdered in Hanoi) and, hey, Jonas has gotten kind of bored with life with Mette and the kids anyway. Work all week, shop on Saturday, have some friends over to dinner — why not chuck all that away and shack up with blind, ultra-rich amnesia-babe, anyway? As you have figured out by now, there are many reasons why not, and those all come together in a crashing finale.

You could call “Just Another Love Story” nothing more than an exercise in style, but A) Bornedal’s got style to burn and B) that’s not quite fair. Beneath all the dazzling cinematography, propulsive score and overcommitted acting, I found this movie an affecting, mordant comedy about male midlife crisis in its most extreme form. As Jonas observes to his best friend — who’s eager to get his paws on Mette, if Jonas doesn’t want her — his own behavior makes him sick. Which doesn’t mean he can stop.

Mexican director Carlos Reygadas — a one-time attorney who reinvented himself as an art-cinema auteur — also has a flair for opening shots. His last film, “Battle in Heaven,” began by bringing us up close and personal with a punk-hippie chick administering an enthusiastic blow job to a remarkably ugly man. In “Silent Light” he goes in a somewhat different direction; the film opens with a six-minute shot of the night sky gradually giving way to dawn, accompanied by a chorus of birds and insects (and ends with a similar shot in reverse, as evening moves into night). It’s amazingly beautiful and it tests your patience; both things are par for the course with Reygadas, After that, you’ve either surrendered to his idiosyncratic sense of rhythm, or you’re out of there.

Unlike Bornedal, Reygadas has no interest in mimicking or tweaking conventional film genres. Despite the in-your-face sexuality of his earlier films, they’re ambiguous and nearly plotless dramas featuring nonprofessional actors and long, contemplative takes, whose roots lie in the cinema of Andrei Tarkovsky or Abbas Kiarostami. “Silent Light” both departs and does not depart from Reygadas’ pattern. There’s no explicit sex at all, but the setting and subject are certainly peculiar. This is presumably the first Mexican film ever made that isn’t in Spanish, as well as the first film from any nation made in Plautdietsch, a Germanic language or dialect spoken (at least in recent centuries) only by isolated communities of Mennonites.

I don’t know how in the world Reygadas recruited Mennonites from the Mexican state of Chihuahua — where about 50,000 Plautdietsch-speakers still hang on — to act in his film. I don’t even know how many of them have ever seen a film. (Unlike their Amish brethren in the United States, the Mexican Mennonites do not universally reject modern technology, but I doubt that movies play a large role in their lives.) Regardless, the results are astonishing. “Silent Light” brings us intimately into the private world of this esoteric society without ever feeling like ethnography or gawkery; at the risk of cliché, this prodigiously atmospheric fable of love and faith feels both timeless and modern. Reygadas deliberately evokes biblical parable and Bergman’s “The Virgin Spring,” but also features a wonderful scene where two men work on an old Chevy pickup and sing along to a norteno hit on the radio.

Like “Battle in Heaven,” “Silent Light” is at least nominally about an individual’s internal moral struggle. Johan (Cornelio Wall), the taciturn father and husband in a Mennonite farm family, has conceived a powerful romantic passion for Marianne (Maria Pankratz), who runs a coffee shop in the nearest town. Johan is too upstanding not to tell his wife, Esther (Miriam Toews), everything, including the fact that he has physically transgressed their marriage vows. For her part, Esther seems determined to bear it all in silence. Advised by a friend that his love for Marianne may be sacred in nature, and by his father (played by Wall’s actual father) that it’s “the work of the Enemy,” Johan is trapped by indecision, which leads first to tragedy and then to miraculous sacrifice and transfiguration.

But as usual with Reygadas, the story accounts for maybe one-quarter of the film’s impact and meaning. His spectacular, ultra-long takes focused on the rituals and details of rural life each become their own little movie, animated by the interaction between the dramatic Chihuahua landscape and the faces and figures of these handsome, stoical people. Are Wall and Pankratz and Toews “acting,” in the normal sense? It’s tough to say. There’s a scene when Johan and his children go for a swim, clad in Mennonite long underwear, in their homemade outdoor pool that’s among the most gorgeous things I’ve ever seen in a motion picture. It isn’t fiction but also isn’t exactly documentary, and it has a passion and mystery and immanent vitality that, for my money, outstrips the film’s somewhat forced conclusion.

“Just Another Love Story” opens Jan. 9 at Cinema Village in New York, with other cities and DVD release to follow. “Silent Light” is now playing at Film Forum in New York, with other cities to follow.

Source / salon.com

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Gaza : Israeli Government Doesn’t Want Peace

Stark contrast: Beauty cloaks horror. Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City, Jan. 8, 2009. Over 600 Palestinians have been killed and more than 2,700 others wounded in Gaza since the so-called Operation Cast Lead began on Dec. 27. Photo by Wissam Nassar / Xinhua.

‘The cease fire failed because Israel does not want peace and subverts any step in that direction. Israel does not want peace because they are the beneficiaries of the status quo’
By David P. Hamilton / The Rag Blog / January 8, 2009

Last June, Hamas initiated a six month cease fire with Israel. They hoped that this ceasefire would lead to an easing of the Israeli blockade of Gaza and greater international recognition of Hamas as a legitimate representative of the people of Gaza. The ceasefire was scrupulously observed by Hamas until November, when it began to unravel.

It failed because Israel and its international supporters, particularly the Bush regime, gave nothing substantial in return. The Israeli blockade of Gaza did not end or significantly diminish. There was no improvement in the acceptance of Hamas as a negotiating partner. Hence, the cease fire lapsed at the end of the six month period and the rocket attacks against Israel, militarily insignificant and misguided as they were, were resumed. The Israelis seized upon this resumption as a pretext to initiate an all out assault on Gaza in an effort to totally destroy Hamas, the legitimately elected government in Gaza.

The result has been, so far, the murder of hundreds of Gaza residents, many of them civilians, including many children and the utter destruction of the paltry preexisting Gaza infrastructure by the IDF, a ratio of killing of roughly 100 Gaza Palestinians for every Israeli killed. This blatant Israeli terrorism is very reminiscent of the Nazi occupation of France, where the Nazi Germans pledged to kill 100 French for every German soldier killed by resistance forces in the occupied zone and on several occasions did so.

The cease fire failed because Israel does not want peace and subverts any step in that direction. Israel does not want peace because they are the beneficiaries of the status quo, in which they continuously strengthen their hold on West Bank land and water that would be part of the future Palestinian state under any conceivable peace treaty.

It is said that Israel has no partner for peace negotiations because the Palestinians call for the destruction of Israel. This is a lie. All Palestinian factions have endorsed the two state solution contained in the Arab League proposals which recognize the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state. These proposals have met with no Israeli positive response since they were first proposed in 2002.

The simple truth is that the Palestinians have no serious negotiating partner, because Israel does not want peace and undermines every step in that direction. The current massacre has more to do with the ruling Israeli political faction, faced with a challenge by the even more right wing Likud Party, looking tough in order to pander to bellicose Israeli public opinion so as to benefit them in the upcoming Israeli elections rather than countering any actual Palestinian terrorism.

The only thing that can be done to change this dynamic would be for the US to pressure Israel to accept serious negotiations that would lead to the establishment of a viable Palestinian state. Even if the Obama administration did so, the Israelis would resist a peace settlement. The provisions of such a settlement are not obscure. They would have to include Israel returning to its pre-1967 borders, although minor revisions might be negotiable. Israel is unwilling to do so and, therefore, obstructs any steps that might lead to peace.

One obvious outcome of this current Israeli invasion of Gaza will be the further diminution of the moral standing of Israel and that diminution will be richly deserved.

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , | 25 Comments

Tom Hayden : Obama on Palestine: A Deafening Silence

Barack Obama, shown with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

Obama must know that his continuing silence today is more than expedient. It is immoral. And if being moral is not the business of statecraft, he must know that his November 4 election helped cause the Israelis to thunder into Gaza and change ‘the facts on the ground’ before his inauguration. They are afraid of his coming.

By Tom Hayden / January 8, 2009

Back when Barack Obama was a longshot candidate in the Iowa primary, he was morally candid, saying on March 11, 2007, that “nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people.” It was one month after the announcement of Obama’s campaign, and the last time he would make such a statement. Three days later, at the AIPAC conference in Washington DC, he was hammered as inexperienced by the New York Times reporter, Patrick Healy, on March 14.

“Less experienced than Mrs. Clinton in the thickets of Jewish and Middle Eastern politics, [Obama] became a bit tangled in the eyes of some voters” at the AIPAC event, Healy commented. After calling himself pro-Israel and endorsing a two-state solution, Obama “pointedly” mentioned the Palestinians. He and Senator Clinton sounded the same themes, Healy wrote, “yet Mr. Obama proved more expansive by bringing up the Palestinians and ruminating on the Holocaust and slavery and on cynicism in politics”, which caused “murmurs” from the audience.

One AIPAC activist, the son of a rabbi and a Hillary fan, was busily “spreading the word at the conference about Mr. Obama’s remarks. ‘It’s just clumsy of him to say that on the eve of the AIPAC conferences.”

While the Obama staff was trying to put up a small speaker’s platform, Mrs Clinton “wanted a big moment…to counteract the curiousity factor and showmanship of Mr. Obama…There was Israeli music on the sound system, there was a sign with Mrs. Clinton’s name in Hebrew, and there were campaign banners and balloons, and a video showing her at work.”

It’s possible to defend Obama’s retreat to a safe pro-Israel position in 2007, especially if he sat down first with long-time Palestinian friends and supporters in Chicago and explained himself. After all, Bush-Cheney and the neo-conservatives were virtually welded to the Israeli hawks, and Hillary Clinton, who once gave Arafat’s wife a kiss on the cheek, was threatening to obliterate Israel’s enemies. Obama would be a fresh start.

But Obama must know that his continuing silence today is more than expedient. It is immoral. And if being moral is not the business of statecraft, he must know that his November 4 election helped cause the Israelis to thunder into Gaza and change “the facts on the ground” before his inauguration. They are afraid of his coming.

He must know that this Israeli offensive is the ultimate effort of the neo-conservatives, with consenting Democratic silence, to wrest a victory in the Middle East. It’s bad enough that William Kristol has gained a coveted columnist’s role at the New York Times; worse is Kristol’s propaganda offensive for the Israelis, claiming that Israel will do Obama a favor by knocking off Hamas. Shamelessly, Kristol adds that this victory will come on top of America’s “success” in Iraq.

Yes, it is difficult to understand much less endorse the apparent Hamas strategy. Knowing what was ahead, they might have taken a disciplined position from October to November of not giving Israel any excuse, any provocation, that could bring the crisis to boil in the interlude between November and the inauguration.

They could have started a diplomatic offensive of their own. Those were their decisions. But it is foolish to ignore and deny, as many do, the deliberate policies of the Israelis and the US to overturn the outcome of the democratic elections that brought Hamas to power.

It is immoral to squeeze the whole Gaza population into collective suffering by the blockade. It is impossible to “destroy” Hamas without guaranteeing the rise of another Palestinian resistance movement, just as Hezbollah was born in the ashes of Lebanon in 1982. And it is simply not true that negotiations between implacable adversaries must be considered forever off the table. As a Hamas spokesman wrote this week, discussions with former President Jimmy Carter have been “a refreshing exchange”, despite Carter’s vocal differences with Hamas. [LAT, Jan. 6, 08] As Obama pointed out in his campaign, it is simple to talk with allies, the point of diplomacy is to talk with enemies or strangers.

Obama is in a process of being cornered, not unlike the efforts to push John Kennedy into the Cuban quagmire in 1961, or the tactics of Richard Nixon to keep Saigon from agreeing to negotiations in 1968.

He is being cornered by his party, too. It is hardly constructive that Sen. Harry Reid said this week that “I think this terrorist organization, Hamas, has got to be put away.” [NYT, Jan. 5, 08] Where are the voices of the Progressive Caucus or Out of Iraq Caucus? Is it possible for Obama to take a stronger position than his own party leaders? Not likely, even though a Rasmussen poll shows a large percentage of Democratic voters supporting diplomatic rather than military approaches.

The silence, Obama must know, is extremely costly. As the bombs fall on Gaza children and civilians, his credibility comes under greater question. The bright promise of moral leadership is sullied and squandered, along with the potential of America’s ability to be an even-handed diplomatic mediator. As January 20 approaches, he will have to make a lonely decision, the first of many, to remember his 2007 words about Palestinian suffering and his campaign pledge to talk unconditionally with adversaries.

Source / The Huffington Post / Progressives for Obama

Thanks to Carl Davidson / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment