Earthships — One Approach to Sustainable Homes

Earthships 101 part I

Earthship n. 1. passive solar home made of natural and recycled materials 2. thermal mass construction for temperature stabilization. 3. renewable energy & integrated water systems make the Earthship an off-grid home with little to no utility bills.
Biotecture n. 1. the profession of designing buildings and environments with consideration for their sustainability. 2. A combination of biology and architecture.

Earthships 101 part II

I stayed in one in Taos NM for a week in the winter time. it was a delight and did a great job keeping the inside warm while it was snowing outside. will build one some day.

repocult

Source. Thanks to Roger Baker / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Freaky Fish, Part II : No Fangs, But Eerie Thumps

Mating calls of the black drum can carry through sea walls and into homes. Photo by Steven Senne/AP.

What’s Making That Awful Racket? Surprisingly, It May Be Fish.
By Nonny De La Peña / April 8, 2008

“Eerie Thumps Haunt Some Cape Residents,” a headline in The News-Press of Cape Coral, Fla., said. “Noise May Cost City Big Bucks.”

It was the end of January 2005, during the spawning season for a fish appropriately called the black drum. Nightly mating calls were at a crescendo. But no one living in the area seemed to realize the din was of aquatic origin.

The retirees who had come to spend their winters relaxing on the gentle estuaries and canals of the Gulf Coast in Florida blamed the municipal utility system. They were pushing the City Council to pay an engineering firm more than $47,000 to eliminate the noise reverberating through their homes.

Then James Locascio, a doctoral student in marine science at the University of South Florida, rescued the city from financial folly. After reading the newspaper article, Mr. Locascio called a Council member just hours before a vote to appropriate the money. He explained that at 100 to 500 hertz, black drum mating calls travel at a low enough frequency and long enough wavelength to carry through sea walls, into the ground and through the construction of waterfront homes like the throbbing beat in a passing car.

“Black drum have taken a liking to the canal system in Cape Coral,” Mr. Locascio said. “Their nightly booming is like a water drip torture that lasts for months.” (Listen to the mating calls of the black drum and other fish sounds.)

At first residents wouldn’t buy it. “The most vocal and persistent complainers said that there was no way a fish could produce a sound that could be heard inside a house,” he recalled.

Mr. Locascio and David Mann, a marine biologist at the University of South Florida who is a bioacoustics expert, recruited these naysayers into a study by asking them to score noise levels and times in notebooks. “We took their data and plotted them with the fish sounds we had recorded with hydrophones under the water,” Mr. Locascio said. “Concordance was perfect.”

A similar situation unfolded two decades ago in Sausalito, Calif., when houseboaters were inundated with toadfish calls. The Marin Independent Journal said in an editorial, “We don’t believe for an instant that the drone keeping Sausalito houseboaters awake at night is caused by a bunch of romantic toadfish humming their version of the Indian Love Song.”

Greg Coppa, a retired high school science teacher, was also greeted with derision when he said he heard noisy fish while boating near Block Island in Rhode Island. “Some people even asked what I drank before hearing the sounds or gave me that look reserved for a good but pathetically impaired friend,” Mr. Coppa said, laughing.

With the help of Rodney A. Rountree, a senior scientist at the research company Marine Ecology and Technical Applications and an adjunct assistant professor at University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Mr. Coppa learned that the fish he had imagined to be a massive sea creature was actually the tiny striped cusk eel, which can sound like a jackhammer.

Naturalists as far back as Aristotle have known that fish make sounds. But when Jacques Cousteau titled his 1956 documentary “The Silent World,” it seemed that he captured the public’s imagination about underwater life while leaving our ears deaf to fish barks, chatter, groans, drones and cries.

“His diving tanks masked all the sounds in the water,” Dr. Rountree said. “In fact, the oceans are a noisy place.”

Yet of the 30,000 species out there, only about 1,200 sound producers have been cataloged, and far fewer have been recorded. Even common goldfish have merited just two scientific publications. In fact, said Philip Lobel, a professor of biology at Boston University, “Most aquarium fish are sonic. Keeping fish in an aquarium is like keeping a canary in a soundproof cage.”

The most definitive tome on fish sounds was published in 1973 by the auspiciously named Marie Poland Fish and William H. Mowbray. Working at the Narragansett Marine Laboratory at Rhode Island University, they were granted access to Navy audio recordings made to detect enemy submarines. Because noisy underwater life kept interfering with the military’s objectives, the authors were asked to tease out the biologic from the manmade. The resulting work, “Sounds of Western North Atlantic Fishes: A Reference File of Underwater Biologic Sounds,” identifies the vocalizations of over 150 fish.

For most fish, the sonic mechanism is a muscle that vibrates a swim bladder not unlike our vocal cord. The bladder is a gas-filled sac used for buoyancy, but it can also be used as a sort of drum. The Gulf toadfish contracts its sonic muscle against its swim bladder thousands of times a minute to generate a loud drone. At nearly three times the average wingbeat of a hummingbird, toadfish have the fastest known muscle of any vertebrate. Cusk eel rattle bones against their bladder, but clownfish have a sonic ligament they use to “chirp.”

Other fish use stridulation, rubbing their bones together in a way that is comparable to plinking the tines on a comb or using a ratchet mechanism on their pectoral fins to make sounds. Herring release bubbles from their anus in a “fast repetitive tick.”

Still, despite careful dissection, the sonic mechanism in many species remains a mystery.

Read all of it here.
New York Times / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Surge. Pause. Surge. Pause. (Moan.)

Petraeus’ Call for a Pause is Really Just “Stay the Course 2.0”
By Arianna Huffington / April 7, 2008

Have you heard the news? “The Surge” is about to end. The next phase of our 100 Year War is “The Pause.” Surge, Pause… Surge, Pause… We can’t pull out! It’s all starting to sound a bit sexual, isn’t it? But the American people are the ones getting screwed.

According to the New York Times, when General Petraeus testifies in front of Congress this week, he’s going to recommend that come July there should be a pause in troop withdrawals. By then, the nearly 20,000 troops still devoted to the “surge” will have returned home, leaving roughly 140,000 still in Iraq. In other words, the Bush administration is going to leave office with around the same troop levels in Iraq as we’ve had over the past five years.

So lest Congress get any crazy ideas about honoring the wishes of the majority of Americans and start bringing the rest of our troops home, the administration is going to run out the clock hiding behind the idea of a “pause.”

I put it in quotes because what they’re proposing isn’t actually a pause — in fact, it’s precisely the opposite of a pause. What they really mean is a continuation. But since “stay the course” was 12 slogans ago, they had to come up with a new one.

This is standard operating procedure for the Bush administration: every time they look at the events on the ground in Iraq, instead of responding with a smart policy, they respond with a catchy new slogan. Usually an utterly misleading catchy slogan.

This conflation — and often confusion — of reality and rhetoric is the true Bush doctrine.

Just take a look back at what we’ve had so far. First there was “Gathering Threat.” Then “Axis of Evil.” And then, in order:

“Slam Dunk”
“Shock and Awe”
“Mission Accomplished”
“Last Throes”
“Adapt to Win”
“Stay the Course”
“New Way Forward”
And then “The “Surge.”
And now “The “Pause.”

Which is just “Stay the Course 2.0”.

But we all know that during The Pause many things won’t be pausing. Like the $3 billion a week this war is costing. And the incredible strain it is putting on our military, which was borne out by Army vice chief of staff Richard A. Cody when he told Congress last week that “lengthy and repeated deployments with insufficient recovery time have placed incredible stress on our soldiers and our families, testing the resolve of our all-volunteer force like never before.”

Another thing that won’t be pausing is the fact that, according to an Army study, “27percent of noncommissioned officers — a critically important group — on their third or fourth tour exhibited symptoms commonly referred to as post-traumatic stress disorders.”

Also not pausing: the continued deterioration of conditions in Afghanistan. Things have gotten so bad in what should have been the “central front in the war on terror,” President Bush was forced to promise NATO leaders last week that he would commit to sending additional troops there.

Though it’s not clear where he’s going to get them from. Perhaps another sweet contract for the Blackwater Gang is in the offing.

And, of course, there will be no pause in the way the administration uses the shine of Gen. Petraeus’ stars to bedazzle — and bamboozle — Congress. There are actually several layers of military command above Petraeus that Bush could use to sell The Pause. But the reason he doesn’t is simple: unlike Petraeus, they don’t agree with him.

As Alex Koppelman notes in Salon:

“Petraeus agrees with current administration thinking, whereas commanders above him do not. Adm. William Fallon, who announced his early retirement from the military, including his position as head of U.S. Central Command, earlier this month, was one of those who was reportedly arguing against Petraeus, and was concerned about the damage the war is doing to the military.”

Or, as Matt Yglesias put it:

“Bush has, from the beginning, always listened to people who tell him what he wants to hear — starting a war with Iraq is a great idea, continuing a war with Iraq is a great idea. If Petraeus told Bush tomorrow that he should admit failure and open up a regional dialogue on how best to manage an American withdrawal from Iraq, suddenly his privileged position would be gone.”

What we’re not likely to hear a lot about this week is the very messy political situation in Iraq, the cleaning up of which was the entire purpose of The Surge in the first place, and thus the primary metric of success on which it should be judged.

Nor will we get it from John McCain, who loves The Surge — and will no doubt be equally turned on by The Pause — but who appears to be utterly clueless about the political realities shaping Iraq.

On Friday, Barack Obama raised what is ultimately the key point about Iraq: “We still don’t have a good answer to the question posed by Sen. (John) Warner the last time Gen. Petraeus appeared: How has this effort in Iraq made us safer and how do we expect it will make us safer in the long run?”

I have a feeling there is going to be a long, long pause before any of us get an answer to that.

Source. The Huffington Post / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Onion / April 7, 2008

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Alec Baldwin on Obama, Clinton

Who can beat McCain?
By Alec Baldwin / April 6, 2008

Lotta folks on this site (the Huffington Post) hating Hillary because she’s a woman. Lotta folks on this site loving Hillary because she’s a woman. Makes me think that, in some quarters, men have been uncomfortable with women a lot longer than whites have been uncomfortable with blacks.

Sometimes I honestly believe that a racist white guy would vote for Obama over anyone like his wife or mother. A woman as Commander-and-Chief? Uh-uh, they say.

How sad.

Lotta folks worried about Obama’s level of experience. Whatever you do, don’t buy into that Republican bullshit. Obama is FDR compared to this Bush. The GOP committed every possible sin in order to get Bush elected. They forged a whole set of new ones to get him reelected. Everyone around the world recognizes that America is in real trouble. Most Americans do, too.

The past eight years have been the moral low point of the American experience.

I have said in these pages before that either candidate has the potential to make a very good president. Clinton is smart and shrewd in ways that will serve her well in office. I think she would play a Democratic Congress like a violin. Obama will have the great fortune of being able to attract his own version of the “Best and the Brightest”, an army of brilliant and capable reform-minded people who would normally abjure political careers as the result of their inherent cynicism.

Who can beat McCain? That is all that matters.

McCain is another right-wing, retro, deficit-loving, never-seen-a-defense-appropriation-I-didn’t-like tool. But there are a lot of people in this dumbed-down country that will buy that.

They want to turn the clock back. To what, I don’t know. Which Democrat will give a critical number of Americans the courage to move forward? This election represents a turning point for this country, not only internally, but regarding our future among the other nations of the world. America will begin to, albeit slowly, irreversibly go down if we do not get this right.

It is wrong to assume that either of these Democrats is less qualified than the other. But Democrats must think like Republicans, now more than ever. Who can win?

You think major GOP fundraisers sat back and clucked over the nomination of Bush in 2000? You must be joking. They held their noses and went along for the ride because Republicans like James Baker and that maniac Richard Mellon Scaife have their hands on the money valve and they anointed Bush. The GOP plays to win. They don’t have good candidates all that often, but they don’t let that stop them. Everyone digs in and puts their shoulder behind even the lamest nominee.

If you want to advocate for Clinton or Obama, do so in the context of how they will defeat McBush.

PS: One possible consequence of an Obama presidency? Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton. Dang, that sounds good.

Source. The Huffington Post / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

"Not You! You!!!"

Tibet and Palestine
By Uri Avnery

[Uri Avnery is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom. He is a contributor to CounterPunch’s book The Politics of Anti-Semitism.]

“Hey! Take your hands off me! Not you! You!!!”–the voice of a young woman in the darkened cinema, an old joke.

“Hey! Take your hands off Tibet!” the international chorus is crying out, “But not from Chechnya! Not from the Basque homeland! And certainly not from Palestine!” And that is not a joke.

Like everybody else, I support the right of the Tibetan people to independence, or at least autonomy. Like everybody else, I condemn the actions of the Chinese government there. But unlike everybody else, I am not ready to join in the demonstrations.

Why? Because I have an uneasy feeling that somebody is washing my brain, that what is going on is an exercise in hypocrisy.

I don’t mind a bit of manipulation. After all, it is not by accident that the riots started in Tibet on the eve of the Olympic Games in Beijing. That’s alright. A people fighting for their freedom have the right to use any opportunity that presents itself to further their struggle.

I support the Tibetans in spite of it being obvious that the Americans are exploiting the struggle for their own purposes. Clearly, the CIA has planned and organized the riots, and the American media are leading the world-wide campaign. It is a part of the hidden struggle between the US, the reigning super-power, and China, the rising super-power – a new version of the “Great Game” that was played in central Asia in the 19th century by the British Empire and Russia.
Tibet is a token in this game.

I am even ready to ignore the fact that the gentle Tibetans have carried out a murderous pogrom against innocent Chinese, killing women and men and burning homes and shops. Such detestable excesses do happen during a liberation struggle.

No, what is really bugging me is the hypocrisy of the world media. They storm and thunder about Tibet. In thousands of editorials and talk-shows they heap curses and invective on the evil China. It seems as if the Tibetans are the only people on earth whose right to independence is being denied by brutal force, that if only Beijing would take its dirty hands off the saffron-robed monks, everything would be alright in this, the best of all possible worlds.

There is no doubt that the Tibetan people are entitled to rule their own country, to nurture their unique culture, to promote their religious institutions and to prevent foreign settlers from submerging them.

But are not the Kurds in Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria entitled to the same? The inhabitants of Western Sahara, whose territory is occupied by Morocco? The Basques in Spain? The Corsicans off the coast of France? And the list is long.

Why do the world’s media adopt one independence struggle, but often cynically ignore another independence struggle? What makes the blood of one Tibetan redder than the blood of a thousand Africans in East Congo?

Again and again I try to find a satisfactory answer to this enigma. In vain.

Immanuel Kant demanded of us: “Act as if the principle by which you act were about to be turned into a universal law of nature.” (Being a German philosopher, he expressed it in much more convoluted language.) Does the attitude towards the Tibetan problem conform to this rule?
Does it reflect our attitude towards the struggle for independence of all other oppressed peoples?
Not at all.

What, then, causes the international media to discriminate between the various liberation struggles that are going on throughout the world?

Here are some of the relevant considerations:

– Do the people seeking independence have an especially exotic culture?

– Are they an attractive people, i.e. “sexy” in the view of the media?

– Is the struggle headed by a charismatic personality who is liked by the media?

– It the oppressing government disliked by the media?

– Does the oppressing government belong to the pro-American camp? This is an important factor, since the United States dominates a large part of the international media, and its news agencies and TV networks largely define the agenda and the terminology of the news coverage.

– Are economic interests involved in the conflict?

– Does the oppressed people have gifted spokespersons, who are able to attract attention and manipulate the media?

From these points of view, there is nobody like the Tibetans. They enjoy ideal conditions.

Fringed by the Himalayas, they are located in one of the most beautiful landscapes on earth. For centuries, just to get there was an adventure. Their unique religion arouses curiosity and sympathy. Its non-violence is very attractive and elastic enough to cover even the ugliest atrocities, like the recent pogrom. The exiled leader, the Dalai Lama, is a romantic figure, a media rock-star. The Chinese regime is hated by many – by capitalists because it is a Communist dictatorship, by Communists because it has become capitalist. It promotes a crass and ugly materialism, the very opposite of the spiritual Buddhist monks, who spend their time in prayer and meditation.

When China builds a railway to the Tibetan capital over a thousand inhospitable kilometers, the West does not admire the engineering feat, but sees (quite rightly) an iron monster that brings hundreds of thousands of Han-Chinese settlers to the occupied territory.

And of course, China is a rising power, whose economic success threatens America’s hegemony in the world. A large part of the ailing American economy already belongs directly or indirectly to China. The huge American Empire is sinking hopelessly into debt, and China may soon be the biggest lender. American manufacturing industry is moving to China, taking millions of jobs with it.

Compared to these factors, what have the Basques, for example, to offer? Like the Tibetans, they inhabit a contiguous territory, most of it in Spain, some of it in France. They, too, are an ancient people with their own language and culture. But these are not exotic and do not attract special notice. No prayer wheels. No robed monks.

The Basques do not have a romantic leader, like Nelson Mandela or the Dalai Lama. The Spanish state, which arose from the ruins of Franco’s detested dictatorship, enjoys great popularity around the world. Spain belongs to the European Union, which is more or less in the American camp, sometimes more, sometimes less.

The armed struggle of the Basque underground is abhorred by many and is considered “terrorism”, especially after Spain has accorded the Basques a far-reaching autonomy. In these circumstances, the Basques have no chance at all of gaining world support for independence.

The Chechnyans should have been in a better position. They, too, are a separate people, who have for a long time been oppressed by the Czars of the Russian Empire, including Stalin and Putin. But alas, they are Muslims – and in the Western world, Islamophobia now occupies the place that had for centuries been reserved for anti-Semitism. Islam has turned into a synonym for terrorism, it is seen as a religion of blood and murder. Soon it will be revealed that Muslims slaughter Christian children and use their blood for baking Pitta. (In reality it is, of course, the religion of dozens of vastly different peoples, from Indonesia to Morocco and from Kosova to Zanzibar.

The US does not fear Moscow as it fears Beijing. Unlike China, Russia does not look like a country that could dominate the 21st century. The West has no interest in renewing the Cold War, as it has in renewing the Crusades against Islam. The poor Chechnyans, who have no charismatic leader or outstanding spokespersons, have been banished from the headlines. For all the world cares, Putin can hit them as much as he wants, kill thousands and obliterate whole towns.

That does not prevent Putin from supporting the demands of Abkhazia and South Ossetia for separation from Georgia, a country which infuriates Russia.

If Immanuel Kant knew what’s going on in Kosova, he would be scratching his head.

The province demanded its independence from Serbia, and I, for one, supported that with all my heart. This is a separate people, with a different culture (Albanian) and its own religion (Islam).

After the popular Serbian leader, Slobodan Milosevic, tried to drive them out of their country, the world rose and provided moral and material support for their struggle for independence.

The Albanian Kosovars make up 90% of the citizens of the new state, which has a population of two million. The other 10% are Serbs, who want no part of the new Kosova. They want the areas they live in to be annexed to Serbia. According to Kant’s maxim, are they entitled to this?

I would propose a pragmatic moral principle: Every population that inhabits a defined territory and has a clear national character is entitled to independence. A state that wants to keep such a population must see to it that they feel comfortable, that they receive their full rights, enjoy equality and have an autonomy that satisfies their aspirations. In short: that they have no reason to desire separation.

That applies to the French in Canada, the Scots in Britain, the Kurds in Turkey and elsewhere, the various ethnic groups in Africa, the indigenous peoples in Latin America, the Tamils in Sri Lanka and many others. Each has a right to choose between full equality, autonomy and independence.


This leads us, of course, to the Palestinian issue.

In the competition for the sympathy of the world media, the Palestinians are unlucky. According to all the objective standards, they have a right to full independence, exactly like the Tibetans. They inhabit a defined territory, they are a specific nation, a clear border exists between them and Israel. One must really have a crooked mind to deny these facts.

But the Palestinians are suffering from several cruel strokes of fate: The people that oppress them claim for themselves the crown of ultimate victimhood. The whole world sympathizes with the Israelis because the Jews were the victims of the most horrific crime of the Western world.

That creates a strange situation: the oppressor is more popular than the victim. Anyone who supports the Palestinians is automatically suspected of anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

Also, the great majority of the Palestinians are Muslims (nobody pays attention to the Palestinian Christians). Since Islam arouses fear and abhorrence in the West, the Palestinian struggle has automatically become a part of that shapeless, sinister threat, “international terrorism”. And since the murders of Yasser Arafat and Sheik Ahmed Yassin, the Palestinians have no particularly impressive leader – neither in Fatah nor in Hamas.

Read all of it here.
CounterPunch / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

To Gratify One Man’s Stunted Imagination


CAROLINE ARNOLD: Soldiers in modern wars all die in vain
By Caroline Arnold / April 6, 2008

Benjamin Franklin may or may not have said it, but it’s a suggestive metaphor for a dilemma of democracy, as well as for our present predicament in the U.S.: “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.”

We see Bush and the big corporations as wolves — strong, sharp-toothed, predatory and scheming; we see the people as lambs — weak, dependent, aimless and confused (and call them, derisively, “sheeple”). It’s easy to see the rich and powerful wolves deliberating our economic crisis, our Iraq crisis, our oil crisis, and easier still to predict who they’ll have for lunch.

The rest of the aphorism, “Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote,” also has attractive resonances. Indeed, both wolves and sheeple — and our boy-warrior Dubya — tend to accept without question the notion of “arms” as necessary defensive and aggressive tools, and “liberty” as the right to use them against any of our neighbors we decide to define as wolves.

In the meantime, our media — newspapers, TV, blogosphere — bring us daily news of the state of the real world:

“Wall Street Shows Optimism That Crisis Is Fading” (New York Times, 4/2/08); the article suggests that investors are confident that they will continue to make money and therefore all is well.

I don’t see much of that confidence here in Portage County. My friend, Bonny, proprietor of Bonny’s Bread, writes “I’m feeling a tad panicked at things I have no control of. Namely the economy, prices on my flour up a sudden 50%. … The thought of asking $7.50 (per one-pound loaf) … has me just frozen with frustration.”

Debby Missimi, director of food pantries and hot-meals programs for Family & Community Services, notes that higher prices at the grocery stores are bringing in more low-income families needing food while reducing the amounts of money and food middle-income families can donate for them. “We’re squeezed,” she says, “I don’t know where it will end.”

My son, faced with spending $40 per week for gasoline to get to his job in Akron, has turned to a motorcycle for commuting, a choice his wife (and his mother) would rather he didn’t have to make. But selling his house and moving to Akron is not a choice, nor is quitting a good job and expecting to find another in Portage County.

The news article tells us how we should think and talk about reality. The grass-roots stories tell us about the reality people live in. None of these stories fit easily into a Wolves & Lamb metaphor of democracy.

But these metaphors and figures of speech still have a powerful influence in our society. Arming the lambs is a favorite, and I doubt there is any hope of persuading a substantial constituency that they can be forbidden to own guns. We might be able to agree to regulate ammunition — licensing individuals to buy ammunition the way we license drivers, or requiring “prescriptions” for ammunition the way we require them for drugs. But that seems only a little less absurd and unlikely than expecting thousands of free and righteous gun-owning lambs to form a militia, storm the White House and deliver Bush and Cheney to the International Court of Justice.

Then there’s “Enhanced interrogation techniques.” Given that waterboarding is now too commonplace, too conflicted and too comic (McCain, Guiliani and Huckabee made jokes about it) to deter terrorists, perhaps Bush should consider some more abhorrent, more cruel and prolonged techniques that might be more persuasive. Impalement worked well for the ancient Assyrians as well as Vlad III Dracula. The Roman Empire found crucifixion useful in “neutralizing” threats to state security, though with the unintended consequence of providing the centerpiece for a religion that swept the world. However, Christianity redeemed its reputation for brutality with burning at the stake during the Inquisition.

How about the gobbledegook about not wanting our soldiers to die in vain? Here’s another take on that reality: 4,000 American soldiers have not died in vain — they died to bring pain, humiliation and death to thousands of Iraqis: they died to make Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo prison possible, to destroy Fallujah, to bring bombs down on the heads and homes of peasant families, to secure profits for multinational corporations, to command oil supplies, to spread fear, and to gratify one man’s stunted imagination.

Whatever are we thinking? Somehow I am reminded of Milton Drake’s 1943 jingle:

Mairzy doats and dozy doats and liddle lamzy divey

The glib phrases of the media and popular culture betray us; we let foolish metaphors — or arrant fictions — drive our actions. We need more plain speech; less media and mediafication of public information systems.

Last week Cheney dismissed all the lambs’ concerns about Bush’s war and policies with a “So?”

We-the-sheeple have to take up that challenge. If we don’t like Bush’s war, don’t want our nation to practice individual and collective violence on other humans, what are we going to do about it?

We are all humans, not wolves and lambs; guns and torture are not adequate to secure democracy or protect us from one another. Democracy cannot function under torture, secrecy, spying and fear. Soldiers in modern wars all die in vain.

“Democracy is … voting on what to have for lunch.” Woovsied lamms unless they own handguns. Lamzy divey. So? A kiddley divey. too. Wouldn’t you?

Source

Liddle Lamzy Divey
By Karen

I don’t care how many ‘e’
sounds
are tacked on
to tripe– tripe
it remains
and
only
speaks
to the moosh
side of the
brain

where we still
wear
diapers

and
dribble pee

on
to thee
margins. Most of us
outgrow it

but
some
of us are stuck

in Cutesy Pukesey-land,
where
baby voices
weirdly
will rise up

from
rumpled
skin

to make
my own

crawl.
Takes
all kinds.
You

have to

sort.

Know your
tarnation
level.


Source

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The State May Not Humiliate Anyone

Saving the American Left: The Case for a New Progressive Creed
By Bernard Chazelle / April 7, 2008

The American left is in the throes of an existential crisis. Some say it’s a failure of nerve, others a loss of belief. It is the latter. Neoliberalism has sucked the oxygen out of the left by deflating the political sphere to the economic one. The left must articulate a new creed around three principles: empowerment (the economic is ancillary to the political); social justice (the disadvantaged have an unconditional claim upon the collectivity); and decency (the state may not humiliate anyone). To make its case, the left must redefine that most exalted form of self-interest, patriotism, as pride in a society that grants all of its members the means to belong.

First, the mythology:

* Democrats burst with Big Ideas. Unfortunately, ballots and Big Ideas don’t mix and the timing is never quite right. But you watch. Once the Congress is theirs, once the White House curtains have been picked, the Dems will get crackin’ on ’em Big Ideas—or on the reelection campaign, whichever comes first.

* Big Ideas being what they are, big, squeezing them into words can be a challenge. Luckily, with academia’s brightest bulbs lighting up the pup tent, liberals can articulate better than anyone why it is they can’t articulate anything. So they’ll pen earnest treatises on the need to call taxes “membership fees” and trial lawyers “public protection attorneys.” Like it or not, this has proven quite effective, and Howard Dean, for one, likes to credit Lakoff’s framing theories for his victorious run for the White House.

* Who cares if the Clintonistas and their merry band of DLC hangers-on spoiled the broth with their third-way brand of workfare centrism and smiley-face imperialism? Across the blogosphere, a nascent grassroots movement is afoot, blowing the winds of change against the Repub-lite sellout show. It’s coming. This time, it’s really coming!

Like all myths, these wishful fantasies contain a grain of truth: Democrats are diffident, tactical, and quick to concede the terms of the debate. The netroots channel genuine passion about liberal causes and the blogs are buzzing. There is palpable excitement out there on the left. A pity there is no there there. America has lefties but no left.

The verdict is brutal. By virtually any measure, the United States is the least progressive nation in the developed world.(1) It trails most of Western Europe in poverty rates, life expectancy, health care, child care, infant mortality, maternity leaves, paid vacations, public infrastructure, incarceration rates, and environmental laws. The wealth gap in the US has not been so wide since 1929. The Wal-Mart founders’ family owns as much as the bottom 120 million Americans combined.(2) Contrary to received opinion, there is now less social mobility in the US than in Canada, France, Germany, and most Scandinavian countries.(3,4) The European Union attracts more foreign students than the US, including twice as many from China. Its consensus-driven polity, studies indicate, has replaced the American version as the societal model to which the developing world aspires.(5)

And yet could America be a right-wing nation of closet lefties? A Zogby poll reveals overwhelming support for rehabilitation over incarceration for young offenders. In an NES survey, those who want “government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending” outnumber backers of spending cuts by 2 to 1. A Pew study cites the same ratio of people who consider corporate profits excessive. It also finds that a majority of Americans believe “government should help the needy even if it means greater debt.” (6)

Democratic leaders, bless their souls, believe no such nonsense. They’ll warn you incessantly that any public policy leaning a nano-angstrom to the left is a suicide pact. They’ll brush off any talk of raising the top marginal tax rate of 35% to anything approaching the 70% of the Nixon years.(7) Yes, the progressive Bill Clinton expanded the Earned Income Tax Credit and signed the Family and Medical Leave Act. He also increased extreme poverty despite high economic growth.(8) He extended the death penalty to non-homicides and oversaw the largest increase in incarceration rates in the 20th century (double what it was under Reagan).(9,10) He exacerbated inequalities, gave up on Kyoto, and, by his own Labor secretary’s account, presided over “one of the most pro-business administrations in American history.” (2,11) His signature social policy, welfare reform, dismantled one of the pillars of the New Deal: the federal cash assistance program for 9 million poor children (AFDC).(12)

By contrast, the conservative Richard Nixon established the Environmental Protection Agency, extended the Clean Air Act, introduced the Supplemental Security Income program (to assist the elderly and the disabled), launched the Minority Business Development Agency, signed the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and implemented the first federally-mandated affirmative action program.(13) Nixon was a “Southern strategist” and a right-wing crook: he was also to the left of Bill Clinton.

The senior Democratic senator from New York, the “ultra-liberal” Chuck Schumer, recently killed efforts to raise the tax rate of hedge fund managers to that of his cleaning lady: a nice government handout to overpaid bankers that is worth, annually, half of the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.(14,15) “I am not a populist,” said Schumer.(16) (Maybe just an opportunist.) During the 2008 presidential campaign, the New York Times gently mocked John Edwards’s unauthorized concern for the poor as “raw populism.” (17) That word again. The other P-word, poverty, has acquired in the liberal mind the cosmic permanence of gravity. Much like in the Middle Ages, short of killing the poor, the thinking goes, one cannot kill poverty—even in the richest nation on earth. This capitulation to imaginary laws of economics marks the ascendancy of neoliberalism as the dominant dogma of the ruling class. This is a worldwide phenomenon but its origins are uniquely American. One may wonder: if it’s worked against the interests of so many, how then did it happen?

Read all of it here (with notes). Information Clearing House.

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Government Too Often Goes for Military Solutions

From the San Antonio Current, with thanks.

John Stanford and those calling for an end to the war in Iraq gather from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. every Thursday at the intersection of Commerce and Flores streets in San Antonio.

Patient, persistent, peaceful
By Greg Harman

John Stanford was among a core group of protestors that first gathered outside San Antonio City Hall two weeks after the attacks of 9/11 to urge a nonviolent response to the assault. The world wept in candle-lit vigils over the loss of life in New York, Washington, D.C., and a Pennsylvania field.

And the world waited, anxiously, to see how the United States would respond to the assault by a small band of motivated killers.

Today, as the U.S. occupation of Iraq enters year five, Stanford is still hopeful that human and political patterns may be adjusted to lead us onto the road of peace at last.

You’ve been meeting downtown with other folks opposed to the U.S. moving on Iraq militarily for years, is that right?

That’s right. We started meeting September 25, 2001. We were in solidarity with the victims of 9/11 — that was two weeks after 9/11 exactly — but we were also opposed to any military action being taken to bomb a country into submission because we didn’t think that would solve the problem … We were opposed to war.

Do you think we could have avoided some of the steps that have happened?

Yeah, we could have avoided that all. We could have not bombed Afghanistan, and a lot of people lost their lives. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. We brought al-Qaeda into Iraq.

Do you think people in San Antonio are beginning to see how the country was duped on Iraq?

I think people all over the country are. Don’t you? There’s no doubt that people see this.

What kinds of numbers come out on Thursday afternoons?

It varies. The people that have been putting out leaflets have been pulling in a few more just recently. I would say now we have about nine to 11. We used to have fewer.

We haven’t given it much publicity. We haven’t been making phone calls for people to come out on the whole. We have a good response from passersby.

It was a lot of horn-honking going on this last Thursday.

[Laughing] It usually is, yeah.

Is it frustrating to feel that support on the city streets for ending the war, but then have no commitment nationally?

It doesn’t frustrate us, because we know we have to work harder to get Congress to take a position. It’s disappointing that Congress has not responded more to what I think was a vote by the people against the war a couple of years ago. [Congress] has voted money for the war, has continued to vote money for the war. I think Congress needs to cut all funds for the war … That’s what we need to do. More and more are getting killed, injured, getting damaged for life, both physically and psychologically. We’ve killed many, many thousands over in Iraq — maybe millions — and created refugees. And certainly devastated the country.

Are you able to look back at any time in our country’s history when we didn’t opt for military solutions to difficult challenges?

They’ve been rare in recent history, certainly. I think there have been some efforts from some people. Many efforts from many people, but our government has too often gone in for military solutions.

How do we transform our foreign policy, how do we transform our country from an increasingly militarized state to one that operates with respect for human rights and negotiation and fairness?

That’s a difficult question, but I think as people are educated more, as these issues are brought out more, as people understand more about what’s going on, we can put more pressure on the government.

Basically, I think we need a change in the economic system toward socialism. I think we need to educate for that also. I think under socialism there would not be the drive for war, the drive for empire, the drive for conquering other peoples and acquiring the resources of other peoples.

I think under capitalism that much can be done to change foreign policy. Increasingly, there are groups that are against the foreign policies that result in sweatshops and the oppression of other peoples and strain the natural resources of other countries. There are a number of different movements that move toward these ends.

So are you optimistic that with education and the empowerment that comes with that, that human culture will be able to grow beyond where we’ve been?

Yes, I certainly am. Yes. Otherwise I wouldn’t be out in the street demonstrating.

Source

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged | Leave a comment

Government Opposes Habeas Corpus in Case Before Supreme Court

Another Test for Habeas Corpus

One of the dismal hallmarks of the Bush administration’s conduct of the war on terror has been its obsession with avoiding outside scrutiny of its actions, including by the federal courts. In particular, it has attacked habeas corpus, the guarantee that prisoners can challenge their confinement before a judge. The administration is doing so again in an important Supreme Court case concerning the habeas rights of American citizens held abroad. The justices should rule that the detainees have a right to review by a United States court.

The two plaintiffs in the case, which was argued in March, are American civilians in Iraq. Shawqi Ahmad Omar and Mohammad Munaf are being held at an Army-run detention center in Baghdad, for transfer to the Iraqis on criminal charges. Mr. Munaf’s conviction on kidnapping charges was overturned, but he may face further charges. Mr. Omar was captured by the American military at his home in Baghdad, and was accused of harboring insurgent fighters. Both men claim to be innocent. Human rights groups warn that they could face torture if they are transferred to Iraqi custody.

Mr. Omar and Mr. Munaf are asking a federal court to review their confinement. Just four years ago, the Supreme Court upheld the habeas rights of an American citizen, Yaser Hamdi, who was captured by the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan in 2001, and then imprisoned in Navy brigs in the United States.

The Hamdi decision should settle this case. To get around this recent precedent, the administration claims that the men are beyond the reach of American courts because the troops holding them are part of a multinational force authorized by the United Nations. The administration is relying on a Supreme Court ruling from 1948, Hirota v. MacArthur, that rejected habeas corpus petitions from Japanese prisoners who were being held in Japan under the authority of the Allied Supreme Commander there, Gen. Douglas MacArthur.

The Hirota case is inapplicable because it involved Japanese soldiers, not American citizens. Even if that were not so, the chain of command of the military in Iraq runs to the president. The administration cannot pretend the United States military in Iraq is not an American force in order to evade American law.

The administration is no doubt hoping that the changes in the makeup of the court since Hamdi was decided will produce a different result. For the sake of civil liberties and the court’s own integrity, it should not. At the oral argument, Justice David Souter called the administration’s reasoning “a little scary.” Extremely scary is more like it.

Source. Editorial / New York Times / April 7, 2008

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Killing of Civilians Has to Stop, on Both Sides

Bare survival is now a way of life for Gaza’s children

Gaza’s Crushed Childhoods
by Queen Rania Al Abdullah

Ayman is a soft-spoken 14-year-old boy in Jabalia City, Gaza. His family is poor, and his parents have already sold almost all their furniture to pay for food and schooling for their children. Recently, after collecting a government food handout, Ayman’s father, who has been unemployed since March 2006, had to sell the milk to pay for the journey back home.

Ayman works very hard in school and dreams of a future career. But, with 47 students in his cramped classroom and double shifts the norm, his learning environment is very stressful. Home is no refuge: the recent incursion into Jabalia was 200 meters from where Ayman lives. The shooting and shelling so terrorized his five-year-old sister that she still wakes up screaming at night.

Ayman’s experience is all too familiar in Gaza’s crowded, crippled neighborhoods, where those who are least to blame for the troubles are suffering the most. Indeed, among Gaza’s 840,000 children – of which 588,000 are refugees – Ayman’s story is luckier than many. Since the recent escalation of violence that began last month, at least 33 Palestinian boys and girls have been killed and many more injured or maimed – caught in the crossfire, shot in their living rooms, or struck by explosions in their own backyards. On February 28, four children playing soccer were hit by a missile, which dismembered them so completely their own families could not identify their bodies.

Ayman, his siblings, and all Gaza’s children are finding their lives diminished each day – a cruel, slow suffocation of their spirit and their dreams. Instead of enjoying expanding horizons, they are trapped in a virtual prison, where things that every child should be able to take for granted are instead being taken away: the right to play, to go to school, to have enough to eat, to have light to study by at night, and to feel safe in their own homes. The weight of one of the world’s longest-running conflicts is resting on their thin shoulders, crushing their childhood and inflicting psychological scars that may never heal.

Palestinians were once reputed to be among the best-educated people in the Middle East; today, after years of violence, isolation, and poverty, their proud tradition of educational excellence has been shattered. Almost 2,000 children in Gaza have dropped out of school in the last five months. Those who remain must share tattered textbooks and do without crucial resources.

The January 2008 semester exams at schools in Gaza operated by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) found 50-60 percent failure rates in mathematics and a 40 percent failure rate in Arabic – the children’s native language. Despite this, Ayman insists, “I want to be an educated person. I want to be an engineer to build my country.”

Let the world recall that Gaza’s crisis is a manmade disaster. And let the world take note that conditions are worse today than at any time since the occupation began. Seventy-nine percent of Gaza’s households live in poverty; eight out of ten depend on food assistance. Almost half the labor force is unemployed; local industry has collapsed. Water and sewage systems are failing; garbage is piling up in the streets.

UNICEF is working around the clock to restore a sense of normalcy for Gaza’s youth – developing remedial worksheets to help children keep up with their studies; creating sports and recreation programs in schools; and working with communities to establish play areas where kids can be kids in safety. UNICEF works with partners to get water, hygiene, and medical supplies to households and health facilities. And UNICEF-supported counseling teams are spread across the area, helping Palestinian parents and children cope with the burden of stress.

But, while UNICEF is doing all it can to comfort those in the midst of Gaza’s madness, only political leaders can bring the dreadful nightmare to an end. It is time for new engagement. The siege must be lifted. The killing of civilians has to stop, on both sides. Palestinian and Israeli children deserve to grow up in peace. And leaders on both sides, supported by the international community, must join in the kind of honest dialogue that is the only viable path toward achieving it.

Ayman’s father quietly says, “My children are my hope.” The children of Gaza are a light in the darkness. They deserve a chance to shine.

Her Majesty Queen Rania Al Abdullah of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is UNICEF Eminent Advocate for Children. This commentary is published by DAILY NEWS EGYPT in collaboration with Project Syndicate (www.project-syndicate.org).

Source

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Review of the Republican Tarot – R. Jehn

The Pictorial Key to the Republican Tarot: A Review
By Richard Jehn / The Rag Blog

When Mariann Wizard first began mentioning her book in the works, I didn’t think I would ever find much impetus to acquire and read it. I’m not superstitious and don’t particularly believe in divination, I disdain Republicans, and I read enough political crap as it is. But Mariann thought better of my notion and sent a copy of her book to me with heartfelt good wishes for my enjoyment as I read her new work.

Read this book to learn something you never knew about a Republican (e.g., Dick Nixon was a cousin of the exiled King of Albania). Or read this book to divine the future (e.g., Mariann devotes an entire chapter to “The Art of Tarot Divination,” where she reminds us that it is as much about patter as it is about patterns).

Or best by far, read this book for a good laugh. For example, she writes “While I do not think that there is a pathology dedicated to politics, about various public extravagances no one can question their derangement, and if anyone does, you have only to show him or her this present volume to set aside all doubt.” That just about covers it!

Only a marvelously talented writer could describe Abraham Lincoln this way: “While the words ‘simple backwoods lawyer’ follow his name as the words ‘poop in the woods’ follow a bear, Lincoln was a successful railroad lawyer and a sophisticated philosopher.”

Mariann has chosen carefully in assigning the various Republican players to the roles in the Tarot deck. For example, she has selected Dick Nixon to play “Death.” How appropriate for someone who did his best to kill off the presidency itself. The Emperor could be none other than Ronald Reagan, for who else did so much in the early stages to bring down the Empire? As she writes, “… the sun shines brightly on-screen … allud[ing] to Reagan’s notoriously sunny outlook on problems (homelessness, joblessness, international ridicule) endured by ordinary Americans,” a benign version of Caligula at his best.

The Bush family is bestowed an entire Lesser Arcana Suite of its own, with natural roles being given to George, Sr. as the Player, Barbara as the Lady, George, Jr. as the Knave, and Jeb and Neil as the Varlets. As Mariann writes of the Varlets, “their bland, featureless, sunny surroundings reflect the essential rootlessness of a family which lived in 17 different cities and 29 houses as they were growing up.” But I’m giving away the story.

I guarantee two things if you read the Republican Tarot: you’ll learn more than you ever wanted to know about majour 20th century Republican players and you’ll laugh a hell of a lot more than you could possibly anticipate. Do yourself a favour: buy this book and enjoy every second of it. Then, one evening when you’re asking yourself what you should be doing, it will strike you that you have never divined your future from Mariann Wizard’s Republican Tarot, and your time will be filled with laughter, excitement, and good cheer.

Taroting in my two cents’ worth.

Ain’t those Republicans just a hoot! Well, Miz Wizard has captured them in all their, shall we say, zaniness. The book is delicious satire with lots of enlightening Republicana tossed in. It’s as offbeat and delightful as is its author.

Thorne Dreyer / The Rag Blog

Go here to find Mariann Wizard’s The Pictorial Key to the Republican Tarot.
For more about Mariann Wizard, go here.

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment