One Family Is Changing the Face of Christmas

Colin Beavan plays with his daughter Isabella
at Washington Square Park near their home.
Photo: Paul Dunn/YES! Magazine

Christmas with No Presents
By Colin Beavan / November 26, 2008

One family’s daring experiment: Christmas without all the stuff.

If Christmas is about presents, then in 2007, my little family and I had no Christmas. I mean, we had the caroling and the uncle playing the piano and the cousins running around with my three-year-old, Isabella, and the grandfather coaxing her to sit on his lap and the good food.

We had, in other words, an amazingly good time.

What we didn’t have, though, was the average American’s $800 hole in our bank accounts, gouged out by Christmas-present spending. Nor did we have the credit card debt still unpaid by June. Nor the forcing of smiles for gifts we didn’t really want. Nor the buying of extra luggage to bring home those unwanted gifts. Nor the stressful rush of last-minute crowds at the mall.

Without presents, you see, we didn’t have the sensation that I, at least, normally associated with Christmas—the stress. And without stress or presents, it’s not Christmas, right? But of course it was. It was the best of Christmas, the part that, research shows, makes people happiest. It was all the upside without the downside.

Let me back up.

From November 2006 to November 2007, I and my little family—one wife, one toddler, one dog—embarked on a lifestyle experiment in which we tried to live with the lowest possible environmental impact (you can read about it on my blog NoImpactMan.com). Among other measures, the experiment included not making trash, not using any form of carbon-producing transportation, and not buying anything new.

This may sound like a lot of meaningless self-deprivation, but the question we wanted to answer was this: Does consuming fewer resources actually feel like deprivation, or is it possible that consuming less opens up another way of life that provides more enduring satisfaction? Or put another way, could we find a win-win way of life that might be happier both for us and for the planet?

Sometimes the answer was no. It may be better for the planet if we all decided not to buy big hunks of metal otherwise known as washing machines, but—believe me—washing my family’s clothes by hand did not make me happier.

Beavan drives the family vehicle.
Photo: Paul Dunn for YES! Magazine

On the other hand, eating local and riding bikes instead of driving cars allowed us to lose the spare tires around our guts, cure ourselves of longstanding skin problems and insomnia and become generally healthier. And not using electricity to power entertainment devices drew us closer together as a family and made us spend more time with friends.

Our experiences illustrated that some uses of planetary resources improve quality of life and some may not. Indeed, we could go a long way toward dealing with the crisis in our planetary habitat if we found a way to avoid those uses that don’t improve our lives—like the packaging that comprises 40 percent of trash in landfills, for example.

But as Christmas 2007 approached, the more pressing question for us was, did the season’s huge consumption of resources add to the Christmas experience or detract from it? Since one-sixth of all American retail sales (and as a consequence, a hefty proportion of our national planetary resource use) occurs during the holiday season, it’s a question worth asking.

Despite the fact that people spend relatively large portions of their income on gifts, as well as time shopping for and wrapping them, such behavior apparently contributes little to holiday joy.

I’ve already told you enough to let you guess how my little family’s experience played out, but you may be surprised to learn that our findings are backed up by bona fide psychological research: Even though oodles of presents at Christmas is the dominant American paradigm, it turns out that people who spend less and have less spent on them at Christmas actually enjoy the season more.

This, anyway, is the conclusion of a paper published in the Journal of Happiness Studies by researchers Tim Kasser of Knox College and Kennon M. Sheldon of the University of Missouri-Columbia. After studying the Christmas experiences of 117 individuals, they found that people who emphasized time spent with families and meaningful religious or spiritual activities had merrier Christmases.

“Despite the fact that people spend relatively large portions of their income on gifts, as well as time shopping for and wrapping them,” the researchers said, “such behavior apparently contributes little to holiday joy.” In fact, subjects who gave or received presents that represented a substantial percentage of their income, Kasser and Sheldon found, actually experienced less Christmas joy.

The Story of Stuff


A fun and fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns.

WATCH THE FILM & LEARN 10 LITTLE AND BIG THINGS YOU CAN DO

Of course, this makes perfect sense. We all know in our hearts that treasuring meaningful experiences and spending time in valued relationships — at Christmas or any other part of the year — make us happier than getting more stuff.

But try telling that to the grandparents at Christmas time!

Try living out these lofty principles when the rest of your family and friends are swapping presents at the same rate as ever. You may find “bah humbugs” shouted in your direction more than once. That’s problematic, particularly if you’re hoping to inspire more sustainable lifestyle choices in other people. Nobody will be convinced by dogmatism or Grinch-like behavior.

The trick to a happy, sustainable, non-consumptive Christmas was not, we discovered, to ignore the expectations of the people we celebrated with. We didn’t want our loved ones to feel bad. Those who expected presents should get them, we decided. Gifts, after all, are associated with the exchange of love.

For us, the answer was to buy presents that did not require the exploitation of large amounts of planetary resources. My mother was very happy with the two massages she got. My father and his wife enjoyed the gift certificate to the fine dining, local-food restaurant in their neighborhood. Friends appreciated the theater tickets we bought them. And unlike those unwanted trinkets one sometimes buys for the “person who has everything,” our sustainable gifts, we felt, actually improved the recipients’ lives.

Still, my wife, Michelle, worried very much that it would be hard for Isabella if all the cousins had presents to open, but she didn’t. Try saying, “The research says you’ll be happier with less,” to a three-year-old. So Isabella’s Aunt Maureen contributed toys that her children had outgrown, and we wrapped them for Isabella.

When present-opening time came, Isabella didn’t care whether the present she was opening was for her or not. She didn’t even want the presents. She just wanted to open them. She didn’t want something to have later. She wanted to participate now. And when her Uncle Joe started playing the piano and singing, she got bored with the present opening anyway and went to sit with him on the piano bench.

Much to our surprise, she didn’t even want to take her cousins’ old toys home when the Christmas vacation was over. She’d already had her presents. What was important to her was what turned out to be important to us: the singing, the charades, the laughter, the time spent with family, and of course, the celebration.

Colin Beavan wrote this article as part of Sustainable Happiness, the Winter 2009 issue of YES! Magazine. Colin’s book about his No Impact Man experiment will be published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux in September 2009. Visit his blog at NoImpactMan.com.]

Source / Yes! Magazine

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Mark Rudd : Let’s Get Smart About Obama

In structuring his presidential campaign, Obama adapted methods he learned as a community organizer in the streets of Chicago.

‘He has a narrow mandate for change, without any direction specified. What he’s doing now is moving on the most popular issues — the environment, health care, and the economy.’

By Mark Rudd / The Rag Blog / November 28, 2008

If you’re anything like me, your inbox fills up daily with the cries and complaints of lefties. Just the mere mention of the names Hillary Clinton and Lawrence Summers alone conjure up a litany of horrendous right-wingers appointed to top level positions.

Betrayal is the name of the game.

But wait a second. Let’s talk about a few things:

* Obama is a very strategic thinker. He knew precisely what it would take to get elected and didn’t blow it. He used community organizing methods to mobilize a base consisting of many people who had never voted before or who regularly don’t vote. Few other candidates in my lifetime have taken this road, which is contrary to conventional political wisdom. (Paul Wellstone was a wonderful exception to the rule.) But he also knew that what he said had to basically play to the center to not be run over by the press, the Republicans, scare centrist and cross-over voters away. He made it.

So he has a narrow mandate for change, without any direction specified. What he’s doing now is moving on the most popular issues — the environment, health care, and the economy. He’ll be progressive on the environment because that has broad popular support; health care will be extended to children, then made universal, but the medical, pharmaceutical, and insurance corporations will stay in place, perhaps yielding some power; the economic agenda will stress stimulation from the bottom sometimes and handouts to the top at other times. It will be pragmatic — Summers is talking about the growth in income disparity as a significant problem. On foreign policy and the wars and the use of the military there will be no change at all. That’s what keeping Gates at the Pentagon and Clinton at State and not prosecuting the torturers is saying.

And never, never threaten the military budget. That will unite a huge majority of congress against him.

And I agree with this strategy. Anything else will court sure defeat. Move on the stuff you can to a small but significant extent, gain support and confidence. Leave the military alone because they’re way too powerful. For now, until enough momentum is raised. By the second or third year of this recession, when stimulus is needed at the bottom, people may begin to discuss cutting the military budget if security is being increased through diplomacy and application of nascent international law.

* Obama plays basketball. I’m not much of an athlete, barely know the game, but one thing I do know is that you have to be able to look like you’re doing one thing but do another. That’s why all these conservative appointments are important: the strategy is feint to the right, move left. Any other strategy invites sure defeat. It would be stupid to do otherwise in this environment.

* Look to the second level appointments. There’s a whole govt. in waiting that Podesta has at the Center for American Progress. They’re mostly progressives, I’m told (except in military and foreign policy). Cheney was extremely effective at controlling policy by putting his people in at second-level positions.

* Read Obama’s first book, “Dreams from My Father.” The second section is the story of his three years doing community organizing in Chicago. It’s some of the best writing on organizing I’ve ever seen. That’s all it’s about, the core of the book. Obama learned many lessons of strategy and patience. Then read the first section, on his family and growing up in Hawaii and Indonesia. No other president has ever had such intimate experience with class and race. The final section is about his trip to Kenya. No other president has ever had an understanding of not only race, but colonialism and neo-colonialism, even using the terms. It’s the whole story he tells of his African family and especially his father, a victim of neo-colonialism. As was his step-father in Indonesia.

This is no stupid guy. I haven’t read The Audacity of Hope yet, but I plan to soon. I am ashamed that it took me so long to read Obama’s books. Had any of the stupid Republicans read his books, they never could have said, “We don’t know who this guy is.” You know every thought he’s ever had.

Our job now is to organize both inside and outside the Demo party. There’s already a big battle in the Demo party at every level. Here in the New Mexico State Legislature, the progressives are challenging the conservative Dems for leadership; the same is true in Congress. If you can’t stand to work in the party, work on putting mass pressure on issues such as healthcare and jobs and the war from outside.

Here’s my mantra: “Let’s put this country on our shoulders and get to work.”

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Dude. 2,700-Year-Old Marijuana Stash Found in China.

Marijuana: A Tribute.

‘The 789 grams of dried cannabis was buried alongside a light-haired, blue-eyed Caucasian man, likely a shaman of the Gushi culture, near Turpan in northwestern China.’
By The Canadian Press / November 27, 2008

OTTAWA – Researchers say they have located the world’s oldest stash of marijuana, in a tomb in a remote part of China.

The cache of cannabis is about 2,700 years old and was clearly “cultivated for psychoactive purposes,” rather than as fibre for clothing or as food, says a research paper in the Journal of Experimental Botany.

The 789 grams of dried cannabis was buried alongside a light-haired, blue-eyed Caucasian man, likely a shaman of the Gushi culture, near Turpan in northwestern China.

The extremely dry conditions and alkaline soil acted as preservatives, allowing a team of scientists to carefully analyze the stash, which still looked green though it had lost its distinctive odour.

“To our knowledge, these investigations provide the oldest documentation of cannabis as a pharmacologically active agent,” says the newly published paper, whose lead author was American neurologist Dr. Ethan B. Russo.

Remnants of cannabis have been found in ancient Egypt and other sites, and the substance has been referred to by authors such as the Greek historian Herodotus. But the tomb stash is the oldest so far that could be thoroughly tested for its properties.

The 18 researchers, most of them based in China, subjected the cannabis to a battery of tests, including carbon dating and genetic analysis. Scientists also tried to germinate 100 of the seeds found in the cache, without success.

The marijuana was found to have a relatively high content of THC, the main active ingredient in cannabis, but the sample was too old to determine a precise percentage.

Researchers also could not determine whether the cannabis was smoked or ingested, as there were no pipes or other clues in the tomb of the shaman, who was about 45 years old.

The large cache was contained in a leather basket and in a wooden bowl, and was likely meant to be used by the shaman in the afterlife.

“This materially is unequivocally cannabis, and no material has previously had this degree of analysis possible,” Russo said in an interview from Missoula, Mont.

“It was common practice in burials to provide materials needed for the afterlife. No hemp or seeds were provided for fabric or food. Rather, cannabis as medicine or for visionary purposes was supplied.”

The tomb also contained bridles, archery equipment and a harp, confirming the man’s high social standing.

Russo is a full-time consultant with GW Pharmaceuticals, which makes Sativex, a cannabis-based medicine approved in Canada for pain linked to multiple sclerosis and cancer.

The company operates a cannabis-testing laboratory at a secret location in southern England to monitor crop quality for producing Sativex, and allowed Russo use of the facility for tests on 11 grams of the tomb cannabis.

Researchers needed about 10 months to cut red tape barring the transfer of the cannabis to England from China, Russo said.

The inter-disciplinary study was published this week by the British-based botany journal, which uses independent reviewers to ensure the accuracy and objectivity of all submitted papers.

The substance has been found in two of the 500 Gushi tombs excavated so far in northwestern China, indicating that cannabis was either restricted for use by a few individuals or was administered as a medicine to others through shamans, Russo said.

“It certainly does indicate that cannabis has been used by man for a variety of purposes for thousands of years.”

Russo, who had a neurology practice for 20 years, has previously published studies examining the history of cannabis.

“I hope we can avoid some of the political liabilities of the issue,” he said, referring to his latest paper.

The region of China where the tomb is located, Xinjiang, is considered an original source of many cannabis strains worldwide.

Source / Toronto Sun

Thanks to Larry Piltz / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Texas Toll Road Soup : The Environment, Federal Funding and Peak Oil

U.S. 281 N Toll Road near San Antonio.

‘”It’s been obvious to us from day one that TxDOT was willing to do and say anything to get a toll road on U.S. 281,” said Terri Hall of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom.’

By Roger Baker / The Rag Blog / November 28, 2008

Four points about TXDot and the Texas toll road mess.

1.) First of all, everyone who follows Texas road politics knows that the environmental studies done by The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) are shoddy. They always conclude that whatever roads TxDOT wants are needed and will have a minimal environmental impact.

Federal officials now seem to agree that TxDOT’s studies have been substandard, after a citizen lawsuit forced the issue and after incriminating internal emails were revealed. The feds are now making the San Antonio’s TxDOT district do their federally required studies over again. The project, the US 281 toll road, would of course stimulate proposed development over the Aquifer where SA gets its drinking water. This “mistake” cost TxDOT $8 million and a delay of three years, so they fired somebody at the bottom. Here is the full story on that.

“It’s been obvious to us from day one that TxDOT was willing to do and say anything to get a toll road on U.S. 281,” said Terri Hall of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom. “I don’t think one biologist should take the fall. It should be management that pays the price.”

Another hugely important fact, which is off-limits for TxDOT’s environmental studies, is that the greenhouse gas emissions closely associated with sprawl development stimulated by new roads are causing irreversible climate change.

According to top climate scientists , this is a critical problem demanding immediate action.

2.) In the case of US 290 E, it has now been revealed that the consulting group that did the Traffic and Revenue studies for this road has quit the traffic forecasting business. Here are the details.

“…URS has established an international reputation as one of the leading consultants in toll financing. URS reports are fully acceptable to the financial community and rating agencies. In illustration of this, URS staff periodically gives seminars on toll road traffic and revenue forecasting to staffs of the three rating agencies… URS’s greatest strength in traffic and revenue work was in the US south. The collapse of political support for toll financing in Texas may have been a factor in the closure of their T&R work…”

These forecasts are work that the bond rating agencies rely on to justify the road’s ability to repay toll road bond debt. By not insuring its toll road bonds, the public would have to take the financial hit because the bond houses often respond to default by lowering the bond ratings for those local governments that participated in the bond sales. This is done in order to force the public to bail out the bond lenders.

The CTRMA (Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority) is refusing to reveal the US 290 E T&R studies on the grounds that the studies are still incomplete, in some sense, and therefore can be withheld by the CTRMA until just before the bond sales. The CTRMA’s refusal to reveal this data indicates that the numbers probably don’t look very good. More evidence is the fact that the US 290 E bonds are considered too expensive (meaning too risky) to be insured.

Meanwhile the CTRMA’s bond counsel, J.P. Morgan Chase Securities is advising CAMPO to change its toll road financing policies through the CTRMA, but they are doing this consulting without any written contract, according to CTRMA director Heiligenstein.

This fundamental change in CAMPO’s road funding policy to allow the transfer of funds within an undisclosed $1.5 billion toll road “system,” would violate the rules that were promised to the public and were unanimously adopted by CAMPO in Oct. 2007.

This change is being posted for a CAMPO vote next week. See agenda item 8 on CAMPO’s Dec. 1 2008 agenda.

3.) The FHWA issued a stinging rebuke to TxDOT last year, and withdrew potential federal approval for its TIFIA loan on SH 121. This is the category for federal loans that the CTRMA is depending on for roughly a third of its toll road financing. (Without the TIFIA loans, the financing for the CTRMA’s toll roads pretty much falls apart.)

The letter announces:

— withdrawal of the special exceptions program (SEP-15) waiver granted to expedite SH121 and two other unnamed highway projects for accelerated environmental clearance

— withdrawal of approvals for TIFIA federal loan and Private Activity Bonds support

— a request for reimbursement of the US Government for its expenses in incurred in considering and evaluating the TIFIA loan associated with SH121

— no future federal funds for SH121

— additional oversight and approval requirements for future Texas applications so long as Texas breach of federal law is not remedied

— more “far reaching compliance measures” if Texas violates federal law again…”

4.) The private bond money on which the CTRMA was depending for about another third of its of its toll road funding has virtually disappeared. Things have changed a whole lot in the last few months. We’re not operating under the Bush/Greenspan bubble with easy credit for long-range debt anymore. Yet this is the type of private funding that TxDOT, and now the CTRMA, were counting on to cover their huge funding shortfalls. Here and here are links that underline the fact that borrowing long-range funds for toll roads has now gotten extremely difficult:

Likely, Obama and the Democratic Congress will favor new transportation money to repair neglected US infrastructure, but it will likely come with new strings attached; being targeted for repair of existing facilities rather than building uninsured new toll roads. TxDOT is acting fast to try to capture what it can of these funds:

“Texas Department of Transportation officials have notified the state’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations to begin identifying ‘ready to go’ projects that could qualify for a new $700 billion federal stimulus proposed this week by President-elect Barack Obama. The package is intended to boost employment by rebuilding infrastructure, modernizing schools, and strengthening the alternative energy industry…”

Meanwhile the 40 year toll road bonds are nearly certain to default. This is because world oil production is peaking with no affordable near-term energy or technology to replace oil. If electric cars should become widely available, they are unlikely to be cheap, would require a lot of new electrical power capacity, and both US consumers and the government are heavily in debt. If you are short of transportation money, urban rail in combination with smart growth policies are a much wiser option than new and widened roads.

World crude oil production practically stopped growing in 2005. Since then, steadily increasing world demand bid the oil price up to $147 a few months ago. Such high oil prices are like a tax on everything involving transportation. This burden has now triggered a severe world recession. Whenever the world economy recovers, oil prices will soar again as the world bids for a limited oil supply:

The peak oil crisis: the Crash of 2008

“…Despite the dramatic drop in oil prices during the last three months, recent developments have only made the supply and demand situation worse. Oil consumption in the U.S. has fallen by 1.8 million barrels a day (b/d) or nearly 9 percent as compared to last year due to a combination of high prices, a slowing economy, and the shortages resulting from the hurricanes that tore up Gulf coast production and refining last month. During September, however, Chinese imports increased by 2 million b/d as Beijing took advantage of the low prices to start building its strategic reserves -so much for falling American demand. The major oil forecasting agencies are now saying that the increase in worldwide demand for oil will slow from rates seen in recent years, but that worldwide oil consumption is still forecast to increase this year and next…”

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Type your summary here



Type rest of the post here

Source

The Rag Blog


Posted in RagBlog | Leave a comment

SOFA* Finally Gets Through Iraqi Parliament


Iraqi parliament approves landmark US military pact
By Salam Faraj / November 27, 2008

BAGHDAD – Iraq’s parliament on Thursday approved a landmark military pact that will see all US troops withdraw by the end of 2011, eight years after the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein and plunged the country into chaos.

After 11 months of hard-nosed negotiations with Washington and a flurry of domestic political horse-trading leading up to the vote, the pact was approved by 149 members of the 198 who attended the session of the 275-member assembly.

The final count of the votes was provided by the office of Deputy Parliamentary Speaker Khaled al-Attiya, which corrected an earlier count announced during the parliamentary session itself.

Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s Shiite-led government succeeded in corralling a majority to support the historic agreement, including the main blocs representing the country’s Sunni and Kurdish minorities.

“Today if this passes it will be a victory for democracy because the opposition have done their part and the supporters have done their part,” government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said ahead of the vote.

“It is good to see that representatives have reached a national consensus.”

The agreement was approved by the cabinet a week ago and is now virtually guaranteed to be ratified by Iraq’s presidential council.

The United States hailed the passing of the agreement, saying it would “formalise a strong and equal partnership” in a statement from Ambassador Ryan Crocker and General Ray Odierno, the top commander of US troops in Iraq.

“(The agreement) provides the means to secure the significant security gains we have achieved together and to deter future aggression,” they said. “We congratulate the government of Iraq and its elected representatives.”

The measure would govern some 150,000 US troops stationed in over 400 bases when their UN mandate expires at the end of the year, giving the Iraqi government veto power over virtually all of their operations.

It marks a coming-of-age for Maliki’s government, which drove a hard bargain with Washington, securing a number of concessions over nearly a year of tough negotiations.

The accord has still drawn fire from certain quarters, including followers of the hardline Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who reject any agreement with the United States and who protested at the accord in Baghdad last Friday.

As the voting on the pact began several Sadrist MPs pounded tables in a bid to hinder the vote, chanting “Yes, yes to Iraq… No, no, to the occupation,” but the 30-member bloc failed to defeat the agreement.

The vote came after a flurry of last-minute negotiations in which the main Sunni parties secured a package of political reforms from the government and a commitment to hold a referendum on the pact in the middle of next year.

Should the Iraqi government decide to cancel the pact after the referendum it would have to give Washington one year’s notice, meaning that troops would be allowed to remain in the country only until the middle of 2010.

The pact was made possible in part by dramatic improvements in security over the past year, with US and Iraqi forces largely containing the violence and the chaos that erupted in the wake of the 2003 US-led invasion and Saddam’s ouster.

But moments before the vote two people were killed and more than two dozen wounded in separate suicide bombings in northern Iraq targeting local security forces, underscoring the lingering violence in the country.

In the first attack south of the city of Mosul, a suicide car bomb rammed into a police patrol, killing two civilians and wounding 25 others, including 15 policemen, police said.

In the second, a bomber strapped with explosives wounded four people when the attacker targeted a police patrol in the centre of Mosul — which the US military considers the last urban bastion of Al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Iraq won a number of concessions in the agreement, including a hard timeline for withdrawal, the right to search US military cargo and the right to try US soldiers for crimes committed while they are off their bases and off-duty.

The agreement also requires that US troops obtain Iraqi permission for all military operations, and that they hand over the files of all detainees in US custody to the Iraqi authorities, who will decide their fate.

The pact also forbids US troops from using Iraq as a launch-pad or transit point for attacking another country, which may reassure Syria and Iran, according to the official Arabic version of the pact, translated by AFP.

Source / ABS/CBN News / Agence France-Presse

The Rag Blog

* SOFA = Status of Forces Agreement

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Thanksgiving: No Reason for Indians to Celebrate

See video “Thanksgiving: A Native American View” below.

Native Blood: The Myth of Thanksgiving
By Mike Ely

It is a deep thing that people still celebrate the survival of the early colonists at Plymouth — by giving thanks to the Christian God who supposedly protected and championed the European invasion. The real meaning of all that, then and now, needs to be continually excavated. The myths and lies that surround the past are constantly draped over the horrors and tortures of our present.

I originally wrote this article a decade ago, and it has showed up in different places and publications usually around the holiday. Pass it on.

Every schoolchild in the U.S. has been taught that the Pilgrims of the Plymouth Colony invited the local Indians to a major harvest feast after surviving their first bitter year in New England. But the real history of Thanksgiving is a story of the murder of indigenous people and the theft of their land by European colonialists–and of the ruthless ways of capitalism.

illustration of a native american

Mike Ely’s articles is available as an MP3 recording. Click on the picture above.

In mid-winter 1620 the English ship Mayflower landed on the North American coast, delivering 102 exiles. The original Native people of this stretch of shoreline had already been killed off. In 1614 a British expedition had landed there. When they left they took 24 Indians as slaves and left smallpox behind. Three years of plague wiped out between 90 and 96 percent of the inhabitants of the coast, destroying most villages completely.

The Europeans landed and built their colony called “the Plymouth Plantation” near the deserted ruins of the Indian village of Pawtuxet. They ate from abandoned cornfields grown wild. Only one Pawtuxet named Squanto had survived–he had spent the last years as a slave to the English and Spanish in Europe. Squanto spoke the colonists’ language and taught them how to plant corn and how to catch fish until the first harvest. Squanto also helped the colonists negotiate a peace treaty with the nearby Wampanoag tribe, led by the chief Massasoit.

These were very lucky breaks for the colonists. The first Virginia settlement had been wiped out before they could establish themselves. Thanks to the good will of the Wampanoag, the settlers not only survived their first year but had an alliance with the Wampanoags that would give them almost two decades of peace.

John Winthrop, a founder of the Massahusetts Bay colony considered this wave of illness and death to be a divine miracle. He wrote to a friend in England, “But for the natives in these parts, God hath so pursued them, as for 300 miles space the greatest part of them are swept away by smallpox which still continues among them. So as God hath thereby cleared our title to this place, those who remain in these parts, being in all not 50, have put themselves under our protection.”

The deadly impact of European diseases and the good will of the Wampanoag allowed the settlers to survive their first year.

In celebration of their good fortune, the colony’s governor, William Bradford, declared a three-day feast of thanksgiving after that first harvest of 1621.

How the Puritans Stole the Land

But the peace that produced the Thanksgiving Feast of 1621 meant that the Puritans would have 15 years to establish a firm foothold on the coast. Until 1629 there were no more than 300 settlers in New England, scattered in small and isolated settlements. But their survival inspired a wave of Puritan invasion that soon established growing Massachusetts towns north of Plymouth: Boston and Salem. For 10 years, boatloads of new settlers came.

Early North America as Native peoples and Europe settlers collide

And as the number of Europeans increased, they proved not nearly so generous as the Wampanoags.

On arrival, the Puritans and other religious sects discussed “who legally owns all this land.” They had to decide this, not just because of Anglo-Saxon traditions, but because their particular way of farming was based on individual–not communal or tribal–ownership. This debate over land ownership reveals that bourgeois “rule of law” does not mean “protect the rights of the masses of people.”

Some settlers argued that the land belonged to the Indians. These forces were excommunicated and expelled. Massachusetts Governor Winthrop declared the Indians had not “subdued” the land, and therefore all uncultivated lands should, according to English Common Law, be considered “public domain.” This meant they belonged to the king. In short, the colonists decided they did not need to consult the Indians when they seized new lands, they only had to consult the representative of the crown (meaning the local governor).

The colonists embraced a line from Psalms 2:8. “Ask of me, and I shall give thee, the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.” Since then, European settler states have similarly declared god their real estate agent: from the Boers seizing South Africa to the Zionists seizing Palestine.

The European immigrants took land and enslaved Indians to help them farm it. By 1637 there were about 2,000 British settlers. They pushed out from the coast and decided to remove the inhabitants.

The Shining City on the Hill

Where did the Plymouth and Massachusetts colonies of Puritan and “separatist” pilgrims come from and what were they really all about?

Governor Winthrop, a founder of the Massachusetts colony, said, “We shall be as a City upon a Hill, the eyes of all people are upon us.” The Mayflower Puritans had been driven out of England as subversives. The Puritans saw this religious colony as a model of a social and political order that they believed all of Europe should adopt.

The Puritan movement was part of a sweeping revolt within English society against the ruling feudal order of wealthy lords. Only a few decades after the establishment of Plymouth, the Puritan Revolution came to power in England. They killed the king, won a civil war, set up a short-lived republic, and brutally conquered the neighboring people of Ireland to create a larger national market.

The famous Puritan intolerance was part of a determined attempt to challenge the decadence and wastefulness of the rich aristocratic landlords of England. The Puritans wanted to use the power of state punishment to uproot old and still dominant ways of thinking and behaving.

The new ideas of the Puritans served the needs of merchant capitalist accumulation. The extreme discipline, thrift and modesty the Puritans demanded of each other corresponded to a new and emerging form of ownership and production. Their so-called “Protestant Ethic” was an early form of the capitalist ethic. From the beginning, the Puritan colonies intended to grow through capitalist trade–trading fish and fur with England while they traded pots, knives, axes, alcohol and other English goods with the Indians.

The New England were ruled by a government in which only the male heads of families had a voice. Women, Indians, slaves, servants, youth were neither heard nor represented. In the Puritan schoolbooks, the old law “honor thy father and thy mother” was interpreted to mean honoring “All our Superiors, whether in Family, School, Church, and Commonwealth.” And, the real truth was that the colonies were fundamentally controlled by the most powerful merchants.

The Puritan fathers believed they were the Chosen People of an infinite god and that this justified anything they did. They were Calvinists who believed that the vast majority of humanity was predestined to damnation. This meant that while they were firm in fighting for their own capitalist right to accumulate and prosper, they were quick to oppress the masses of people in Ireland, Scotland and North America, once they seized the power to set up their new bourgeois order. Those who rejected the narrow religious rules of the colonies were often simply expelled “out into the wilderness.”

The Massachusetts colony (north of Plymouth) was founded when Puritan stockholders had gotten control of an English trading company. The king had given this company the right to govern its own internal affairs, and in 1629 the stockholders simply voted to transfer the company to North American shores–making this colony literally a self-governing company of stockholders!

In U.S. schools, students are taught that the Mayflower compact of Plymouth contained the seeds of “modern democracy” and “rule of law.” But by looking at the actual history of the Puritans, we can see that this so-called “modern democracy” was (and still is) a capitalist democracy based on all kinds of oppression and serving the class interests of the ruling capitalists.

In short, the Puritan movement developed as an early revolutionary challenge to the old feudal order in England. They were the soul of primitive capitalist accumulation. And transferred to the shores of North America, they immediately revealed how heartless and oppressive that capitalist soul is.

The Birth of “The American Way of War”

In the Connecticut Valley, the powerful Pequot tribe had not entered an alliance with the British (as had the Narragansett, the Wampanoag, and the Massachusetts peoples). At first they were far from the centers of colonization. Then, in 1633, the British stole the land where the city of Hartford now sits–land which the Pequot had recently conquered from another tribe. That same year two British slave raiders were killed. The colonists demanded that the Indians who killed the slavers be turned over. The Pequot refused.

European colonists attack the Pequot village.

The Puritan preachers said, from Romans 13:2, “Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.” The colonial governments gathered an armed force of 240 under the command of John Mason. They were joined by a thousand Narragansett warriors. The historian Francis Jennings writes: “Mason proposed to avoid attacking Pequot warriors which would have overtaxed his unseasoned, unreliable troops. Battle, as such, was not his purpose. Battle is only one of the ways to destroy an enemy’s will to fight. Massacre can accomplish the same end with less risk, and Mason had determined that massacre would be his objective.”

The colonist army surrounded a fortified Pequot village on the Mystic River. At sunrise, as the inhabitants slept, the Puritan soldiers set the village on fire.

William Bradford, Governor of Plymouth, wrote: “Those that escaped the fire were slain with the sword; some hewed to pieces, others run through with their rapiers, so that they were quickly dispatched and very few escaped. It was conceived they thus destroyed about 400 at this time. It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fire…horrible was the stink and scent thereof, but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully for them.”

Mason himself wrote: “It may be demanded…Should not Christians have more mercy and compassion? But…sometimes the Scripture declareth women and children must perish with their parents…. We had sufficient light from the word of God for our proceedings.”

Three hundred and fifty years later the Puritan phrase “a shining city on the hill” became a favorite quote of conservative speechwriters.

Discovering the Profits of Slavery

This so-called “Pequot war” was a one-sided murder and slaving expedition. Over 180 captives were taken. After consulting the bible again, in Leviticus 24:44, the colonial authorities found justification to kill most of the Pequot men and enslave the captured women and their children. Only 500 Pequot remained alive and free. In 1975 the official number of Pequot living in Connecticut was 21.

Some of the war captives were given to the Narragansett and Massachusetts allies of the British. Even before the arrival of Europeans, Native peoples of North America had widely practiced taking war captives from other tribes as hostages and slaves.

The remaining captives were sold to British plantation colonies in the West Indies to be worked to death in a new form of slavery that served the emerging capitalist world market. And with that, the merchants of Boston made a historic discovery: the profits they made from the sale of human beings virtually paid for the cost of seizing them.

One account says that enslaving Indians quickly became a “mania with speculators.” These early merchant capitalists of Massachusetts started to make genocide pay for itself. The slave trade, first in captured Indians and soon in kidnapped Africans, quickly became a backbone of New England merchant capitalism.

Thanksgiving in the Manhattan Colony

In 1641 the Dutch governor Kieft of Manhattan offered the first “scalp bounty”–his government paid money for the scalp of each Indian brought to them. A couple years later, Kieft ordered the massacre of the Wappingers, a friendly tribe. Eighty were killed and their severed heads were kicked like soccer balls down the streets of Manhattan. One captive was castrated, skinned alive and forced to eat his own flesh while the Dutch governor watched and laughed. Then Kieft hired the notorious Underhill who had commanded in the Pequot war to carry out a similar massacre near Stamford, Connecticut. The village was set fire, and 500 Indian residents were put to the sword.

A day of thanksgiving was proclaimed in the churches of Manhattan. As we will see, the European colonists declared Thanksgiving Days to celebrate mass murder more often than they did for harvest and friendship.

The Conquest of New England

By the 1670s there were about 30,000 to 40,000 white inhabitants in the United New England Colonies–6,000 to 8,000 able to bear arms. With the Pequot destroyed, the Massachusetts and Plymouth colonists turned on the Wampanoag, the tribe that had saved them in 1620 and probably joined them for the original Thanksgiving Day.

In 1675 a Christian Wampanoag was killed while spying for the Puritans. The Plymouth authorities arrested and executed three Wampanoag without consulting the tribal chief, King Philip.

As Mao Tsetung says: “Where there is oppression there is resistance.” The Wampanoag went to war.

The Indians applied some military lessons they had learned: they waged a guerrilla war which overran isolated European settlements and were often able to inflict casualties on the Puritan soldiers. The colonists again attacked and massacred the main Indian populations.

When this war ended, 600 European men, one-eleventh of the adult men of the New England Colonies, had been killed in battle. Hundreds of homes and 13 settlements had been wiped out. But the colonists won.

In their victory, the settlers launched an all-out genocide against the remaining Native people. The Massachusetts government offered 20 shillings bounty for every Indian scalp, and 40 shillings for every prisoner who could be sold into slavery. Soldiers were allowed to enslave any Indian woman or child under 14 they could capture. The “Praying Indians” who had converted to Christianity and fought on the side of the European troops were accused of shooting into the treetops during battles with “hostiles.” They were enslaved or killed. Other “peaceful” Indians of Dartmouth and Dover were invited to negotiate or seek refuge at trading posts–and were sold onto slave ships.

It is not known how many Indians were sold into slavery, but in this campaign, 500 enslaved Indians were shipped from Plymouth alone. Of the 12,000 Indians in the surrounding tribes, probably about half died from battle, massacre and starvation.

After King Philip’s War, there were almost no Indians left free in the northern British colonies. A colonist wrote from Manhattan’s New York colony: “There is now but few Indians upon the island and those few no ways hurtful. It is to be admired how strangely they have decreased by the hand of God, since the English first settled in these parts.”

In Massachusetts, the colonists declared a “day of public thanksgiving” in 1676, saying, “there now scarce remains a name or family of them [the Indians] but are either slain, captivated or fled.”

Fifty-five years after the original Thanksgiving Day, the Puritans had destroyed the generous Wampanoag and all other neighboring tribes. The Wampanoag chief King Philip was beheaded. His head was stuck on a pole in Plymouth, where the skull still hung on display 24 years later.

The descendants of these Native peoples are found wherever the Puritan merchant capitalists found markets for slaves: the West Indies, the Azures, Algiers, Spain and England. The grandson of Massasoit, the Pilgrim’s original protector, was sold into slavery in Bermuda.

Runaways and Rebels

But even the destruction of Indian tribal life and the enslavement of survivors brought no peace. Indians continued to resist in every available way. Their oppressors lived in terror of a revolt. And they searched for ways to end the resistance. The historian MacLeod writes: “The first `reservations’ were designed for the `wild’ Irish of Ulster in 1609. And the first Indian reservation agent in America, Gookin of Massachusetts, like many other American immigrants had seen service in Ireland under Cromwell.”

The enslaved Indians refused to work and ran away. The Massachusetts government tried to control runaways by marking enslaved Indians: brands were burnt into their skin, and symbols were tattooed into their foreheads and cheeks.

A Massachusetts law of 1695 gave colonists permission to kill Indians at will, declaring it was “lawful for any person, whether English or Indian, that shall find any Indians traveling or skulking in any of the towns or roads (within specified limits), to command them under their guard and examination, or to kill them as they may or can.”

The northern colonists enacted more and more laws for controlling the people. A law in Albany forbade any African or Indian slave from driving a cart within the city. Curfews were set up; Africans and Indians were forbidden to have evening get-togethers. On Block Island, Indians were given 10 lashes for being out after nine o’clock. In 1692 Massachusetts made it a serious crime for any white person to marry an African, an Indian or a mulatto. In 1706 they tried to stop the importation of Indian slaves from other colonies, fearing a slave revolt.

Celebrate?

Looking at this history raises a question: Why should anyone celebrate the survival of the earliest Puritans with a Thanksgiving Day? Certainly the Native peoples of those times had no reason to celebrate.

The ruling powers of the United States organized people to celebrate Thanksgiving Day because it is in their interest. That’s why they created it. The first national celebration of Thanksgiving was called for by George Washington. And the celebration was made a regular legal holiday later by Abraham Lincoln during the civil war (right as he sent troops to suppress the Sioux of Minnesota).

Washington and Lincoln were two presidents deeply involved in trying to forge a unified bourgeois nation-state out of the European settlers in the United States. And the Thanksgiving story was a useful myth in their efforts at U.S. nation-building. It celebrates the “bounty of the American way of life,” while covering up the brutal nature of this society.

[Mike Ely is a participant in the Kasama Project, where several of his other historical writings are available.]

Source / Links: International Journal of Socialist Renewal

Thanksgiving: A Native American View

Many thanks to Diane Stirling-Stevens / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Gimme Shelter : Pilots ‘n Paws Offers Dogs at Risk a Ticket to Ride

“I’m leavin’ on a jet plane.” Photo by Joyce A. Davis / USA Today.

These are wonderful dogs that simply had the bad luck of winding up in a place where there are too many pets in shelters,’ says Pilots N Paws co-founder Jon Wehrenberg.’
By Sharon L. Peters / November 25, 2008

Puppy love is reaching new heights.

Pilots are donating their time, planes and fuel to transport dozens of dogs a month from overcrowded shelters where they face almost certain death to rescue groups and shelters several states away that are committed to finding them homes.

The mission-of-mercy relocations are flown by general aviation pilots who have signed on with the recently formed Pilots N Paws, a Web-based message board where pilots can access information about animals in need.

Once the electronic connection is made, dogs plucked by rescuers from death row — mostly in the South where sterilization rates are low and pet overpopulation is rampant — are loaded onto small planes and flown one, two or six at a time to rescue groups and shelters that have available space.

“These are wonderful dogs that simply had the bad luck of winding up in a place where there are too many pets in shelters,” says Pilots N Paws co-founder Jon Wehrenberg of Knoxville, Tenn. The retired manufacturing executive and weekend pilot has flown scores of dogs from high-kill shelters this year. Earlier this month, his mission involved six small mixed-breed dogs from Knoxville’s Young-Williams Animal Center.

The happy half-dozen enjoyed a smooth-sailing, 90-minute flight to Greensboro, N.C., where they were met by radio station executive Jennifer Hart, head of Animal Rescue & Foster Program, who had arranged foster care. One dog has been adopted; the others are receiving additional attention, socialization and training and should be ready for new homes soon after Thanksgiving.

Beginning of the journey

“Pilots N Paws has given about 20 of our animals a second chance,” says Tim Adams, executive director of the Young-Williams shelter, which euthanizes 70% of the animals that land there. “We take in 17,000 animals a year, and Knoxville simply isn’t big enough… to get new homes for them here. Twenty animals saved may not sound like much, but every one of them matters.”

Pilots N Paws started operating in February soon after Wehrenberg offered to fly a Doberman in Florida to his pal Debi Boies of Landrum, S.C., who is a retired nurse, horse breeder and long-time rescuer. He began asking questions about the rescue world and learned about the passionate underground railroad of animal lovers who orchestrate days-long road journeys to save some of the 4 million to 6 million animals destined for euthanasia in U.S. shelters annually.

“I’d had no idea of the number of animals being euthanized, and the ordeal people and animals were going through in transports,” Wehrenberg says. “Pilots love to fly. I believed that if we created a means for them to discover situations where they could fly and also save animals, many would do it.”

He and Boies joined forces to spread the word, and within months, 85 pilots had signed on. Nearly 200 dogs have now been flown from several shelters and rescue groups to welcoming arms hundreds of miles away.

“For most of these dogs, the next walk they would have taken would have been to death’s door,” says administrative assistant Dawn Thompson of Falconer, N.Y., who for 18 years has taken in, nursed, socialized and re-homed more than 100 dogs a year from various high-kill areas. In recent months 30 have arrived via Pilots N Paws, and she’s learned the ones that arrive by plane rather than ground transport “don’t have the stress that two days on the road creates, and that makes them almost instantly adoptable.”

‘Doggy kisses’ are worth gas

Each flight costs the pilot hundreds of dollars in fuel alone, not including routine maintenance and other operating expenses. Boies and Wehrenberg are working to gain non-profit status for the group so pilots could declare the fuel costs a charitable contribution. But the pilots aren’t exactly agitating for that.

“Doggy kisses are worth the $6 a gallon,” says Westminster, Md., businesswoman and small-plane pilot Michele McGuire. She was recently part of a two-leg relay that flew a 110-pound skin-and-bones Great Dane from Arab, Ala., where a rescue group saved it from euthanasia, to a new family in Baldwin, Mass.

“I don’t know what (the animals’) opinion of flying is, but it sure makes their trip a lot shorter,” says Nick O’Connell, a Williamsburg, Va., contractor who did his first such flight earlier this month. The two-leg hand-off involved two pilots, several hundred miles and two chow-mix puppies rescued from a dump near Atlanta and delivered to their new family in Chesterfield, Va.

The animals are almost always remarkably calm about the adventure, O’Connell and other pilots report.

“It’s almost as if they understand that this is their chance for life,” Boies says.

Sometimes pilots scroll through the “Transport needed” section of Pilots N Paws and find a plea to fly an animal to a town or city they already were planning to visit.

Most times, however, they study the requests, see a need that touches them and offer their services.

Broomfield, Colo., software engineer/pilot Mike Boyd was involved in a multi-state, multi-person transport of a German shepherd in October, and he’s aiming to do more missions. “To take my hobby and apply it to help this situation, well, it’s just a great feeling,” he says.

Adds O’Connell: “It is rewarding beyond my wildest imagination.”

Source / USA Today

Pilots save 10-year old Great Dane Dana

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Thorne Dreyer : The American Voting Public? Not that Bright.

Kathleen Parker, having fed publicly on the bones of the Republican Party and the evangelical movement within it, now suggests that the dumbing down of America reaches far beyond the walls of the Grand Old Party.

By Thorne Dreyer / The Rag Blog / November 26, 2008

See Kathleen Parker’s sad commentary on the sagging IQ of the American public, Below.

And the hits just keep on coming.

The latest dispatch from the surprising Kathleen Parker should give pause to all. Parker asserts, using a recent study as ammunition, that most citizens don’t know “diddly about doohickey.” Her report about the dumbing down of America — certainly facilitated by the less than scholarly (hell, marginally literate) Bush regime — is revealing if not a revelation.

The findings of this study are remarkable and chilling. Parker suggests that the Founding Fathers would find the development, shall we say, revolting. They understood, she says “that an ignorant electorate was susceptible to emotional manipulation and feared the tyranny of the masses.”

The traditionally conservative Parker, incidentally, continues to impress. During the recent election she shocked many (“Oh my. Oh my.”) and was ostracized by some in the Republican ranks for standing up, pointing her finger, and shouting that the Emperor had no clothes. Obvious, to be sure, but previously unspoken and presumably verboten in the ranks of conservative punditry.

Parker even tagged Sarah Palin unworthy of higher office and called on her to drop off the ticket. (“Oh my.”)

Her withering attacks on the state of the Republican Party and the conservative movement, have continued.

In a recent column she suggested that the party check out “the gorilla in the pulpit” — what she labeled “armband religion” — as a topic for the ritual post-mortems. She referred to it as “the evangelical, right-wing, oogedy-boogedy branch.” The GOP has become “beholden to an element that used to be relegated to wooden crates on street corners,” she said, and prayed that religion be returned to “the privacy of one’s heart where it belongs.”

Now Katheleen Parker suggests that the Grand Old Party has no exclusive when it comes to dumbing down. (My, oh my.)

‘It’s disheartening in the wake of a populist-driven election celebrating joes-of-all-trades to be reminded that the voting public is dumber than ever.’
By Kathleen Parker / November 25, 2008

WASHINGTON — So much for the wisdom of The People.

A new report from the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) on the nation’s civic literacy finds that most Americans are too ignorant to vote.

Out of 2,500 American quiz-takers, including college students, elected officials and other randomly selected citizens, nearly 1,800 flunked a 33-question test on basic civics. In fact, elected officials scored slightly lower than the general public with an average score of 44 percent compared to 49 percent.

Only 0.8 percent of all test-takers scored an “A.”

America’s report card may come as little surprise to fans of Jay Leno’s man-on-the-street interviews, which reveal that most people don’t know diddly about doohickey. Still, it’s disheartening in the wake of a populist-driven election celebrating joes-of-all-trades to be reminded that the voting public is dumber than ever.

The multiple-choice ISI quiz wouldn’t deepen the creases in most brains, but the questions do require a basic knowledge of how the U.S. government works. Think fast: In what document do the words “government of the people, by the people, for the people” appear? More than twice as many people (56 percent) knew that Paula Abdul was a judge on “American Idol” than knew that those words come from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address (21 percent).

In good news, more than 80 percent of college graduates gave correct answers about Susan B. Anthony, the identity of the commander in chief of the U.S. military, and the content of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech.

But don’t pop the cork yet. Only 17 percent of college grads understood the difference between free markets and centralized planning.

Then again, we can’t blame the children for what they haven’t been taught. Civics courses, once a staple of junior and high school education, are no longer considered important in our quantitative, leave-no-child-behind world. And college adds little civic knowledge, the ISI study found. The average grade for those holding a bachelor’s degree was just 57 percent — only 13 points higher than the average score of those with only a high school diploma.

Most bracing: Only 27 percent of elected officeholders in the survey could identify a right or freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Forty-three percent didn’t know what the Electoral College does. And 46 percent didn’t know that the Constitution gives Congress power to declare war.

What’s behind the dumbing down of America?

The ISI found that passive activities, such as watching television (including TV news) and talking on the phone, diminish civic literacy.

Actively pursuing information through print media and participating in high-level conversations — even, potentially, blogging — makes one smarter.

The ISI insists that higher-education reforms aimed at civic literacy are urgently needed. Who could argue otherwise? But historian Rick Shenkman, author of “Just How Stupid Are We?” thinks reform needs to start in high school. His strategy is both poetic (to certain ears) and pragmatic: Require students to read newspapers, and give college freshman weekly quizzes on current events.

Did he say newspapers?! Shenkman even suggests government subsidies for newspaper subscriptions, as well as federal tuition subsidies for students who perform well on civics tests. They could be paid from a special fund created by, say, a “Too Many Stupid Voters Act.”

Not only would citizens be smarter, but also newspapers might be saved. Announcements of newsroom cuts, which ultimately hurt quality, have become routine. Just this week, USA Today announced the elimination of about 20 positions, while the Newark Star-Ledger, as it cuts its news staff by 40 percent, lost almost its entire editorial board in a single day.

In his book, Shenkman, founder of George Mason University’s History News Network, is tough on everyday Americans. Why, he asks, do we value polls when clearly The People don’t know enough to make a reasoned judgment?

The founding fathers, Shenkman points out, weren’t so enamored of The People, whom they distrusted. Hence a Republic, not a Democracy. They understood that an ignorant electorate was susceptible to emotional manipulation and feared the tyranny of the masses.

Both Shenkman and the ISI pose a bedeviling question, as crucial as any to the nation’s health: Who will govern a free nation if no one understands the mechanics and instruments of that freedom?

Answer: Maybe one day, a demagogue.

Source / Washington Post

The Rag Blog


Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

A Bulldog for the Underdog : Jim Mattox Laid to Rest

Yellow Dog Democrat pays respects: Photo by Tom Blackwell / The Rag Blog.

This wonderful yellow dog attended the funeral of Attorney General Jim Mattox in Austin on Tuesday. Here he waits while the casket was loaded on a horse drawn hearse. There was a walking procession to the State Cemetery from the First Baptist Church.

Tom Blackwell / The Rag Blog / November 25, 2008

In Memoriam: Jim Mattox
By Vince Leibowitz / November 20, 2008

Today, Texas lost a luminary and a fighter. Texas lost Jim Mattox.

Former Texas Attorney General James Albon “Jim” Mattox passed away last night in his sleep. He was 65.

He will be remembered as a man who fought many fights for average, working Texans, and who left an indelible mark on Texas government in politics in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Mattox will likely be remembered as one of the state’s greatest attorney generals in history, along with Jim Hogg and James Allred.

James Albon Mattox was born in Dallas on August 29, 1943, the first of three children of Norman and Mary Katheryn Harrison. His father was a union sheetmetal worker, and his mother was a waitress.

He attended Woodrow Wilson High School in Dallas, worked his way through the Baylor School of Business. He graduated from Baylor magna cum laude in 1965 and won the Wall Street Journal Award for academic excellence. He earned his law degree from Southern Methodist University, and received the third-highest grade on the state bar exam in 1968.

Mattox served as an Assistant District Attorney in Dallas County under the legendary Harry Wade, and embarked on a long political career when he took office as a State Representative from East Dallas in 1973. Early in his career, Mattox was also an intern to Congressman Earl Cabell.

Mattox gained a reputation as a reformer during his service in the legislature, and worked for open government legislation focusing on open meetings, open records, full financial disclosure, campaign finance reform, and lobby registration.

In 1976, Mattox was elected to the U.S. Congress from the Fifth District. He became the only freshman elected to the House Budget Committee that session and later chaired that committee’s Task Force on National Security and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Banking Committee.

In 1979 and 1980, Mattox ran aggressive campaigns for Congress, defeating Tom Pauken, a Dallas Republican best known for chairing the Republican Party of Texas.

He was elected the 47th Attorney General of Texas in 1982, succeeding Mark White, and went on to win re-election in 1986. Maddox’ 1982 election came in the last year in which Democrats swept all statewide races on the ballot. Mattox defeated State Senator William “C. Bill” Meier (R-Euless).

Many will remember that Mattox’s 1986 re-election came after he was acquitted, following a lengthy trial, of commercial bribery charges. In spite of that incident, “The People’s Lawyer” still had the support of the people.

His 1986 election victory over San Antonio lawyer Roy Barrera, Jr., proved that Mattox was a popular figure and someone who Texans believed was on their side. Mattox revolutionized child support collection, and his use of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices act against large corporations earned him many admirers among everyday Texans.

As attorney general, Mattox took on airlines over deceptive advertising related to fare prices, and the insurance industry–among many other corporations–on behalf of Texas consumers. Mattox fought insurance companies, claiming they were trying to create an insurance crisis in Texas in his second term.

In 1990, Mattox ran for attorney general and was defeated in the Democratic Primary by former governor, the late Ann Richards.

In 1994, Mattox ran for U.S. Senate in the Democratic primary and lost to Richard Fisher, a Ross Perot campaign operative during the 1992 presidential election. Fisher was eventually defeated by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison.

In 1998, Mattox again ran for Attorney General and fell to John Cornyn in a year when Democrats at the top of the ticket in Texas were forced to deal with then-governor George W. Bush’s long coat-tails.

He was a delegate to numerous Democratic National Conventions, including the 2008 DNC in Denver. As recently as a week ago, Mattox was still working hard for change and reform in the Democratic Party, testifying at a hearing on the state’s prima-caucus system, where he was cheered by loyal Democrats:

Participants in the hearing at the Texas AFL-CIO Building in Austin cheered former Attorney General Jim Mattox , who said the caucus feature needs reform.

“You’re not dealing with a Gordian knot here,” Mattox told the panel. “This is not something you can’t untie.”

Mattox, a Clinton delegate to the national convention, called the caucuses an embarrassment to the party.

Rest in Peace, General Mattox. Texas is a better place having had the benefit of your service.

Source / Burnt Orange Report / Nov. 20, 2008

Also see Texans pay respects to Mattox by Corrie MacLaggan / Austin American-Statesman / Nov. 25, 2008

And Jim Mattox, Combative Texas Politician, Dies at 65 / AP / New York Times / Nov. 20, 2008

Thanks to Tim Mahoney Law / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Legendary Artist of the New Left : Frank Cieciorka Dead at 69

Iconic image of the New Left: Woodcut by Frank Cieciorka.

My year in Mississippi was certainly one the most profound experiences in my life and helped shape my political consciousness to this day. I’m saddened that this country hasn’t done more to eliminate poverty and racism in the intervening forty years.

Frank Cieciorka

Noted watercolorist and graphic artist, Frank Cieciorka organized during Freedom Summer in Mississippi, was art director at The Movement and created the emblematic version of the left’s iconic clenched fist image.

November 25, 2008

A great movement artist and friend of the Freedom Archives, Frank Cieciorka, has died. He will be missed­ –his work goes marching on!

Frank Cieciorka, a nationally recognized watercolor painter, political artist, activist, and author who created many of the iconic images of the 1960s, including the clenched fist and the black panther, died on November 24, 2008 at his home in Alderpoint, California. The cause was emphysema.

Born April 26, 1939, Frank grew up in the upstate New York factory town of Johnson City where his father worked at a grocery store. Frank began work at the age of 14 as a bowling alley pin-boy and then on the assembly line at the local shoe factory. Recognized since childhood for his artistic talent, he enrolled in the fine arts program at San Jose State College in 1957, where he became an anti-war activist, protesting military interventions in Vietnam and the Dominican Republic.

On graduating in 1964, Frank volunteered for Freedom Summer in Mississippi and later was hired as a field secretary for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). He helped organize African-Americans to register to vote and assisted in organizing the racially integrated Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, which challenged the all-white official Democratic Party. Frank also wrote and illustrated Negroes in American History­A Freedom Primer, taught in Freedom Schools throughout the south. The book is still used as a resource text.

Frank continued his political activism in San Francisco, where he became artistic director of The Movement, a national newspaper of community, anti-war, and civil rights organizing. His art also appeared in many other publications, posters, and underground papers, including The Realist. Among the powerful images he created for The Movement were full-size front-page portraits of Nat Turner and John Brown. His political artistry there and at People’s Press inspired a generation of activist artists.

At the end of the Sixties, tired of city life, Frank became an avid backpacker. In 1972 he purchased a half-acre plot in rural Alderpoint, where he designed and built his own home and studio, and turned to watercolor painting. His works celebrate the southern Humboldt County countryside, the beauty of the female figure in natural settings, and ordinary people doing what they do.

He is survived by his wife, the painter Karen Horn, with whom he enjoyed over 25 years of love and artistic dialogue. He is also survived by his step-daughter, Zena Goldman Hunt and her family, and by his brother, James Cieciorka, and his wife, Jean. Family and friends rejoice in having shared Frank’s life: a testimony to political and artistic passion.

The Freedom Archives.

Also see Frank Cieciorka, Designer for the Left, Is Dead at 69 by Steven Heller / New York Times / November 27, 2008

And A brief history of the “clenched fist” image.

Thanks to Col. Jeffrey Segal / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Foreclosure Chronicles : The Desperate Hours of Addie Polk

1918: Bathing suit parade, the year Addie Polk was born.

1919: Race Riots in Chicago.

2008: Fannie Mae foreclosed on the home of Addie Polk; Annie Mae Polk put a gun to her chest.

‘In 1970, Robert and Addie Polk bought a small white wood-frame house in a Black neighborhood of Akron for $10,000. Or to put it another way, he exchanged years of labor on the Goodrich assembly line for a place to live.’

On October 1, 2008, a sheriff and his deputy knocked on the door of a small white house in Akron, Ohio. Addie Polk, the 90-year-old Black woman who lived there, went to her dresser and looked at the foreclosure notice that had been duct-taped to her door a month earlier. She pulled out her life insurance policy. She put it next to her keys.

And then she opened the drawer where the pistol was kept.

Addie Polk was born in 1918. It was the year World War 1 ended. That war—between England, France, Russia and the U.S. on one side, and Germany on the other—was fought over which imperialist powers would control the colonies of Asia, Africa and Latin America. The war brought carnage on an unprecedented scale—five million lives thrown onto the altar by the “great powers” to determine the outcome. The war also brought huge changes, all over the world.

In the United States, the war provided a chance to make big profits. But the American capitalists needed workers to make those profits, and their preferred source of workers—the impoverished immigrants from Europe—were cut off by the war.

So the capitalists cast their gaze to the South, where the masses of Black people were still chained to the land. The South, where Black people were forced to grow and pick the cotton, from can’t see in the morning to can’t see at night, only to end up deeper in debt at year’s end—while the landlords grew richer. The South, where Black people had to step off the sidewalk when a white man walked down it, and turn their eyes to the ground when they talked to a white man. Where they couldn’t drink out of fountains reserved for whites, or go to school with whites. And where those who didn’t go along were jailed and made into a new kind of slave on the road gangs and in the mines of the South…or were beaten…or were lynched.

So when the northern capitalists put out the word that they would, for the first time, hire Black people in large numbers, the people responded. They fled the horrors of the South for the “promised land” of the North in massive numbers, and half a million found jobs in the big northern industries. Sometimes, especially in the early days of the migration, the Black people heading North would even break into cheers and song when the train passed over the Mason-Dixon line—the dividing line between North and South.

Akron—where Addie Polk was to make her home—boomed in the war as well. It became the “rubber capital” of the world, churning out tires. Its population went from 69,000 in 1910 to nearly 210,000 in 1920. And Akron, where a lynch mob had once run wild for two days in 1900, saw a Black community begin to take root.

But when the war ended, the boom ended. Capital could no longer profitably employ many Black people who had come North. It didn’t need them.

And besides—the social order was becoming unglued. In Russia, the Bolsheviks had led the masses to make a revolution. This revolution was led by the formerly bitterly-exploited working class and it had, as a central point, freedom and equality for the oppressed nationalities of the Russian empire. The revolution, and the communist ideology that led it, were gaining worldwide influence. And the Black men who had been drafted in World War I had been trained and sent to Europe to fight for the U.S.—where they were in some cases treated as equals by European whites. The men of property and power decreed that traditional social relations—the hierarchy—must be forcibly hammered back into place.

And so in 1919, when Addie Polk was one year old, the cheers on the train turned to dust in the people’s mouths. White workers (along with small businessmen, shopkeepers, etc.) were, once again, mobilized as white people—to protect “their” jobs and “their” neighborhoods. Scores of cities, North as well as South, witnessed barbaric white rampages against African-Americans. Chicago was the worst, with at least 38 Black people killed. Norfolk, Virginia was in a way the most bitterly and bloodily ironic, as a white mob broke up a reception for Black troops returning from World War I and murdered six. Hundreds fell to the violence of white mobs—with at least eight Black people being publicly burned.

But there was also something new afoot. W.E.B. Du Bois, a great Black intellectual and leader of the time, put it this way: “Today we raise the terrible weapon of self-defense. When the murderer comes, he shall no longer strike us in the back. When the armed lynchers gather, we too must gather armed. When the mob moves, we propose to meet it with bricks and clubs and guns.”

The riots finally ended. But the majority of Black people who had come north had been cast and hammered into a subordinate position within the working class. They were to be the last hired and first fired, and when they did work they were to be confined to the very worst, dirtiest and most dangerous jobs. They were segregated into housing that was almost as expensive as it was dilapidated, and cast into broken-down schools that barely deserved the name; and they were dogged at every turn by brutalizing and murdering police. Northern capital inserted Black workers into its system—and in such a way that their labor would turn super‑profits for the system.

This was the world in which Addie Polk took her first steps; the world in which she learned her ABCs; the world in which she grew to womanhood.

Addie Polk looked at the pistol. She heard again the knock at the door, and the voices of law enforcement. She felt the blood pounding in her chest, and pounding in her brain. She picked up the pistol and walked, stiffly, over to her bed.

When World War 2 came in the 1940s, capital once again had need of Black labor—and this time on a far greater scale than before. Now millions more Black people came North. Black men like Robert Polk—Addie Polk’s husband—could find work at Goodrich Tire. The dirtiest, the hardest, and the most dangerous work—but work.

America came out of World War 2 on top. U.S. capital called the tune for the whole world—except for the Soviet Union and the new revolutionary socialist state in China. Facing off against the challenge of the socialist world, and riding atop the imperialist heap, the capitalist rulers of America felt they could—and they felt they had to—pay higher wages to the workers within the U.S., to pacify them and turn them away from any radical movement.

These capitalists also felt that they could—and that they had to—begin to make some concessions to Black people. On the one hand, the big changes of the “Great Migration” and of the upheaval of the war itself contributed to a more militant mood among Black people from all strata, and to growing grassroots resistance. On the other hand, it didn’t go down well internationally for the United States to pose as the supposed great upholder of freedom, when millions of its own people were legally forced to endure segregation, to live without political or social rights, and to face lynch-mob violence at any time.

But those concessions were not enough to stop Black people from rising up, first in the civil rights movement and then in the Black liberation struggle. Over 250 American cities erupted in rebellion during the 1960s. A spirit of defiance took hold and a revolutionary movement began to develop, in the streets and on the campuses and more broadly beside—including the factories where Black workers labored. The ruling class was forced to grant concessions far beyond what they had ever envisioned, and this included opening up jobs that were formerly reserved for whites.

Meanwhile, Robert Polk worked in one of those factories. He punched in each morning and when he did he turned over all his life force to the greater good—and profit—of Goodrich Tire. He punched out each night and went home dead tired. And on payday, he would open the envelope to find just enough to provide the necessities that would bring him back again to the time clock early Monday morning.

It was the “equal exchange” that, multiplied a billion times, keeps capitalism running—the exchange of one person’s life force and labor power, which produces those profits, for the means of subsistence. The “equal exchange” that results in the most profound inequality in wealth, in power, and in life-chances. The “equal exchange” on which all the so-called financial instruments are built. The “equal exchange” that masks a relation of exploitation: the exchange of labor power for wages.

In 1970, Robert and Addie Polk bought a small white wood-frame house in a Black neighborhood of Akron for $10,000. Or to put it another way, he exchanged years of labor on the Goodrich assembly line for a place to live.

Addie Polk lay down on her bed, pistol in her hand. Still the voices, still the occasional knock. She put the pistol to her chest. She began to squeeze the trigger with the 90-year-old fingers that were so achy, and finally so tired.

Capitalism came into the world unique—the only economic system in which innovation was a necessity. No capitalist knows how much “the market will bear”—they don’t know in advance if they can sell all that they produce. But if they do not sell, they go under. So they must constantly figure out ways to produce more goods more cheaply. They invest in new, more productive machinery and they constantly search for ways to more thoroughly exploit the workers they already employ…or else they shift operations altogether.

The U.S. stood atop the heap after World War 2. But European capital innovated. The tire companies of Akron “lost market share” in the ‘70s and early ‘80s to new kinds of tires produced first in Europe, and then in the factories of the “third world.” Soon the factories shut down. Akron, once dubbed the “rubber capital” of the world, found a new title as the city decayed: the “meth capital” of Ohio. Akron, now nearly 30% African-American, saw crack invade its Black community and the streets and schools fall further into disrepair. On Addie Polk’s street, the roadbed comes right up through the concrete, and nearly every other house lies empty, or is up for sale.

Robert Polk died in 1995. But capital was not done with Addie Polk yet. There was blood yet left to suck. Just as meth and crack rampaged through Akron, stoking people up to make it through one more day of hell, new “instruments” of credit gave the capitalist economy a shot of new energy. Politicians and financial commentators on TV talked as high and as giddy about this as a cranked-out meth freak yammering in a bar. But these new “credit instruments” now turn out to have victims. They have victims all over the world on a horrendous scale—and they have victims within the U.S. as well.

Addie Polk’s house had been hers, bought and paid for, “free and clear.” But in a society where the basic necessities of health care, for instance, constantly climb out of reach …in a situation where no one even pretends that the social security and the pittance of a pension for industrial workers are enough to survive on…Addie Polk needed money. The sharks came—not the street-corner ones, but the “legitimate” ones. And they offered her deals—mortgage your house again and get the money you need, up front. And then mortgage it once more, to pay off your earlier deal and to get more money. It was all part of what they now call “the real estate bubble.”

And like so many others, when the real hidden terms kicked in, Addie Polk fell behind. The notices began to come. Knocks on the door, followed by the frightening papers that said NOTICE in big red letters and threatened eviction. The lending company foreclosed. And on October 1, 2008, three men with guns stood downstairs, preparing to move Addie Polk and the few cherished possessions of 90 years, into the streets.

Addie Polk held the gun to her chest, and pulled the trigger. Did she cry out in despair when the first shot missed, and hit her shoulder? We don’t know. But if she had second thoughts, they carried no force—for she marshaled the strength to pull the trigger yet again.

Addie Polk, somehow, did not die. Her neighbor, Robert Dillon, had climbed into her window to check on her and found her stretched out, unconscious, on the bed. She was rushed to the hospital, where she remains today. The mortgage holder, stung by the bad publicity, promises, for now, to let her remain in her home—when and if she gets out of the hospital.

Last week, it was announced that another 765,000 houses entered into the foreclosure process, or were actually being auctioned in the last three months alone.

The end is not in sight.

Source / Revolution

Also see Fannie Mae forgives loan for woman who shot herself / CNN / Oct. 3, 2008

Thanks to Mercedes Lynn de Uriarte / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment