Bill Ayers? McCain Campaign Connected to REAL Terrorists

McCain’s terrorist: Eduardo Arocena.
Convicted murderer Eddie Arocena, being taken from FBI headquarters. Photo by Marice Cohn / Miami Herald.

‘McCain’s campaign and advisers find themselves allied with and/or supporting militants who have committed acts that any reasonable observer would define as terrorism’
By A.L. Bardach / October 15, 2008

The campaign of John McCain has made much of Barack Obama’s relationship with Weather Underground bomber-turned-university professor Bill Ayers, whom Republicans call an “unrepentant terrorist.” Indeed, the Obama-Ayers connection has become a centerpiece of the McCain-Palin campaign. V.P. nominee Sarah Palin mentions Ayers in practically every public appearance, and John McCain has all but promised to bring up Ayers in tonight’s debate. [And, indeed he did.]

McCain’s campaign, however, has its own questionable connections to terrorists. Since John F. Kennedy’s failed Bay of Pigs invasion, Florida’s Cuban-Americans have been regarded as a reliable Republican voting block. And from 1960 until Sept. 11, 2001, some exile hard-liners in Miami endorsed a double standard on terrorism in which anti-Castro militants and bombers were judged to be “freedom fighters,” regardless of the civilian deaths and collateral damage they caused in Cuba and the United States, as well as elsewhere. While the Cuban-American community has undergone dramatic changes—with the majority now supporting dialogue with Cuba and an end to restrictions on travel and remittances—hard-liners still control the major levers of power in Miami. Such is their clout in turning out reliable voters that McCain dropped his stance of 2000, when he said he would support normalizing relations with Cuba even under Fidel Castro. (“I’d be willing to do the same thing we did with—with Vietnam.”) McCain has allied his campaign with the Cuban Liberty Council, an uncompromising anti-Castro group that has all but dictated policy to George W. Bush. Two of the council’s most prominent members, media personality Ninoska Perez-Castellon and her husband, Roberto Martin Perez, have been among McCain’s most dedicated campaigners and champions in Miami.

As a result, McCain’s campaign and advisers find themselves allied with and/or supporting militants who have committed acts that any reasonable observer would define as terrorism. On July 20, while campaigning for McCain in Miami and just prior to speaking at a McCain event, Sen. Joe Lieberman met with the wife of convicted serial bomber Eduardo Arocena and promised to pursue a presidential pardon on his behalf. Arocena is the founder of the notorious Cuban exile militant group Omega 7, renowned for a string of bombings from 1975 to 1983. Arocena was convicted of the 1980 murder of a Cuban diplomat in Manhattan. In 1983, Arocena was arrested and charged with 42 counts pertaining to conspiracy, explosives, firearms, and destruction of foreign government property within the United States. He is currently serving a life sentence in federal prison in Indiana. His targets included:

* Madison Square Garden (he blew up an adjacent store);

* JFK airport (Arocena’s group planted a suitcase bomb intended for a TWA flight to Los Angeles—in protest of the airline’s flights to Cuba. The plane would have exploded if not for the fact that the bomb went off on the tarmac prior to being loaded);

* Avery Fisher Hall at Lincoln Center (causing damage to three levels of the theater and halting the performance of a music group from Cuba);

*the ticket office of the Soviet airline Aeroflot;

*and a church.

He also attempted to assassinate the Cuban ambassador to the United Nations.

Arocena was also convicted of the 1979 murder of New Jersey resident Eulalio José Negrín. The 37-year-old Negrín, who advocated diplomacy with Cuba, was machine-gunned down as he stepped into his car, dying in the arms of his 13-year-old son.

Nevertheless, Lieberman, who at the time was McCain’s first choice for vice president and is said to top McCain’s list for secretary of state, was caught on video promising Miriam Arocena he would petition Washington to grant a pardon to her husband. “It’s my responsibility; it’s my responsibility. I will carry [the pardon request] back. I will carry it back,” Lieberman told Arocena just before addressing a group at a McCain event. “I think of you like you were my family. … I’ll bring it back. I’ll do my best.”

Queried on the matter, a Lieberman spokesman demurred, telling the AP, “Sen. Lieberman does not intervene in criminal proceedings including requests for pardons. The correspondence was merely forwarded without any comment, endorsement or support whatsoever.”

Another vocal champion of an Arocena pardon is CLC member Roberto Martin Perez, who narrates a McCain commercial about Castro that has played in South Florida. His wife, radio host Ninoska Perez-Castellon, says that the McCain campaign has queried them about making a television spot as well.

Miami attorney Alfredo Duran, Bay of Pigs veteran and a leader of the Cuban Committee for Democracy, explains the GOP strategy: “They think that the Arocena campaign will energize a certain segment of the ultra-conservative exile community that will deliver for McCain and the Republican Party.”

Arocena is not the only militant who’s received help from McCain’s team. In September, McCain announced he was choosing Lincoln Diaz-Balart, a Republican congressman from Miami, as his senior adviser and spokesman on Latin America. Rep. Diaz-Balart is a fierce hard-liner on Cuba, advocating, at various times, a blockade of the island, even military action if needed, to unseat Fidel Castro (his former uncle, once married to Diaz-Balart’s aunt). He, too, has been a supporter of certain kinds of terrorists who have struck on American soil. Since 2000, Diaz-Balart and his colleague Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen have lobbied for and helped win the release of several convicted exile terrorists from U.S. prisons. Among the most notorious were Omega 7 members Jose Dionisio Suarez Esquivel and Virgilio Paz Romero, both convicted for their roles in the 1976 assassination of Chilean diplomat Orlando Letelier and his American colleague Ronni Moffitt with a car bomb in Washington, D.C. According to four agents I interviewed, the FBI also suspects the pair were involved in other bombings and attacks. (Suarez is known by the nickname “Charco de Sangre”—Pool of Blood.)

Diaz-Balart also pushed for the release of Valentin Hernandez, who gunned down Miami resident and Cuban émigré Luciano Nieves in February 1975 for speaking out in support of a dialogue with Cuba. Nieves was ambushed by Hernandez in a hospital parking lot in Miami after visiting his 11-year-old son. Hernandez also went on to kill a former president of the Bay of Pigs Association in an internecine feud. Hernandez was captured in Puerto Rico in 1977 and sentenced to life in prison. Today, Hernandez is living freely in Florida.

Nor has McCain’s senior adviser Diaz-Balart ever wavered in seeking “due process” for legendary bombers and would-be Castro assassins Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch. Both were charged with the bombing of a Cuban airliner in 1976, killing all 73 civilian passengers—the first act of airline terrorism in the Americas. In 2005, when I asked him about those who died—many of them teenage athletes—Bosch responded, “We were at war with Castro, and in war, everything is valid.”

After serving nine years, Posada “escaped” from prison in Caracas, Venezuela, thanks to a bribe paid to the warden. Posada gives effusive thanks in his memoir, Los Caminos del Guerrero, to at least two members of the Cuban Liberty Council for their help in resettling him during his early fugitive days. After serving 11 years, Bosch won an acquittal (following death threats to several judges hearing the case). However, hundreds of pages of memorandum of the FBI, CIA, and State Department, released by the National Security Archives, leave no doubt that U.S. authorities fully concurred with Venezuelan, Trinidadian, and Cuban intelligence that the two men had masterminded the airplane bombing.

Former Attorney General Richard Thornburgh described Bosch, who spent four years in federal prison for firing a bazooka into a Polish freighter bound for Havana in Miami’s harbor, as an “unreformed terrorist” and recommended immediate deportation when he showed up in Miami in 1988. But there were political considerations in Miami. Ros-Lehtinen, then running for Congress and now the Republican leader of the House foreign-affairs committee, lauded Bosch as a hero and a patriot. After she personally lobbied then-President George Bush (with her campaign manager Jeb Bush at a meeting noted in the Miami media), Bush overruled the FBI and the Justice and State departments, and Bosch was granted U.S. residency.

In 1998, I interviewed Luis Posada in Aruba for an investigative series for the New York Times in which he claimed to have orchestrated numerous attacks on both civilian and military targets during his 50-year war to topple Castro. Most notably, Posada took credit for masterminding the 1997 bombings of Cuban hotels that killed an Italian vacationer and wounded 11 others.

Posada made his last failed attempt to eliminate Fidel Castro at the Ibero-America Summit in Panama in November 2000. After his trial and conviction in 2004, Diaz-Balart (along with his brother, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, and Ros-Lehtinen), wrote at least two letters on official U.S. Congress stationery to Panamanian President Mireya Moscoso seeking the release of Posada and his collaborators. “We ask respectfully that you pardon Luis Posada Carriles, Guillermo Novo Sampol, Pedro Crispin Remon and Gaspar Jimenez Escobedo,” went one missive. On Aug. 24, 2004, Posada and his fellow conspirators—all with colorful rap sheets—received a last-minute pardon from the outgoing Moscoso.

Posada’s supporters tell me that he had been quietly assured by several Miami exile leaders that he would be allowed to live free in the United States like Bosch. While still a fugitive, Posada slipped into Miami in 2005. But following international outrage over his release, a federal grand jury was impaneled in Newark, N.J., in January 2006 to hear evidence against Posada for the Havana hotel bombings. FBI investigators testified that Posada had smuggled plastic explosives in shampoo bottles and shoes into Cuba a few weeks prior to the bombings. At the cost of millions of dollars, dozens of witnesses have testified to the grand jury over two and a half years. On Sept. 19 and 20, 2007, two witnesses, compelled to turn state’s evidence, offered damning evidence implicating Posada and his confederates. (Disclosure: The New York Times and I were subpoenaed in the matter but have not appeared before the grand jury, citing First Amendment protections.)

But election year politics seem to have interfered with the case. One of the attorneys representing Posada’s comrades in the case told me that the defendants received target letters last year and were warned by the FBI that they would be indicted by the end of 2007. Now he says it is certain nothing will happen because of the 2008 elections and the damage that could be done to the McCain ticket, the Diaz-Balarts, and Ros-Lehtinen. Another Posada attorney told me that he had been assured that Posada’s case “is being handled at the highest levels” of the Justice Department.

In the meantime, Posada has resettled in Miami. In November 2007, the Big Five Club, an elite watering hole for Miami’s movers and shakers, hosted an art show and fundraiser to benefit Posada and his comrade-in-arms, Letelier assassin José Dionisio Suárez. On May 2, 2008, there was another gala fundraiser in honor of Luis Posada at the Big Five Club. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ros-Lehtinen were both invited.

A few months earlier, a relaxed and expansive Posada attended a tribute for a well-known Cuban dissident. Just a few feet away from him, amid the ding of clinking glasses, were Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ros-Lehtinen. Should McCain-Palin prevail in November, those pesky, pending indictments against Posada are very likely to get tossed.

[Ann Louise Bardach has written the “Interrogations” column for Slate and is the author of Without Fidel: A Death Foretold in Miami, Havana, and Washington, to be published in April, and Cuba Confidential: Love and Vengeance in Miami and Havana.]

Source / Slate

Thanks to Alice Embree / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Mounted Cops Attack Protesters Led by Iraq Vets

Protesters at Hofstra University, site of the presidential debate, on Oct. 15. Photo by The West / College OTR.

Around the time that Barack Obama and John McCain bent over backwards to show that they commiserated with the “hurtin’” middle class, two anti-war activists were physically hurt protesting outside of the debate held at Hofstra University. One, Nicholas Morgan, fractured a cheekbone when trampled by a Mounted Unit horse. In the end, fifteen protestors who identified themselves as Iraq War veterans were arrested.

The West / College on the Record

Fifteen arrested, two hurt at demonstrations before presidential debate.
By David Mathison / October 15, 2008

See video of protest, Below.

HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. — Pandemonium erupted outside Hofstra University tonight at around 8pm, an hour before the final presidential debate of the 2008 campaign was scheduled to begin there, when mounted police charged protesters and spectators.

Fifteen people were reportedly arrested and three injured. Protesters included a contingent of the group Iraq Veterans Against the War. Members of the group intended to submit questions to the the candidates but never had the chance. Local police on horseback drove the protesters away from the university’s David S Mack Sports and Exhibition Complex, where the debate was held, knocking some to the ground and in at least one case trampling them.

Source / Off the Bus / The Huffington Post

Earlier in the day, Jean Stevens of Manhattan, a spokeswoman for peace group Code Pink, said the anti-war protesters were “here to bring our message to both candidates and both parties to stop the war.”Newsday.

Video of protest by David Mathison

Also see 15 protesters arrested at presidential debate by Patrick Whittle / Newsday / Oct. 16, 2008

Thanks to Jesse James Retherford / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

…I Approve this Method

Cartoon by Charlie Loving / The Rag Blog.
The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Who Needs Watergate? We’ve Got Joe the Plumber!

Looking good, Joe.

Latest on Joe: Things just ain’t what they seem.
By sweatpantsmom / October 16, 2008

If you watched the third and final presidential debate last night you know that there were many mentions of “Joe the Plumber.” Joe is actually Joe Wurzelbacher, an ‘everyman’ who appeared out of a crowd at an Obama campaign appearance and asked the senator about his economic plan. Joe says his American Dream is being able to provide for his family and send his son to college. But some are saying that Joe isn’t who he appears to be.

Here’s the buzz from the internet:

* Wurzelbacher, who says he was playing football outside with his son when he came upon the crowd gathered around Obama, was planted by the Republican party. This would explain how conservative sites got stories posted about him in advance of the debate and how easily everyone else found him for interviews.

* Wurzelbacher is not a registered voter.

* Wurzelbacher may not be licensed in his home state of Ohio.

* Wurzelbacher may be related to Robert Wurzelbacher of Cincinnati, Ohio, who happens to be Charles Keating’s son-in-law. Keating was implicated in the Keating 5 scandal.

* Wurzelbacher already owns a few companies, which would contradict his claims of being a plumber looking to buy a small business.

(One thing that is on the record: Wurzelbacher compared Obama to Sammy Davis Jr. in an interview with Katie Couric. Ouch.)

So is any of this true? I’m not sure, but some things are suspicious. For instance, how was it that a newspaper was present when Joe was watching the debates (they took the picture above) if Joe didn’t know his name would be mentioned?

I’m sure the National Enquirer is already hot on Wurzelbacher’s trail, so expect to hear more on Joe the Plumber soon. In the meantime, I’d like to get Joe’s number – my bathroom faucet is leaking.

UPDATE: MSNBC has confirmed that Wurzelbacher has no plumbing license.

Source / Babble

Also see Joe in the Spotlight / by Larry Rohter and Liz Robbings / The Caucus / New York Times / Oct. 16, 2008

Thanks to Carl Davidson / The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Austin : Former Black Panther Kathleen Cleaver Sparks UT Gathering

‘1968: A Global Perspective’ keynote speaker Kathleen Cleaver, center, at the UT-Austin campus. Immediately flanking her are conference panelists Alice Embree and Thorne Dreyer of The Rag Blog. At far left and far right are Jim Retherford and Carl Webb of MDS/Austin. Photo by Carlos Lowry / The Rag Blog.

Cleaver’s readings from her upcoming memoir were tender and honest.
By Alice Embree / The Rag Blog / October 16, 2008

An interdisciplinary conference at the University of Texas at Austin focused on 1968: A Global Perspective. In a previous Rag Blog article, Thorne Dreyer highlighted the keynote speakers, Daniel Ellsberg and Kathleen Cleaver and a panel discussion on “SDS and Student Activism Today.” The same post gave information on an exhibit at the Center for American History that can be viewed through January 2009. Susan Van Haitsma wrote about Ellsberg’s fine presentation in another Rag Blog article.

Kathleen Cleaver, law professor (Yale and Emory) and former leader of the Black Panther Party read from her memoir, “Memories of Love and War” on Friday, October 10 on the campus of the University of Texas at Austin. Cleaver was a keynote speaker at “1968: A Global View.” Cleaver’s work – still in progress – was both tender and honest.

She and Eldridge lived in Oakland at one of the epicenters of revolutionary activity. She described the raids on her home, the murder of Bobby Hutton, the organizing to free Bobby Seale. It gave context to the news that she and other Panthers heard in their attorney’s office on April 4th – that Martin Luther King, Jr. had been assassinated. She is unrelentingly honesty. The Panthers were living day-to-day with escalating repression when the advocate for non-violent resistance was gunned down.

Cleaver’s respect for Eldridge was obvious. She came out of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and he came out of prison, a self-educated, well-read political analyst. Their marriage co-existed in the cauldron of revolutionary upheaval. They lived in exile in Algeria for several years.

In her responses to questions, she never seemed to “triangulate” on truth. A student asked her opinion of what the New York Times calls a “post-racial” America. “First,” she said, “don’t rely on the New York Times to define you.” She talked about the Panthers’ study of Franz Fanon and his theories about colonial domination. When an audience member asked her about feminism, she responded that they were focused on trying to keep both their brothers from being murdered.

Cleaver will be coming to teach at the UT law school this spring. Hopefully, this will allow for more dialogue.

On Saturday, October 11th, Thorne Dreyer and I participated as the elder generation in a dialogue about student organizing. Rosario Martinez of (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicana/o de Aztlan (MEChA) and Kelly Booker of Campus Antiwar Movement to End the Occupations (CAMEO). Martinez talked about successful efforts to build a coalition around immigrant rights before the April 10 and May 1,2006 Austin marches. Booker spoke of the successes and challenges of antiwar organizing in a post-9/11, Patriot Act environment. There were huge antiwar mobilizations preceding the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. When they did nothing to prevent the invasion, morale shattered and many decided that marches had no effect.

If you want to support the current generation, there are two things that you can do:

1) Boycott Chipotle until they sign a contract with the Florida farm workers and agree to work with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW). This has been an effective strategy with McDonald’s and Burger King and Yum Brands. Visit www.ciw-online.org for more information.

2) Hear Camilo Mejia at 7 pm, on Thursday, October 16 at UT Garrison 01.102. CAMEO is the sponsor of this event. Mejia grew up in Nicaragua and Costa Rica before moving to the U.S. He joined the military at 19. After fighting in Iraq for five months, he became the first known Iraq veteran to refuse to fight. He was convicted of desertion and sentenced to a year in prison. He is the author of Road from ar Ramadi: An Iraq War Memoir.

Also of note, the Center for American History at UT has an exhibit in progress that features 1968 poster art and the SDS Comic Show. Panels from Students for a Democratic Society: A Graphic History are displayed. The book, published by Hill and Wang, is written by noted graphic artist Harvey Pekar, illustrated by Gary Dumm and edited by Paul Buhle, senior lecturer at Brown University and left historian. Austin panels included in the book are featured as well. The Center is open 10-5 Monday-Friday and Saturday 9-2 (when UT doesn’t play an at-home football game). Parking is easy. The exhibit is free. It will run through January 2009.

To learn more about the conference, see Daniel Ellsberg, Kathleen Cleaver Headline Austin ‘1968’ Conference by Thorne Dreyer / The Rag Blog / Oct. 7, 2008

And Daniel Ellsberg and the Concept of Freedom of Conscience by Susan Van Haitsma / The Rag Blog / Oct. 9, 2008

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Do You Believe Your Vote for President Will Count?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Greg Palast have teamed up to tell voters how to ensure their votes will be counted. (Artwork: www.stealbackyourvote.org).

Greg Palast and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “Steal Back Your Vote!”
By Sari Gelzer / October 14, 2008

Greg Palast and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. believe that the 2008 elections have already been stolen. What’s an American to do given these circumstances? They suggest: “Steal it back“.

Palast, an investigative journalist, and Kennedy, a voting rights attorney, paired up to create a nonpartisan voter guide that illustrates the six ways that American votes will be stolen this election and seven ways to steal them back.

You may ask who’s stealing your votes. Palast and Kennedy believe that the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), created in 2002, is one of the main reasons votes are systematically being stolen. Secretaries of state attempting to comply with HAVA are purging voters from the registration rolls and blocking new ones from registering. The purging occurs if a voter’s name does not match a government database.

Those who are at most risk for having their vote stolen are new voters, people of color, low-income, elderly and swing state voters, Palast told Truthout.

In 2006, Palast says that 40 percent of citizens who were purged from the voter rolls in California had Islamic, Vietnamese, Chinese and Hispanic names. These names were at most risk for misspellings.

The Steal Back Your Vote Guidelines promote the importance of going to the secretary of state Web site for your state to confirm that you are registered ahead of the election.

The New York Times appeared to confirm Palast and Kennedy’s findings on mass voter purges in its report last week titled “States’ Actions to Block Voters Appear Illegal“. The newspaper found that tens of thousands of eligible voters were being illegally purged ahead of the 2008 elections.

In the crucial swing states of Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio, The New York Times reported that Social Security databases are being used to verify voters, as opposed to more accurate state databases. Federal law requires Social Security databases to be used for verification only as a last resort.

The swing states of Michigan and Colorado are also violating federal law, according to The New York Times, because they are removing voters from the registration rolls within 90 days of the presidential election.

When a name has been purged from the voter rolls, election workers will hand out a provisional ballot. However, Palast points to 1.1 million provisional ballots that went uncounted in the 2004 elections as proof that provisional ballots often go uncounted.

“Once you sign that provisional ballot, the chances are officially one in three that your ballot will be thrown in the garbage can,” said Palast.

In their guide, Palast and Kennedy write that a provisional ballot will most often render a vote uncounted. They suggest seeking adjudication on the spot, by calling a voter’s rights hotline instead of accepting and signing the provisional ballot.

“Don’t go postal,” says Palast, urging voters not to mail in their ballot.

Palast told Truthout: “All you need is the most minor error, like you didn’t use your middle initial in your registration; not enough postage cost a third of a million votes in the US the last time around because most ballots are two stamps, not one. There’s a million ways to not count your vote on a mail-in; don’t do it.”

The other suggestions in the “Steal Back Your Vote” guide include voting early, getting involved in voter-registration and get-out-the-vote organizations, and pursuing legal action if disenfranchised.

Palast and Kennedy will be following the 2008 elections as they unfold, including publishing reports in Rolling Stone and BBC news.

Source / Truthout

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Why Is Diplomacy Now Called Treason in the US?

“Remnants of an Army,” Elizabeth Butler

The reality of war in Afghanistan
By Stephen Kinzer / October 15, 2008

DESPITE their differences over how to pursue the US war in Iraq, Senators John McCain and Barack Obama both want to send more American troops to Afghanistan. Both are wrong. History cries out to them, but they are not listening.

Both candidates would do well to gaze for a moment on a painting by the British artist Elizabeth Butler called “Remnants of an Army.” It depicts the lone survivor of a 15,000-strong British column that sought to march through 150 kilometers of hostile Afghan territory in 1842. His gaunt, defeated figure is a timeless reminder of what happens to foreign armies that try to subdue Afghanistan.

The McCain-Obama approach to Afghanistan, like much of US policy toward the Middle East and Central Asia, is based on emotion rather than realism. Emotion leads many Americans to want to punish perpetrators of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. They see war against the Taliban as a way to do it. Suggesting that victory over the Taliban is impossible, and that the United States can only hope for peace in Afghanistan through compromise with Taliban leaders, has been taken as near-treason.

This knee-jerk response ignores the pattern of fluid loyalties that has been part of Afghan tribal life for centuries. Alliances shift as interests change. Warlords who support the Taliban are not necessarily enemies of the United States. If they are today, they need not be tomorrow.

In recent weeks, this elemental truth has begun to reshape debate over Western policy toward Afghanistan. Warlords on both sides met quietly in Saudi Arabia. The Afghan defense minister called for a “political settlement with the Taliban.” Secretary of Defense Robert Gates would not go that far, but said he might ultimately be open to “reconciliation as part of the political outcome.”

Gates, however, struck a delusionary note of “can-do” cheeriness by repeating the McCain-Obama mantra: More US troops can pacify Afghanistan. Speaking days after a National Intelligence Estimate concluded that the United States was caught in a “downward spiral” there, Gates asserted that there is “no reason to be defeatist or underestimate the opportunity to be successful in the long run.”

In fact, long-run success in Afghanistan – defined as an acceptable level of violence and assurance that Afghan territory will not be used for attacks against other countries – will only be possible with fewer foreign troops on the ground, not more.

A relentless series of US attacks in Afghanistan has produced “collateral damage” in the form of hundreds of civilian deaths, which alienate the very Afghans the West needs. As long as the campaign continues, recruits will pour into Taliban ranks. It is no accident that the Taliban has mushroomed since the current bombing campaign began. It allows the Taliban to claim the mantle of resistance to a foreign occupier. In Afghanistan, there is none more sacred.

The US war in Afghanistan also serves as a recruiting tool for Al Qaeda. It is attracting a new stream of foreign fighters into the region. A few years ago, these jihadists went to Iraq to fight the Great Satan. Now they see the United States escalating its war in Afghanistan and neighboring regions of Pakistan, and are flocking there instead.

Even if the United States de-escalates its war in Afghanistan, the country will not be stable as long as the poppy trade provides huge sums of money for violent militants. Eradicating poppies is like eradicating the Taliban: a great idea but not achievable. Instead of waging endless spray-and-burn campaigns that alienate ordinary Afghans, the United States should allow planting to proceed unmolested, and then buy the entire crop. Some could be turned into morphine for medical use, and the rest destroyed. The Afghan poppy crop is worth an estimated $4 billion per year. That sum would be better spent putting cash into the pockets of Afghan peasants than firing missiles into their villages.

Deploying more US troops in Afghanistan will intensify this highly dangerous conflict, not calm it. Compromise with Al Qaeda would be both unimaginable and morally repugnant, but the Taliban is a different force. Skillful negotiation among clan leaders, based on a genuine willingness to compromise, holds the best hope for Afghanistan. It is an approach based on reality, not emotion.

Stephen Kinzer is author of “A Thousand Hills: Rwanda’s Rebirth and the Man Who Dreamed It.”

© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.

Source / Boston Globe

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Mob : Did John McCain Play Piano in a Bordello?


‘Perhaps McCain was untainted by the mob and corruption, but one wonders if he could have been that successful had he not somehow made his peace with that situation.’
By Sherman De Brosse
/ The Rag Blog / October 15, 2008

This is the second in a series by Rag Blog contributor Sherman De Brosse on John McCain and his shady involvements, past and present.

John McCain retired from the Navy in 1981 and moved to Phoenix with Cindy, his second bride. He quickly threw himself into politics, and was twice elected to the United States House of Representatives before the voters sent him to the Senate in 1986. Before 1981, he had no prior involvement with the state. No doubt, his celebrity status as a war hero had a great deal to do with his political success. The solid backing Duke Tully, publisher of The Arizona Republic, and a lot of special interest money also account for his extraordinary success. The Phoenix 40 was the closest thing to a political machine in Arizona, and this machine got behind John McCain.

Duke Tully claimed he was a fighter pilot like Mc Cain. Eventually it came out that the man had never been in the military. Old Arizona hands say McCain must have had that figured out, but said nothing.

Arizona politics then was shot through with corruption and mob influence. Perhaps McCain was untainted by the mob and corruption, but one wonders if he could have been that successful had he not somehow made his peace with that situation. It might be a bit like the fellow who played the piano in the bordello but had no idea what went on up-stairs.

The big fish in the Arizona pond was Kemper Marley (d.1990), a billionaire liquor magnate and rancher. He was the protégé of Sam Bronfman, a close friend of Al Capone and Meyer Lansky, who visited Arizona in his company. He was also very close to Gus Greenbaum, a Lansky aide and Phoenix gambler.

Gene Hensley, McCain’s father-in-law, became Marley’s chief henchman.

Greenbaum and his wife were slain in 1948, setting off a mob war that Marley won. Marley became the state’s only billionaire. In 1948, Marley escaped prison while 52 of his prisoners went were incarcerated including henchman James Willis Hensley, who would become John McCain’s father-in-law. Marley’s attorney was William Rehnquist. Hensley was general manager of Marley’s United Liquor. Hensley’s brother, Eugene, was a bootlegger and was also convicted. They both served very short sentences. The court said Hensley must never get into the liquor business again, but when he got out he received a big Budweiser distributorship. Hensley also made money in dog racing, but sold his track to the Jacobs family of Buffalo. They were also linked to the Bronfman booze empire of Canada and the Lansky interests.

Marley headed the Valley National Bank, which lent Meyer Lansky’s man, Bugsy Siegal, the money to build the Flamingo casino . Siegel was killed for stealing from his bosses, and his nationwide gambling wire was turned over to Marley.

Marley (d. 1990) was very generous with the Republican party and also controlled the Arizona Democrats. Many in major office there owed their jobs to him. Marley’s men included Dennis De Concini, a Democrat, and John McCain. Captain John McCain, married to Hensley’s beauty queen daughter Cindy Lou since May, in 1980, became a rising star in Arizona politics, and Marley did nothing to block him Mc Cain worked for his father-in-law. John Mc Cain said Cindy’s father was a “role model.” He soon went into politics.

Kemper Marley Sr. Is Dead at 83; Name Arose in ’76 Slaying Inquiry / New York Times / June 28, 1990

THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: THE ARIZONA TIES; A Beer Baron and a Powerful Publisher Put McCain on a Political Path /

Source / David Icke Articles

For McCains, a Public Path but Private Wealth / by David M. Halbfinger / New York Times / August 23, 2008

John McCain Calls Convicted Felon with Ties to the Mob a “Role Model” / Wikio News / August 25, 2008

The murder of an investigative reporter in Phoenix set off an important investigation of the influence of the mob in Phoenix.

Arizona Republic investigative reporter Don Bolles was killed in a 1976 car bombing. He had investigated crooked land deals that were tied to many of the rich and powerful and had also looked into Marley’s service on state commissions. This led to a 36 member team of investigative reporters coming to Arizona. It produced The Arizona Project: How a Team of Investigative Reporters Got Revenge on Deadline. They believed but could not prove that the Marley gang was behind the murder of Bolles. But they produced a great deal of information on the mob in Arizona.

Astonishingly Bolles lived for eleven days after the explosion and said: “They finally got me. The Mafia. Emprise. Find John (Harvey) Adamson.” There was no effort to find out who hired the man who gave Adamson the contract. Anderson, who was convicted of the car bombing, said the Marley gang also wanted Attorney General Bruce Babbitt killed because he wanted anti-trust action against them.

John McCain married mob heiress Cindy Hensley. From the time of his arrival in Phoenix in 1979, the Hensley family sponsored his political career. He received a $50,000 a year salary in 1982 to tour the state as a PR man for the family Budweiser distributorship, but of course he was beginning a Congressional campaign. Anheuser-Bush lobbyist Richard Scheffel said that Hensley used McCain as a channel to move money to politicians.

Ayers? Let’s look at the Marley-Hensley murder of Don Bolles / Political Inquirer / Sept. 23, 2008

John McCain, Married to the Mob / US Message Board / Feb. 21, 2008

John McCain: Married to the Mob / by Bob Fertig / Democrats.com / Feb. 26, 2008

McCain Top Aide Linked To Suspected Russian Mob-King, Arranged Meeting With Senator / Jeffrey H. Birnbaum and John Solomon / The Huffington Post / Jan. 25, 2008

McCain does not seem to have done anything for the mob, but he must know it was their money that fueled his career. He refrains from voting on liquor issues, but liquor interests remain near the top of the list of McCain contributors. But as chairman of the Commerce Committee he knew how to scuttle proposals detrimental to the liquor industry by declining to hold hearings. Among them were measures dealing with recyclable bottles, advertising, and safety.

In 1995, Senator McCain sent “Happy Birthday” wishes to Joseph Bonanno, the head of the New York Bonanno mob who had retired in Arizona. Five members of the Bonanno family have made large contributions to the McCain presidential campaign. In 2005, Rick Davis arranged for McCain to meet Oleg Deripaska, Russian mob figure and aluminum magnate, in Switzerland. It should be noted that earlier McCain did only a little damage to the Russian mob by exposing some of Jack Abramoff’s mistreatment of Indians running casinos.(There was some Russian mob money in some Abramoff connected casinos.) He did not dig very deep. McCain celebrated his 70th birthday aboard a yacht with convicted felon Raffaello Follieri, along with his girlfriend actress Ann Hathaway . Follieri posed as someone with close Vatican ties to bilk people of their money. McCain is also close to Rep. Rick Renzi, who has been indicted for wire fraud, extortion, and money laundering.

The bottom line is that there is a great deal we need to know about John Mc Cain before we send him to the White House.

John McCain: Married to the Mob / by Bob Fertig / Democrats.com / Feb. 26, 2008

McCain Top Aide Linked To Suspected Russian Mob-King, Arranged Meeting With Senator / Jeffrey H. Birnbaum and John Solomon / The Huffington Post / Jan. 25, 2008

Haunted by Spirits / by John Dougherty, Amy Silverman / Phoenix New Times / Feb. 17, 2008

[Sherman De Brosse, the pseudonym for a retired history professor, is a contributor to The Rag Blog and also blogs at Sherm Says and on DailyKos.]

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Planned Parenthood Is the Winner: Thanks, Sarah!


Parental discretionary donors
By Shuchi Saraswat / October 9, 2008

How Sarah Palin generated over $1 million in donations to Planned Parenthood

Polarizin’ Palin has people everywhere opening their pocketbooks to the pro-choice movement’s benefit. A viral e-mail, of unknown origin, urged people who disliked the Alaska governor’s under-no-circumstance view on abortion to donate to Planned Parenthood, in her honor. The e-mail has been circulating for more than a month and, as of October 6, has generated 38,000 donations — at least two-thirds of them from first-time givers — to the international organization, totaling more than $1 million.

The latest high-profile boost to the “In Honor of Palin” campaign comes from singer/songwriter Gretchen Peters, who was outraged when Palin was brought on stage at a rally after Thursday’s vice-presidential debate to the strains of Martina McBride’s 1994 recording of Peters’s “Independence Day,” whose lyric centers on a victim of domestic abuse. On her Web site, gretchenpeters.com, Peters pledges to donate future “Independence Day” royalties to Planned Parenthood, on behalf of, you guessed it, the GOP veep nominee, whom Peters refers to as “a candidate who would set women’s rights back decades.”

This will be a hard one for the McCain campaign to ignore. Planned Parenthood offers to acknowledge generosity by mailing a card to the person in whose name the donation is made. The cards noting the Palin donations will be mailed to “McCain for President” headquarters, as per donors’ requests, starting this week.

Thanks to Mariann Wizard / Read all of it here. / Boston Phoenix

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Remember, the Money Was There All Along


The God That Failed: The 30-Year Lie of the Market Cult
By Chris Floyd / October 11, 2008

Perhaps the most striking fact revealed by the global financial crash — or rather, by the reaction to it — is the staggering, astonishing, gargantuan amount of money that the governments of the world have at their command.

In just a matter of days, we have seen literally trillions of dollars offered to the financial services sector by national treasuries and central banks across the globe. Britain alone has put $1 trillion at the disposal of the bankers, traders, lenders and speculators; and this has been surpassed by the total package of public money that Washington is shoveling into the financial furnaces of Wall Street and the banks. These radical efforts are being replicated on a slightly smaller scale in France, Germany, Italy, Russia and many other countries.

The effectiveness of this unprecedented transfer of wealth from ordinary citizens to the top tiers of the business world remains to be seen. It will certainly insulate the very rich from the consequences of their own greed and folly and fraud; but it is not at all clear how much these measures will shield the vast majority of people from the catastrophe that has been visited upon them by the elite.

But putting aside for a moment the actual intent, details and results of the global bailout offers, it is their very extent that shocks, and shows — in a stark, harsh, all-revealing light — the brutal disdain with which the national governments of the world’s “leading democracies” have treated their own citizens for decades.

Beginning with Margaret Thatcher’s election in 1979, government after government — and party after party — fell to the onslaught of an extremist faith: the narrow, blinkered fundamentalism of the “Chicago School.” Epitomized by its patron saint, Milton Friedman, the rigid doctrine held that an unregulated market would always “correct” itself, because its workings are based on entirely rational and quantifiable principles. This was of course an absurdly reductive and savagely ignorant view of history, money and human nature; but because it flattered the rich and powerful, offering an “intellectual” justification for rapacious greed and ever-widening economic and social inequality, it was adopted as holy writ by the elite and promulgated as public policy.

This radical cult — a kind of Bolshevism from above — took its strongest hold in the United States and Britain, and was then imposed on many weaker nations through the IMF-led “Washington Consensus” (more aptly named by Naomi Klein as the “Shock Doctrine”), with devastating and deadly results. (As in Yeltsin’s Russia, for example, where life expectancy dropped precipitously and millions of people died premature deaths from poverty, illness, and despair.)

According to the cult, not only were markets to be freed from the constraints placed on them after the world-shattering effects of the Great Depression, but all public spending was to be slashed ruthlessly to the bone. (Although exceptions were always made for the Pentagon war machine.) After all, every dollar spent by a public entity on public services and amenities was a dollar taken away from the private wheeler-dealers who could more usefully employ it in increasing the wealth of the elite — who would then allow some of their vast profits to “trickle down” to the lower orders.

This was the cult that captured the governments of the United States and Britain (among others), as well as the Republican and Democratic parties, and the Conservative and Labour parties as well. And for almost thirty years, its ruthless doctrines have been put into practice. Regulation and oversight of financial markets were systematically stripped away or rendered toothless. Essential public services were sold off, for chump change, to corporate interests. Public spending on anything other than making war, threatening war and profiting from war was pared back or eliminated. Such public spending that did remain was forever under threat and derided, like the remnants of some pagan faith surviving in isolated backwaters.

Year after year, the ordinary citizens were told by their governments: we have no money to spend on your needs, on your communities, on your infrastructure, on your health, on your children, on your environment, on your quality of life. We can’t do those kinds of things any more.

Of course, when talking amongst themselves, or with the believers in the think tanks, boardrooms — and editorial offices — the cultists would speak more plainly: we don’t do those things anymore because we shouldn’t do them, we don’t want to do them, they are wrong, they are evil, they are outside the faith. But for the hoi polloi, the line was usually something like this: Budgets are tight, we must balance them (for a “balanced budget” is a core doctrine of the cult), we just can’t afford all these luxuries, sorry about that.

But now, as the emptiness and falsity of the Chicago cargo cult stands nakedly revealed, even to some of its most faithful and fanatical adherents, we can see that this 30-year mantra by our governments has been a deliberate and outright lie. The money was there — billions and billions and billions of dollars of it, trillions of dollars of it. We can see it before our very eyes today — being whisked away from our public treasuries and showered upon the banks and the brokerages.

Let’s say it again: The money was there all along.

Money to build and generously equip thousands and thousands of new schools, with well-paid, exquisitely trained teachers, small teacher-pupil ratios, a full range of enriching and inspiring programs.

Money to revitalize the nation’s crumbling inner cities, making them safe and vibrant places for businesses and families and communities to grow.

Money to provide decent, affordable and accessible health care to every citizen, to provide dignity and comfort to the elderly, and protection and humane treatment for the mentally ill.

Money to provide affordable higher education to everyone who wanted it and could qualify for it. Money to help establish and sustain local businesses and family farms, centered in and on the local community, driven by the needs and knowledge of the people in the area, and not by the dictates of distant corporations.

Money to strengthen crumbling infrastructure, to repair bridges, shore up levies, maintain roads and electric grids and sewage systems.

Money for affordable, workable public transport systems, for the pursuit of alternative sources of energy, for sustainable, sensible development, for environmental restoration.

Money to support free inquiry in science, technology, health and other areas — research unfettered from the war machine and the drive for corporate profit, and instead devoted to the betterment of human life.

Money to support culture, learning, continuing education, libraries, theater, music and the endless manifestations of the human quest to gain more meaning, more understanding, more enlightenment, a deeper, spiritually richer life.

The money for all of this — and much, much more — was there, all along. When they said we couldn’t have these things, they were lying — or else allowing themselves to be profitably duped by the high priests of the market cult. When they wanted a trillion dollars — or three trillion dollars — to wage a war of aggression in Iraq, they found it. Now, when they want trillions of dollars to save the speculators, fraudsters and profiteers of greed in the global market, they suddenly have it.

Who then can believe that these governments could not have found the money for good schools, health care, and all the rest, that they could not have enhanced the well-being and livelihood of millions of ordinary citizens, and helped create a more just and equitable and stable world — if they had wanted to?

This is one of the main facts that ordinary citizens around the world should take away from this crisis: the money to maintain, secure and improve the lives of their families and communities was always there — but their governments, and their political parties, made a deliberate, unforced choice not to use it for the common good. Instead, they subjugated the well-being of the world to the dictates of an extremist cult. A cult of greed and privilege, that preached iron discipline to the poor and the middle-class, but released the rich and powerful from all restrictions, and all responsibility for their actions.

This should be a constant — and galvanizing — thought in the minds of the public in the months and years to come. Remember what you could have had, and how it was denied you by the lies and delusions of a powerful elite and their bought-off factotums in government. Remember the trillions of dollars that suddenly appeared when the wheeler-dealers needed money to cover their own greed and stupidity.

Let these thoughts guide you as you weigh the promises and actions of politicians and candidates, and as you assess the “expert analysis” on economic and domestic policy offered by the corporate media and the corporate-bankrolled think tanks and academics.

And above all, let these thoughts be foremost in your mind when you hear — as you certainly will hear, when (and if) the markets are finally stabilized (at whatever gigantic cost in human suffering) — the adherents of the market cult emerge once more and call for “deregulation” and “untying the hands of business” and all the other ritual incantations of their false and savage fundamentalist faith.

For although the market cult has suffered a cataclysmic defeat in the last few weeks, it is by no means dead. It has 30 years of entrenchment in power to fall back on. And the leader of every major political party in the West has spent their entire political career within the cult’s confines. It has been the atmosphere they breathed, it has been the sole ladder by which they have climbed to prominence. They will be loath to abandon it, once the immediate crisis is past; most will not be able to.

So remember well the lessons of this new October crash: The money to make a better life, to serve the common good, has always been there. But it has been kept from you by deceit, by dogma, by greed, and by the ambition of those who have sold their souls, and betrayed their brothers and sisters, their fellow human creatures, for the sake of privilege and power.

Thanks to Erich Seifert / Source / Empire Burlesque

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Galveston Homeless : Where Will They Go?

Galveston: clean-up continues; many still homeless.

Post-Ike tent city for homeless to close with no back-up plan.
By Sue Sturgis / October 14, 2008

Before Hurricane Ike devastated Galveston Island on the Texas coast, about 60 homeless people spent their nights at the local Salvation Army building. But that building was extensively damaged in the storm and won’t reopen for at least two months — and the people who depended on it may soon have no place to go.

The shelter’s clients are currently living in a Red Cross tent city set up behind a local elementary school, the Galveston Daily News reports. But the tent city is scheduled to close on Oct. 26.

Major Elda Flores, director of the Salvation Army shelter, says she has heard the authorities want to pressure her to reopen soon. But she says that’s impossible because the building has been gutted. The electrical systems have to be replaced, and the flood-damaged first floor will have to be almost completely rebuilt.

At a city news conference held yesterday, it became clear that officials have no idea what will become of Galveston’s homeless when the tent city closes.

This is the latest housing problem to afflict the island’s poor residents since Ike struck a month ago. We recently reported that Galveston’s public housing residents were ordered to leave their homes but were given no answers about where they were supposed to go. Some presumably ended up in the soon-to-be-closed Salvation Army encampment.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has announced it will launch a program providing rental assistance to families displaced by Ike, but that isn’t set to start until November — a week after the Red Cross tent city is scheduled to close.

Source / Facing South

Also see Ike Aftermath : Residents of Galveston Public Housing Given Heave-Ho / The Rag Blog / Oct. 1, 2008

The Rag Blog

Posted in RagBlog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How Will the Crash of 2008 Impact the Elderly?


Health care, the nursing home, the retirement home, and, heaven help us, John McCain.
By Dr. S. R. Keister / The Rag Blog / October 15, 2008

One of the most frightening aftereffects of the crash of 2008 will be the impact on the elderly, a subject, by-in-large, as yet unaddressed. More frightening still is the fact that in my talking to the elderly regarding the upcoming election is the fact that the response that I hear most frequently is, “I will vote for Senator McCain, he is old enough to appreciate the problems of the elderly.” The disconnect and absence of information is frightening to say the least, in view of the fact that little time remains until election day.

I am myself 87 years old, practiced medicine for 40 years and after retirement worked part time at the V.A. and at St. Paul’s Free Clinic. While at the former, before the Bush administration started their budgetary cuts, I was impressed by the excellence of medical care provided by this single example of ‘socialized medicine’ in the United States. When I first approached the free clinic I anticipated so. These were good, solid, decent people in low paying jobs and unable to afford health insurance. An excellent example of our broken system of medical care in the United States.

Over the past 30 years I have noted the increasing tendency of the commercial interests in the nation to feed off of the elderly, knowing of course that many of these folks were ill informed or even worse misinformed. The advent of Social Security, Medicare, and pensions, whether employer provided, or IRA, gave the leeches a chance to attached to the bloodstream of the income of the elderly. Let us look at some of the examples….

The Nursing Home. These have proliferated like mad since approximately 1980. A recent U.S. Government report indicates that some 90% of these facilities show various deficiencies. There are two groups of nursing homes available. (1) Those sponsored by religious organizations, hereabouts Catholic, Presbyterian, Episcopalian, all of which were founded with good intentions in mind and providing first rate care. (2) The commercial establishments, many of which are large chains, established of course as business enterprises. As we all know a business is intended to make a profit for its management and stockholders. The costs for both groups are approximately $3000-$4000/month; however, objective surveys show that by-in-large better care is provided in the church sponsored homes. Quality control is largely a state matter, and of course is influenced in many instances by the relationship of the commercial management to state government. Did I say baksheesh?

Another booming industry in the past 20-25 years is The Retirement Home. These are of multiple origins. Some are unashamedly related to hotel chains and others masquerade as quasi-church related organizations, but are indeed independent ‘non-profit enterprises’. Finally, there are the bona-fide, openly, church related homes.

A word about “non-profits”. Talk to the average individual in a “non-profit” home and he/she has the idea that this is in some way related to a charitable organization, and is absolutely dumbfounded when informed that most ‘non-profits’ are tax exempt businesses that have a well-paid group of businessmen in control, and vary from a commercial business only in not having stock holders. A common ploy to entice residence is an offer to sell them an apartment, for say $120,000, refundable to the estate fully or in part, upon death of the tenant. Of course, and many folks are not aware of this, that under normal stock market conditions, that the individual loses, say, 6% interest on the money while the retirement home takes that interest as their own. (One wonders with the stock market crash how these deposits survived.) In addition the tenant pays $3000-$4000 a month maintenance fee, which includes dinner daily whether it is partaken of or not. Of course there are other fees for changing light bulbs, filling pill boxes, giving insulin injections, etc. In various states there is no legal requirement for intercom systems, auxiliary generators, or emergency notification in the event of power failures, etc.

Many of the commercial “homes” and a few of the excellent church-related homes require the ‘purchase’ of the apartment, and in house, or on-ground, facilities vary; however, the cost is still in the $3000-$4000 per month range. All of these situations have exploded in number with the advent of Medicare, Social Security, and the aforementioned plans. This burgeoning industry in much greater in the United States than in Western Europe, granted it varies by country, and government implicated Social Services are much more extensive. One can almost relate the creation of these institutes to the advent of “neo-Liberal” economics introduced in this country during the Reagan administration.

For some time Medicade provided a modicum of help to poor nursing home patients but this has been abbreviated by the Bush administration. Concurrently the Bush administration tried to privatize Social Security, and the Congress, in its one of its few brave confrontations, refused to accept the program. The Bush administration has been making a conscious effort to privatize Medicare by establishing the “Medicare Advantage Plans” which deplete the Medicvare Trust Fund by approximately 17% per enrollee per year. The Medicare, Part D, fiasco, establishing a bizarre and costly prescription plan for the elderly, and which was really a pay-off of billions of dollars to the pharmaceutical and insurance industries by the Republicans with Medicare funds. One notes of late that the co-payments have been reduced and prescriptions covered lessened by the insurers as the price of drugs has increased..

Now we must factor in the current economic crises’ effect on the elderly, to continue to pay these folks who have been by hook or by crook sharing their retirement incomes. It would appear that Social Security and Medicare, for the short term, are intact, and hopefully can be saved by an enlightened administration in Washington, free of the economic nonsense inherent in our society since 1970. Those living largely off of IRAs or 401Ks are in a more questionable position. Further, the McCain economic plan, in spite of the disaster of the past several weeks, still includes privatizing Social Security, and reducing Medicare payments by over 1.2 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. What will happen to the thousands of residents if their individual or corporate retirement accounts disappear into thin air?

When I hear the elderly supporting McCain I am reminded of the Greek myth of Erysichthon. If the older American supports McCain he is bringing on his own destruction. Why should an elderly man a professional politician, who has been consumed by self interest all his life, and who is worth millions of dollars, acquired by questionable connections, be interested in the old gentleman in a nursing home? There is a frightening disconnect here.

The Rag Blog

Posted in Rag Bloggers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments